logo
Why U.S. military power is trapped in a loop of its own making

Why U.S. military power is trapped in a loop of its own making

India Today21-07-2025
They say history repeats itself — but in America's case, it sometimes refuses to end. From the trenches of Europe to the deserts of the Middle East, the United States has fought, and continues to fight, wars that blur the lines between defence and domination, justice and justification. A century after entering the First World War, American troops are still deployed in more than 80 countries. Some conflicts fade from the headlines — yet they never truly end.advertisement This is the story of America's forever wars — open-ended military operations with no clear victory, no fixed timeline, and too often, no meaningful public debate.
From World War to World PoliceThe United States entered World War to 'make the world safe for democracy'. The century that followed tested that promise repeatedly. In the post-1945 world, America fought in Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Panama, and beyond. Since 1945, the U.S. has used military force in over 100 foreign interventions — with wildly varying justifications.Some wars lasted weeks. Others spanned decades. The Korean War never ended — it merely paused with an armistice in 1953. U.S. troops are still stationed on the Korean peninsula, 70 years on. The Vietnam War left nearly 60,000 Americans and over 2 million Vietnamese dead, ending in scenes of chaos rather than triumph.War Without EndThe Cold War may have ended in the 1990s, but the interventions did not. In 1989, the U.S. invaded Panama. In 1991, it launched Operation Desert Storm in Iraq. In 1993, American forces intervened in Somalia. In 1999, they bombed Yugoslavia. And then came the so-called War on Terror.After the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003. The justifications varied — from dismantling al-Qaeda to eliminating Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction. But those WMDs were never found. Instead, war became a permanent fixture of U.S. foreign policy.Afghanistan became America's longest war — 20 years, 2,400 U.S. soldiers killed, and over 170,000 Afghan lives lost. Even after the death of Osama bin Laden in 2011, the war continued for another decade. In Iraq, over 4,500 U.S. troops died, alongside up to 500,000 Iraqis. The power vacuum after Saddam's fall enabled the rise of ISIS.In Syria, U.S. forces have operated since 2015 with no formal declaration of war. In Yemen, the U.S. has supported the Saudi-led coalition, supplying weapons and intelligence despite mounting civilian casualties and a deepening humanitarian crisis.The Machinery of Perpetual WarWhy can't America stop fighting?advertisementCritics point to a blend of policy, politics, and profit. A crucial legal mechanism is the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) — passed in 2001, just days after 9/11. It has since been used by successive presidents to launch operations in 19 countries, bypassing Congress and public scrutiny. There is no geographic limit, no expiry date, no oversight. In effect, it's a blank cheque for war.The numbers are staggering. Since 2001, the U.S. has spent over $8 trillion on its post-9/11 wars — including $2.3 trillion in Afghanistan and $1.9 trillion in Iraq and Syria. According to Brown University's Costs of War project, over 929,000 people have been killed in these wars, and more than 38 million have been displaced.These aren't just financial or statistical costs. They are human tragedies.The Invisible War at HomeBut the impact isn't limited to foreign battlefields. The domestic consequences of perpetual war are profound. War, once a national emergency, has become background noise. There's no draft. No war tax. No shared burden. A small volunteer military fights overseas, while the rest of the country scrolls past the headlines.Meanwhile, the Pentagon's budget keeps growing — topping $860 billion in 2024, more than the next 10 countries combined. Much of this money flows to private defence contractors like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing — the backbone of the military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower famously warned about in 1961.advertisementThe logic of these forever wars is circular: instability demands presence; presence breeds backlash; backlash justifies further presence. The treadmill keeps turning — and stepping off seems politically impossible.Redefining the ThreatSince the early 2000s, the targets have changed — from al-Qaeda to ISIS, from terrorists to great power rivals. Today, U.S. troops conduct drone operations and low-intensity combat missions in Africa, while shifting strategic focus toward Russia and China. The War on Terror may be fading, but the Forever War architecture remains firmly intact.Even more alarming, the tools of war have seeped into American civil life. To combat terrorism, Washington expanded surveillance, militarised policing, justified torture, and operated secret prisons. Civil liberties eroded, often with bipartisan support — and the public barely noticed.The Question No One Wants to AnswerThe media moves on. Congress rarely intervenes. And presidents, regardless of party, continue the mission. War is rebranded, relocated, resold — but not retired.In 2021, President Biden withdrew U.S. forces from Afghanistan. The chaotic exit dominated headlines. But even as troops left Kabul, they redeployed elsewhere. The war machine, critics argue, never stopped — it merely reshuffled.advertisementSo how do these wars end?Veterans, whistleblowers, and peace activists argue that endless war erodes democracy and weakens global stability. They point to the psychological toll on soldiers, the rise of authoritarian policies, and the blowback that breeds new enemies faster than old ones are defeated.Their warning is clear: if war becomes the default state, democracy becomes an illusion. If conflict becomes identity, then peace becomes impossible.In the end, America's forever wars pose a fundamental question: What does the United States gain by fighting endlessly? And what does the world lose when it cannot stop?Until those questions are seriously addressed — not just by policymakers but by citizens — the cycle will continue. The headlines may fade. But the bombs will fall. The costs will mount. And the war will go on.- Ends
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House releases roadmap to make US the ‘crypto capital of the world'
White House releases roadmap to make US the ‘crypto capital of the world'

India Today

time13 minutes ago

  • India Today

White House releases roadmap to make US the ‘crypto capital of the world'

The White House unveiled sweeping recommendations from the President's Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, outlining an ambitious strategy to solidify the United States' leadership in blockchain and digital financial report stems from Executive Order 14178, signed by President Trump earlier this year, which directed federal agencies to align policy, regulation, and innovation with his pledge to make America the 'crypto capital of the world.'advertisement'By implementing these recommendations, policymakers can ensure that the United States leads the blockchain revolution and ushers in the Golden Age of Crypto,' the Working Group said in its report. The group — composed of officials across federal regulatory agencies — recommends a mix of legislative and executive actions, including clarity on regulatory oversight, expanded crypto banking access, a robust framework for stablecoins, and modernized tax and anti-money laundering RECOMMENDATIONS:1. Regulatory Clarity and InnovationThe Working Group calls on Congress to act on bipartisan momentum behind the CLARITY Act by granting the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) the authority to oversee non-security digital asset spot markets. It also urges regulators to embrace DeFi and allow new financial products through tools like safe harbors and regulatory sandboxes.'A fit-for-purpose market structure framework is essential to support growth and innovation,' the report states.2. Crypto-Friendly Banking ReformsAfter ending "Operation Choke Point 2.0," the Trump administration now wants clear banking rules for custody, stablecoin issuance, and blockchain use. The group stresses aligning capital requirements with real risks, not just the 'fact of their presence on a distributed ledger.'3. The GENIUS Act and StablecoinsWith the recent signing of the GENIUS Act, America has enacted its first federal stablecoin framework. The group calls for swift implementation and proposes the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which would codify Trump's executive order banning Central Bank Digital Currencies.'The widespread adoption of dollar-backed stablecoins will modernize payments infrastructure,' the report adds.4. Combating Illicit Finance Without OverreachThe group seeks modern AML rules that protect national security without infringing on self-custody rights or targeting law-abiding citizens.5. Digital Asset Tax ReformsThe IRS and Treasury are advised to reduce red tape, clarify rules around mining, staking, and de minimis receipts, and adjust tax codes to treat digital assets as a distinct asset class — subject to modified securities and commodity rules.- EndsMust Watch

'I'm proud to say no Hindu can ever be a terrorist': Amit Shah in Rajya Sabha
'I'm proud to say no Hindu can ever be a terrorist': Amit Shah in Rajya Sabha

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'I'm proud to say no Hindu can ever be a terrorist': Amit Shah in Rajya Sabha

NEW DELHI: "I am proud to say, no Hindu can ever be a terrorist," Union home minister Amit Shah declared in Rajya Sabha on Wednesday, hitting out at Congress for manufacturing the thesis of "saffron terror" to malign majority community as part of its politics of appeasement. "They tried to give terrorism a religious colour for the sake of votes - but people of India rejected that falsehood," he said. Shah recalled the effort in some quarters to blame Hindutva outfits for the 26/11 terror attacks that Lashkar-e-Taiba carried out in Mumbai, and said Congress neta Digvijaya Singh was among those who fanned it. tnn 'Afzal Guru couldn't be hanged as long as PC was home mantri' Home minister Amit Shah recalled the effort in some quarters to blame Hindutva outfits for the 26/11 terror attacks that Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) carried out. "All this was done for political gain. Innocent people were jailed, tortured and defamed - not in pursuit of justice but to build a story that served electoral purposes," Shah said, without naming names. Significantly, his attack came on the eve of a court judgment in the Malegaon terror blasts case - the first case allegedly involving members of Abhinav Bharat, supposedly an extremist Hindutva outfit. On Tuesday, PM Narendra Modi in Lok Sabha had also attacked Congress for talking on Hindutva terror even as "Pakistan-backed terror organisations like the LeT were carrying out bomb attacks in different parts" during its regimes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo In a leaked diplomatic cable, a neta can be heard saying that he was more concerned about "Hindu terror", Modi had said, in what was seen as a reference to the Wikileaks disclosure of a purported conversation between a US diplomat and Rahul Gandhi, then a Congress MP. Participating in the special discussion on Operation Sindoor and Operation Mahadev, Shah accused Congress of enabling terrorism through decades of "appeasement politics" and weakening India's internal security. "The only reason terrorism spread in this country was because of your (Congress) vote-bank calculations," he said. He also said death sentence for Afzal Guru, who was convicted for the terror attack on Parliament, could not be carried out for long as P Chidambaram was home minister. On J&K, Shah said terrorism was now at its lowest point. "There was a time when Pakistan didn't even need to send terrorists. Our own youth were being radicalised. But in the last six months, not a single Kashmiri youth has picked up a gun. All those being eliminated now are Pakistanis," he said. "In the last six months, terrorist groups have not been able to enlist a single local youth," said Shah, who emphasised that the last elections in J&K were the fairest the it has seen. "Elections in J&K were routinely rigged. One senior security officer told me that his main job during the polls was not to ensure safety but to stuff ballots," he said, adding that faith in the fairness has led to a huge turnaround in sentiment. "There was not a single village where processions were not taken out against the killings of tourists at Pahalgam," he said. On Pakistan, he reiterated, "There will be no dialogue until terrorism ends. We stopped only after they pleaded for a ceasefire - when they were on their knees."

Will remain in that fight: Kamala Harris opts out of California governor bid
Will remain in that fight: Kamala Harris opts out of California governor bid

India Today

time28 minutes ago

  • India Today

Will remain in that fight: Kamala Harris opts out of California governor bid

Former US Vice President Kamala Harris announced she will not enter the 2026 California gubernatorial race, ending months of speculation about a potential return to state politics.'I love this state, its people, and its promise,' Harris wrote in a statement posted on X. 'But after deep reflection, I've decided that I will not run for Governor in this election.'Harris, who served as California's Attorney General and US Senator before becoming Vice President, said the decision was guided by her belief in public service but also a recognition that the current political landscape demands new That closes the door, at least for now, on what could've been a high - profile return to state politics. However, Harris made clear she isn't stepping away from politics has kept a relatively low profile since losing the presidential election to Republican Donald Trump in 2024. California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who has held the post since 2019, cannot run for re-election due to term limits. Kamala Harris' statement on the California governor's race. (Photo: X) 'For now, my leadership -- and public service -- will not be in elected office,' she wrote. 'I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans.'What those plans look like remains to be seen. But Harris signalled she's thinking beyond traditional political paths. 'We must be willing to pursue change through new methods and fresh thinking,' she wrote, 'committed to our same values and principles, but not bound by the same playbook.'She also offered a thinly veiled critique of the current state of politics: 'We must recognise that our politics, our government, and our institutions have too often failed the American people, culminating in this moment of crisis,' she said. 'As we look ahead, we must be willing to pursue change through new methods and fresh thinking.'"In the United States of America, power must lie with the people. And We, the People must use our power to fight for freedom, opportunity, fairness, and the dignity of all. I will remain in that fight, Harris concluded.- EndsWith inputs from AgenciesTrending Reel

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store