Trump says outcome will be known ‘pretty soon' over steel tariffs
It remains to be seen whether tariffs on British steel imports into America will be eliminated, remain at 25% where they currently stand, or increase further.
Asked by reporters at the top of his meeting with Sir Keir Starmer when the cost of steel tariffs will come down, Mr Trump said: 'We're gonna know pretty soon, we're gonna have it pretty soon.
'These people are tough negotiators, OK. We're a big buyer of steel, but we're going to make our own steel and we're going to make our own aluminium for the most part.
'But we buy a lot of aluminium from right here and a lot of steel too.'
In a readout after the meeting, Downing Street said the leaders spoke about the 'economic prosperity deal' reached earlier this year to ease US tariffs on the UK.
'The leaders remarked on how beneficial the deal is for working people in the UK and the US and agreed to continue to work together to build further on their close and strong economic relationship,' a spokesperson said.
When the UK and US signed a trade deal in June, it reduced tariffs on car and aerospace imports to the US.
Agreement on a similar arrangement for Britain's steel imports was not reached, leaving tariffs on steel at 25%.
American concerns over steel products made elsewhere in the world, then finished in the UK, are said to be among the sticking points.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds had suggested it may take more than Monday's meeting between the two leaders to resolve the matter, telling BBC Breakfast: 'We were very happy to announce the breakthrough that we had a few months ago in relation to sectors like automotive, aerospace, which are really important to the UK economy.
'But we always said it was job saved, but it wasn't job done. There's more to do.
'The negotiations have been going on on a daily basis since then. There's a few issues to push a little bit further today.
'We won't perhaps have anything to announce a resolution of those talks, but there's some sectors that we still need to resolve, particularly around steel and aluminium, and there's the wider conversation about what the US calls its reciprocal tariffs.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
18 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why Donald Trump's visit was a good thing for Police Scotland
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Well, well, despite all the scare stories, Donald Trump's four-day visit went exactly as planned. Contrary to the dire predictions of some, our policing system was not brought to its knees by a long weekend's work. If our community policing model could just survive the year of extractions caused by the 84/85 Miners Strike, it could surely withstand the extra demands of four days. It was, however, a tricky operation, with more than two venues and a lot of outside exposure for a president who has recently survived two assassination attempts, and appears to be 'catnip' for extremists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But now that Air Force One is well away and the pointless placards put away 'til next time, we can safely reflect on the fact that the presidential visit has actually benefited our police service. Let me explain. READ MORE: Deer put down after being hit by police car in Aberdeenshire ahead of Trump visit Police Scotland officers guard the Trump Turnberry golf course ahead of Donald Trump's arrival in Scotland (Picture: Christopher Furlong) | Getty Images Ensuring match fitness Police Scotland, whether in its recent national incarceration or its old constituent forces, had a well-deserved reputation for the professional handling of major events. Next to London, Edinburgh had more major and royal events than any other city in the UK. The west of Scotland was also highly experienced. The continuous exposure to the ritual hate fest which is 'Old Firm' football ensures that police in and around Glasgow always knew how to control hostile crowds. But experience has a shelf-life and the preparedness of police forces to deal with complex and major events depends on 'match fitness'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The last truly major event in Scotland was the initial phase of the funeral of Queen Elizabeth in 2022, and, while it was logistically tricky, there was very little real threat. You have to go back to the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow the previous year to find a major event that tested all aspects of police planning and operations. But that was four years ago, and things change quickly at the top of policing. Almost all the senior officers involved in COP26 have now moved on and been replaced by officers, who though able have not actually been in the hot seat. For you can plan all you like, run exercises all day long, but there is no substitute for the real thing. Regardless of contingencies, things go wrong as soon as real people become involved. Small mistakes can turn into big problems, and before you know it you are reacting to incidents rather than driving the operation. Trump's habit of going 'off script' In the case of President Trump's visit, there were good points and bad. It was not a state visit with high-risk public processions in crowded streets. On the other hand, golf links, while remote, are vast open spaces and difficult to protect. Transport routes were also tricky, with lots of minor roads to be protected from disruption. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And the US Secret Service would have been on edge, with the recent assassination attempts and their president's habit of impromptu 'off-script' behaviour adding to the tension. But in the end, it all came good, as I was sure it would. The plan worked, and all the little things that went wrong were sorted quickly and without fuss. So congratulations to the event 'Gold Commander', Assistant Chief Emma Bond, and all her team. Another big job well done, lessons learned and valuable experience banked.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
‘I create fake IDs of your MP so you can get round Online Safety Act'
'It will be funny when Keir Starmer 's driving licence is leaked online,' said Tim Knight, the creator of Use-Their-ID, a website that generates IDs of any sitting MP in response to the Online Safety Act. Type in a postcode, and in just seconds you can get something that looks uncomfortably real – a photo, a signature, a date of birth, a home address. Like the prime minister's ID, all of it is fake, of course – but people are trying to use it to bypass age verification checks online. Use-Their-ID is part prank, part protest against the controversial law, which aims to stop children from seeing harmful content relating to suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and pornography. Since the Online Safety Act came into effect last Friday, more than 100,000 driving licences have been generated on Knight's website. Explaining the idea behind it, the 39-year-old told Metro that it is 'inevitable' that sooner or later, there will be a major data leak and British passports and driving licences will be released online. He added: 'My gut reaction was, well, if the government is going to require me to send my ID all over the internet to view anything that it deems to be 'adult content', that sounds like a privacy and a security nightmare. 'Websites that are implementing age verification checks are incentivised to do it as cheaply as possible – which means outsourcing it to a third party. 'Then it just goes to the cheapest bidder, right? And that means that these checks will not be being done securely and safely or thoroughly. '[The Online Safety Act] is a disaster for privacy online, but also security… It is a big overreach from the government.' Personal information leaks are not the only element of the process that he is worried about. Knight said that people are 'being cut off from a good selection of online resources' because they are too concerned about their privacy to upload their IDs. He pointed to website like Spotify, which now forces ID checks before its users can listen to music with explicit lyrics. The Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia, has said that unless the website is made exempt, it would likely be barred under the law. 'All sorts of websites – like suicide prevention resources, so not the porn sites that the government is talking about – are building verification checks,' the creator said. 'They are suddenly having to build walls to keep out children. And we are also seeing websites around the internet blocking UK traffic altogether. If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that. — Peter Kyle (@peterkyle) July 29, 2025 'So we are just being cut off from a good selection of resources on the internet.' It is not just Knight who is protesting the Online Safety Act. Only a week since it was enforced, nearly 500,000 people signed a petition asking for it to be repealed. In response, the government said it had 'no plans' to scrap it. Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Peter Kyle, said that those who want it gone are 'on the side of predators'. Like Knights, critics argue that the legislation is too vague and far-reaching. He added: 'MPs seem to have come up with this legislation based on their gut feeling – and not really listening to experts. 'The entire tech industry – and I do not just mean American social media companies – are all face-palming right now at how silly the legislation is. 'It has turned the UK into a bit of a laughing stock.' Knight created Use-Their ID as a 'joke'. He thought it would be 'funny when the inevitable data leaks do happen and MP's ID cards show up' online. As a software engineer, he builds web applications for a living, so he does 'actually know about the security side of things'. In the last week, people have praised his site, describing it as an 'excellent use of his skills'. Comments from supporters read 'thank you immensely' and 'thank you for caring', with one of them saying: 'Thank you so much for the ID website, it is both bloody funny and an excellent idea. 'Best of luck if anyone comes after you.' A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology told Metro: The law is clear: platforms must not promote ways to circumvent requirements of the Act , and those who fall short will face serious enforcement action. 'Ofcom is already assessing platform compliance to ensure robust safeguards are in place to prevent circumvention, and investigations are underway into 37 sites.' check our news page.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Spotlight on Keir Starmer's recognition of Palestine
I'm puzzled by the conditions Keir Starmer has set for Israel to meet, failing which he'll recognise Palestine as a state (UK to recognise state of Palestine in September unless Israel holds to a ceasefire, 29 July). Why does recognition depend on Israel's actions? Surely it should depend on Palestine's: commitments to abjure terrorism, disarm Hamas, hold democratic elections and, of course, to release the hostages. As for Israel, UK policy should be to impose draconian sanctions: if Israel continues to act like a pariah state, let it be treated as one. Without sanctions, there would probably still be an apartheid regime in South Africa. The UK must act now, not half-heartedly in September; thousands of children in Gaza can't wait until MaughanDunblane, Perthshire Like so many people in the UK, I thought that my despair and shame over the situation in Gaza could not be deepened. Keir Starmer achieved that. How like this prime minister to obfuscate further and kick any sense of decisiveness into the long grass of contingency. One might think that Britain has some special responsibility for recognising the state of Palestine, whose population it abandoned to the predations of its neighbour in 1948. What will be left of Gaza, the West Bank and its people by September? A genocide? A diaspora? The UK doesn't negotiate with terrorists, just with war Prof Graham MortLancaster University Soon after the atrocities of 7 October 2023 I heard someone on the radio say, with respect to Israel's imminent invasion of Gaza, 'Beware of being goaded by your enemy into doing what your enemy wants you to do.' Nearly two years on, the Israeli government seems hell-bent on creating a moral equivalence between itself and Hamas. If you become like your enemy, then your enemy has won. Thus, despite what it says about recent moves to recognise a Palestinian state, the Israeli government, more than any other, is 'rewarding' Hamas for its terrorist actions. The Rev Rob KelseyBerwick-upon-Tweed, Northumberland It is impossible for us to know the depth of despair Palestinians must feel to hear western nations pontificating that we will not recognise them as a nation if their oppressors stop killing them. It seems this is the ultimate acknowledgment that they have no rights except those we deem to give them. We have expelled them from the land in which they lived to ensure that Europe didn't have the problem of resettling the thousands displaced by a European war. They are being attacked in Gaza and the West Bank with weapons supplied by western governments. They are being starved in Gaza to keep their oppressor-in-chief in office. And now our governments are praised for condescending to recognise the fact that they are a nation (that has existed for more than 1,000 years). How can we think we have any integrity left in our dealings with the oppressed?Michael McLoughlinWallington, London What will give greater weight to the call for a two-state solution is outlining the building blocks for establishment of a Palestinian state: for example, Gaza would be placed under UN control to allow for demilitarisation, the physical reconstruction and drawing up a basic law to guide the development of a constitutional WeirCape Town, South Africa Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
