
Trump says US will send 'sophisticated' equipment to Ukraine as he criticises Putin
Date: 07:35 BST
Title: Ukraine attacks Zaporizhzhia site with drones, says Russia
Content: Ukrainian drones attacked a training
centre at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant on Sunday
evening, according to the Russian-installed administration of the Russia-held
plant in south-eastern Ukraine.
It says "no critical" damage was recorded.
The BBC has not been able to verify the report which was published by the administration on Telegram this morning.
The report comes a day after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that it had heard hundreds of rounds of
small arms fire late on Saturday at the plant.
Update:
Date: 07:18 BST
Title: US envoy Kellogg salutes Zelensky's chief of staff as he arrives in Kyiv
Content: Volodymyr Zelensky's chief of staff has just posted a video on X showing Donald Trump's special envoy Gen Keith Kellogg arriving in Ukraine.
He got off a train in Kyiv and greeted Andriy Yermak with a salute followed by a big hug.
During his visit, Kellogg is expected to discuss security for Ukraine and sanctions against Russia.
Later today Donald Trump is set to meet Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in Washington DC.
Rutte's 10:00 local time (14:00 GMT) Oval Office meeting will be closed to media, and the Nato chief is also slated to meet with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth as well.
We will be keeping an eye on both and be bringing you the latest as it happens.
Update:
Date: 07:17 BST
Title: Trump pledges come as Russia increases strikes on Ukraine
Content: Lviv, in the far west of Ukraine, close to the Polish border, was recently hit by Russian missiles
Donald Trump's pledge of support comes at a critical time in the war in Ukraine.
Last week, Ukraine suffered its heaviest aerial attack, when 728 Russian drones and 13 cruise or ballistic missiles struck cities around the country.
The city of Lutsk - which lies 90km (56 miles) from the Polish border in western Ukraine and is a transit hub for military and humanitarian aid - suffered the brunt of the overnight attack.
Attacks were also reported in the western cities of Lviv and Rivne.
The night after, capital Kyiv was hit by a massive attack, killing at least two people and injuring 16.
This led Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to declare that "Russia is obviously stepping up terror" and urged partners to "act faster investing in weapons production and developing tech".
Last month, Ukraine recorded the highest monthly civilian casualties in three years, with 232 people killed and 1,343 injured, according to the UN.
Update:
Date: 07:08 BST
Title: 'He talks nice and then he bombs everybody'
Content: Donald Trump teased today's announcement last night, when he spoke to reporters ahead of his Washington DC meeting with Nato chief Mark Rutte.
"We basically are going to send them [Ukraine] various pieces of very sophisticated military," he told media gathered on the tarmac outside Air Force One.
He went on to say "they" are "going to pay us 100%" - it's unclear if that means Ukraine, the European Union, Nato members, or a combination.
The US president refused to go into specifics on the number of weapons Ukraine would receive, but said "we will send them Patriots, which they desperately need".
The decision to back Ukraine comes after Trump appeared to grow frustrated at talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"Putin really surprised a lot of people," Trump explained. "He talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening. So there's a little bit of a problem there. I don't like it."
Update:
Date: 07:05 BST
Title: Trump pledges 'sophisticated' equipment to Ukraine amid Putin frustration
Content: Jenna MoonLive editor
US President Donald Trump has signalled a "major" statement on Ukraine today, amid what appears to be his increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
On Sunday night, Trump said that "sophisticated" military equipment will be heading to Ukraine, including Patriot air defence missiles.
And the US president seemed irritated by Moscow's lack of action towards a ceasefire in Ukraine, telling reporters that "Putin … talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening".
His comments follow an interview on Thursday, in which he promised a "major statement" today. US news outlet Axios reported last night that the president is considering sending offensive weapons to Ukraine.
So far, Trump has only offered the nation defensive weaponry - such as the Patriot system.
Trump will meet Nato chief Mark Rutte today at the White House, and US special envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, is in Kyiv this week for talks.
We'll be following all the major developments here, so stick with us.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
36 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump is clearly fed up with Putin - but will his shift in tone force Russia to the negotiating table?
As ever, there is confusion and key questions are left unanswered, but Donald Trump's announcement on Ukraine and Russia today remains hugely significant. His shift in tone and policy on Ukraine is stark. And his shift in tone (and perhaps policy) on Russia is huge. Ever since Mr Trump returned to the White House he has flatly refused to side with Ukraine over the Russian invasion. He has blamed Ukraine and Joe Biden for the incursion but has never been willing to accept that Russia is the aggressor and that Kyiv has a legitimate right to defend itself. Today, all that changed. In a clear signal that he is fed up with Vladimir Putin and now fully recognises the need to help Ukraine defend itself, he announced the US will dramatically increase weapons supplies to Kyiv. But, in keeping with his transactional nature and in a reflection of the need to keep his isolationist "America-First" base on side, he has framed this policy shift as a multi-billion dollar "deal" in which America gains financially. American weapons are to be "sold" to NATO partners in Europe who will then either transfer them to Ukraine or use them to bolster their own stockpiles as they transfer their own existing stocks to Kyiv. "We've made a deal today," the president said in the Oval Office. "We are going to be sending them weapons, and they are paying for them. We are manufacturing, they are going to be paying for it. Our meeting last month was very successful... these are wealthy nations." 2:27 This appears to be a clever framing of the "deal". Firstly, America has always benefited financially by supplying weapons to Ukraine because much of the investment has been in American factories, American jobs and American supply chains. While the details are not entirely clear, the difference now appears to be that the weapons would be bought by the Europeans or by NATO as an alliance. The Americans are the biggest contributor to NATO, and so if the alliance is buying the weapons, America too will be paying, in part, for the weapons it is selling. However, if the weapons are being bought by individual NATO members to replenish their own stocks, then it may be the case that the US is not paying. NATO officials referred all questions on this issue to the White House, which has not yet provided clarity to Sky News. It is also not yet clear what type of weapons will be made available and whether it will include offensive, as well defensive, munitions. 1:49 A key element of the package will likely be Patriot missile batteries, 10 to 15 of which are believed to be currently in Europe. Under this deal, it is understood that some of them will be added to the six or so batteries believed to be presently in Ukraine. New ones would then be purchased from US manufacturers to backfill European stocks. A similar arrangement may be used for other weapons. The president also issued the Russian leader with an ultimatum, saying that Putin had 50 days to make a peace deal or else face 100% "secondary tariffs". It's thought this refers to a plan to tariff, or sanction, third countries that supply Russia with weapons and buy Russian oil. This, the Americans hope, will force those countries to apply pressure on Russia. But the 50-day kicking of the can down the road also gives Russia space to prevaricate. So, a few words of caution: first, the Russians are masters of prevarication. Second, Trump tends to let deadlines slip. And third, we all know Trump can flip-flop on his position repeatedly. 2:00 Maybe the most revealing aspect of all this came when a reporter asked Mr Trump: "How far are you willing to go if Putin sends more bombs in the coming days?" "Don't ask me questions like that..." Mr Trump doesn't really know what to do if Mr Putin continues to take him for a ride. Mr Biden, before him, supplied Ukraine with the weapons to continue fighting. If Mr Trump wants to end this, he may need to provide Ukraine with enough weapons to win. But that would prolong, or even escalate, a war he wants to end now.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
BBC's repeated failures to curb abuse and bias have shattered trust and left many feeling betrayed
Beeb in crisis HOW many more times will the BBC fail to deal with a powerful star bent on abusing his wealth and position? And how much more anti-Israel bias must viewers endure? 1 Two reports yesterday into very different areas of the corporation revealed an organisation in crisis. Producers in charge of MasterChef indulged Gregg Wallace's sleazy behaviour for years while ignoring at least six direct complaints. Weakly, they now admit they should have done more to stop him. Just as the BBC didn't take its chances to stop Huw Edwards, Jimmy Savile and others. Despite those scandals, the Wallace report reveals little has been done since to curb the culture of misogyny among its so-called male 'talent'. Likewise, no one has dealt with the decades-long anti-Israel bias within BBC News. Far from making any proper checks into its broadcast of a flawed documentary on Gaza, a second report says that BBC execs breached accuracy guidelines over a film featuring a Palestinian child narrator. Viewers, of course, weren't told he was the son of a Hamas terrorist. Isn't it likely that there was no proper editorial control of the film by bosses in BBC News because of institutional blindness? There is a repeating pattern here — from misreporting rocket attacks on Gazan hospitals to broadcasting race hate rants at Glastonbury. And it will leave many British Jews feeling let down. Meanwhile, the BBC — the original virtue-signalling empire of left-wing woke ideology — now finds itself serially accused over sexism, racism and antisemitism. Is anyone in Government willing to tackle these repeated failures at our state-funded national broadcaster? Trump card THERE will be immense relief in Kyiv — and across Europe — at Donald Trump's military support for Ukraine. The President appears to have grown tired — in his words — of Vladimir Putin's 'bull****'. And there are those in the White House who believe Russia's economy is close to collapse. Now might be the time to take advantage of any weakening of the tyrant's grip on power. Arming Ukraine via deals with European countries is a breakthrough after months of US indifference. Slapping 100 per cent tariffs on Moscow for 50 days until it agrees to a peace deal may also do more to bring Putin to the table than any number of Patriot missiles.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Church caves in to pressure over compensation for abuse survivors
The Church of England has bowed to pressure from survivors of historic sex abuse by approving a new £150 million fund for victims. They will be eligible for counselling and therapy after the compensation package was approved by the General Synod, the Church's governing body. The Church of England has been under mounting pressure following a series of historical abuse scandals and accusations that it has ignored and refused to support victims. As a result, many victims require continuing mental health treatment and some have taken their own life. The Most Rev Justin Welby was forced to step down as Archbishop of Canterbury in November 2024 after a report found he mishandled abuse allegations against John Smyth, a former barrister, who has been described as the most prolific abuser in the Church's history. It had been feared that a loophole would lead to victims missing out on compensation by deducting financial redress they had already received from the final amount paid, but the Synod voted to close it on Monday. Andrew Graystone, an advocate for victims and survivors of church-related abuse, welcomed the move. He said: 'For many years the Church of England has dragged survivors through an agonising, re-traumatising process. 'Today, the General Synod has taken a really significant step in the direction of generosity and justice for victims and survivors. If the Church follows through on its commitment to redress without betrayal, this could be a day when some healing can begin.' The Archbishop of York, the Most Rev Stephen Cottrell, said: 'This scheme exists because of our manifold failures which we acknowledge and of which we repent. The redress scheme is just one part of what we must do to build a better and different future and acknowledge the failings of the past.' The Bishop of London, the Rt Rev Dame Sarah Mullally, described the redress scheme as a 'necessary step, it's a necessity which is to our shame'. Source of profound shame The Bishop of Winchester, the Rt Rev Philip Mounstephen, said: 'It is a source of profound shame that it [abuse] was ever perpetrated, not only in the Church but even in the name of the Church too. 'Today marks a significant and welcome step in providing much-needed redress for victims and survivors. 'Once operational, this independently run, survivor-focused scheme will be a crucial response to a clear need. It will make a real difference to people's lives, offering not just financial redress but heartfelt apology, acknowledgment and care, treating survivors with the fairness, compassion and dignity they deserve.' Phil Johnson, a survivor of Church-related abuse and a member of the Redress Project Board, also welcomed Monday's vote. He said: 'It is the culmination of years of hard work and when it opens, it will make a huge difference in the lives of people. For the Church, it is an opportunity to rectify some of the harm that's been done to victims and survivors.' The Church announced the fund in 2023 after it was recommended by the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse concluded that a national redress scheme should be set up for abuse victims. The new abuse redress measure will now go to Parliament for scrutiny and Royal Assent. It will be independently administered by the law firm, Kennedy's, free from influence by Church officials or bishops. The public website will go live on Friday enabling victims to register their interest and receive advance notification of the scheme's official opening date once it is known.