Paul Simon cancels shows due to 'intense' back pain that 'demands immediate attention'
The legendary Simon & Garfunkel singer, 83, shared in a statement on Instagram that he has canceled his performances set for Saturday, June 28, and Sunday, June 29, at Philadelphia's Academy of Music.
"Paul has been struggling with chronic and intense back pain," the statement said. "Today it became unmanageable and demands immediate attention. Unfortunately we have to cancel these shows at this time, as we don't have the ability to reschedule them."
Simon's announcement said that he will undergo a "minor surgical procedure" in the next few days but that he is "hopeful" he will be able to complete his tour and make up the Philadelphia shows. Refunds for the performances are available at the point of purchase.
The "Bridge Over Troubled Water" hitmaker is currently in the middle of his A Quiet Celebration tour. He completed a farewell tour in 2018 but announced his return in February, fresh off an appearance on the 50th anniversary special of "Saturday Night Live" with Sabrina Carpenter.
Paul Simon returns to touring after 7-year hiatus and 2018 retirement
According to his February tour announcement, Simon, "who has been dealing with severe hearing loss," chose "intimate venues with optimal acoustics" for the shows, which began in New Orleans in April and will conclude in August in Seattle, Washington.
Paul Simon, graceful poet and musical genius, gets his documentary due 'In Restless Dreams'
In a June appearance on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," the 16-time Grammy winner explained he previously "didn't think it was possible for me to be able to perform again with other musicians" due to his hearing loss.
Simon is next scheduled to perform in Long Beach, California, on July 7, according to his website. He then has more shows scheduled throughout July in California before he's off to Vancouver and Seattle.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
3 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Travis Kelce Said His Reading Difficulties Made Hosting SNL Hard
Sure, dating Taylor Swift has certainly boosted Travis Kelce's global popularity outside of the sporting world. But it's fair to say he was already pretty famous before they crossed paths — famous enough, in fact, to host Saturday Night Live. Yep, in March 2023, shortly after winning his second Super Bowl, the Kansas City Chiefs tight end followed in the footsteps of many Hollywood stars before him and made his hosting debut on SNL. Joined by Kelsea Ballerini as the episode's musical guest, Travis's turn on the sketch show was met with tons of praise, with viewers hailing him as a natural on the SNL stage. One glowing review from the Guardian said at the time that he massively 'exceeded expectations' and '[knocked] it out of the park' as a comedic performer — not too shabby! You can watch his opening monologue here. Honestly, it still holds up! And so, some two-and-a-bit years later, it turns out that Travis found certain aspects of the experience quite challenging, not that we'd have been able to tell. Speaking on the July 1 episode of the Bussin' With the Boys podcast, Travis reflected on his 'crazy ride' hosting SNL and admitted that he found the table read with the entire cast super challenging as 'a guy that can't really read that well.' 'It was kind of a fucked situation,' he recalled. 'I felt like I was just trying to get through the reading instead of actually, like, acting it out and giving it a voice and giving it a character and things like that. Like, I was just focused on, 'Don't fucking skip this line.'' Describing himself as someone who's 'more of an audio guy,' he said the table read 'was the hardest fucking part' of the entire process. If you've watched SNL for a long time, you'll know that sports stars don't always make the best hosts. With that in mind, Travis said he was eager to impress, especially given that he felt surprisingly 'comfortable' taking on all the comedy and 'silly stuff.' 'There was still a sense of, I need to be a professional here,' he said, looking back. 'I wanna have fun doing it, but I don't wanna look like a loser doing this. I wanna make them respect my approach and how I'm taking it serious.' 'It was just a fun rollercoaster,' he went on. 'You're there all week, fucking up to 2, 3 in the morning every day just trying to knock stuff out, do some of the prerecorded stuff. That was insane. That was a crazy ride. That was fun.' Honestly, I think it's about time they invited him back to host again. Lorne Michaels, if you're reading this…
Los Angeles Times
7 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
What trans people need now
There's a scene toward the end of 'Will and Harper' that I can't get out of my head. I'm referring to the 2024 road-trip documentary where Will Ferrell is reintroduced to his old 'Saturday Night Live' buddy Harper Steele as a trans woman. The two zigzag through several red states, as Ferrell, star of 'Anchor Man,' 'Talladega Nights' and 'Elf,' is his quirky self, posing awkward questions ('How are your boobs?'), donning cartoonish disguises and pulling a series of public stunts, some of which backfire. The goofiness comes to a halt when Harper drives them to Trona, Calif., a tiny town in the Mojave Desert, southwest of Death Valley. She pulls up to a dilapidated house with boarded-up windows on a small dirt plot — sad to even look at. She bought the place six or seven years before, wanting to get away from the world after another holiday season of uncertainty, regret and suicidal thoughts. 'I just hated myself so much,' she says, and breaks down crying. ' I just felt like a monster.' She brings him inside. The house has been vandalized; there's broken furniture, walls full of graffiti, a bare mattress stained and smeared with who knows what. They step out on a small balcony overlooking an empty street with telegraph poles, the desert horizon in the distance. 'I was going to be a woman here,' Harper tells Will. 'That was the plan. … I was just gonna close the curtains and walk around this house and it was a safe space.' That's pretty desolate: an Emmy-winning comedy writer and producer, willing to forfeit everything, just to be a woman residing alone in the middle of nowhere. But the most desolate thing in the scene is Will Ferrell's face, stricken with pathos. He has shifted from curiosity to certainty. Trans identity is real. He gets it. Transgender and cisgender people are the same in this way: We'd sooner die than live outside of our gender. The difference is that cis people don't have to face that predicament, while every trans person has. Earlier this century, mainstream America started to catch on to the same thing about gay people: They're real. They were born this way. Homosexuality isn't a disease that straight people were going to catch. It took decades of LGBT organizing and fighting and (way too much) dying to get to that place. It also required a majority of straight Americans to perceive that gay identities are as real as theirs, to pave the way for marriage equality. Transgender children are equally real, though conservative politicians and Christian nationalist groups have campaigned furiously to convince us otherwise. To be sure, many children go through phases of experimenting with gender expression. The way parents know one of their children is trans is by observing if their urge to transition is consistent, insistent and persistent. Consistent means you watch, insistent means you listen and persistent means you stay patient. These three things will make it quite obvious. There's one other thing. All parents of trans children experience a moment similar to Ferrell's in the desert: They witness a person whose life is on the line, a person they must protect. Red state lawmakers, who know nothing about medicine, want us to think 'do no harm' means stripping trans kids of medical care, lest they make 'permanent' decisions before they're adults. Parents of trans children, and every major American medical organization, know that 'do no harm' means preventing the catastrophe of undergoing puberty in the wrong gender. They also want to prevent suicide, and the nightmare of being forced to live in exile from your identity, which is a living death. Even Ron Burgundy, the Anchor Man, knows that. The Supreme Court Skrmetti decision handed down June 18, upholding a Tennessee law banning healthcare for trans minors, was as contorted as it was predictable. The justices had one thing to decide: Did a law explicitly targeting trans people deserve the heightened scrutiny applied to laws discriminating against protected groups or on the basis of sex? Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the conservative majority, argued that the Tennessee law doesn't 'exclude any individual from medical treatments on the basis of transgender status but rather removes … gender dysphoria, gender identity disorder, and gender incongruence from the range of treatable conditions.' This is like saying we're not targeting diabetics, just removing their insulin. Cisgender kids in Tennessee, however, can still receive hormones and puberty blockers because 'the state has an interest in encouraging minors to appreciate their sex.' Justice Amy Coney Barrett, for good measure, claimed that transgender people don't qualify as a protected group because a) we're too hard to 'define,' and b) we don't suffer from a history of legal discrimination. The Skrmetti decision will go down as discriminatory, deadly and patently false in its claims. After the Trump administration declared trans people nonexistent (then went about trying to eradicate what doesn't exist), the court now sets a precedent and a permission structure for states to do whatever they want to us. In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor effortlessly defined transgender people as a group, then pointed to 'a lengthy history of … cross-dressing bans, police brutality, and anti-sodomy laws' that have criminalized trans people dating back to 1843. 'Those searching for more evidence of de jure discrimination against transgender individuals,' she added, 'need look no further than the present. The Federal Government, for example, has started expelling transgender servicemembers from the military and threatening to withdraw funding from schools and nonprofits that espouse support for transgender individuals.' Under New York state law I could have been arrested for cross-dressing in the 1980s, and instantly have lost my job as a public school teacher. A generation earlier, in San Francisco's Tenderloin district, police often walked into Gene Compton's cafeteria, a gathering place for neighborhood trans women, and randomly arrested customers for 'female impersonation.' Amanda St. Jaymes was one of them. She described repeated arrests, being stripped and locked up for refusing to let them shave her head. 'One girl [spent] 60 days in the hole because she wouldn't let them cut her hair. That's how important it was to us back then.' In 'Screaming Queens: The Riot at Compton's Cafeteria' (another movie worth watching), historian Susan Stryker chronicles, through firsthand accounts, 'the first known instance of collective militant queer resistance to police harassment in United States history.' It started with a police raid on a hot August night in 1966 (three years before Stonewall). When one of the cops grabbed one of the queens, she flung coffee in his face, and a riot erupted. Tables were turned over, people threw everything in sight, plate glass windows were smashed. They kicked and punched and beat the police with their heavy purses. 'The cops retreated outside to call for backup. But cafeteria customers, maybe sixty in all, poured into the streets through the broken doors and windows and kept fighting' — in fearless feminine wrath. 'There was a lot of joy after it happened,' said St. Jaymes. 'A lot of [us] went to jail, but there was a lot of 'I really don't give a damn. This is what needs to happen.'' The Compton's riot demonstrates that transgender identity was as real 60 years ago — before we even had the word 'transgender' — as it is now. 'I just ask you as my friends to stand up for me,' Harper Steele wrote in her coming out letter. I make that same appeal here, and I thank everyone who is standing up for trans people, as well as those who one day will. We're real. We need you. Diana Goetsch is a poet, essayist and journalist and the author of the memoir, 'This Body I Wore.'
New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
Travis Kelce says hosting ‘SNL' was hard since he can't ‘read that well': ‘F–ked situation'
This is why we can't have nice things. Travis Kelce admitted that hosting 'Saturday Night Live!' was a no small feat because admittedly, he 'can't really read that well.' 'The table read was the hardest f–king part,' the Kansas City Chiefs tight end, 35, said on the 'Bussin' With The Boys' podcast on Tuesday. 4 Travis Kelce hosted 'Saturday Night Live' on March 4, 2023. Will Heath/NBC via Getty Images A 'SNL' table read is when the writers, cast and host gather to read through potential sketches for an upcoming episode of the long-running late-night comedy sketch show. The 3-time Super Bowl champ claimed he loved being 'pitched ideas' by the writers, but felt a large amount of pressure not to mess up before cameras even started rolling at 30 Rock. 'I felt like I was just trying to get through the reading instead of actually acting it out and giving it a voice and giving it a character and things like that,' Kelce said. 'Like, I was just focused on, 'Don't f–king skip this line.'' Kelce joked that cold-reading scripts during the table read was 'kind of a f–ked situation' and called himself 'more of an audio guy.' The NFL star made his hosting debut on the show in March 2023. 4 Kelce admitted 'the table read was the hardest f–king part' of hosting the popular show. Will Heath/NBC via Getty Images 4 Kelce made a surprise appearance on the Season 49 premiere of 'SNL' to joke about how the NFL kept focusing on his relationship with Taylor Swift. GC Images Months later, he made a surprise cameo appearance in a skit during Season 49's premiere in October 2023 and joked about the NFL's obsession with him and his girlfriend, Taylor Swift. At the time, his relationship with the 14-time Grammy winner was very new. Kelce didn't plan on being part of the show that night but the writers were able to squeeze him into the sketch last-minute when he and the 'Blank Space' singer appeared backstage. 4 Kelce admitted that he felt pressure when he first read scripts in front of the 'SNL' team. Rosalind O'Connor/NBC via Getty Images 'We showed up to 'SNL' having the idea of supporting Ice Spice, her and Taylor are good friends,' Kelce shared on his 'New Heights' podcast days later. 'I've always wanted to meet Pete Davidson, been a fan of his since he was actually on 'SNL.'' The athlete added that he didn't 'even remember' what he said because he 'blacked out' from excitement. Kelce already boasts several TV credits, including the 2024 TV series 'Grotesquerie.' He will make a cameo in Adam Sandler's highly anticipated 'Happy Gilmore 2' movie. The comedy is set to be released on Netflix on July 25.
