Melania Trump Faces Criticism For Social Media Post On Texas Floods
My heart goes out to the parents in Texas during this difficult time. I am holding you in my thoughts and sending prayers for strength, comfort, and resilience.
— First Lady Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) July 5, 2025
Also Read | Trump's MAGA Ally Laura Loomer Predicts These 3 Americans Will Join Musk's New Party
"My heart goes out to the parents in Texas during this difficult time. I am holding you in my thoughts and sending prayers for strength, comfort, and resilience," Melania said in the post on X on Saturday.
Many users criticised Melania's post for being inadequate, given the severity of the situation. Some pointed out that the Trump administration had previously cut funding for disaster response and forecasting, which may have contributed to the tragedy.
Several critics highlighted that the Trump administration had impacted critical disaster response and forecasting budgets, which could have saved lives. Previously, at least five former National Weather Service directors had warned that such cuts would lead to fatalities.
Joaquin Castro, a Democratic congressman from Texas, told CNN that fewer personnel at the weather service could be dangerous. "When you have flash flooding, there's a risk that if you don't have the personnel... to do that analysis, do the predictions in the best way, it could lead to tragedy," Castro said.
Social media users expressed their disappointment and frustration with Melania's response, with some asking her to apologise for the administration's role in the tragedy.
One user wrote, "They've already seen the vids of you dancing on the balcony while their children were dying."
"Prayers don't rebuild homes. Empathy doesn't restore what your husband stripped away. While Texas suffers, you offer thoughts-after your government cut disaster aid and silenced response teams. We see through the performance. Vanta never forgets," another user wrote.
"Your heart goes out but where were your voices when policies tore families apart? Thoughts and prayers don't fix systems Action does," a third user wrote.
Texas floods
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was activated on Sunday. They have been deploying resources to first responders in Texas after President Donald Trump issued a major disaster declaration, the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement. United States Coast Guard helicopters and planes are helping the search and rescue efforts, DHS said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ‘frank' talks with Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Kuala Lumpur
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he expressed the United States' frustration that more progress has not been made on ending the war in Ukraine in a meeting on Thursday with Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov. 'It was a frank conversation. It was an important one,' Rubio said his 50-minute talks with the Russian foreign minister on the sidelines of the ASEAN foreign ministers' meeting in Malaysia. He said he expressed to Lavrov what US. President Donald Trump has said publicly, 'that there's not been more flexibility on the Russian side to bring about an end to this conflict.' The envoys' second in-person meeting came amid intensified Russian attacks in Ukraine. Trump has grown increasingly – and publicly – frustrated with Russian President Vladimir Putin as the war drags on. Rubio said he and Lavrov shared some ideas, including 'a new or a different approach' from the Russian side, which he would relay to Trump upon his return. 'We need to see a roadmap moving forward about how this conflict can conclude,' Rubio said. Russian drones and missiles bore down on the Ukrainian capital early on Thursday, as escalating Russian attacks have strained Ukrainian air defences, forcing thousands into bomb shelters overnight. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Russia had launched 18 missiles and around 400 drones in an attack that primarily targeted the capital Kyiv. There was no comment from Moscow, which the previous night launched a record 728 drones at its smaller neighbour. Trump returned to power this year promising a swift end to the war, which began in 2022, and had been more conciliatory toward Moscow than his predecessor Joe Biden, who backed Kyiv staunchly. But on Tuesday, a day after ordering a resumption of deliveries of U.S. defensive weapons to Ukraine, he was unusually critical, saying Putin's statements on moving towards peace were 'meaningless.' Trump has also said he is considering supporting a bill that would impose steep sanctions on Russia, including 500% tariffs on nations that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium or other exports. Rubio said the Trump administration has been engaging with the U.S. Senate on that bill. Rubio spoke with Lavrov in Kuala Lumpur on Thursday evening, having already met with the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations in his first trip to Asia since taking office. The two diplomats first met in Saudi Arabia in February as part of Trump's effort to re-establish relations and help negotiate an end to the war. The counterparts also spoke by phone in May and June. The Kremlin said on Wednesday it was relaxed about Trump's criticism and would keep trying to fix 'broken' relations with Washington. At a conference of Ukraine-friendly nations in Rome on Wednesday, Trump's Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg met with Zelenskiy.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump targets Harvard again, threatens to strip accreditation over civil rights allegations
Harvard University in Cambridge (Pic credit: AP) The Trump administration has turned its gaze once more toward Harvard University, not with dialogue or policy debate, but with subpoenas, threats, and the specter of accreditation loss. What began as a political disagreement over curriculum and campus governance has now escalated into a full-blown assault on institutional autonomy. The latest move, declaring that Harvard may no longer meet federal accreditation standards, marks a chilling milestone in a war where ideology, not law, appears to dictate the rules. At the heart of the controversy is the allegation that Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by failing to protect Jewish and Israeli students. While all claims of discrimination must be taken seriously, it is impossible to ignore the broader pattern: funding cuts, blocked admissions of international students, and a growing effort to subordinate higher education institutions to political whims. What is happening at Harvard is not merely a legal battle. It is a trial of ideas, fought in the shadows of subpoenas and administrative maneuvers, with profound consequences for academic freedom across the United States. Accreditation becomes a weapon Until recently, accreditation was viewed as a system of checks and balances that safeguarded academic integrity. Today, it is being transformed into a tool of executive pressure. The Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services have formally urged Harvard's accreditor, the New England Commission of Higher Education, to investigate the university for non-compliance. This, despite the fact that Harvard is not scheduled for comprehensive review until 2027. Such pressure sets a dangerous precedent. Although the accreditor is technically independent and cannot be ordered to revoke accreditation, the signal from Washington is unmistakable. This is no longer a process to ensure academic quality. It is a warning shot to any institution that dares to defy the administration's line. Targeting international students: A calculated blow Perhaps the most consequential aspect of the administration's campaign is its threat to revoke Harvard's ability to admit international students. The Department of Homeland Security has stated that it will issue subpoenas related to the "criminality and misconduct" of student visa holders on campus. No specifics have been offered, but the damage is already done. Harvard's international students make up nearly 27 percent of its population. The financial and intellectual contribution they bring is irreplaceable. This threat, if executed, would not only cripple Harvard's global stature, but would also signal to the world that the United States no longer welcomes international scholars unless they conform to the prevailing political order. This is not a matter of national security. It is ideological warfare disguised as regulatory oversight. First amendment at risk or political smoke? Harvard has argued that the administration's actions are retaliatory, a response to the university's refusal to yield control over its curriculum and admissions processes. It claims this is a direct infringement of its First Amendment rights. Whether one believes that this is purely about free speech or not, the pattern remains unmistakable. This is about power. The power to control what is taught, who gets to teach it, and who is allowed to learn. It is an attack not just on Harvard, but on the autonomy of any institution that does not toe the government line. If the government can freeze $2.5 billion in grants, challenge accreditation status, and intimidate a university into compliance through visa threats, then the separation between state and campus is all but gone. A warning to the academic world Harvard may be the target today, but the implications are far wider. If one of the wealthiest and most globally recognized institutions in the world can be politically cornered and publicly humiliated, then what protections exist for smaller, less resourced universities? What happens when public universities with fewer legal defenses face similar scrutiny? This is not governance. This is a performance of power meant to stoke fear and submission. Universities, long heralded as bastions of independent thought and critical inquiry, are being slowly transformed into ideological battlegrounds. Those that resist may find their funding cut, their students harassed, and their legitimacy questioned. The Idea of Harvard and the American Ideal The name Harvard conjures images of scholarly excellence, historical gravitas, and intellectual independence. But now it stands at the center of a storm that threatens the very principles it was built upon. The question is no longer whether Harvard can survive this administration's campaign. The real question is whether American higher education can survive the precedent being set. This is not just about a university. It is about whether a nation still believes in the importance of dissenting ideas, in the independence of its institutions, and in the sacred separation between government and education. If not, then what is happening at Harvard is not the exception. It is the beginning. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Marco Rubio says US and Russia have exchanged new ideas for Ukraine peace talks
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Thursday that the US and Russia have exchanged new ideas for Ukraine peace talks after he met with his Russian counterpart in Malaysia Thursday. "I think it's a new and a different approach," Rubio told reporters after talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. "I wouldn't characterise it as something that guarantees a peace, but it's a concept that, you know, that I'll take back to the president." He didn't elaborate. Rubio added that President Donald Trump has been "disappointed and frustrated that there's not been more flexibility on the Russian side" to bring about an end to the conflict. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Average Cost To Rent A Private Jet May Surprise You (View Prices) Private Jet I Search Ads Learn More Undo "We need to see a roadmap moving forward about how this conflict can conclude. And then we shared some ideas about what that might look like," he said of the 50-minute meeting. "We're going to continue to stay involved where we see opportunities to make a difference." The two men held talks in Kuala Lumpur on the sidelines of the annual Association of Southeast Asian Nations Regional Forum, which brings together 10 ASEAN members and their most important diplomatic partners including Russia, China , Japan, South Korea, European nations and the US. Live Events The meeting was their second encounter since Rubio took office, although they have spoken by phone several times. Their first meeting took place in February in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, as the Trump administration sought to test Russia and Ukraine on their willingness to make peace. Thursday's meeting occurred shortly after the US resumed some shipments of defensive weapons to Ukraine following a pause, ostensibly for the Pentagon to review domestic munitions stocks, that was cheered in Moscow. The resumption comes as Russia fires escalating air attacks on Ukraine and as Trump has become increasingly frustrated with Russian President Vladimir Putin. US diplomatic push could be overshadowed by tariff threats Rubio was also seeing other foreign ministers, including many whose countries face tariffs set to be imposed August 1. Rubio sought to assuage concerns as he held group talks with ASEAN foreign ministers. "The Indo Pacific, the region, remains a focal point of US foreign policy," he told them. "When I hear in the news that perhaps the United States or the world might be distracted by events in other parts of the planet, I would say distraction is impossible, because it is our strong view and the reality that this century and the story of next 50 years will largely be written here in this region." "These are relationships and partnerships that we intend to continue to build on without seeking the approval or the permission of any other actor in the region of the world," Rubio said in an apparent reference to China. Trump notified several countries on Monday and Wednesday that they will face higher tariffs if they don't make trade deals with the US. Among them are eight of ASEAN's 10 members. US State Department officials said tariffs and trade won't be Rubio's focus during the meetings, which Trump's Republican administration hopes will prioritise maritime safety and security in the South China Sea, where China has become increasingly aggressive toward its small neighbours, as well as combating transnational crime. But Rubio may be hard-pressed to avoid the tariff issue that has vexed some of Washington's closest allies and partners in Asia, including Japan and South Korea and most members of ASEAN, which Trump says would face 25 per cent tariffs if there is no deal. Rubio met earlier Thurday with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who has warned global trade is being weaponised to coerce weaker nations. Anwar urged the bloc Wednesday to strengthen regional trade and reduce reliance on external powers. Rubio's "talking points on the China threat will not resonate with officials whose industries are being battered by 30-40 per cent tariffs," said Danny Russel, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute and a former assistant secretary of state for East Asia and the Pacific during the Obama administration. When Anwar said "ASEAN will approach challenges as a united bloc' he wasn't talking about Chinese coercion but about US tariffs," Russel noted. Majority of ASEAN members face major tariff hikes Among ASEAN states, Trump has announced tariffs on almost all of the bloc's 10 members. Trump sent tariff letters to two more ASEAN members Wednesday: Brunei, whose imports would be taxed at 25 per cent, and the Philippines at 20 per cent. Others hit this week include Cambodia at 36 per cent, Indonesia at 32 per cent, Laos at 40 per cent, Malaysia at 25 per cent, Myanmar at 40 per cent and Thailand at 36 per cent. Vietnam recently agreed to a trade deal for a 20 per cent tariffs on its imports, while Singapore still faces a 10 per cent tariff that was imposed in April. The Trump administration has courted most Southeast Asian nations in a bid to blunt or at least temper China's push to dominate the region. In Kuala Lumpur, Rubio also will likely come face-to-face with China's foreign minister during his visit. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is a veteran of such gatherings and "fluent in ASEAN principles and conventions," while Rubio "is a rookie trying to sell an 'America First' message to a deeply skeptical audience," Russel noted. Issues with China remain substantial, including trade, human rights, militarisation of the South China Sea and China's support for Russia in Ukraine. US officials continue to accuse China of resupplying and revamping Russia's military industrial sector, allowing it to produce additional weapons that can be used to attack Ukraine. Earlier on Thursday, Rubio signed a memorandum on civilian nuclear energy with Malaysia's foreign minister, which will pave the way for negotiations on a more formal nuclear cooperation deal, known as a 123 agreement after the section of US law allowing such programmes. Those agreements allow the US government and US companies to work with and invest in civilian energy nuclear programmes in other countries under strict supervision.
