Thailand closes border crossings with Cambodia after landmine blast
A Thai Army statement said five soldiers were wounded when one of them stepped on a land mine in a border area.
The incident drew a swift response from the Thai government with acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai saying the Foreign Ministry would make an official protest to Cambodia and further measures would be considered.
The landmine incident on Wednesday came a week after three other Thai soldiers were wounded after one stepped on a landmine and lost a foot in a different area along the border, which has several small pockets claimed by both countries.
Thai authorities say that the mines were newly laid along paths that by mutual agreement were supposed to be safe.
They said the mines were Russian-made and not of a type employed by Thailand's military.
The army statement called on Cambodia "to take responsibility for this incident, which constitutes a serious threat to peace and stability in the border region between the two countries."
Cambodia rejected the Thai version of the events as "baseless accusations" and denied that it had laid new mines along the border, pointing out that many unexploded mines and other ordnance remain all over the country, a legacy of civil war and unrest that began in 1970 and ended only in 1998.
Since the end of that fighting, nearly 20,000 Cambodians have been killed and about 45,000 injured by leftover war explosives.
Defence Ministry spokesperson Lieutenant General Maly Socheata said the landmine explosion took place on Cambodian territory and charged that Thailand had violated a 2000 agreement "regarding the use of agreed paths for patrols."
Many border checkpoints had already been closed by one side or the other or operated with restrictions after relations between the neighbours deteriorated following an armed confrontation on 28 May in which one Cambodian soldier was killed in one of several small contested patches of land.
Efforts to defuse the situation have been hindered by the nationalist passions that flared in both countries. There is historical enmity between the two nations.
There have been major political consequences in Thailand, with former prime minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra suspended from office last month after making what critics saw as a disparaging comment about her country's military in a phone call to Cambodia's former Prime Minister Hun Sen, who leaked a recording of it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
24 minutes ago
- Euronews
Syria wants Russia 'by our side,' foreign minister says in Moscow
Syria's top diplomat said Damascus wants Moscow "by our side" on the first visit to Russia by a member of the new government since former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was ousted in a rebel offensive late last year. Russian President Vladimir Putin hosted Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani in the Kremlin on Thursday, according to Syrian news agency SANA, a meeting that underlined the Kremlin's desire to establish working ties with the country's new leadership. Before the talks with Putin, al-Shibani met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who emphasised that the Russian authorities "sincerely wish that the Syrian people, with whom we have long-standing friendship, overcome all existing challenges and completely normalise the situation." "The current period is full of various challenges and threats, but it is also an opportunity to build a united and strong Syria," Al-Shibani said. Al-Assad was an ally of Russia and Moscow's scorched-earth intervention in support of him a decade ago turned the tide of Syria's civil war and kept al-Assad in his seat until his swift demise in December. Russia, which has focused on the fighting in Ukraine and kept only a small military contingent in Syria, didn't try to counter the rebel offensive but sheltered al-Assad after he fled the country. Without naming al-Assad, al-Shibani called on Russia to support the country's "transitional justice" process and said Syria has formed a committee to review past agreements with Russia. Despite having been on opposite sides of the battle lines during the civil war, the new rulers in Damascus, headed by interim President Ahmed al-Sharra, have taken a pragmatic approach to relations with Moscow. A Russian delegation visited Damascus in January and the following month Putin had a call with al-Sharaa that the Kremlin described as "constructive and business-like." Russia has retained presence at its air and naval bases on the Syrian coast and the Kremlin has voiced hope for negotiating a deal to keep the outposts. Moscow also has reportedly sent oil shipments to Syria. Syria's Defence Minister Murhaf Abu Qasra accompanied al-Shibani on his visit to Moscow and met his Russian counterpart Andrei Belousov. They discussed "cooperation between defence ministries and the situation in the Middle East," the Russian Defence Ministry said. Speaking to reporters after the talks on Thursday, Lavrov thanked "Syrian colleagues for the steps they're taking to ensure the safety of Russian citizens and Russian facilities" in Syria. "We reaffirmed our support for the preservation of the unity, territorial integrity and independence of the Syrian Arab Republic and are ready to provide the Syrian people with all possible assistance in post-conflict reconstruction. We agreed that we will continue our dialogue on these issues," Lavrov said. Al-Sharaa has thanked Russia for its "strong position in rejecting Israeli strikes and repeated violations of Syrian sovereignty" after Israel intervened in clashes between Syrian government forces and armed groups from the Druze minority earlier this month. Al-Shibani on Thursday criticized Israel's "interference in internal affairs" and said it complicates efforts to resolve conflicts between different communities in Syria.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
'Trump is falling for Putin's flattery'- Russian opposition activist, Kara-Murza
Kara-Murza was sentenced to 25 years in prison in Siberia for "spreading disinformation" about the Russian military, following the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine. He was released in 2024 as part of a prisoner/spy swap negotiated by former US President Biden, former German Chancellor, Olaf Scholz and Vladimir Putin. In an interview with Euronews' The Europe Conversation he laments how Western leaders bought into a "myth" in the early days of Putin's first term in office as president, and before that as Prime Minister. Kara-Murza said Putin was never a modernising force who "believed in reform" of the ways of the Soviet Union. "Nothing could be further from the truth," Kara-Murz told Euronews' Shona Murray. "The myth is that there was some kind of an early Putin, who was supposedly okay, you know, who believed in reform and modernisation and cooperation with the West, and then something went horribly wrong along the way," he said. Kara-Murza said Western governments who talk about the version of an "early" Putin do so for reasons of "self-justification". Kara-Murza said the true nature of Putin's intentions for Russia were clear from the start. He recalled Putin commissioned a statue to celebrate a former KGP operative who was key in the suppression of Hungarians in 1956 who attempted to rise against the Soviet Union's brutal rule in their country. "I remember very well the day I understood exactly who that man was and what direction he would take our country," said Kara-Murza. "On the 20th of December, 1999, this was before he became president, he was still prime minister, he came to Lubyanka Square in Moscow at the former KGB, now FSB headquarters, to officially unveil a memorial plaque to Yuri Andropov, a long time former Soviet KGB chief," Kara-Murza said. Yuri Andropov was also someone instrumental in the 1956 invasion of Hungary, who "prioritised the suppression of domestic dissent when he was chairman of the KGB", claimed Kara-Murza, adding that he was "somebody who embodied everything that was wrong with the communist system". Kara-Murza also warned that Putin is using the same type of flattery with Trump and his administration to dissuade them from acting against his invasion of Ukraine. In March, Putin informed US envoy Steve Witkoff that he personally commissioned a portrait by a Russian a painter as a gift for President Trump. Witkoff described it as a "beautiful painting" and said Putin told him he "prayed' for Trump following the assassination attempt made against him during a campaign rally. "He rightly calculated, Putin did, that the best way to do this with Donald Trump is through personal flattery," said Kara-Murza. "That's exactly what he did with that conversation about praying for him. And also, of course, giving him a painting that Mr. Witkoff brought to Washington," he said. "I mean, look, these are tricks that have been used by Soviet, and not just Soviet security services, for decades," he said, adding: "Incomprehensible to me how serious people can fall for this kind of stuff in the 21st century."
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
'Europe's ability to defend its interests, already questionable, is now seriously in doubt'
The announcement of a deal between the European Union and the United States has shaken up what looked set to be a quiet summer. The official confirmation that Europeans would meekly accept a 15% tariff on their exports to the US is, without doubt, striking. However, beyond the heated debate in France, which is known neither for its subtlety nor its benevolence toward the EU or the US, any definitive judgment seems premature. First of all, what do we actually know? As with all trade agreements from the Trump administration – fond of dramatic announcements – we can, for now, only rely on the words of the leaders. For details, we must wait for the publication of a jointly approved text, something this administration no longer guarantees. Incidentally, this will likely only be a political agreement on unilateral actions by each partner, not a trade agreement in the strict sense of the term. So it will not be subject to the usual approval and enforcement mechanisms. Scope still to be defined The main element of the agreement is that Europeans will accept 15% tariffs on all of their €532 billion in exports to the US in 2024, relinquishing retaliatory measures that this blatant breach of international law would have allowed them to take. That tariff rate will be the one currently applied, not an increase as in the case of the United Kingdom (+10%). While this may seem modest compared to the average pre-Trump tariff rate of about 3.5%, many sensitive products already faced tariffs between 5% and 15%, especially in the agricultural sector, which lessens the scale of the EU's concessions. Furthermore, vehicles, which have faced 27.5% tariffs since April, would, in practice, see a specific reduction for EU-made products. Exemptions also apply. Under a zero-for-zero framework, the entire aerospace and minerals sectors, as well as "certain" chemical, pharmaceutical, agricultural (including spirits) and semiconductor products would see their tariffs lifted. Depending on the final scope, which remains to be defined, this would affect 10% to 20% of EU exports to the US.
