Abortion rights organizer Sarah Dixit running for Spokane city council
Bingle is one of two conservatives in the minority of the seven-member council. Fellow conservative Michael Cathcart and Bingle represent council District 1, which covers the northeastern third of the city — east of Division and north of Trent. The district also includes almost all of downtown Spokane.
Bingle is running for re-election for the first time after winning his first four-year term in 2021. Last year, he unsuccessfully ran for the Republican nomination of Spokane's Congressional seat.
Cathcart announced Wednesday that he's running for Spokane County Auditor in 2026.
In challenging the incumbent, Dixit said she wants to bring a young voice to city council that will uplift marginalized communities and those who may not be civically engaged.
"A lot of folks are working jobs," she said. "They have kids at home. They can't follow what's happening at city council. We need to make this whole process more accessible for people, and especially for communities of color, immigrant populations and young people."
At 29, Dixit believes she can reach these underserved populations as a young, queer woman of color. Dixit said she does not see that kind of advocacy from her opponent.
"I don't see Jonathan in the community. At the events I'm at," she said. "I just haven't heard that type of advocacy from him when it comes to transit, bike safety investment, other issues."
A big focus of her nascent campaign will be accessibility to public transit . Dixit wants to increase investments in public transit and have fares on a sliding scale, allowing those with the least resources to get the most access.
Though firmly aligned with the council's progressive majority, Dixit said she would not be a "cookie-cutter" version of those already on council.
Having grown up in Southern California, Dixit came to Spokane to attend Whitworth University. While in college, the first election of Donald Trump spurred her into activism. She went on to found the Christian college's first pro-choice club.
Since graduating in 2018, she has advocated for reproductive and abortion rights full time at Planned Parenthood and as organizing director of Pro-Choice Washington.
At Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho, Dixit worked under Paul Dillon, who now serves on Spokane's city council. Dixit called Dillon a "mentor" who encouraged her to run.
As a potential representative of downtown Spokane, Dixit said she has pride for the city center.
"There's a lot of rhetoric about downtown that I don't necessarily agree with," she said. "I love downtown, and it's a place that makes Spokane really special."
When addressing homelessness, the city should have a "multipronged approach" that uses less incarceration and more resources to prevent someone from becoming unhoused in the first place, she said.
"A lot of the issues stem from the dehumanization of folks who are unhoused. I really want to make sure that we are working on issues in a way that recognizes these folks are Spokanites too. And their humanity needs to be a part of the conversations we're having," she said.
Asked about concerns she might be too young to effectively serve, Dixit said there is no shortage of older voices on council.
"I approach the work in a way that comes from all my lived experiences — being the daughter of immigrants, being someone who really loves the culture and the heart of Spokane. That lends itself to me being a different type of council member for Spokane," she said. Her parents emigrated from India.
Endorsements for Dixit include Council President Betsy Wilkerson, Dillon, state Rep. Natasha Hill, state Sen. Marcus Riccelli and others.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
25 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Congress slashes aid to Colombia over drug use allegations in Petro's government
A powerful congressional panel led by Florida Republican Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart is moving to sharply cut non-military U.S. aid to Colombia, citing a combination of rising instability, weakening rule of law and growing concerns about drug use within the highest levels of President Gustavo Petro's government. In a report released this week alongside the 2026 National Security, Department of State and Related Programs Appropriations Bill, the House Appropriations Committee criticized Petro's government for what it called 'detrimental policies, erratic behavior and malign relationships.' The report also flagged concerns about increased drug use in Colombia, including among top government officials, and what it described as a deteriorating security situation. As a result, the committee is proposing a 50% reduction in non-military assistance to Colombia compared to 2025 levels. The move, driven by Díaz-Balart — chair of the subcommittee that oversees foreign aid — signals a shift in what has long been a bipartisan consensus supporting Colombia as a close strategic ally in the U.S.-led fight against narcotrafficking. The bill still requires approval by the full House and reconciliation with Senate legislation before becoming law. Still, the proposed cuts point to a significant cooling in relations between Washington and Bogotá, adding pressure on Petro's government amid growing domestic and international scrutiny. The committee report referenced the June 7 assassination attempt against opposition senator and 2026 presidential candidate Miguel Uribe Turbay as emblematic of Colombia's mounting political instability. It also cited the resurgence of armed groups in regions previously reclaimed under Plan Colombia, the multi-billion-dollar U.S. security initiative launched in the early 2000s. 'The security environment is deteriorating, and political volatility is on the rise,' the report states, warning of escalating violence in several parts of the country. Among the more unusual elements of the report is its focus on domestic drug consumption in Colombia—traditionally seen as a drug-producing nation rather than a consumer one. The congressional committee directs the secretary of state to consult with Congress within 90 days on launching drug demand-reduction programs in Colombia. The report's reference to alleged substance abuse among government officials comes amid renewed political turmoil in Bogotá. Earlier this year, a leaked audio recording surfaced in which former Foreign Minister Álvaro Leyva — once a key Petro ally — appeared to call for Petro's removal from office, reportedly citing health concerns. According to the Madrid newspaper El País, Leyva traveled to Washington in April and attempted to meet with Republican leaders, including Díaz-Balart and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. It remains unclear whether any of those meetings actually took place or whether U.S. officials seriously entertained Leyva's claims. The committee also raised alarms over judicial proceedings against former President Álvaro Uribe Vélez, a staunch U.S. ally. The report cites alleged due process violations, unauthorized surveillance and judicial politicization as cause for concern, framing the case as part of a broader trend of democratic erosion worldwide. 'These challenges reflect a troubling pattern of threats to due process and judicial independence,' the report reads. Despite the proposed cuts to development and civilian law enforcement aid, military support remains largely unchanged. The bill allocates $38.5 million in Foreign Military Financing and $67.3 million for National Security Investment Programs. The International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account would receive $103 million, underscoring the continued importance of counternarcotics efforts in the bilateral relationship. If adopted, the bill would mark a rare and dramatic recalibration of U.S.-Colombia ties, long rooted in security cooperation but now increasingly strained under Petro's leftist government.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Missouri AG sues Planned Parenthood for allegedly lying about dangers of abortion drugs
Missouri is suing Planned Parenthood for allegedly lying to patients about the risks of the abortion medication mifepristone. Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey (R) filed a lawsuit Wednesday in Jefferson City arguing that Planned Parenthood's claims that the abortion drug is safer than many other medications including penicillin and Tylenol are untrue and violate the state's consumer-protection law. Bailey claims that the nonprofit organization has lied about the safety of the drug to 'cut costs and boost revenue,' according to the lawsuit. The complaint also requests a court order to stop Planned Parenthood from 'continuing to promote the falsehoods,' in Missouri and for the organization to pay more than $1.8 million in civil penalties. The attorney general's office is also asking for the organization to be fined $1,000 in damages to every woman in the Show-Me State that has received abortion medication through one of is providers in the past five years. On top of this, it asks that the organization reimburse the state for Medicaid and other tax-payer-funded emergency care provided to people who suffered complications after taking mifepristone. 'We are going to hold these charlatans and death dealers accountable,' Bailey wrote in a post on social platform X about the suit. The crux of the lawsuit's argument comes down to a disagreement over how many people suffer adverse health effects after taking mifepristone. On the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) warning label for the drug, it states that between 2.9 percent and 4.6 percent of people who have taken it along with misoprostol report visiting an emergency room afterwards. There are two drugs typically needed for a medication abortion: mifepristone and misoprostol. Mifepristone stops the pregnancy from growing while misoprostol induces cramping and bleeding to empty the uterus. More than 100 scientific studies across decades have looked at the efficacy and safety of the pair and all of them have found the drugs safe for use, according to an analysis from The New York Times. Bailey's lawsuit claims that the FDA's label is inaccurate and that 'recent studies' suggest the complication rate is much higher. The lawsuit does not cite a specific study to back up its claim and a spokesperson for the attorney general's office did not answer questions from The Hill about what data was used to back up its claim. The lawsuit does echo findings outlined in a deeply flawed study published in April by the conservative think tank the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) which states that after analyzing more than 865,000 prescribed mifepristone abortions, it determined that nearly 11 percent of women experienced a 'serious adverse event.' That's nearly 22 times higher than what the FDA reports. Bailey's lawsuit references a 'dataset' of more than 850,000 mifepristone abortions that identified 'serious adverse events' in more than 10 percent of women who took the drug. Medical researchers have criticized the EPPC study for its lack of transparency and for flaws in its methodology. One of the largest hiccups of the study is its inclusion of emergency room visits as one of the 'serious adverse events' that can happen after taking the abortion pill, health experts say. The EPPC study breaks down 'serious adverse events' into categories including hemorrhage, sepsis and emergency room visits. It looks as if emergency room visits were counted as adverse events even if health care workers determined the patient was healthy and released them without treatment. Some people might go to an emergency room after taking the abortion pill to confirm that they are no longer pregnant or to make sure that the bleeding they are experiencing is normal, two principal research scientists at the Guttmacher Institute noted in an op-ed last month. The lawsuit is the latest attack from conservative lawmakers on Planned Parenthood. Under the GOP's new tax and spending bill, the organization would lose its ability to receive Medicaid reimbursements for health services it provides for one year. The nonprofit sued the Trump administration over the provision and a federal judge granted the organization's request for a temporary injunction earlier this week.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
These 11 Republicans are backing the Khana-Massie Epstein measure
A bipartisan effort to force a binding House vote on releasing the 'Epstein files' has picked up Republican support, though just how many in the GOP ultimately support the measure won't be seen at least until the lower chamber returns from its August recess. The bipartisan bill from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) is one of two measures related to the Epstein files, which have effectively stymied the entire chamber and prompted Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to send members home early. It has the 11 Republican and nine Democratic co-sponsors as of Wednesday. Massie and Khanna have vowed to file a discharge petition to bypass House leadership and force their bill to the floor with 218 signatures. Discharge petitions are rarely successful, and seldom used by members of the majority. But Massie and Khanna's could be successful if all 11 GOP co-sponsors sign on with all Democrats. It would not be ready for a vote until September due to procedural rules. The measure would require Attorney General Pam Bondi to make public 'in a searchable and downloadable format' all 'unclassified records, documents, communications and investigative materials in the possession' of the Justice Department (DOJ) related to the late sex offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Massie has led the charge from the GOP side and taken heat from Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who on Tuesday said he was baffled about Massie's motivations. The House will now leave town Thursday, a day earlier than scheduled, for its recess. Democrats have hammered Johnson for avoiding any summer votes on the Epstein bills. Here are the Republicans who are backing the measure. Lauren Boebert Rep. Lauren Boebert (Colo.), a fierce ally of President Trump, was one of the first lawmakers to call for a special counsel to investigate the government's handling of the files. 'People are frustrated. We want to know if there's more information,' the Colorado lawmaker said on NewsNation last week. Boebert was among the lawmakers who celebrated the Trump administration's move in February to reveal what it claimed were the Epstein files — a move that ended up disappointing many observers who hoped for new revelations. In 2020, while Boebert was running for her first term in Congress, she appeared to indulge a conspiracy theory that Epstein did not die by suicide. 'Is 2020 a set up so we all forget Epstein didn't kill himself?' she wrote then on X, adding a chin-scratching emoji. The medical examiner ruled that Epstein, who was in New York City jail awaiting trial, died by suicide in 2019. The DOJ and the FBI reaffirmed the cause of his death in an unnamed memo earlier this month, where officials also said that the disgraced financier did not keep the so-called 'client list.' Jeff Van Drew Rep. Jeff Van Drew (N.J.) switched from the Democratic Party to the GOP in 2020 over Trump's first impeachment. The New Jersey Republican, who represents a South Jersey district that includes Atlantic City, has not commented extensively on the Epstein files. 'The American people deserve full transparency,' Van Drew said in a post on X announcing his support. Marjorie Taylor Greene Epstein is one of the rare issues on which Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), one of the most prominent MAGA Republicans in Congress, has not been in lock-step with the president. The Georgia lawmaker has warned that voters could turn on Trump over the controversy. 'If you tell the base of people, who support you, of deep state treasonous crimes, election interference, blackmail, and rich powerful elite evil cabals, then you must take down every enemy of The People,' she wrote on X Monday. If not, 'The base will turn and there's no going back.' Greene celebrated Trump's move to ask to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Epstein last week, and derided Democratic outrage on the issue as 'fake.' Eric Burlison Rep. Eric Burlison (Mo.), a two-term congressman, has blamed both the DOJ and the 'deep state' for hiding files related to Epstein. He expressed skepticism early on about the DOJ-FBI memo, as well as their release of hours of surveillance footage from outside Epstein's cell. The footage is missing about one minute around midnight, which Bondi has said was due to standard resetting of the prison's security cameras every night. 'What is a reasonable person supposed to conclude when they're first told the footage doesn't exist, only to see it later released, showing a different cell and missing a full minute?' Burlison wrote on X the day the footage was released. Tim Burchett Rep. Tim Burchett (Tenn.) successfully pushed Tuesday for a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee to subpoena Maxwell, Epstein's longtime associate who is serving a lengthy prison sentence. 'It's about to get real. I just did this,' he wrote on X after moving to issue the subpoena. Burchett has also criticized the Democrats, who celebrated the subpoena, for not caring about Epstein until Trump had been encircled in the controversy. 'If Democrats were serious about this issue, they wouldn't have waited four years to bring it up,' he said on CNN last week. Cory Mills Rep. Cory Mills (Fla.) has not yet publicly commented on his decision to co-sponsor the resolution. He garnered headlines for a different reason last week after news broke of court filings alleging that he owed $85,000 in back rent at his D.C. apartment. Mills blamed an online processing error and has since said the debt is settled. Mills was previously a Trump appointee on the Defense Business Board. He represents a coastal district in north-central Florida, centered on the town of New Smyrna Beach. Max Miller Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio) said last week he signed on the petition because he believes in 'transparency and delivering the truth' to the American people. Miller previously was Trump's senior advisor during his first White House term and was in the Marine Corps Reserves for six years. Also in recent but unrelated news, Miller said last month he was run off the road by a 'deranged man' who was waving a Palestinian flag and hurled death threats before driving off. Eli Crane Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.), a staunch Trump defender and member of the conservative Freedom Caucus, announced he would co-sign Massie's measure last week, writing 'Add me. Transparency matters.' The former Navy SEAL, who sits on the subcommittee on border security enforcement, told Axios 'that's been something that I've supported from day one … I think there needs to be transparency, and I'm glad to see that this is bipartisan because it should be.' Nancy Mace Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) has linked her support for Epstein transparency to her own alleged experience with sexual violence. In February, she accused four men, including her former fiancé, of a range of sex crimes. All four men have denied accusations. 'I've always been an advocate for women and children. The Jeffrey Epstein case is no different. I want to see arrests. I want to see any one who raped underage girls in handcuffs and behind bars,' Mace, who is mulling a run for South Carolina governor, said in a X post last week. 'No more passes for predators,' she added. 'May God bless President Trump – he's never let us down before!' Mace said in an interview that she was in favor of appointing a special counsel to probe who might be involved in trafficking girls and young women, along with investigating if anyone destroyed evidence. 'If the Justice Department can be more transparent on this, it would be best for the country. People don't trust the government, and we haven't given them much reason to over the past few years,' Mace told The New York Times last week. Keith Self Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas), a military veteran, said during an interview on Wednesday that the bipartisan Massie-Khanna measure will 'easily pass' the lower chamber if it comes to a full vote. 'We want to expose the criminals, we want to protect the victims. Recent reports said there were 1000 victims, we need to figure out who perpetrated the crimes against those victims and this seems to be the only way that we're going to get to do it,' Self told Newsmax. Self noted that the release of the Epstein files has widespread support among the American public and predicted that the petition will secure 218 votes in the House. 'But again, this is an issue of justice. It's an issue of transparency and frankly, accountability of the government. The American people want to see a government that is accountable to our employers, who are the citizens, the voters of the United States,' the Texas Republican said. 'It is as simple as that.' Tom Barrett Rep. Tom Barrett (R-Mich.) said last week there are too many 'questions and not enough answers' about the Epstein files. 'I agree that it's time to release them, which is why I put my name on a resolution to force their release and give the American people the transparency they deserve,' Barrett wrote on X. Democrats At least nine Democrats have signed onto the measure, as the party looks to fuel GOP angst over the Epstein files and force tough votes on the issue. The co-sponsors are: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Rashida Tlaib (Mich.), Jim McGovern (Mass.), Hank Johnson (Ga.), Jamie Raskin (Md.), Ryan Patrick (N.Y.), Debbie Dingell (Mich.), Joe Neguse (Colo.), Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Nydia Velazquez (N.Y.).
