
When disorder means power: A bloody story of one oil giant
The bloody clashes on the streets of Tripoli clearly show that the country, which has been engulfed in power struggles and turmoil for over decade, is a long way off from achieving unity, stability, and the rule of law despite the UN's efforts to facilitate elections, draft a constitution, and reorganize state structures.
Chaos broke out on the night of May 13, when fighting erupted between various factions linked to the government of western Libya. The conflict was triggered by the assassination of the leader of the Stability Support Apparatus (SSA), Abdelghani al-Kikli, known as 'Ghneiwa.'
Back in 2022, al-Kikli backed the head of the Government of National Unity (GNU), Abdul Hamid Dbeibah, during armed confrontations with the forces of Fathi Bashagha who was appointed prime minister by Libya's eastern-based parliament and attempted to take control over Tripoli. Presumably, Dbeibah's supporters killed al-Kikli at the Tekbali base, the headquarters of the 444th Combat Brigade affiliated with the GNU. Al-Kikli was there for a meeting with other commanders from western Libya. While the details surrounding his death are unknown, reports suggest he was shot at close range in the back of the head.
Al-Kikli was a militia commander in Tripoli, who wielded significant influence over various governmental structures and was affiliated with the Libyan Presidential Council – the country's highest executive authority which carries out the functions of the head of state. Following the outbreak of the civil war in 2014, he adeptly integrated his militia into the security apparatus of the government. The General Electricity Company was under al-Kikli's indirect control and was headed by his protégé Muhammad Al-Mashai. This company operates under the firm grip of armed factions that thwart any attempts to hold a state audit of its operations. Additionally, al-Kikli gained control over the Facilities Security Authority, the only organization authorized to oversee the secure transfer of funds between major banks in Tripoli and the Central Bank of Libya.
In the capital, al-Kikli established an extensive business network spanning commerce, logistics, and retail, and recently sought to extend his influence into the strategically vital oil sector. His group is based in Tripoli's Abu Salim neighborhood, which came under the control of forces linked to the GNU's Ministry of Defense after heavy fighting on May 13. The operation utilized heavy armored vehicles, and Prime Minister Dbeibah hailed it as 'a significant achievement in ensuring security and restoring state authority in the capital,' emphasizing the commitment to unify security forces under one command.
'We will spare no one who continues to engage in corruption or extortion. Our goal is to create a Libya free from militias and corruption,' he said during a televised address.
The clashes that followed al-Kikli's assassination lasted two days, engulfing residential areas in Tripoli. According to the UN, these confrontations were some of the fiercest Tripoli had seen in recent years. Fighting erupted between the 444th Brigade, led by Mahmoud Hamza, who also heads the GNU military intelligence, and the SSA. Another major armed group, the Deterrence Anti-Organized Crime and Terrorism Apparatus (RADA), led by Abdelraouf Kara, intervened after the 444th Brigade attacked areas under its control.
On May 14, a ceasefire was agreed upon, and on May 18, the Presidential Council, acting as the Supreme Commander of the Libyan Armed Forces in collaboration with the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), established a special truce committee.
Shortly thereafter, mass protests erupted in the capital, calling for Dbeibah's resignation. At the same time, demonstrations in Misrata – Dbeibah's hometown – expressed support for him. To suppress the protests in Tripoli, armed groups were deployed and fired live ammunition. As a result, there were civilian casualties. Several GNU ministers resigned in solidarity with the demonstrators.
In the midst of the Eid al-Adha celebrations, clashes reignited in Tripoli between rival factions, though they were quickly quelled by the efforts of the Reconciliation Committee. Simultaneously, fighting erupted in the city of Sabratha in western Libya. While currently the situation in the capital is relatively calm, the threat of renewed violence remains high.
Despite the assassination of its leader, the Stability Support Apparatus (SSA) continues to operate. Dbeibah lacks the authority to disband or restructure the SSA, which was established by a decree of the Presidential Council in 2021. Nevertheless, forces loyal to Dbeibah have seized control of several SSA facilities, including the group's base in Abu Salim. Subsequent video reports revealed ten charred bodies on the premises, while an additional 67 unidentified bodies were discovered in hospital morgues in the vicinity. Reports also surfaced about a burial site at the Tripoli zoo, which had been under SSA control. In light of this, the UN expressed serious concerns regarding security in Tripoli.
Dbeibah has also failed to dissolve RADA, another group formed by the Presidential Council's decree. The head of the council, Mohammed Menfi, issued an order freezing any decisions made by the prime minister regarding the restructuring of security forces or appointments to military or law enforcement positions.
By early June, the politicians reached an agreement, establishing a temporary security and military arrangements committee for Tripoli, headed by Menfi. This committee includes representatives from the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Defense, RADA, and the Western Coast Military Zone.
The recent hostilities stem from a struggle for influence and control over resources, but they also reflect a broader political divide in the country with two opposing centers of power – one based in Tripoli (western Libya) and represented by the Government of National Unity (GNU) and its affiliated armed groups and quasi-governmental forces, and the other based in Benghazi (eastern Libya), and led by the Libyan National Army (LNA) under Khalifa Haftar.
This situation is the result of a protracted crisis that began in 2011 when opposition forces, with direct support from an international coalition primarily comprised of NATO countries, overthrew and killed Libya's longtime leader Muammar Gaddafi, who had ruled the country since 1979.
This sparked a protracted war between various factions. In May 2014, then-Major General Khalifa Haftar launched Operation Dignity from Benghazi, targeting Islamist groups, including cells of the Islamic State.
Haftar took control over Tripoli, where elections for the House of Representatives (HoR) took place. However, by August 2014, Haftar's forces were repelled from the capital, leading to the final bifurcation of power into two parallel structures: the House of Representatives, which relocated to Tobruk in the east, and the General National Congress (GNC), later replaced by the current High Council of State (HCS), established by Islamist groups. Each region established its own cabinet of ministers.
In 2015, negotiations were held in Skhirat, Morocco, under the auspices of the UN; as a result, the parties agreed to sign a ceasefire agreement and establish a Government of National Unity (GNU). However, implementing the Skhirat Agreement proved challenging. Not all parties recognized its legitimacy and soon the hostilities in Libya reignited. Between 2019 and 2020, Khalifa Haftar, backed by Russia, Egypt, the UAE, and several other nations, launched another campaign to seize Tripoli, which also ended in failure.
It was not until October 2020 that a permanent ceasefire was agreed upon in Geneva, again facilitated by the UN. Then, on February 5, 2021, during the Libyan Political Dialogue Forum, representatives reached a consensus to create a temporary Government of National Unity, appointing Dbeibah as its head. At that time, Muhammad Menfi was also chosen to lead the Presidential Council established by the 2015 Skhirat Agreement.
The new authorities were tasked with preparing the country for presidential and parliamentary elections within a year. However, the elections scheduled for December 24, 2021, were postponed indefinitely due to the inability of the House of Representatives in Tobruk and the High Council of State to agree on a legal framework for national voting. Since then, no electoral campaigns have been initiated, despite numerous dialogues between various factions from the east and west of the country.
In September 2021, the House of Representatives in Tobruk expressed a vote of no confidence in Dbeibeh's cabinet, whose mandate had expired after the canceled elections. However, Dbeibeh showed no intention of leaving his post and declared that he would step down only after national elections were held. Subsequently, the Parliament appointed a new government in eastern Libya led by Fathi Bashagha, who unsuccessfully attempted to relocate his cabinet to Tripoli in 2022. Clashes erupted between the supporters of the GNU and those of Bashagha, forcing the latter to back down.
The deep political divide that emerged in Libya following the ousting of Gaddafi has impacted nearly all state institutions. Currently, Libya has two rival governments. The first – Dbeibah's GNU – is based in Tripoli in the west of the country and is recognized by the UN, but not by Libya's parliament. The second, located in Benghazi in the east and headed by Osama Hammad, who replaced Bashagha, is backed by the parliament and Khalifa Haftar.
This division extends beyond the executive and legislative branches; it has also affected the National Oil Corporation (NOC), which remained split between the east and west for years; it reunited only after the establishment of the GNU. Talks held in 2021 in Geneva also resolved the division of the Central Bank. However, key institutions such as the Libyan Audit Bureau and the Administrative Control Authority remain divided, and have offices both in Tripoli and Benghazi.
For over a decade, various factions in both eastern and western Libya have pursued their own agendas, relying heavily on external support. The country has effectively split into two political entities – a military-oriented regime in the east and constantly warring armed groups and tribal factions in the west.
In 2014, General Haftar, a former officer in Gaddafi's army, launched a campaign to rebuild the military under the banner of the Libyan National Army. With backing from the House of Representatives, he was officially appointed commander-in-chief in 2015 and was soon elevated to the rank of marshal by Speaker Aguila Saleh. What began as a force of just over 300 fighters has now grown to more than 120,000 soldiers and officers. A parade in Benghazi on May 26, 2025, demonstrated not only the army's personnel, but also its impressive arsenal of advanced weaponry.
'The army will have the final say at the critical moment,' said Haftar, sending a clear message to his opponents in western Libya.
In light of the general chaos and the armed conflict in Tripoli, Haftar's statement carries particular weight, especially coming from Benghazi, a city that has enjoyed relative stability for many years. The eastern region remains the center of Haftar's political and military influence. His forces have effectively extended control to the southern territories, stretching from Benghazi through Sirte (where the frontline lies) and Jufra in the center of the country, reaching all the way to Libya's southern borders with Sudan, Chad, Niger, and Algeria.
Haftar also maintains influence over the so-called 'oil crescent' along the northeastern coast, home to key oil export terminals like Ras Lanuf, Es Sider, Brega, and Zueitina. It is likely that his forces control several important oil fields in southern Libya, which bolsters his economic and strategic influence. His dominance over most oil-rich regions is supported by a network of ground and air military bases scattered throughout eastern, central, and southern Libya. The most notable of these is the Al Jufra Airbase in central Libya, approximately 600 kilometers southeast of Tripoli, which was used as a launching pad for air operations during the war in Tripoli in 2019.
Although Usama Hamada's government is not recognized internationally, it operates under Haftar's protection and aims to strengthen ties with cities in the east and south through projects initiated by the Libya Development and Reconstruction Fund headed by Haftar's son, Belgasem. As for the House of Representatives, despite the expiration of what the UN considers its 'legitimate' term, it continues to enact laws and collaborates with the High Council of State in Tripoli on laying the groundwork for future elections.
In Tripoli, the Presidential Council, led by Menfi, heads the executive branch following the 2020 Geneva Agreement. But although it is recognized by the international community, it lacks real power in Libya. While, symbolically, the Presidential Council is the supreme commander of the Libyan army, it has no actual control over it. In western Libya, it competes for authority with the Government of National Unity (GNU), which assumes executive and security functions.
Dbeibah remains the key decision-maker regarding budgetary allocations across all sectors and institutions in Libya, even as the House of Representatives and the Central Bank demand to put an end to all funding except for salaries. Dbeibah remains the Minister of Defense but lacks a unified regular army and primarily relies on loyal armed groups, along with support from Türkiye which supplies him with Bayraktar TB2 drones and establishes military bases and training centers based on agreements made with the previous government.
Forces in western Libya have several military bases, including the Al-Watiya Air Base located southwest of Tripoli and the Mitiga Air Base in the capital itself, and maintain shaky control over areas bordering Tunisia, Algeria, and parts of Niger.
Libyans, especially those living in the country's western regions, have grown accustomed to living under the threat of renewed conflict and armed clashes, a reality starkly illustrated by recent events in Tripoli. Despite appearances of stability, the country has remained deeply divided since 2011.
International efforts to resolve the situation in Libya have consistently failed, leading to a growing dissatisfaction with the existing UN structures among the populace. The prolonged absence of consensus suggests that many may be content with the status quo, and are unwilling to change anything. Even if the opposing factions view the current divide as a form of 'consensus,' the strong, influential Libya that existed under Muammar Gaddafi is long gone, and there are no immediate prospects for improvement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
France wants to nuke citizens' holidays to fund a fantasy war with Russia
The day after French President Emmanuel Macron said that, in the year 2027 alone, he would blow another roughly €60 billion on weapons for some fantasy war with Russia that France isn't even in, the French prime minister proposed axing some statutory holidays in an effort to balance the books. Dude just hit a third rail and electrocuted his political career. There are two things the French hold sacred. The first is their sprawling social safety net, which they fund with sky-high taxes and from which they get diminishing returns. And the other is their numerous beloved paid vacation days. Macron's handpicked prime minister, longtime establishment centrist fixture François Bayrou, has chosen to mess with the one thing that unites the nation more than even football: their time off. Why would he want to do that? So the French can work more. So the activity generated can be taxed. Because the government is super broke. Bayrou says that he has to find another €44 billion in the state's couch cushions to keep France's ballooning debt and borrowing costs from setting off more investor panic and bond-dumping. Normally, the government doesn't even touch the budget until September, when legislators return from their sacred summer break, which of course they're not being asked to sacrifice in the interests of austerity. But Bayrou says that he wants to get a head start because the public needs time to digest his 'let's cancel holidays' pitch. Or maybe he just needs a running start at the cliff that he's about to hurl himself off. Because both the anti-establishment right and left will almost certainly vote non on his holiday cuts, possibly triggering a no-confidence vote. Or rather, another one. He's survived eight so far. But with a proposal so ludicrously unpopular, this cat's ninth political life may be about to bite the dust. It's been a year since the last election, so France could legally have another one anytime now. Which would make it three elections in as many years. And it's not like those are free either, by the way. So here he is, Prime Minister Bayrou, waxing all poetic about national sacrifice, while at the same time proposing to axe the Easter Monday state holiday in April, and the one that falls on France's WWII Victory Day on May 8: 'I think this is the last station before the cliff and the crushing by the debt. We must call it by its name. It is a mortal danger for a country,' Bayrou said. Hear that, Frenchies? Accept his proposal or the country gets fatally knifed. No mention of cutting anything else from the budget, huh? Not a whiff of trimming that €170-billion deficit from any of the other more glaring bloated line items? He said that he has zero interest in messing with Macron's new 5% of GDP for NATO defense spending, despite France not actually being in a war. 'We planned to double the budget by 2030, we are actually going to double it by 2027,' Macron had just announced. 'To this end, a review of the military planning law will be presented in the autumn. And I call on the National Assembly to vote on it,' he said. Look, I'm no Inspector Clouseau, but I think I just may have an idea of where they can find a super big line item so they don't have to keep nickel and diming French workers. As one might imagine, this is going over like canned Cheez Whiz with the average French citizen who depends on those clustered April-May-June holidays to build 'bridges' from midweek days off to weekends – or maybe even use them to dig full-blown 'tunnels' under entire work weeks. The government is now asking ordinary people to surrender rest so it can look fiscally responsible without touching bloated defense budgets or elite entitlements. It has decided that its taxpayers' time, and ultimately, their lives are less valuable than its agenda. And what does it say about a country when it kills a peace holiday commemorating the end of a world war to pay for hypothetical ones? France isn't under siege, but its leadership is acting like it is. 'Since 1945, freedom has never been so threatened, and never so seriously,' Macron told French soldiers in a speech around the Bastille Day national holiday. 'To be free in this world, we must be feared. To be feared, we must be powerful,' he said. That fear-based urgency is how power justifies undermining democracy in favor of the authoritarian imposition of unpopular decisions. It took Europe two world wars to understand the value of peace. Now its leaders would rather erase the memory of that understanding than touch their military budgets. When they start talking about 'sacrifice,' it never includes their own entitlements or pensions. That's not sacrifice, it's scapegoating. When they demand it from everyone else but not themselves, it's not real austerity — just theatre. And when leaders govern like the people are the problem, it implies that they've come to see the people as their main opposition. As someone who has long joked about the ridiculous amount of paid holidays the French get, particularly compared to North Americans, I never thought that I'd ever find myself defending them. But the French prime Minister has managed to change my mind. Now, it seems that defending them is a revolutionary act against technocrats treating democracy like an inconvenience when it's time to 'make tough decisions.' It rips the mask off the French state's mantra of 'liberté, égalité, fraternité' and makes inequality glaring, calling their bluff on their 'we're all in this together' narrative. It throws back in the government's face the notion that the problem lies with the citizens and not them. Because nothing says 'budget responsibility' quite like nuking Victory Day, to bankroll wars that it isn't even in, all while acting like the real enemy of the state – at least until Russian President Vladimir Putin gets around to fulfilling their fantasy of rolling up the Champs-Elysées – is your long weekend.


Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Patrice Lumumba's struggle was global, not just African
Patrice Lumumba's fight for justice and freedom went beyond Africa and had a global impact, his daughter Juliana has told RT in an exclusive interview. The former minister of culture of the Democratic Republic of the Congo emphasized that her father's fight became – both for the Soviet Union and for Africa – 'an emblem of the anti-colonial struggle and for ideals, in any case also against neocolonialism.' The strength of that solidarity was made visible through symbolic gestures such as 'the naming of avenues in his honor,' she noted. Lumumba's 'struggle for justice and freedom was not limited to Africa and transcended borders,' she added. While many countries condemned Lumumba's assassination in 1961, 'it was strongest in the Soviet Union,' where the Peoples' Friendship University was named after her father, Juliana Lumumba said. That same university in Moscow 'still bears his name today as Patrice Lumumba University' and has produced many African specialists and numerous African leaders, including in the DC Congo, she noted. According to Lumumba, this reflects a form of 'geopolitical continuity… a solidarity that is present, real, and continues.' Turning to Africa's own future, Juliana Lumumba stressed that 'breaking free from neocolonialism can only be accomplished by unity.' Genuine African solidarity, she said, is being translated into action. 'For example, there's more trade between African countries because we have more trade with each other than with foreigners, European countries or the US,' Lumumba added. 'There's this desire which is becoming stronger and stronger.' Juliana Lumumba previously described her father as a 'truly iconic figure' of African dignity, who 'symbolizes... liberation, the Africa that he wanted to see independent, standing on its own feet, united.' Patrice Lumumba was born in 1925 and died in 1961. He was the first democratically elected prime minister of the DR Congo following its liberation from Belgian colonial rule in 1960. His murder was the result of a complex conspiracy involving both domestic Congolese actors and foreign powers, particularly Belgium. On January 17, 1961, Lumumba and his comrades were shot by Katangese soldiers under the command of Belgian officers and buried at the site of the shooting. The following day, the bodies were dug up, dismembered, and dissolved in acid.


Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
Nelson Mandela: A lifelong struggle for equality and independence
Modern-day South Africa is a true melting pot, home to diverse nationalities. At the forefront of shaping the modern Republic of South Africa was Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, the country's first black president, who dedicated his life to the fight for equality among all people, regardless of race. Mandela not only championed the rights of the indigenous population which had been oppressed throughout the 20th century, he also steered the nation away from a potential civil war. He fought against the oppression of black South Africans under the apartheid government, consistently emphasizing that 'South Africa belongs to all who live in it, black and white.' In global history and politics, few people have had the privilege of being remembered as active peacemakers between warring factions. This is why Mandela continues to be a symbol and moral compass for various ideologically and politically diverse groups and organizations — not just in Africa, but around the world. South Africa boasts one of the most varied demographic landscapes in the world. Its population, which exceeds 60 million, is mostly Black African (over 80%), as well as White, Indian, and mixed race. In addition to the Bantu communities, who form the largest ethnic group, South Africa is home to the Khoisan, Nguni, Tswana, Sotho, Tsonga, and Venda peoples. The white minority primarily consists of Afrikaners – descendants of Dutch and other European settlers (Boers). However, these ethnic groups have not always enjoyed equal rights. For a long time, South Africa's black population endured the oppression of the white minority. In 1910, four British colonies: Cape Colony, Natal, Transvaal, and the Orange Free State, united to form a new nation under British and Afrikaner rule – the Union of South Africa. This self-governing dominion within the British Empire was established after the Anglo-Boer Wars (1899-1902) which were fought between British forces and the Afrikaners for control over South Africa's resources. The Union of South Africa began implementing laws that systematically stripped the native population of its rights. In 1913, the authorities limited land ownership for black South Africans to just 7% of the total territory. By 1923, they had prohibited black individuals from living in urban areas unless they were employed there, and in 1936, they revoked their voting rights. The final 'enslavement' of the indigenous population occurred in 1948 when the National Party, led by Afrikaners, won the elections and officially instituted a policy of racial segregation known as apartheid (the Afrikaans word for 'separateness'). The party's campaign appealed to white voters with slogans encouraging to fight 'the black danger.' Nelson Mandela was born on July 18, 1918, in the village of Mvezo in eastern South Africa. He belonged to the Thembu, a sub-ethnic community of the Xhosa people. His first name, Rolihlahla, translates to 'pulling the branch of a tree' or 'troublemaker.' The name Nelson was given to him by a schoolteacher at a Methodist mission school. Thanks to the guidance of elders, Mandela absorbed both Western education and the traditions of his people. Mandela was a member of a ruling clan dynasty, and his background influenced his political approach. His political philosophy combined traditional values with modern governance principles. He referred to the legacy of the Xhosa as 'democracy in its purest form.' In 1939, Mandela was admitted to the University of Fort Hare — the only institution of higher learning open to black and mixed-race individuals at the time. Two years later, he moved to Johannesburg, a city known for its gold mines, where he began working at a law firm. There, he witnessed the brutal inequalities that black South Africans faced daily. Describing the average citizen, Mandela wrote: 'His life is circumscribed by racist laws and regulations that cripple his growth, dim his potential, and stunt his life.' 'Colored people' were forcibly relocated to overcrowded areas to free up major cities for white residents. Freedom of movement was also restricted; Black South Africans were required to carry passbooks to travel outside the designated territories, known as bantustans. Failing to present the document upon request could lead to arrest and imprisonment. 'I cannot pinpoint a moment when I became politicized, when I knew that I would spend my life in the liberation struggle. To be an African in South Africa means that one is politicized from the moment of one's birth, whether one acknowledges it or not,' Mandela wrote in his autobiography. In 1944, he joined the African National Congress (ANC), the oldest political organization representing indigenous people, founded in 1912. Throughout the 20th century, the ANC advocated for equal rights for all South Africans and fought against racial segregation. Within the ANC, Mandela and his comrades: Oliver Tambo, Walter Sisulu, Anton Lembede, and Ashby Peter Mda, established the Youth League, whose manifesto called for equality among all racial groups and land redistribution. Nelson Mandela's views were initially influenced by Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy of nonviolent resistance. In 1952, he became one of the founders of the Defiance Campaign, which organized peaceful demonstrations against the racist laws enacted by the National Party. During this campaign, over 8,000 individuals were arrested for peacefully defying apartheid laws — for example, by entering 'white only' territories. By the 1950s, Mandela's political activism had attracted increased attention from the authorities. Police prohibited him from speaking publicly, and restricted his movement across the country. Meanwhile, the government continued to limit the rights of citizens based on race. The Bantu Education Act of 1953 established a separate and inferior education system for black South Africans, aimed at preparing them for roles as laborers and servants. The curriculum was intentionally restrictive, and the funding was minimal — in the 1970s, the government spent 644 rand per white student compared to just 42 rand per black student. One of the most significant achievements of Mandela and the ANC was organizing the Congress of the People in 1955, where 3,000 delegates adopted the Freedom Charter, proclaiming equality for all: 'South Africa belongs to all who live in it, black and white.' Shortly afterward, in 1960, a peaceful protest against passbook laws took place in Sharpeville. Police opened fire on the crowd, resulting in 69 deaths and over 180 injuries. In response to the protest, the ANC was banned by the authorities. This raised urgent questions about the need to organize armed resistance. A year later, Mandela founded uMkhonto weSizwe (MK), which means 'Spear of the Nation' in the Zulu and Xhosa languages, the paramilitary wing of the ANC. As the leader of MK, Mandela secretly traveled throughout the country and operated out of a farm in Rivonia, then a suburb of Johannesburg. He also journeyed abroad, engaging in discussions with leaders of emerging independent African nations, most notably Julius Nyerere of Tanganyika (part of modern-day Tanzania) and Emperor Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia, about the need to fight against apartheid. On August 5, 1962, on his way back from a trip, Mandela was arrested; this time, the apartheid government was determined to silence the charismatic leader whom thousands of people were ready to follow. During the Rivonia Trial, which lasted from 1963 to 1964, Mandela steadfastly defended his beliefs. His speech from the dock in 1964 emphasized the necessity of eradicating racial superiority, building an egalitarian society, and his willingness to die for this cause: 'I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. 'It is not true that the enfranchisement of all will result in racial domination. Political division, based on color, is entirely artificial and, when it disappears, so will the domination of one color group by another. The ANC has spent half a century fighting against racialism. When it triumphs, it will not change that policy.' Mandela was sentenced to life in prison for organizing armed resistance against the apartheid government. The authorities held him in various prisons, but he spent the majority of his sentence, 18 out of 27 years, on Robben Island. Political prisoners were kept together, which helped ease the harshness of their confinement and allowed them to continue their fight, even if it was limited to the confines of their cells. ANC members exchanged opinions and engaged in debates with one another and with other inmates. In 1962, Mandela began studying law through correspondence courses from the University of London. He continued his education in prison and even took on the role of lecturer for fellow inmates. Meanwhile, the government continued to restrict the freedoms of black citizens, encroaching upon their private lives. Between 1950 and 1985, under the Immorality Act, which prohibited relationships between different races, 19,000 people were prosecuted, with many arrested without trial. Despite his incarceration, Mandela's popularity in the country grew, making him a symbol of resistance against the regime. In the 1970s, the authorities offered to release Mandela on the condition that he renounce the armed struggle. In 1974, the Minister of Justice visited him, but Mandela refused to make deals with the government. Tensions escalated as pressure mounted on the government from the UN, European nations, and African states condemning apartheid. To quell public outrage, the authorities resorted to violent tactics once again. In 1976, thousands of black students in Soweto protested against the mandatory use of the Afrikaans language in schools. The police responded with brutal force, firing live ammunition into the crowd, resulting in at least 176 deaths. In 1985, South African President Pieter Willem Botha announced he would consider freeing Mandela if he publicly condemned violence. Mandela once again rejected these unilateral terms, and this made him even more popular in society. Protests erupted across the nation, prompting the Afrikaner government to declare a state of emergency. Ultimately, independently of the ANC, Mandela recognized the need to lay the groundwork for official negotiations, fearing the country was headed toward civil war. While still in prison, he met with the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Safety, and the president. Progress in negotiations was only achieved, however, in late 1989, after a change in government leadership. In February 1990, the ANC and several other previously banned organizations were legalized. Nelson Mandela was released to a jubilant crowd. This marked the beginning of an official negotiation process aimed at dismantling the apartheid system and finding compromises in governance. Although the ANC owed much of its presence in the political arena to Mandela's personal contributions, he did not impose his will on the party. Upon his release, he was not interested in seizing power; rather, he coordinated actions with colleagues and was prepared to make concessions. In July 1991, Nelson Mandela was elected president of the African National Congress (ANC), and by 1994, South Africa held its first parliamentary elections that granted voting rights to all citizens. The ANC received nearly two-thirds of the votes. Mandela became the nation's president, with F.W. de Klerk and Thabo Mbeki, an ANC member, serving as deputy presidents. A primary goal of his presidency was national reconciliation, bringing both the oppressed and the oppressors into the government as a crucial step toward dismantling the legacy of apartheid. 'I knew as well as I knew anything that the oppressor must be liberated just as surely as the oppressed. A man who takes away another man's freedom is a prisoner of hatred... The oppressed and the oppressor alike are robbed of their humanity,' said Mandela. Nelson Mandela's legacy is deeply ingrained not only in South African culture but all around the world. He is remembered as a symbol of resilience, forgiveness, and the power of reconciliation. His wisdom helped steer the country away from the brink of civil war. While he aimed to protect the rights of marginalized groups, he never sought revenge against the white minority or discriminated against them. Mandela consistently resisted authoritarianism and stepped down after his first presidential term (1994-1999). As Mikatekiso Kubayi, researcher at the Institute for Global Dialogue and the Institute for Pan African Thought and Conversation, noted in an interview with RT, Mandela's legacy is very much alive in South Africa. 'Up to this day, you simply can't separate his legacy from it. His influence is still very much there. So, the president Cyril Ramaphosa pays homage to the influence of late former president Mandela as well, because his legacy is embedded in many things, the many ways, the ways we run government, the ways we run the Congress, the way we do our politics. For instance, breakaway parties like the EFF, now MK party and the APC, the UDM and others still carry some of the DNA of the liberation movement that shaped the former president,' he said. Nelson Mandela passed away on December 5, 2013, but his legacy lives on. He remains a global moral leader. The Nelson Mandela Foundation, established in 1999, continues his work of promoting peace, democracy, and social justice worldwide. In 2014, the United Nations established the Nelson Mandela Prize for achievements in social transformation, as Mandela's life story serves as a timeless testament to perseverance and indomitable will.