logo
Channel crossing migrants should face prosecution if child dies

Channel crossing migrants should face prosecution if child dies

Leader Live2 days ago
Yvette Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme it was 'totally appalling' that children were being 'crushed to death on these overcrowded boats, and yet the boat still continues to the UK'.
She added: 'Everybody who is arriving on a boat where a child's life has been lost, frankly, should be facing prosecution, either in the UK or in France.'
The Government has already included a new offence of 'endangering life at sea' in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill currently making its way through Parliament.
Ms Cooper has previously said this would allow the authorities to act against people 'involved in behaviour that puts others at risk of serious injury or death, such as physical aggression, intimidation, or rejecting rescue attempts'.
But on Friday, she appeared to go further by suggesting even getting on an overcrowded boat could result in prosecution.
She said: 'If you've got a boat where we've seen all of those people all climb on board that boat, they are putting everybody else's lives at risk.'
Crossings have increased in the past year, reaching 20,600 by July 2, a rise of 52% compared with the same period in 2024.
Some 15 children died trying to cross the Channel last year, prompting charity Project Play to warn that conditions were becoming 'more dangerous' for young people.
Advocacy co-ordinator Kate O'Neill, based in northern France, blamed policies aimed at preventing crossings for the increasing risk.
She told the PA news agency: 'Ultimately the children we're meeting every day are not safe.
'They're exposed to a level of violence, whether it's they are directly victims of it or the witness.
'We're ultimately at all times putting out fires… the underlying issue is these policies of border securitisation… that are creating more and more barriers to child safety and child protection.'
She said there was hope when the Labour Government took office a year ago that there would be some improvement, adding: 'This is not at all what we've seen.
'They continued to make conditions more difficult and more dangerous.'
She said: 'The smash-the-gangs narrative is not effective and it's harmful because ultimately the only way to put the gangs out of business is to cut the need for them.'
Meanwhile, Ms O'Neill said French police were already intervening in crossing attempts in shallow waters despite the changes to the rules to allow this having not yet come into force.
She said: 'This is not a new tactic… it's something that has been happening for a long time in Calais and surrounding areas.
'My feeling is that this is increasing based on the number of testimonies we're receiving from children and their families recently.
'It's really dangerous because the children often are in the middle of the boats.'
On Friday, the Home Secretary welcomed reports that French police were intervening in French waters to prevent crossings, and said she had been 'working very closely with the French interior minister' to ensure the rules were changed 'as swiftly a possible'.
Ms Cooper also declined to confirm reports the UK was looking at a 'one in, one out' policy that would see people who had crossed the Channel returned to Europe in exchange for asylum seekers with connections to Britain.
Asked about the policy, she would only tell Sky News that ministers were 'looking at a range of different issues' and 'different ways of doing returns'.
A boat carrying migrants could be seen off the coast of Gravelines in northern France on Friday morning as a family and dog walkers enjoyed the sunny weather on the beach.
A French authority boat followed the dinghy closely as it travelled along the coast passing big ships such as a DFDS ferry, and a French border control helicopter flew overhead.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ministers ‘pushed ahead too fast' on welfare reform, says Phillipson
Ministers ‘pushed ahead too fast' on welfare reform, says Phillipson

Powys County Times

timean hour ago

  • Powys County Times

Ministers ‘pushed ahead too fast' on welfare reform, says Phillipson

Ministers 'pushed ahead too fast' and 'didn't listen enough' on welfare reform, the Education Secretary has said. Bridget Phillipson also said that future spending decisions had been made 'harder', when asked about the prospect of the two-child benefit cap being scrapped. Ms Phillipson told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme that she was 'not going to pretend that it hasn't been a tough or a challenging week' after ministers were forced to scrap their plans for the personal independence payment (Pip) in the face of a backbench revolt. 'I'd be the first to acknowledge that, both in the pace and the nature of what we set out, we didn't get it right, but we do need to reform the system we've got,' she said. Asked about the Prime Minister's authority, the Education Secretary said: 'What the Prime Minister has said, and what I also believe, is that what we set out, we pushed ahead too fast, we didn't listen enough to people, including, I would say, including to lots of people who had concerns about the nature of that change.' Ministers have warned MPs that there will be financial consequences to the decision not to reform Pip as planned. Labour backbenchers have also been pushing for the Government to scrap the two-child benefit cap. When asked if there was now less chance of the cap being scrapped given the costs that come with Tuesday's decision, Ms Phillipson told the BBC that ministers were 'looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty'. Pushed on whether the likelihood of the cap going was now slimmer, Ms Phillipson said: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder. 'But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty.' Meanwhile, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride had written to the budget watchdog asking whether a new updated fiscal forecast was in the works after Labour's U-turns on welfare and winter fuel. I've written to the @OBR_UK seeking urgent clarity on the multi-billion pound hole created by Labour's unfunded spending commitments. When governments lose control of the finances and transparency is sidelined, confidence in our economy is put at risk. Parliament and the public… — Mel Stride (@MelJStride) July 6, 2025 In his letter to the Office for Budget Responsibility, Sir Mel said: 'The public, Parliament and markets deserve clarity and transparency about the impact of recent events on the nation's finances and the Government's fiscal strategy.' The Conservatives will try to change the Government's welfare Bill to tighten up access to Pip and universal credit by laying a series of amendments this week.

Civil servants have discovered their most pointless money-waster yet
Civil servants have discovered their most pointless money-waster yet

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Civil servants have discovered their most pointless money-waster yet

If you go down to the website today, you're sure of a small surprise. Trying to identify it is a bit like trying to solve one of those old-fashioned childhood puzzles where you had to find the differences between two similar pictures. Look hard, then harder. Still can't see it? Well, the logo, once chastely black and white, has blossomed into colour. The background is now a limpid sky-blue, and instead of lurking shyly at the foot of the lettering, the full stop has turned an ethereal shade of Cambridge blue and hovers halfway up the type. This cost of this momentous change – part of a 'brand refresh' of the site undertaken by the communications agency M&C Saatchi – is reported to be more than £500,000. And if that seems a bit steep for a spot of colouring-in with blue crayons, it comes with a hefty explanatory dossier, written in that curious argot used by officials hoping to deflect comparisons between their latest brilliant wheeze and the Emperor's New Clothes. The functions that the cerulean blob is intended to undertake are as multifarious as they are baffling. 'The dot can take on different roles – guiding users through content, journeys and experiences across channels', the guidance explains, adding 'it should always serve a clear purpose'. If only the same could be said of the dossier, which suggests that the dot should act as 'the bridge between government and the UK', and 'a guiding hand for life'. If the dot is starting to sound like the changeling child of Isambard Kingdom Brunel and the Hand of the King from Game of Thrones, there is more to come. The dossier also suggests that the dot could depict a coin being saved into a piggy bank, or a text bubble in a guide on how to vote. But there is a stern warning for larky civil servants thinking of busting out into a full-scale homage to the dotty artist, Yayoi Kusama. They are not to 'use the dot in a decorative way or distort or skew the dot'. All this may evoke an episode of the Radio 4 comedy, The Consultants, in which Chesney fixes the leaky 'e' that has developed in the alphabet. The annals of consultant-led branding are littered with tragi-comic disasters, from Consignia to Abrdn (the meme-haunted rebrand of Aberdeen Asset Management). But the satire isn't quite as hilarious when it is hard-pressed taxpayers who have coughed up for the 'journey', or wild goose chase, on which the blue dot is to lead us. If only the corridors of power were populated by classicists rather than PPE graduates, someone might have twigged that Aristophanes of Byzantium, the grammarian, editor of Homer and head librarian of the library of Alexandria, could have delivered a similar dot for free. A couple of millennia ago, the great scholar devised a system of placing a dot, or punctus, at various heights in a text to denote rhetorical divisions in speech. Were he currently working in Whitehall, he would instantly recognise the fabulously pricey new dot, hovering at the midpoint of the surrounding type, as his very own stigma mese – a dot placed midway up the surrounding type – waiting patiently since 200BC to guide the public on a journey through the promised land of channels.

Another tantrum from the Labour backbenches is inevitable
Another tantrum from the Labour backbenches is inevitable

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Another tantrum from the Labour backbenches is inevitable

In common with many parents across the country, here's a conversation that I have with my young daughter on a semi-regular basis (bear with me, this will take on some political relevance eventually). Me: "So it's 15 minutes until your bedtime, you can either have a little bit of TV or do a jigsaw, not both." Daughter: "Ummmm, I want to watch TV." Me: "That's fine, but it's bed after that, you can't do a jigsaw as well." Fast-forward 15 minutes. Me: "Right, TV off now please, bedtime." (Pause) Daughter: "I want to do a jigsaw." Now replace me with the government, the TV and jigsaw options with axing welfare cuts and scrapping the two-child cap, and my daughter with rebellious backbenchers. 6:36 That is the tension currently present between Downing Street and Labour MPs. And my initial ultimatum is the messaging being pumped out from the government this weekend. In essence: you've had your welfare U-turn, so there's no money left for the two-child cap to go as well. As an aside - and before my inbox fills with angry emails lambasting me for using such a crude metaphor for policies that fundamentally alter the lives of some of the most vulnerable in society - yes, I hear you, and that's part of my point. 9:11 For many in Labour, this approach feels like the lives of their constituents are being used in a childish game of horse-trading. So what can be done? Well, the government could change the rules. Altering the fiscal rules is - and will likely remain - an extremely unlikely solution. But as it happens, one of Labour's proverbial grandparents has just popped round with a different suggestion. 5:31 A wealth tax, Lord Neil Kinnock says, is the necessary outcome of the economic restrictions the party has placed on itself. Ever the Labour storyteller, Lord Kinnock believes this would allow the government to craft a more compelling narrative about whose side this administration is on. That could be valuable, given one of the big gripes from many backbench critics is that they still don't really understand what this prime minister stands for - and by extension, what all these "difficult decisions" are in aid of. The downside is whether it will actually raise much money. 16:02 The super-rich may have lots of assets to take a slice from, but they also have expensive lawyers ready to find novel ways to keep their client's cash away from the prying eyes of the state. Or, of course, they could just leave - as many are doing already. In the short term, the future is a bit easier to predict. If Downing Street is indeed now saying there is no money to scrap the two-child cap (after heavy briefing in the opposite direction just weeks ago), an almighty tantrum from the backbenches is inevitable. And as every parent knows, the more you give in, the harder it becomes to hold the line.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store