CBS News Legend Lowell Bergman Explains Why Paramount's Trump Settlement Is ‘A Lot Worse' Than His Big Tobacco Case
'We're in a really grim moment, when absurd lawsuits and huge amounts of money come together to damage the public interest,' Bergman told The New York Times' 'The Daily' podcast on Monday.
More from TheWrap
CBS News Legend Lowell Bergman Explains Why Paramount's Trump Settlement Is 'A Lot Worse' Than His Big Tobacco Case
'Inside Edition' Taps ABC News Correspondent Eva Pilgrim as New Anchor
DOJ, FBI Insist There's No Jeffrey Epstein List, 5 Months After AG Pam Bondi Said It Was Sitting On Her Desk | Video
Latest Trump-Musk Battle Spurs $70 Billion Stock Decline for Tesla
Bergman said he believed Trump's lawsuit against Paramount was 'even weaker' than the lawsuit the president filed against ABC and George Stephanopoulos, which was settled for $15 million late last year.
Stephanopoulos had said on air several times that Trump was found 'liable for rape' in the civil case E. Jean Carroll brought against him. In fact, Trump was found liable for sexual abuse, which carries a different definition in New York, where the case took place.
'A reasonable jury could interpret Stephanopoulos' statements as defamatory,' Magistrate Judge Reid wrote last year. 'Stephanopoulos stated 10 times that a jury — or juries — had found plaintiff liable for rape.'
The judge's comments, coupled with the fear a Florida jury would award Trump more than the $15 million he ultimately received, pushed Disney towards settling.
On Monday, Bergman said ABC 'capitulated' to Trump — and Paramount followed suit last week with its own settlement.
'Every legal expert thought it was sort of nonsense, right? It's nonsense,' Bergman said about Trump's lawsuit against Paramount. 'It's done to intimidate, and so the result will be that you have litigation, and it becomes all-consuming when you're in the middle of it.'
Trump initially sued Paramount for $20 billion over how '60 Minutes' edited an interview with Kamala Harris last year, arguing it was 'false advertising' and election tampering. The president's lawyers later argued the segment caused him 'mental anguish.'
A settlement was reached last week, with the payment including 'plaintiffs' fees and costs' as well as a donation that will be allocated to a 'future presidential library.' Paramount also said that 'in the future, '60 Minutes' will release transcripts of interviews with eligible U.S. presidential candidates after such interviews have aired, subject to redactions as required for legal or national security concerns.'
Bergman added he believed the settlement is a bigger smear on CBS' legacy than when the network's lawyers blocked a '60 Minutes' interview with Jeffrey Wigand, a whistleblower from Brown & Williamson tobacco company. The interview ultimately ran months later, after the Wall Street Journal reported on Wigand's allegations against the tobacco industry — all of which eventually served as the drama for Michael Mann's 1999 political thriller 'The Insider,' which featured Al Pacino playing Bergman.
'It's not like a case involving tobacco and the pressure that was coming down was easy to see where it would be coming from,' Bergman said. 'This is the president of the United States, and this is without precedent in the history of this country.'
Bergman added journalists have to be a 'little bit depressed' about what the future holds for the profession.
'The fact is, that anyone working at '60 Minutes' from now on has to worry about what is going to be allowed on the air,' Bergman said.
Listen to Bergman's full interview on 'The Daily' here.
The post CBS News Legend Lowell Bergman Explains Why Paramount's Trump Settlement Is 'A Lot Worse' Than His Big Tobacco Case appeared first on TheWrap.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump says Coca-Cola has agreed to use real cane sugar in Coke
President Trump said Wednesday that Coca-Cola has agreed to use "REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States." Why it matters: The beverage giant has been under pressure to reduce sugar in its drinks. The company currently uses high fructose corn syrup in the original soda recipe, according to its website. What they're saying: Trump said he's been speaking with the Atlanta-based company about using cane sugar, which it does in its Mexican Coke. " I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. Zoom in: Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey told investors in April that "we continue to make progress on sugar reduction in our beverages." He noted that the company has "done this by changing recipes as well as by using our global marketing resources and distribution network to boost awareness of and interest in our ever-expanding portfolio." The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
900 DOJ attorneys urge Senate to reject Bove nomination
More than 900 former Justice Department attorneys are urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to reject the nomination of Emil Bove for a lifetime judicial appointment. Bove, who previously served on President Trump's criminal defense team, is now in the No. 3 role at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and has been nominated for a judgeship on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The extraordinary outpouring came from attorneys from the Kennedy administration to the current Trump administration who pinpointed Bove as a key figure behind numerous firings and policy shifts, calling him a 'leader in this assault' on the Justice Department. 'Emil Bove has been an architect and enforcer of many of the attacks on DOJ and its employees,' said Stacey Young, executive director and founder of Justice Connection, which organized the letter. 'His nomination to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals sent shockwaves across DOJ's workforce, and should alarm all Americans concerned about the Department's future and the survival of the rule of law.' The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to consider Bove's nomination Thursday, as well as that of Fox News host Jeanine Pirro to serve as a U.S. Attorney. The letter runs through a string of recent controversies in which Bove has played a role. He was central in pushing the dismissal of the bribery charges brought against New York Mayor Eric Adams, prompting a wave of resignations from members of the department's Public Integrity Section. He was behind terminations of prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and a request to turn over a list of FBI agents who investigated riot cases. It also focuses on recent allegations from a DOJ whistleblower who said Bove told top department officials they may need to consider saying 'f— you' to judges who might block the administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to send migrants to Salvadoran prison. Bove has said he couldn't recall whether he used the expletive, but told lawmakers during his confirmation hearing that he 'certainly conveyed the importance of the upcoming operation.' 'Each one of the undersigned would testify, under oath, that we have never — and would never — tell a Justice Department attorney to consider defying a court order. Moreover, the Justice Department's later defiance of judicial mandates in the cases where Mr. Bove previewed doing so further suggests that disregarding court orders was Mr. Bove's intent all along,' the letter states. Bove's nomination looks poised to proceed, as Sen. Thom Tillis (N.C.), the only Republican on the panel to previously oppose a Trump nominee, has said he would follow the staff recommendation. 'We ask that before the Judiciary Committee votes on this nomination, you rigorously examine the actions Mr. Bove has taken at DOJ and the effects they've had on the Department's integrity, employees, and mission-critical work,' the attorneys wrote. 'It is intolerable to us that anyone who disgraces the Justice Department would be promoted to one of the highest courts in the land, as it should be intolerable to anyone committed to maintaining our ordered system of justice.'
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP split on whether Trump should fire Powell
Republican lawmakers are split over if President Trump should fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, with some pushing him to nix the central bank head and others encouraging him to be patient. Trump indicated to some lawmakers that he plans to fire Powell during an Oval Office meeting Tuesday evening, a White official and a second source told The Hill. But by Wednesday, the president was walking back some of his sentiments, telling reporters, 'I don't rule out anything but I think it's highly unlikely. Unless he has to leave, fraud.' The idea of Trump pursuing Powell's removal before his term is up next year rattled the markets, causing them to dip on Wednesday before finishing up. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose half a percent on the day and the S&P 500 was up 0.3 percent. It was clear, as Trump has indicated before, his words have a real-time impact on stocks and bonds. But just who is advising Trump on the matter appears to be somewhat of a mystery. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) was in the camp of believing that firing Powell was a bad idea, citing that markets are watching. 'No. Long term, the markets watch very carefully the independence of the Federal Reserve,' he told The Hill on Wednesday. 'I think when the time comes to reduce interest rates – and I think the time is coming – I think the fact that he has maintained his credibility with the markets will help and will send a really positive message to the markets.' 'By allowing the Fed chair a recognition and a stability in his tenure is going to work to the president's advantage long term,' Rounds added. When pressed on if the president is hearing that message enough, Rounds said he wasn't sure who has his ear. 'I don't know who that would be. I think [Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent] would clearly understand that and I'm hoping that his other advisers would be counseling him in the same way,' he said. Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), meanwhile, said feelings about whether to nix Powell were mixed within the GOP conference. 'It depends who you ask,' he said. Some Republicans in the House were cheering for Powell to be out, including Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) who shared reporting about Trump being likely to fire Powell soon and said 'told you.' 'Jerome Powell better lower those interest rates. You heard @POTUS 's statement just now. Plenty of smart people with common sense begging for the job. Ball is in his court. If he doesn't lower rates he will be FIRED. Bookmark this,' she said on X. But feelings in that chamber are mixed, too. Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), who is running for Florida governor, said he's not on board yet on supporting removing Powell. 'I'm not there yet, but I'll tell you that the president doesn't rule anything out,' Donalds said in an interview at the Hill Nation Summit. 'It's pretty clear the president is frustrated about where short-term interest rates are,' Donalds said. Trump went back and forth about removing Powell this week, reportedly drafting a letter to do so that he showed the lawmakers in the Oval Office meeting on Tuesday evening. But by the next day, he called such reporting 'not true' and said no letter had been drafted. Earlier this week, Bessent said there was a ' formal process ' underway to select Powell's successor. Powell's term as chair of the Fed's board of governors ends next year and his term as a governor goes until 2028. No president has ever fired a Fed chair before, and there are serious doubts that the presidential powers include the legal authority to do so. Trump's main quarrel with Powell is that the Federal Reserve's interest rate-setting committee hasn't dropped interest rates this year, a move that would make lending cheaper and likely please financial markets. Powell said earlier this month that the Fed has held rates aloft specifically because of the anticipated price effects of Trump's tariffs, which have likely just started to show up in the national price data. Asked if the Fed would have cut rates more if it weren't for the tariffs, Powell said, 'I think that's right.' That puts Fed policy squarely at odds with Trump's desires. Prices in the consumer price index rose to a 2.7-percent annual increase in June, up from 2.4 percent in May, likely due to the cost of tariffs being passed on to consumers. Prices rose in heavily imported goods such as apparel, appliances, and home furnishings, which was a smoking gun for tariff inflation for many economists. Republicans also just passed a law including large-scale tax cuts, which are traditionally thought to be economically stimulative, though projections show very little growth coming from the cuts. 'If President Trump's goal was to get interest rates down, doing nothing would've been a much better course of action than imposing sweeping tariffs and passing a huge, deficit-financed tax cut,' Kevin Rinz, a senior fellow at the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, wrote in a commentary. 'Antagonizing the Fed and actively threatening to fire Chairman Powell only makes it harder to get to the point where prices are stable and rates can come down,' he added.
