
Angry neighbours dub Edinburgh inflatable dome 'enormous zit'
Now residents have launched a petition demanding "visual adjustments" and soundproofing for the fans while others have called for it to be taken down.They say it is a "monstrous blight" in a conservation area which is close to the UNESCO World Heritage Site of Edinburgh's Old Town.The Grange Club has not responded to requests to comment. Claire Baxter, 45, who lives locally, told BBC Scotland News she was shocked when she saw the dome."It's horrendous and looks like an enormous zit. Every time I walk past it I cannot believe it's been allowed. "Everyone in the neighbourhood has been talking about it for months."Keith Hughes, who lives in a house beside the inflatable, likened it to having a version of London's Millennium Dome (now the O2) outside his window."I am awake every single night with the low hum of the background fans keeping the tennis court roof inflated."They have totally disregarded their heritage. They should be ashamed of themselves for the impact on this world heritage area. They have had no consideration for the local people."The 57-year-old said he was now planning to move house after enjoying three years in the "beautiful" suburb.And he contrasted the dome with the category A-listed cricket pavilion at The Grange Club, which is home to the Scotland national cricket team."You have this lovely grandstand since 1892, which looks in place and then you have this ugly monolith that dominates the skyline and jars the eye, it's hideous, how have they got away with this? It's a nightmare."Mr Hughes, an IT programme manager, added: "This only benefits a very select few who are members of the Grange Club and who don't even live next door to it."
It is not clear from planning documents how long The Grange Club intends to keep the inflatable structure. Residents believe it is now permanent. The application to erect the structure was initially rejected by planners with City of Edinburgh Council but it was then appealed to the Scottish government. Scottish government reporter, Andrew Fleming - an official appointed by ministers - overruled the council's decision, paving the way for the dome to be constructed.He said he allowed it for public benefit because there were a lack of indoor tennis facilities in Edinburgh.Jacquie Christie said her 80-year-old mother, who has lived in the same house for 50 years, could feel vibrations from the powerful fans and it was "horrendous"."The stress it's caused her, every morning when she gets up and looks out into the garden and that's her view," said the 58-year-old."She is really devastated over what they have done without a second thought or communication."Ms Christie said she was baffled how the "jumpy castle" got the go ahead when her mother had to go to three different appeal panels just to get double glazing installed.
Local resident Sarah Hill said she could hear the hum of the fans, as well as players calling to each other and whacking balls. She also described the dome as "very overpowering".Ms Hill added: "The whole application proposal needs to be flagged up over the fact it was against the community wishes and was rejected by the city council but was overturned on the decision of one reporter."It's not right and the process really needs to be addressed."None of us were consulted. I heard about it from someone on the community council."It is extremely ugly and is a big eyesore out with the keeping of the conservation zone."
Another resident who overlooks the inflatable said she had stopped looking out of her windows because it dominated her view and upset her so much.Meanwhile Lady Jennifer Bute, who has a house beside the structure, said she thought it was "objectionable"."I think they need to paint it a different colour to make it more invisible," she added.Max Mitchell, an Edinburgh councillor whose ward covers the tennis court, said: "It's another frustrating example of a Scottish government civil servant overruling the decision of democratically elected and accountable councillors."The concerns around the impact on the conservation and residential amenity have sadly come true for those living nearby."I can understand why residents are unhappy especially when the applicant was allowed a second bite at the cherry via an appeal."A Scottish government spokesman said: "The right to appeal certain decisions made by local planning authorities is an important part of the planning system."The decision was issued by an independent reporter, who is required to make their decision on the planning merits of the case, taking full account of submissions made by all parties, including those from members of the local community."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
17 minutes ago
- The National
Protest organised against fence blocking access to Scottish harbour
A fence was installed on Burntisland harbour for 'public safety' reasons on the north side of the Firth of Forth after obtaining planning consent from Fife Council in 2022. This led to an outcry from locals, including an online petition which gained over 3000 signatures. The Burntisland Harbour Access Trust (BHAT) campaign group was then formed, who still continue to protest the fence and fight to restore public access to the harbour. READ MORE: Major rescue operation after man falls off cliff near Scottish holiday park The group said that they have received legal advice that indicates that Forth Ports 'acted illegally in barring the public from the harbour and breakwater' and that when presented with the lawyers report 'had failed to address the issue'. Now, BHAT has organised a protest march and rally in the town next weekend. Spokesperson Sandra Maguire told The Courier: 'Even now, people continue to gain access by any means possible. 'Recently fishermen have been taking their life in their hands by scaling a high fence set up by Forth Ports to deter access. 'This steel fence has been repeatedly opened up by the community who refuse to give up their right to access. 'In response, Fife Ports raised the height of the fence and erected a camera.' A spokesperson for Forth Ports said: 'The fence was installed around areas that were deemed high risk and ensures public safety within a working port. 'The measure still enables the people of Burntisland to safely walk through the port, avoiding these high risk areas. 'We continue to communicate with community representatives, local politicians, and other local stakeholders on matters relating to access at the Port of Burntisland.' The protest leaves the Beacon Centre in Burntisland at 11am on August 10.


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Scotland's overall best universities, as students prepare for SQA results day
Across Scotland, thousands of students will soon be opening their exam results - and starting to make a solid plan for what will come next. SQA results day is now just days away, falling on Tuesday, August 5 this year. As Highers results roll in, so too will the outcomes of conditional university offers, for the many students hoping to use them as a springboard to launch themselves into the next step of their academic journey. Others, including those who applied after the deadline and those who didn't get the grades they might have hoped, will have another shot at being matched up with a university that works for them through the Clearing process. Fortunately for them, Scotland has no shortage of excellent universities, even when compared to others across the UK. With results day in mind, we've revisited The Guardian's latest university league table for 2025. This prestigious ranking gives most of the UK's 160-odd universities an overall score out of 100 based on a range of different metrics, including current student's satisfaction with both teaching and feedback, the school's staff-to-student ratio, how much money the institution spends per student, the average UCAS entry score for new starters, the percentage of first year students continuing on to their second year of study - and even graduate career prospects. We looked at how each of Scotland's universities fared, to create a useful guide for this year's upcoming cohort of university students. Our list is limited to institutions that achieved a score of more than 50 out of 100, according to The Guardian's metric. It is worth noting, however, that a few schools didn't appear in the overall rankings, which the paper says is due to not enough data being available. It's also important to remember that a low score overall doesn't mean that a university won't be a good place for you to study. Rankings can jump around year-on-year based on factors like extra funding - and even universities with lower overall rankings will often rank very highly for specific courses. Here were the Scottish universities that made the cut: 1 . University of St Andrews Taking out Scotland's top spot for 2025, this prestigious institution in St Andrews, Fife, is Scotland's oldest university - and is also thought to also be one of the oldest English-speaking universities in the world. It was ranked 2nd overall across the UK, with The Guardian giving it an exceptional score of 98.6 out of 100. | Peter Thompson/Photo Sales 2 . University of Aberdeen Another historic university, Aberdeen came in second place for Scotland, and was ranked 12th overall in the UK. The Guardian gave it a score of 73.3 out of 100. | UoA/Supplied Photo Sales 3 . University of Glasgow The University of Glasgow is Scotland's third highest-ranking university. It ranked 14th overall across the UK, with The Guardian giving it a score of 68.9 out of 100. | Fabian Bleh/Wirestock Creators/Adobe Stock Photo Sales 4 . University of Edinburgh Just behind it came the capital's namesake institution, which was ranked 15th overall in the UK. The Guardian gave it a score of 68.4 out of 100. | Adobe Stock Photo Sales


Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: Wind farm could mean loss of Scottish bird species
Scottish Government backing for a massive windfarm off North Berwick didn't have a single correspondent on side Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It's an amazing experience to go on a boat trip to see the puffins and world-famous colony of gannets on Bass Rock. The Scottish Government has approved the Berwick Bank offshore wind farm, one of the largest wind farms in the world, which they acknowledge will affect the birds. It is off the coast of the seabirds colonies of St Abb's Head, too. The developer predicts 31,000 collisions during its 30-year life span. I do not think it is possible to predict the behaviour of birds with such accuracy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When we moved to our cottage in 1992 we would have skeins of pink-footed geese over our cottage in spring and autumn. Gladhouse Reservoir was made a Ramsar site because of the numbers there. My parents marvelled at the sight when they visited In 1999. In 2002 Bowbeat wind farm was built in the Moorfoot Hills on the flight path and we have not seen skeins from that direction for many years, and the Gladhouse numbers are now low – so much so that the RSPB could not put in an objection to the 18-turbine, 180m high Torfichen windfarm, near Gladhouse, on pink foot grounds but had to rely on other species. A view of the proposed wind farm site from St Abb's Head (Picture: National Trust for Scotland / Rachel Bonnici) How can we justify such a large experiment when Scotland is world famous for these species and we already have enough wind power for our own needs? Celia Hobbs, Penicuik, Midlothian Shot in foot? The decision in principle by the Scottish Government to grant planning permission for a completely unnecessary massive offshore wind farm (Berwick Bank) to be constructed in an environmentally sensitive location frankly beggars belief, especially given the scale of the well-judged opposition, which has simply been ignored. The irony is that Holyrood is currently contemplating the introduction of an Ecocide Bill, at the very time that the Scottish Government is complicit in ecocide committed by renewable energy companies on an ever-expanding scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We note that 'SSE Renewables will have to provide a plan to counter any impact the wind farm may have on seabirds to be approved by ministers", but this is thin gruel, especially as SSE is quoted as admitting in its own environmental impact assessment that more than 31,000 bird collisions are estimated during its lifespan. What will their proposed 'mitigation' provide? It is to be hoped that it will be something better than the farcically inappropriate plans Equinor has put in place to construct an inappropriately sited nesting habitat for Arctic terns, hundreds of miles from its proposed massive wind farm extension off the coast of Norfolk. Whatever it is, it is difficult to see how it can provide more than a small sticking plaster for a deliberate act of ecocide that should never have been granted permission The Scottish Government may well have shot themselves in the foot. Even people who would not normally object to a wind farm are sickened by this decision. The sleeping giant in the name of Joe Public has awakened. Aileen Jackson, Scotland Against Spin, Uplawmoor, East Renfrewshire Strange silence There is a deafening silence from Holyrood over the unit cost of electricity from Berwick Bank. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are non-stop claims that the output is the cheapest electricity generation system in the UK, but what the SNP Energy Secretary refuses to admit is that the party have taken out three 'insurance policies' to keep the lights on in Scotland as wind output is both unreliable and inefficient. The first 'policy' is the myriad battery units required to ensure grid stability during short lulls in wind speed (over a period of minutes). The second is the output from pump store plant to cover a lack of wind over a time period of about six hours. The last is the proposed 25GW of hydrogen-fuelled gas turbines to cover for dunkelflaute weather conditions. Why, then, do our 129 MSPs refuse to inform the people of Scotland of the unit cost of wind output that includes the capital repayment and operational running costs of the three projects? Ian Moir, Castle Douglas, Dumfries & Galloway Botched Whatever one thinks of the Berwick Bank wind farm project, we can only hope the rights auction is open so as to maximise revenue. A few years ago the SNP horribly botched the ScotWind auction, losing the public coffers a whopping £15 billion, the equivalent of more than £3,000 per adult in Scotland! George Morton, Rosyth, Fife Not so bonny Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Our beautiful country used to be called 'Bonny Scotland'. Nowadays, it would be more apt to call it 'Pylon-ny Scotland'. Please, please rid us of these horrible eyesores. John MacKay, Cumbernauld, Dunbartonshire Legal focus Veteran nurse Sandie Peggie, who was suspended by NHS Fife for objecting to the presence of a male-born, female-identifying doctor in a female changing room while she was undressing, has enjoyed a groundswell of public support. However, NHS Fife's lawyer, Jane Russell KC, produced two witnesses, both former colleagues and friends. Their evidence mainly focused on Ms Peggie's presumed character based on some politically incorrect banter at some point in the past. Ms Peggie actually didn't deny this and admits it was in bad taste. Arguably Ms Russell's detailed questions about Sandie Peggie's menstrual flow and who is paying for her case weren't exactly tasteful either. Yet nothing of this should deflect from the matter at hand. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What the judges will have to decide is not whether Ms Peggie 'deserved' to be suspended due to her supposedly flawed character. They will decide whether NHS Fife acted fairly and lawfully when suspending a nurse for insisting on her sex-based rights, no more, no less. Their conclusion will ultimately guide public perception of the case. Regina Erich, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Terrible talk I'd just like to say well done Anas Sarwar for saying what every decent person in Scotland is thinking. The alleged racist language of Sandy Peggie is horrific and highly offensive. Politicians Joanna Cherry and Murdo Fraser, who have both spoken in support of Ms Peggie since these allegations were made public, should hang their heads in shame for failing to speak out against these racist statements and offensive jokes. Alexander Lunn, Edinburgh Oust the SNP So, it seems that as a result of Donald Trump's visit to Scotland, First Minister John Swinney has decided he has an 'updated strategy' for achieving Scottish independence. More fool him! He has conveniently forgotten that the UK Supreme Court's ruling was quite clear in that 'there can only be another referendum on such a matter if the UK Government agrees! Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As is obvious to most folks, except for diehard SNP followers, Mr Swinney is deluded in his quest for an independent Scotland. If the efforts of Alex Salmond, and his prodigy Nicola Sturgeon, failed to convince the people of Scotland that independence would be to their advantage, then John Swinney is on a hiding to nothing campaign in respect of Scottish independence. The Holyrood elections in May 2026 will hopefully see off the SNP for a very long period. Let us hope that whatever alliance of political parties is needed to achieve this objective, we will see radical changes put into effect at Holyrood, and at local council levels. Fellow Scots, let us all be fully supportive of whatever alliance of political parties is needed to oust the SNP. Unless radical changes are put into effect at Holyrood, then the only answer to Scotland's political dilemma is to return all political powers to Westminster. Hopefully that will not be our only option! Robert IG Scott, Northfield, Ceres, Fife Good call I congratulate Foysol Choudhury for his article in The Scotsman, 'Staying silent over Gaza risks complicity in war crimes, even in Scotland' (Perspective, 1 August). He confirms 'the right of every person to live free from fear, violence and oppression and there must be immediate international action to stop the violence, protect civilians, and hold those responsible to account'. It's rare for a Labour MSP to call out and criticise Hamas. Lewis Finnie, Edinburgh An apology Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As a beleaguered American citizen, I first want to apologise to the Scots for inflicting Donald Trump upon you, and the world. Secondly, my profound thanks and blessings on your heads for your protests, marches, signs, etc displayed during his visit. You cannot imagine how reassuring it was to know that we are not alone, that good people in Scotland also agree and support us, even when we sometimes feel our voices are lost in the wind. C Root, Flagstaff, Arizona Historic pun According to the US President, Nicola Sturgeon was a terrible First Minister (your report, 31 July). Can this be the latest 'Blast of the Trump against the Monstruous Regiment of Women'? Peter Freshwater, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad