Cancer patients still facing ‘dangerous treatment delays', experts warn
It comes as new figures show the proportion of patients who had cancer diagnosed or ruled out within 28 days has declined for the third consecutive month, while those waiting no longer than 62 days for their first treatment also fell.
Monthly data published by the NHS shows 74.8% of patients urgently referred for suspected cancer were diagnosed or had cancer ruled out within 28 days in May, down from 76.7% in April and the third monthly fall in a row.
The Government and NHS England have set a target of March 2026 for this figure to reach 80%.
Elsewhere, the proportion of patients who had waited no longer than 62 days in May from an urgent suspected cancer referral, or consultant upgrade, to their first definitive treatment for cancer was 67.8%, down from 69.9% in April.
The target to reach 75% is also March 2026.
Professor Pat Price, oncologist and chairwoman of Radiotherapy UK, said: 'Today's cancer waiting times show yet another missed opportunity to put a stop to dangerous treatment delays.
'Patients should not be kept on the edge of their seats waiting for the chance to access the life-saving treatment they need.
'It's an unfortunate reality that these delays have become normalised.'
Kate Seymour, head of external affairs at Macmillan Cancer Support, said: 'Behind these delays in cancer diagnosis are thousands of people hoping for clarity, support and the chance to move forward.
'Right now, many people are experiencing differences in care depending on who they are or where they live, which is completely unacceptable.
'Everyone facing cancer deserves the very best care, as quickly as possible, no matter their postcode, background, or circumstances.
Ms Seymour added that the upcoming National Cancer Plan for England 'is a real chance to make things better'.
The Department of Health and Social Care launched a call for evidence to help shape a national cancer plan in February.
The blueprint is expected to be published later this year and will aim to transform cancer care by improving diagnosis, screening and treatment, as well as bolstering research and looking at ways to help prevent the disease.
An NHS spokesperson said: 'Despite the NHS seeing and treating record numbers of people for cancer, with more people diagnosed at an earlier stage than ever before, we know there is more to do to improve early diagnosis, access to tests and life-saving treatments.
'Our 10 Year Health Plan launched last week sets out some of the ways we will transform cancer care to be fit for the future, including innovation to speed up referral and diagnosis, with more to follow in the National Cancer Plan coming later this year.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
6 hours ago
- News24
What is National Health Insurance?
The NHI is a policy aimed at providing universal healthcare access for all South Africans, funded through taxes. It establishes a single-funder system to deliver equitable, need-based healthcare, though concerns about affordability and implementation persist. National Health Insurance (NHI) is a health policy aimed at improving universal health coverage and ensuring that everyone in the country has access to quality healthcare in line with their needs and not their ability to pay for health care. What is NHI? The aim of introducing NHI is to ensure every South African has access to quality health care in line with their healthcare needs. The NHI service will be pre-funded by all taxpayers, so that no one pays the costs of what they need when they go to hospital, see a doctor, get medicine, have a diagnostic test or access any other healthcare service. There are many different models of NHI around the world, but generally it is defined as health insurance provided by a government entity and funded by taxes. Public and private sector providers are typically contracted to provide the services that the government entity funds. Healthcare policy since democracy NHI was initially the targeted health policy of the democratic government elected in 1994. It chose to pursue this policy by initially implementing social health insurance. Social health insurance means those who could afford to pay for private healthcare would do so through medical schemes, while those who could not afford it would access state healthcare facilities and only pay according to their means. Regulation of medical schemes was revised to prohibit discrimination on health status and ensure minimum benefits were provided to all members. In order to strengthen cross subsidisation, civil servants were obligated to belong to a scheme, the amalgamation of schemes was encouraged and plans were made to equalise the cost of providing benefits to all members through risk equalisation. It was envisaged that over time, NHI would be introduced with multiple funders, but a single risk equalisation fund. State healthcare facilities, however, remained overburdened and private healthcare became increasingly expensive. South Africa's healthcare spend, relative to other countries, does not match healthcare outcomes, as measured by life expectancy, burden of disease and other leading indicators, that other countries achieve. Renewed focus on NHI The ANC-led government revised its plans for implementing NHI in 2007. A green paper (draft policy) was produced in 2011 and a white paper (NHI policy) in 2015. In 2018 the first draft of the NHI Bill was published and it was tabled in parliament in 2019. The NHI bill was passed by parliament in late 2023 and President Cyril Ramaphosa signed the Act into law in May 2024 without specifying an implementation date. The Act has since then been challenged in at least six court cases, two of which were combined for hearing and resulted in a High Court ruling in May 2025, compelling the president to release the full record of how he decided to sign the Act into law despite numerous objections to it. This case is now being appealed. Why the single-funder NHI model? The argument for choosing a single funder NHI system is that the government will become a powerful single purchaser able to bulk purchase healthcare services, drive prices down and ultimately pay for more benefits. There are, however, counter arguments that when there are multiple purchasers of healthcare services, as is the case when there are many medical schemes, there is more competition and innovation by providers. This aspect of the NHI Act is being challenged in court. Some of the legal challenges also point out that even with these efficiencies, NHI may be unaffordable in South Africa given the small tax base and recent lack of economic growth. How will NHI work in South Africa? The NHI Act provides for an NHI Fund to be established to pay for healthcare services for all South Africans and certain foreign nationals. The fund will be governed by a board which reports to parliament. The NHI Fund and the board account to the Minister of Health, who is also required to approve many aspects of the fund's work, including the approval of the benefit design. The fund will co-ordinate the work of a number of committees and units, including: A Benefits Advisory Committee to decide which healthcare services the fund will pay for including the setting in which services are provided and the treatment protocols for those services. A benefits pricing committee that will decide how and what to pay for those services each year. Alternative payment mechanisms will be negotiated, for example, an amount per person for a general practitioner to provide primary healthcare services to a certain number of people who sign up with that doctor. A unit that will accredit providers who can provide healthcare services and a contracting unit that will facilitate contracting with these accredited providers in both the public and private sectors. The performance of providers will also be monitored so that they can be paid in line with their performance in providing healthcare. A procurement unit that will decide what medical devices and other medical supplies to buy and from whom. A central registry of health records for all NHI users. The fund will also report on how NHI is impacting the health of the country. How will NHI be funded? The NHI Act states that the NHI Fund will obtain funding from a number of sources including: General tax revenue, including the amounts government already allocates to healthcare spending for the different provinces; The removal of medical scheme fees tax credits; A payroll tax (a percentage of an employer's wages and salaries) that employers and employees will pay, similar to the way that employees contribute to the Unemployment Insurance Fund; and An additional charge on individual taxpayer's personal income tax. The Act also provides for funding of medical expenses paid out by the Road Accident Fund, Compensation Fund for Occupational Diseases and Injury and the fund managed by the Compensation Commissioner for Occupational Diseases in Mines and Works to be redirected to the NHI fund. The removal of subsidies paid to government medical schemes (Goverment Employees Medical Scheme (GEMS), Polmed, Parmed, and so on) has also been included in the NHI White Paper, but is not explicitly mentioned in the NHI Act. What will NHI cost? Estimates on the cost of NHI were produced with the Green Paper in 2011, adjusted in the White Paper in 2015 and have not been updated since. The estimate in the White paper was that NHI would require an additional R256 billion for the healthcare budget by 2025. This was based on an economic growth rate of four percent which has not been achieved. The estimate apparently also does not take into account any deterioration in public health facilities since 2010, the failure to implement aspects of the National Health Act and the reforms that started with GEMS and the Medical Schemes Act in 1998. The cost estimate was done without any decisions on the benefits for which the fund would pay and this could have a material impact on the cost. The Act states that the NHI Board must advise the Minister of Health on the NHI fund's budget. The amount of revenue required will be determined based on the size of the population and the extent and cost of the health benefits to be provided. In order to direct funding to the NHI fund, parliament needs to pass what is known as a money bill. How will the NHI Fund be governed? The fund will be governed by a board and a chief executive officer who will be appointed by the Minister of Health in consultation with the Cabinet. The board will be made up of up to 11 publicly nominated people with relevant expertise and recommended by an advisory committee. They will serve a five-year term. The NHI Act gives the Minister of Health the power to make regulations, to issue directives and make technical decisions relating to the operation of the NHI Fund. The fund must be run in accordance with the Public Finance Management Act and the expenditure and reporting of the fund will be audited by the Auditor General. When will NHI be implemented? The President signed the NHI Act in 2024 without specifying when it would be implemented. The government and the healthcare industry have indicated that realistically it will take 10 to 15 years from signing, without considering any legal challenges. A set of draft regulations that have been published are expected to bring at least 20 of the NHI Act's 58 sections into effect, setting up the NHI Fund's Board and Committees, and appointing the chief executive officer. The Act provides for its implementation in two phases. In phase one, for a period of four years from 2023 to 2026, the fund must: Continue to strengthen the health system by aligning human resources that may be required by NHI users; Develop the National Health Insurance legislation and amendments to other legislation; Undertake initiatives aimed at establishing institutions required for the fund; Purchase health care services for vulnerable groups such as children, women, people with disabilities and the elderly; and Prepare for the establishment of the fund, including developing and implementing administrative and personnel related arrangements. In phase two, between 2026 and 2028: Strengthening of the healthcare system will continue. Additional resources will be mobilised. The fund will start contracting selectively with providers. The fund has begun contracting with providers in some pilot studies but is only set to start purchasing services for vulnerable groups such as children, women, people with disabilities and the elderly in 2028. This article was first published on an initiative by the Association for Savings and Investment South Africa (ASISA). News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 cannot be held liable for any investment decisions made based on the advice given by independent financial service providers. Under the ECT Act and to the fullest extent possible under the applicable law, News24 disclaims all responsibility or liability for any damages whatsoever resulting from the use of this site in any manner.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
'I'm utterly lost': Patients' anger over doctors strike cancellations
The resident doctors strike in England has begun after a dispute over pay between the government and the British Medical Association (BMA). Thousands of doctors are walking out over five days, with Health Secretary Wes Streeting insisting that disruption will be kept to a minimum. But several NHS patients have told the BBC they fear their conditions could become worse after delays to scheduled procedures, while some have also expressed sympathy over the concerns the doctors are raising. Peter Plant, 58, of Tamworth, who has kidney cancer, said his surgery to remove the organ on Friday was cancelled on Thursday morning. The operation has been rescheduled for 20 August, but he fears the delay could be a "death sentence". "Resident doctors do not care that delaying operations like mine are very likely a death sentence," he said. "I'm absolutely angry and frustrated. It is not just about me, it's about our whole family. "You try and gear yourself up for it and then it's utter deflation." Mr Plant said he and his family had been living in "limbo" and that he felt "utterly lost". "Wes Streeting says he has told hospitals to carry on as normal and they're clearly not," he added. Official figures have not yet been released on the impact of the strike. Some hospitals are reporting more than 80% of their non-urgent work is still being carried out. Previous walkouts have led to mass cancellations of operations, appointments and treatments: more than one million were cancelled during resident doctor strikes in March 2023 and routine care was cut by half at some hospitals. 'My three-year-old needs surgery now' Hassnain Shahid, from Bradford, said his three-year-old daughter urgently needed lung surgery but it had been indefinitely postponed - despite medical warnings about the risks of delay. "It's been an emotional rollercoaster and it's very frustrating for us," Mr Shahid said. Mr Shahid's daughter has Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation (CPAM), a rare lung condition. He said consultants told him surgery was urgent and that it was important it took place in the summer when there was less chance his daughter could catch a cold. "Now we've been told the surgery has been cancelled and they have no availability - not even in September," he said. "They were the ones that said she needed to have it done. "I understand why the doctors are striking, but when you take this path and you go to university you know how much you're going to earn - if you're not happy with the pay, look at an alternative career." Repeated delays to surgery Sarah, a patient from the north-west of England, said she was due to have a hysterectomy - an operation to remove her uterus - on Monday but it had been cancelled for a second time. "They don't have a rescheduled date for me at this time," she said. "It's very hard when you have been mentally preparing yourself for major surgery, especially as I was first told that I needed one in November 2024." Andrew Mundy, 58, from Lincoln, expressed fears that repeated delays to his tendon surgery could leave him permanently injured. He injured his knee in early February and was given an initial date for surgery at the end of May, which he said was cancelled because the consultant was on holiday. The surgery was rearranged for Friday but was cancelled because of the strike, he said. "I am furious and aware that every delay in surgery will make the chances of a successful repair even less likely," he said. "It is not fair that I may never recover from this injury due to delays in treatment. "It's frustrating because [the NHS] say that they are not cancelling stuff and things are running as normal, but they are cancelling stuff." Michele, from Somerset, has been waiting three years for spinal surgery. She has been told her appointment, which had been scheduled for Thursday, has been cancelled, which she believes is down to the strikes. Michele said she suffers "constant" and "relentless" nerve pain down the left side of her body. "I feel I've been let down, I feel like I'm not worth it. It's knocked me," she said. Michele said she had taken sick leave from work for more than a fortnight, having already taken a step back from her leadership role to work part-time from home due to the pain. "It's got to the point so I can't even do that now. It's really affecting my life," she added. John Dixon, 81, from the Isle of Wight, said he found out that his knee operation scheduled for Friday at Southampton General Hospital was cancelled with just three hours' notice. Mr Dixon said he was already on the ferry to Southampton when he received a call from the hospital informing him of the cancellation. "How can the NHS treat patients like this?" he said. "They must have [had] a good idea [on Thursday] without letting people go on long journeys just to return home." Michael Overson, from Gainsborough, Lincolnshire, has been waiting three years for a knee operation and found out on Friday his surgery, which had been scheduled for Tuesday, had been cancelled. Mr Overson is a delivery driver for a national supermarket chain and says the delay means he will have to "continue living and working in pain". "This places me in limbo as I have no idea when it'll be rearranged. I can't plan anything," he said. "The increased costs the strikes cause only causes greater harm to the NHS." Dr Tom Dolphin, the chairman of the BMA, said before the action began that "we are very sorry that strikes have become necessary". "Of course if people have emergencies or need urgent care they should still present to the hospital or their GP as usual, as they always would," he said. "Striking is something that doctors don't want to have to do." Additional reporting by Bernadette McCague, Mary Litchfield, Rozina Sini and Kris Bramwell NHS faces challenging few days during doctors strike, warns Streeting Why are resident doctors striking and what are they paid?
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sleep, run, hydrate - should you be a stickler for recommended daily doses?
It felt like there was a collective sigh of relief when a study, published this week, suggested 10,000 steps a day isn't the health utopia we had all been led to believe. The news that we only had to reach 7,000 steps was enough to quite literally stop us in our fervent step-counting stride. So what about some of the other health targets that many of us swear by? Can we fall short of the mark but still live long, healthy and happy lives? We've taken a handful of commonly cited healthy lifestyle benchmarks, examined them with various experts to get an idea of why they exist, explored the health claims, and, most importantly asked if there is any wriggle room. Is sleep so important that we have to spend so much of our lives doing it? How much exercise is enough? What about drinking water? How much do we really need? Disclosure - the below is not medical advice, it's more of an inspection of many of the health ideals we have on our radar. Water (6-8 glasses a day) According to the NHS, the average grown-up should be drinking between six and eight glasses (1.5-2 litres) of water a day. However, maybe we don't need to cart our fancy flagons around with us as much as we thought. Prof Neil Turner, kidney specialist at the University of Edinburgh, says as humans we existed for thousands of years without knowing what a pint or a litre was. "I mean, mice don't need flashing water bottles telling them how much to drink - why do we?" he says. "Our bodies are set up to do things just right - we eat when we are hungry, we breathe when we need to breathe, and we drink when we are thirsty." Oh. Is it really that simple? According to Prof Turner, who has seen a lot of kidneys in his time, that rule applies to the vast majority of us. Those with specific conditions, like a kidney disorder, may have to drink more. He says if our urine is dark, in the general healthy population, we shouldn't panic that we haven't drank enough - that is the kidney doing its job. It is reserving water in our body, he explains, and our body should tell us that we feel thirsty and then we will get a drink. Dr Linia Patel, a performance nutritionist, disagrees. We might drink different amounts, she says, due to factors like our size, how warm we are, whether we've been drinking alcohol, but she feels having a target of 1.5 to 2 litres is a good thing - especially for women. "I would definitely say from a women's health point of view, where I work, what I see is a lot of the symptoms [associated] with being dehydrated. It might be fatigue, constipation, brain fog, feeling hungry [or] cravings." She says that if the problem is related to hydration then it's "an easy one to get right, if you're consistent with it". Sleep (7-9 hours a night) Moving on to sleep - the NHS recommends seven to nine hours a night for the average adult, and there's not much wriggle room to be had there. Prof Ama Johal, a specialist in sleep disorders, says sleep is vital; without it we are beginning to shave years off our lives. "The evidence is there, there are huge bodies of research which show that the health benefits are multiple. "A good night's sleep - that's at least seven hours of quality sleep - reduces the risk of obesity, diabetes, depression and finally, it lowers mortality rates." He points to a study which used 10,000 British civil servants - those that slept for fewer than five hours a night had an increased risk of early death. But could we shave an hour off the minimum recommended - and settle for six hours a night? "No," Prof Johal says. "As soon as we lower the limit then there's a risk people will think it's ok to sleep for less time." Cat napping? "Unfortunately not," he says, "Our bodies have very different reactions to naps through the day, and eventually if we tried to make up the hours we were missing overnight by sleeping through the day, we would struggle to fall asleep at night." But all is not lost, nappers among us - there are studies that suggest a short snooze in the day can keep the brain youthful, and even compensate for poor or broken sleep the night before. Prof Johal suggests that for those who struggle to get the recommended amount, try to target a few nights of good sleep a week, and just being "more aware that sleep is so important". Emily and Lucy are two avid walkers from Manchester. But alongside their love of walking, the two women share a less healthy trait: they struggle to nod off because of their anxiety. But they say the target of seven hours sleep a night is something they "are working towards". Exercise (150 mins a week) Emily and Lucy are, however, "definitely nailing it" when it comes to exercise. Through their group, Soft Girls who Hike, they have found a love of walking which has not only improved their mental health, they say, but connected them with many other women. They don't try to meet all the healthy benchmarks on their radar, they explain, because "life just gets in the way". But they are doing 7,000 steps a day and taking long, low impact walks at the weekend. The Chief Medical Officer recommends doing 150 minutes of exercise a week and two strength training sessions. Is that achievable for most? Dr Sinead Roberts, a sports nutritionist who trains elite athletes, is pragmatic in her approach. While moderate strength training and physical activity is vital for maintaining muscle mass, she says, as well as resistance to injuries and supporting our immune systems, you have to adapt the recommendations to fit with your life. "Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise people," she says. "This phrase really does apply here. "I have friends who do nothing - and that really does show, I say, 'You're walking like an 80-year-old!' "But if you are doing one strength session a week and some moderate exercise then that is definitely a good thing, just try and do more if you can." She uses an analogy of a highway - the more things we can do to stay healthy the wider the road, which, in turn means we can go off course sometimes without careering up a grassy verge. "All those benchmarks are interlinked - you can't just do one healthy thing and ignore the rest. Equally you don't need to put so much pressure on yourself to achieve them all." This attitude chimes with Emily and Lucy, who say they happily "chip away" at some of the health benchmarks. "For example, we might do five minutes of meditation [which is] better than nothing, but we wouldn't stress about not hitting the recommended goal." Mindfulness (10 mins a day) Through its Every Mind Matters campaign, the NHS recommends 10 minutes of mindfulness a day. Basically, instead of pondering the future or thinking about the past, you pay attention to the moment, noticing what is going on inside and outside of ourselves, letting our thoughts pass by without judgement. Some studies suggest activities like mindfulness can have a positive effect and also help change the structure of the brain. Psychologist Natasha Tiwari, founder of The Veda Group, says 10 minutes is a good start to "give the mind time to settle, and the brain enough time to truly benefit" from the process of mindfulness. But many of us lead busy lives, and to carve out 10 minutes in the day can be a luxury. In some respects, could having these targets make life more stressful? Ms Tiwari disagrees - it's less about the time spent and more about the awareness of mindfulness and bringing it to our everyday lives. "Even brief pauses," she explains, "can still have a positive impact". Most experts I've spoken to agree that while benchmarks are useful, and simplicity is key, it's better not to fixate on a number. Rather, find a way to incorporate a healthy outlook to diet, exercise and mental health into everyday life. After sitting for some time writing this, I am going to sign off - there is another health benchmark I've just come across: limiting sitting down to less than eight hours a day. So, I had better get moving. More Weekend Picks People say cola and fries are helping their migraines - but there's a twist Stop telling me to lower my cortisol - it's making me stressed! Emma is doing something she swore she never would - buying her kids vapes
