46 people arrested at protest supporting banned Palestine Action
Protesters gathered for the second week in a row in central London after police reiterated that showing support for the group was a criminal offence.
Other demonstrations were also planned across the UK on Saturday, including in Manchester, Cardiff and Londonderry, Northern Ireland, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries, who organised the event.
Two groups of protesters gathered underneath both the Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela statues in Parliament Square for the demonstration shortly after 1pm.
The individuals then wrote the message 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' with black markers on pieces of cardboard, and silently held the signs aloft as they were surrounded by Metropolitan Police officers and members of the media.
Some demonstrators could be seen lying on top of each other on the floor as police searched their bags and took their ID cards and handmade signs.
Officers could then be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square.
Other standing protesters were also led away from the statues and placed into the vans.
The last of the protesters was lifted from the Nelson Mandela statue shortly after 2.30pm.
A Metropolitan Police officer at the scene told the PA news agency that 46 people had been arrested at the protest.
The offences mainly related to Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000, the officer said.
In a post shared on X, Defend Our Juries said the protesters had been arrested 'for holding cardboard signs' and that further arrests had been made at the Manchester demonstration.
Scotland Yard said its stance remains that officers will act where criminal offences, including support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed.
The force added that this includes 'chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos'.
Police arrested 29 people at a similar protest in Parliament Square last weekend.
The terror group designation means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
The move to ban the organisation came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action, saying that the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Northamptonshire police officers honoured for rescuing man
Two police officers have described how "instinct took over" when they dragged an injured man from a burning car moments before it Callum Simpson and PC Anna O'Donoghue, of Northamptonshire Police, came across a vehicle that had crashed into a fuel pump at high speed."We weren't sent to the job, we didn't have any time to come up with a plan of action," said PC O' pair have been recognised for their actions with a nomination at the National Police Bravery Awards. They were driving along the A45 in Wellingborough in December 2023 when they saw a petrol station on fire, so pulled over."We didn't expect anybody to be trapped inside the vehicle. As soon as we got out, we heard this awful scream, a cry for help," said PC O'Donoghue."We ran towards the car and saw a man trying to drag another badly injured, unconscious man out of the burning car."They managed to drag the driver out of the vehicle to safety just in time, as flames soon engulfed the car, followed by a series of officers gave first aid to the injured driver, despite the fire burning out of control close Simpson said: "We didn't have time to think about anything, we just wanted to get him as far away as possible."PC O'Donoghue added: "Sometimes when you have too much time to think, you over-think, but in that split second, your instinct takes over."Being emergency responders, we save life and limb. How could we not run towards the burning car? We had to."She said it was a "surprise" to be nominated for a bravery award."Every day in this job you do things which are traumatic and impactful and you very rarely get recognised for good work," she said."So to be nominated as the bravest of Northants – it feels surreal, and maybe a bit unnecessary, but it's really nice."Northamptonshire Police Federation chair Sam Dobbs said: "Callum and Anna displayed incredible bravery to pull the driver from a burning vehicle."There is no doubt in my mind that their quick-thinking and heroic actions saved the driver's life. We couldn't be prouder of them." Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Constance Marten's crocodile tears: Moment killer aristocrat 'breaks down' as she is told her baby has been found dead is revealed - as she and Mark Gordon are found guilty of newborn Victoria's manslaughter
Newly released footage shows runaway aristocrat Constance Marten breaking down in crocodile tears as she is told by police that her baby is dead. In an extraordinary case which gripped the country, Marten and her partner Mark Gordon went on the run with their daughter in a 'desperately selfish' bid to prevent her being taken into care after their four previous children were removed by social workers, who feared they would come to harm. The baby, Victoria, died in the flimsy freezing tent, Marten, 38, and Gordon, 50, were camping in on the South Downs in the freezing cold. After her death, the couple dumped their daughter in a soiled nappy inside a Lidl bag for life. The new footage shows the moment a police detective breaks the news to Marten that her daughter has been found dead. The officer says 'Constance, I can tell you, the baby's not alive' before then asking: 'Is it your baby?' To which Marten responds 'Yes, it is.' The duo shook their heads in the dock of the Old Bailey as they were found guilty of manslaughter today. Moments after being convicted, Gordon angrily shouted from the dock: 'I'm not surprised by the verdict. It was faulty, it was unlawful. This is not over, it has just begun.' Marten yelled, 'It's a scam', before walking out of the court in fury. It can now be revealed, following their retrial, that the pair have already been convicted at an earlier trial of child cruelty, concealing the birth of a child and perverting the course of justice. Scotland Yard launched a nationwide manhunt, spending more than £1.2million chasing the couple around the country after discovering a placenta in their car when the vehicle was ablaze on a motorway in Greater Manchester on January 5, 2023. More than 100 officers pursued the couple as they fled in taxis, travelling hundreds of miles across the country from Bolton to Liverpool, then to Harwich in Essex, and on to East London before finally resorting to a freezing tent. Five police forces joined the hunt, devoting 1,000 officer hours at a cost of £500,000 just to find the child's body after the pair refused to cooperate when they were arrested near Brighton after nearly two months on the run. Police were shocked to discover the millionaire aristocrat had hidden her child's body beneath an empty beer can and discarded sandwich packaging in a disused shed. Following two trials, costing taxpayers an estimated £1.6million, it can now be revealed that: Gordon is a 'sociopathic' rapist whose sadistic crimes were compared to the American serial killer Ted Bundy. A national safeguarding panel is now looking at the landmark case as police have called for new laws to protect unborn children; The couple were granted legal aid for their defence, hiring 19 lawyers to defend them at an estimated cost of £600,000 - yet she is a trust fund heiress worth £2.4million; Gordon attempted to avoid trial, claiming he was more notorious than Wayne Couzens, the Scotland Yard police firearms officer who murdered Sarah Everard. Marten's father was a page to the late Queen and her grandmother was a playmate of Princess Margaret, but her lover's background could not be more different. Experts have described Gordon, 50, as a sociopathic sex offender considered so dangerous that experts compared his sadistic crimes to the American serial killer Ted Bundy or Australian-American serial killer Christopher Wilder. Hooked on violent pornography, Gordon was just 14 when he raped a woman at knifepoint in 1989 after breaking into her home armed with knives and hedge clippers, telling her: 'Don't scream or I'll kill your children.' Over the next four and half hours, the teenage rapist tormented his victim, telling her she was going to die as he ran the blade down her body, holding it to her throat and heart saying: 'All I have to do is push and you are dead.' The mother recalled: 'I had no hope. I was told to say goodbye to my children because this was the day I was going to die. 'When I thought he might be going to leave, he said 'No, your nightmare isn't over yet'.' Franklin Nooe (corr), treatment director of a sex assault clinic who counselled Gordon's first victim, described Gordon as a sociopath in the same category as Ted Bundy: 'That's the 5 per cent of the rapists, that's your Ted Bundys, your Wilders that obviously enjoy it. It is something that actually fuels them. 'They are a progressive kind of rapist that would lead to, I would expect, to go from just raping, to raping and murdering'. Within three weeks of carrying out the attack, Gordon broke into the home of a second woman armed with a set of knives. But as he crept into her bedroom, placing two seven-inch knives outside the door, Gordon was startled to find her husband home. Gordon battered him around the head with a shovel before fleeing in panic. Gordon was jailed for 40 years, serving half of that in the US before being deported back to the UK. When he was sentenced for both attacks, the rape victim pleaded with a judge to never let him free saying: 'I ask you to make sure that this man does not have the opportunity to destroy any more lives. 'Someone who is capable of doing this, a cruel calculated act at this age is not going to get better. He is only going to do more harm in society.' The rape victim, who cannot be named, welcomed Gordon's conviction today, telling the Mail: 'I'm very happy. This, once again, proves that our justice system works. They are too dangerous to be free to hurt anyone else. 'Hopefully, this time, they will never get that chance again. Unfortunately, Victoria had to pay the price.' Gordon hid his appalling criminal history from Marten when they met in 2016, keeping it secret until after they had a spiritual marriage in Peru and had their first child together. It wasn't until he assaulted two police officers in hospital after Marten gave birth under a false name that she learnt he was a violent rapist considered at 'high risk' of reoffending. Gordon later attacked Marten when she was pregnant with their third child, throwing her out of their flat window and sending her plunging 18ft to the ground, hitting a car on the way. As she lay screaming in agony with a shattered spleen and internal bleeding, putting her life and her unborn child at risk, Gordon didn't call an ambulance and attempted to delay paramedics alerted by concerned neighbours. Marten would spend the next eight days in hospital recovering from surgery, but Gordon demanded she should be discharged despite doctors warning this would put her life at risk. The domestic abuse was the catalyst for a family court judge to rule their four older children should be taken into care for their own protection from a 'violent sex offender' whose actions had 'put her life and the life of their unborn child at serious risk'. Two years before the death of Victoria, District Judge Madeleine Reardon warned: 'It is much more likely than not that in the foreseeable future the children will be exposed to serious physical violence between their parents. 'It is quite possible that they will be injured themselves.' When police discovered a placenta in Marten and Gordon's car, revealing the existence of their fifth child, authorities were so concerned for baby Victoria's welfare that an emergency care order was made on January 20 so she could immediately be taken from her parents. Tragically, police did not find her in time to save the infant, who died of hypothermia, exposure or co-sleeping, experts believe. Afterwards Gordon tried to avoid prosecution for his daughter's death, claiming he faced a higher risk of jury prejudice than Couzens. Neena Crinnion, defending, argued Gordon could not have a fair trial as he had been portrayed as a 'black rapist' on the run with a 'white aristocrat', adding: 'Ms Marten was described as beautiful, refined, educated, an aristocrat who had links to the Royal Family, whereas Mr Gordon is repeatedly referred to as 'the rapist'.' In a scandal which raises questions about the legal aid system, Marten was granted taxpayer funding for her defence despite her huge wealth. She attempted to claim a raft of benefits, including child benefits for her elder children after they had already been taken into care, and demanded to be given a council house after turning down a home in London paid for by her trust fund. During their prosecution, the couple conspired to delay, lie and obfuscate repeatedly in a bid to sabotage the case, shocking one of Britain's most senior judges, who declared that they behaved worse than teenage murderers. The pair spun a web of conspiracy, claiming social workers were working with Marten's aristocratic family to abduct their children and private investigators were bombing cars and spying on their every move, while police hunted them like 'terrorists'. But Prosecutor Tom Little KC dismissed Marten's 'grandstanding on a Premier League level', saying 'lies fell from her mouth like confetti in the wind'. The unprecedented case is now the subject of a national child safeguarding review to consider whether new laws should be brought in to protect unborn children. Detective Superintendent Lewis Basford, who led the case, believes that lives could be saved if officers had the power to bring in protection and family contact orders before a baby is born to parents considered at high risk of harming their children. He said: 'At the moment police are powerless to protect that child until a baby draws their first breath. 'If there was a change in the law, we could put contact orders in place to monitor the pregnancy and protection orders could be in place before that child is born so they could immediately be taken into care. 'If you look at cases like Baby P, this could save lives.' Following the jury's verdict after 14 hours of deliberation, the officer said: 'Today, the justice we have long fought for has been finally been served for baby Victoria. 'The selfish actions of Mark Gordon and Constance Marten resulted in the death of a newborn baby who should have had the rest of her life ahead of her. She should have recently celebrated her second birthday, but this was snatched away by the very people who should've protected and cared for her. 'This was an incredibly challenging investigation for the hundreds of officers who were involved in the search. Our main focus throughout the search was finding Victoria alive and we all remain devastated by her death. 'As anyone who's followed this trial will know, it was an incredibly complex investigation. Mark Gordon and Constance Marten deliberately avoided the authorities and continued to shield Victoria from us even after their arrest. This meant even the most experienced child pathologists in the country were unable to establish the cause of Victoria's death. 'We know today's verdict won't bring Victoria back, but I am pleased our painstaking investigation has resulted in those who caused her death being brought to justice. 'Victoria's death was completely avoidable. The couple had plenty of opportunities to do the right thing and come forward to ask for help. 'They knew throughout that officers were looking for them and baby Victoria. They also ignored medical professionals who directly reached out to them to say their actions were putting baby Victoria at risk. 'In court, Marten said they moved around a lot to avoid 'one single authority' having jurisdiction over their daughter. Marten stated that her children had been 'stolen by the state,' referring to the social care system after her previous four children were removed from her by the family court. 'I would like to personally thank the media for the positive support you showed throughout the search, the many members of the public who reported sightings and Sussex Police for the support provided in the arrests and subsequent search for Victoria. This support was incredibly important to the investigation throughout. 'Speaking personally as a father, I find it hard to comprehend how, instead of providing the warmth and care their child needed, Mark Gordon and Constance Marten chose to live outside during freezing conditions to avoid the authorities, causing the death of baby Victoria. 'Throughout the trial, both defendants made repeated attempts to disrupt and frustrate the judicial process, employing tactics designed to undermine proceedings and shift focus away from the serious charges they faced. Their behaviour ranged from non-cooperation and persistent interruptions aimed at delaying progress. 'Despite these challenges, the professionalism and resilience of the legal advocates, the judge, and court staff ensured that the integrity of the trial was maintained throughout. Through careful case management, clear judicial direction, and a steadfast commitment to due process, the court was able to navigate these obstructions effectively. As a result, the jury remained focused on the evidence and, unimpeded by the defendants' attempts to derail the proceedings, reached today's just and rightful guilty verdict.' The couple will be sentenced on September 15.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
This is how justice has gone so awry in twenty-first century Britain
A while back I came across some people who were actually being deported by the Home Office. They were an American couple running the only shop in a remote part of Scotland. Locals were up in arms about the nice couple being booted out. I think of them when I see stories about some of the people who are allowed to stay in this country by our courts. The Ugandan murderer who clubbed a man to death in the back of an ambulance but was allowed to stay because of his mental health. The Pakistani paedophile was allowed to stay because his life would be at risk back home. The Jamaican murderer who can't be deported because a rival criminal gang in his native country might harm him. Welcome to justice in twenty-first century Britain. Judges, some of whom are also pro-migrant activists, have decided that the rights of foreign criminals are more important than the right of everyone else to live in safety; there are more than 10,000 foreign national offenders living in the country. There's a pattern here. The British state persecutes the law-abiding while coddling dangerous people. This worst-of-both-worlds has been dubbed 'anarcho-tyranny'. Examples of it abound. Take Martyn's Law. Security Guard Kyle Lawler was suspicious of Manchester bomber Salman Abedi, but did not confront him because, he says, he didn't want to be branded a racist. Rather than confronting this real problem, Parliament instead passed a law requiring village halls and small events to draw up bureaucratic terrorism action plans. Exactly as predicted, the cost of this bureaucracy has led to events being closed for the law-abiding population: Shrewsbury Flower Show (started in 1875) has folded, to some extent, because of the extra costs of security. Horrific knife crimes have become common. In July 2015, we passed a law saying adults convicted for a second time or more of carrying a knife must receive a minimum six-month prison sentence. But judges are ignoring it – four in ten are not jailed, despite the clear view of Parliament. Instead of fixing the problem, the BBC and others are promoting an absurd campaign to ban pointed kitchen knives, with celebrity endorsements from people like Idris Elba. That's anarcho-tyranny in action: don't jail criminals but take away granny's cheese knife instead. If you, a law-abiding person, want to open a bank account or invest money you will face layers of bureaucracy. God help you if you are self-employed. But if you want to set up a blatant money laundering operation like some of the candy stores of Oxford Street or open the 14th 'Turkish Barber' in a tiny town, then HMRC will barely touch you. I get my train ticket checked every day. But staff on the tube stand idly by while people jump over the ticket barriers. When Robert Jenrick made a film pointing this out, Transport for London (TFL) threatened to prosecute him for 'filming illegally'. Recently, tube trains on the Bakerloo and Central lines have been covered in graffiti. Various groups have started cleaning off the graffiti. What has been the TFL's response to this? They complained about people cleaning up the graffiti and then claimed they had put it there themselves. This is the instinct of anarcho-tyranny. Attack the law abiding and the victims, rather than deal with the problem; in two tier Britain, not all protests are equal. Women protesting the Sarah Everard case had their faces squished to the floor. BLM protesters were treated with kid gloves; while everyone else was instructed to stay home to stop covid, they were allowed to gather in Whitehall for a protest that turned into a riot. British police arrest more than 30 people a day for online posts, double the rate in 2017. Even the ultra-liberal Economist magazine argues Britain has a problem with free speech. One of the worst things about anarcho-tyranny is its arbitrary nature. According to a Policy Exchange report, in 2023, Essex Police recorded 808 'Non-Crime Hate Incidents' (NCHIs). Meanwhile, West Yorkshire Police, a force with 38 per cent more police officers than Essex, recorded only 146 NCHIs. In the last three years Essex police spent time logging two NCHIs every single day – but only solved 6 per cent of burglaries and 3 per cent of rapes. It is terrible that free speech is being policed like this, but somehow even worse that what you can say now depends on where you happen to live, and the whims of local officials. But then, that's the whole point. Persecuting the law-abiding makes officials feel powerful and important. The numbers arriving in small boats are soaring under Starmer, and the number of terrorists and criminals who we can't deport because of human rights is ever-growing. At least ugly new barriers have been recently put up around Parliament to protect us MPs and Peers. By a quirk of timing the work started in the week when the Mayor of London gave a stirring speech declaring that we must 'build bridges, not walls'. He said this after spending recent years having to install ugly concrete anti-terrorism walls on the ends of all of London's bridges, which law-abiding people must walk round. The mayor spent money on an ad campaign declaring 'London is open', but for the law-abiding London is less open: when I was born you could walk up Downing Street, or go into parliament without airport style security. In the grooming gangs scandal, we saw how the authorities turned on the victims and those who tried to blow the whistle. People like detective Maggie Oliver, youth worker Jayne Senior and even Labour MPs Ann Cryer and Sarah Champion paid a career penalty for speaking out; Champion was made to quit her job in the Labour front bench in 2017. Labour first tried to block an inquiry and are now pushing through a definition of 'Islamophobia' that I'm sure would have been used against those whistleblowers. Our politics are upside down. We pamper those who do the wrong thing, while we punish those who try to do the right thing. It's anarcho-tyranny. Don't like it? Well, choose your words carefully, or you'll end up in jail.
