Hong Kong code of conduct will oblige legislators to ‘sincerely support' Beijing
The proposal for the new code, introduced on Wednesday, included tiered penalties for legislators who breach the code, including suspension without payment for the most serious offences.
It stipulated that legislators must 'sincerely support the central government's overall jurisdiction while securing the Hong Kong SAR's [special administrative region's] high degree of autonomy', as well as the principle of 'patriots administering Hong Kong', referring to election reforms which ensure that only pro-Beijing candidates can run.
'They should not intentionally vilify the governance credibility of the chief executive and the SAR government, nor should they deliberately undermine or weaken the effectiveness of executive-led governance,' it said.
The president of the legislative council of Hong Kong, Andrew Leung, told media the new rules wouldn't restrict legislators from speaking up, but they must be careful to 'not cross the red line', Hong Kong Free Press reported.
Hong Kong's governance system has undergone major overhauls in recent years, after a crackdown on the city's pro-democracy movement and politicians saw major interventions by the government in Beijing.
Every major democratic party has disbanded or begun the process of disbandment, and thousands of people – including politicians and activists – have been prosecuted under national security laws.
A separate proposal this week flags new prison rules which include only allowing visits pre-approved by the correctional services department, would empower the department to consider restrictions on clergy visits, and seek rulings to bar visits by specific legal representatives to imprisoned clients.
'In the past, some people have abused the visiting mechanism and conducted visits in the name of 'humanitarian support',' said the amendment proposal. 'In fact, they are using soft means to influence prisoners, intending to incite them to resist the supervision of the correctional services department, arouse their hatred towards the central government and the SAR government, and even make them become potential risks to national security and public safety after returning to society.'
The crackdown on Hong Kong's pro-democracy population has been widely criticised by human rights and legal groups. Senior foreign judges have left or resigned from Hong Kong's appeal court, with several specifically citing concerns over the new environment. Hong Kong authorities reject the claims.
In an interview published by an academic journal this week, the UK's Brenda Marjorie Hale, who quietly declined an offer to extend her post on the Hong Kong court in 2021, said she was now 'all the more convinced that it was the right thing to do'.
'Because, as things have developed, the National Security Law has taken over the Basic Law,' she said, referring to Hong Kong's mini constitution.
'Even though the foreign judges are not likely to be asked to sit on national security cases, they are being asked to give respectability to a system that despite the best efforts ... are not going to succeed.'
Additional research by Lillian Yang and Jason Tzu Kuan Lu
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Gym boss typifies Taiwan's division over China
Heavily tattooed, uber-muscly and foul-mouthed, the Taiwanese gym manager and live streamer Chen Chih-han is an unlikely ambassador for China-Taiwan friendship. Yet on his YouTube channel with more than a million subscribers, Chen live streamed a recent six-day trip to Shanghai, praising everything from the city's maglev trains to its 'pretty' police station. It's quite a turn from a few years ago, when Chen railed against the Chinese Communist Party as a 'totally unreasonable, very tyrannical and murderous regime'. The man known to most as Kuan Chang, 'The Manager', has a Joe Rogan-like following for his straight-talking style. You'd expect no less from someone who was a member of a triad gang and, before that, in the marines. But his visit and volte-face has elicited a huge reaction in Taiwan, dominating conversation for days, even overshadowing the trip of a former Taiwanese president to the People's Republic at around the same time. What explains Chen's about-turn? Critics say that he's been bought off by the CCP, while supporters (and there are plenty of them) say he's just honestly describing what he saw in China. Most probably, Chen's real paymaster is the YouTube algorithm, where his live streams garnered more than 100,000 views each day. His motivations aside, the ensuing storm goes to show how deeply divided Taiwan is over the question of China, a division that is only getting worse. • Yes we can! A master of political slogans reveals his secrets The Taipei-based political scientist Lev Nachman puts it thus: 'Taiwan has always been incredibly, deeply polarised because the fundamental questions about it are: who are we and what do we do about our future?' Politics doesn't fall on a spectrum of left to right, but green to blue: green emphasising Taiwan's independence, like the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP); blue favouring engagement with China, like the Kuomintang (KMT) — yes, the CCP's erstwhile enemies. These are rough labels because both extremes are political no-go zones: the Taiwanese know that any declaration of independence is an invitation for war, while there is next-to-zero appetite for unification with the People's Republic. One problem facing the democracy is that while the DPP holds the presidency, as of last year's election, the KMT is the biggest party in the legislature. This has produced unedifying chaos. Fist fights in the chamber (hospitalising five) erupted last year when KMT legislators rushed through reforms to expand their power against the executive. Street protests followed. The reforms were quashed by Taiwan's Constitutional Court but a frustrated DPP retaliated, calling on voters to recall KMT legislators en masse. More than 30 of them face a recall vote this month. 'We are in another election year. It's unprecedented,' says Brian Hioe, editor of Taiwan's New Bloom magazine. Polls suggest that voters are generally against the so-called 'Great Recall'. After all, they only chose these legislators a year ago. There's no guarantee on the outcome. 'Both sides are trying to drive turnout,' says Hioe. • Juliet Samuel: MI5's 'epic' China warning is being ignored Are these the signs of a healthy democracy or an indulgent tussle between navel-gazing politicians? I lean to the latter. Just as Brexit narrowed the British government's bandwidth for dealing with other pressing issues, and just as the subsequent parliamentary wrangling and debate over a second referendum appealed to different definitions of the democratic mandate, Taiwan's political turmoil is splitting society, with both sides accusing the other of bad faith. Ultimately, it means that the domestic issues that drove so many voters out last year — soaring property prices, stagnant wages, the rising cost of living — are not being tackled. It also means that the high-stakes dance with China is reduced to tribal party politics. To make life hard for the executive, the KMT-controlled legislature has cut defence budgets on projects such as Taiwan's submarines, citing fiscal discipline. And a DPP campaign to root out spies has embroiled 12,000 Chinese immigrants in a loyalty test, where they must prove that they have relinquished any Chinese residency rights to maintain their Taiwanese residency. (The irony is that many of them have had to travel to China to do the paperwork.) Meanwhile, voters on both sides have become increasingly mistrustful of what they hear on traditional media. • Lenin, Mao and Castro: three journeys that shook the world In this febrile environment, influencers like Chen become more crucial. A recent Reuters Institute poll found that nearly half of Taiwanese get their news from YouTube. Mainstream outlets are declining in importance, especially among the young. The changing media landscape might also be changing public opinion: whereas Taiwan's young have traditionally been more China-sceptic and likely to identify as only Taiwanese, a recent poll from the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation found that, now, a smaller proportion of 20 to 24-year-olds identify as Taiwanese compared with over-25s. Just as Gen Z in the West seem less 'woke' than millennials, could Taiwan's Gen-Z be less sceptical of China? If this phenomenon is real (still an 'if'), The Manager may be on to something with his U-turn.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
How tariffs are shifting global supply chains
A 90-day pause on Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs plan is about to expire on Wednesday, which could upend US trading relationships with the rest of the world. But the uncertainty of the last few months has already forced several companies to rethink their supply lines in radical ways. When an Illinois toymaker heard that Trump was introducing tariffs on Chinese imports, he was so incensed that he decided to sue the US government."I'm inclined to stand up when my company is in genuine peril," says Rick Woldenberg, who is the CEO of educational toy firm Learning majority of his company's products are made in China, so the tariffs, which US importers have to pay, not Chinese exporters, are now costing him a says his import taxes bill leapt from around $2.5m (£1.5m) a year to more than $100m in April when Trump temporarily increased tariffs on Chinese imports to 145%. That would have "devastated" the company, he says."This kind of impact on my business is just a little bit hard to wrap my mind around," he US tariffs on Chinese imports now at 30%, that's still unaffordable for many American companies such as Learning in addition to its continuing legal fight, it is changing its global supply chain, moving production from China to Vietnam and two countries, like most others around the world, have seen the US hit them with general 10% tariffs, two-thirds lower than those on China. Although these 10% tariffs are due to run out on Wednesday, 9 July, uncertainly remains over what they may be replaced many Canadian companies, who often trade in both their home country and in the US, are now facing a double hit to their supply hits are the 25% tariffs put in place by Trump on many Canadian imports, and the reciprocal ones of the same level that Canada has placed on a host of American other businesses around the world are looking at exporting less to the US, because their American import partners are having to put up prices to cover the tariffs they now have to pay, which makes their products more expensive on US shelves. At Learning Resources, Mr Woldenberg has now moved about 16% of manufacturing to Vietnam and India. "We have gone through the process of vetting the new factories, training them on what we needed, making sure that things could flow easily, and developing relationships."Yet he admits that there are uncertainties: "We don't know if they can handle the capacity of our business. Much less the whole world moving in there at the same time."He also points out that switching production to another country is expensive to the meantime, his legal case against the US tariffs, called "Learning Resources et al v Donald Trump et al" is continuing its way through the US court May a judge at the US District Court in Washington DC ruled that the tariffs against it were unlawful. But the US government immediately appealed, and Learning Resources still has to pay the tariffs for the time the firm is continuing to move production away from China. Global supply chain expert Les Brand says that it is both expensive and difficult for companies to switch manufacturing to different countries."Trying to find new sources for critical components of whatever you are doing - that's a lot of research," says Mr Brand, who is CEO of advisory firm Supply Chain Logistics."There's a lot of quality testing to do it right. You have to spend the time, and that really takes away from the business focus."He adds: "The knowledge transfer to train a whole new bunch of people on how to make your product takes a lot of time and money. And that effects already razor-thin margins businesses have right now." For Canadian fried chicken chain Cluck Clucks, its supply chain has been significantly impacted by Canada's revenge tariffs on US imports. This is because while its chicken is Canadian, it imports both specialist catering fridges and pressure fryers from the it can't live without the fridges, it has decided to stop buying any more of the fryers. Yet with no Canadian company making alternative ones, it is having to limit its menus at its new is because it needs these pressure fryers to cook its bone-in chicken pieces. The new stores will instead only be able to sell boneless chicken, as that is cooked differently."This was a substantial decision for us, but we believe it's the right strategic move," says Raza Hashim, Cluck Clucks CEO."It's important to note that we do plan to retain the necessary kitchen space in new locations to reintroduce these fryers should the tariff uncertainty be completely resolved in the future."He also warns that with the US fridges now more expensive for the company to buy, the price it charges for its food will likely have to go up. "There is a certain amount of costs we cannot absorb as brands, and we may have to pass those on to consumers. And that is not something we want to do."Mr Hashim adds that the business is continuing with its US expansion plans, and it has set up local supply chains to source American chicken. It currently has one US outlet, in Houston, Texas. In Spain, olive oil producer Oro del Desierto currently exports 8% of its production to the US. It says that the US tariffs on European imports, presently 10%, are having to be passed on to American shoppers. "These tariffs will directly impact the end consumer [in the US]," says Rafael Alonso Barrau, the firm's export company also says it is looking at potentially reducing the volume it sends to the US, if the tariffs make trading there less profitable, and exporting more to other countries instead."We do have other markets where we can sell the product," says Mr Barrau. "We sell in another 33 markets, and with all of them, and our local market, we could cushion US losses."Mr Brand says that firms around the world would have been less impacted if Trump had moved more slowly with his tariffs. "The speed and velocity of these decisions are really making everything worse. President Trump should have gone slower and been more meaningful about these tariffs."Back in Illinois, Mr Woldenberg is also concerned about where Trump will go next in his trade battles."We just have to make the best decision we can, based on the information we have, and then see what happens," he says."I don't want to say 'hope for the best', because I don't believe that hope is a strategy."
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Scott Bessent spars with CNN host over whether Trump's tariffs count as trade deals
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reignited his feud with Elon Musk on Sunday during an interview with CNN, where the Cabinet secretary also quibbled with a host over whether the president had made the '90 deals in 90 days' he had promised the American public. Bessent's comments come as the administration is set to hit many U.S. trading partners this month with 'reciprocal' tariffs following the end of a 90-day pause. During that period, the White House discussed the types of trade agreements Donald Trump and his team were set to negotiate with China, the U.K., Canada, and dozens of other countries, which the president has accused of engaging in unfair trade practices. The majority of those deals did not materialize, except for a handful of exceptions. Many issues continue to divide U.S. and Chinese officials, but some export controls instituted by Beijing were lifted after an agreement was inked in late June. On Sunday, Bessent echoed a familiar line from the administration: the insistence that the tariffs Trump was imposing in the absence of formal agreements with foreign governments constituted the 'deals' promised by the White House. 'The president has a reputation, a self-described dealmaker, so why haven't we seen the kind of deals that he promised in the last 90 days?' asked CNN's Dana Bash. "Again, he didn't promise this,' countered Bessent. In reality, it was Trump's trade adviser, Peter Navarro, who set this goal during a Fox Business interview. 'And when we send out the 100 letters to these countries, that will set their tariff rate. So we're going to have 100 done in the next few days,' he continued. Bash responded: 'But that's not a deal. That's a threat.' 'No, that's the level,' said the Treasury secretary. 'That's the deal.' 'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don't move things along, then on August 1st, you will boomerang back to your April 2nd tariff level.' The White House initially announced a slate of 'Liberation Day' tariffs in early April, setting individualized tariff rates for dozens of U.S. trading partners, including some as high as 50 percent. Markets immediately engaged in a sell-off, prompting panic and a reversal by the president. But the end of Trump's 90-day pause is fast approaching, with the official deadline on Wednesday, July 9. So far, administration officials have not indicated that another pause is likely. Administration officials are currently negotiating with the EU, which is among the U.S. trading partners still seeking to avert a massive tariff hike. Before the president was re-elected, the average tariff on goods from the EU imported to the U.S. was just 2 percent. Trump has threatened to mark up tariffs as high as 50 percent. Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Germany's Berenberg bank, said the most likely outcome of the trade talks is that 'the US will agree to deals in which it takes back its worst threats of 'retaliatory' tariffs well beyond 10 percent'. Bessent's support of tariffs was one of several issues that led to his conflict with Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO and former DOGE overlord who joined the administration as a temporary appointee in January. The two argued frequently and even had one physical confrontation, according to news reports, and emerged as sharp personal rivals in addition to being political foes. On Sunday, the Treasury secretary made it clear that there was no love lost between the two men after Musk, who left the administration in May, publicly blew up at the president in a series of Twitter posts about a legislative package Trump had endorsed — the 'big, beautiful bill.' Musk was, and still is, a furious critic of the bill's deficit spending, which is projected to add trillions to the national debt over 10 years, and threatened last week to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. His threats did not work, and it passed with only a few Republicans dissenting. 'The principles of DOGE were very popular. I think, if you looked at the polling, Elon was not,' Bessent told CNN.
