The future of the initiative petition process and how it might affect Missouri democracy
It began around the first of 2025," said Nancy Zeliff, a volunteer. "We currently have over 6,700 volunteers statewide, and we have around 1,900 individuals ready to collect signatures on our citizen-driven petition."
The organization is currently working on three key initiatives:
* Banning the state legislature and politicians in Jefferson City from overturning the will of Missouri voters.
* Prohibiting "ballot candy," a term used for misleading language in ballot initiatives.
* Preserving the current initiative petition process
"There's a law that was passed and signed by our governor in April of this year, and it was SB 22," Zeliff said. "Its nickname is called 'Let Politicians Lie', because what's important for the Missouri voters is to have accurate ballot language on our ballots when we vote traditionally in a November election, because that's what the voters read and understand."
Two issues that have sparked concern for the group include Amendment 3 and Proposition A.
Before the Missouri Supreme Court verified that abortion would appear on the November ballot, campaigns had to collect signatures from 8% of voters in six of Missouri's eight congressional districts.
In September 2024, in a 4-3 ruling, the Missouri Supreme Court allowed Amendment 3, known as the "Right to Reproductive Freedom initiative, to remain on the November 2024 ballot.
The majority opinion stated that requiring ballot initiatives to list every statute that might be repealed or affected would be overly burdensome and make constitutional amendments unworkable.
In October 2024, the Court reaffirmed its decision, ruling the abortion amendment met constitutional form requirements. It also determined that petition sponsors were not legally obligated to list every potentially affected law.
Now, SB 22, signed by Governor Mike Kehoe in April 2025, extends the word limit of ballot summaries, expands the Attorney General's authority and gives the state legislature more control over ballot language.
'If the Attorney General's office or the legislature are the ones writing the ballot language, and not the initiator of the petition, we fear what we call 'ballot candy', misleading language,' Zeliff added.
News-Press NOW will continue to update this story.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
38 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
After a Mayor's Mysterious Death, a Land Dispute Divides Republicans in Tennessee
MANCHESTER, Tenn.—Smack dab between the swelling urban centers of Nashville, Chattanooga, and Huntsville, Ala., rural Coffee County was poised to become Tennessee's next boomtown, with subdivisions rapidly replacing farmland. But when the county's pro-growth mayor, Judd Matheny, died under unusual circumstances last year, it unleashed a development battle with a Southern Gothic twist that has split this deeply red area over the fundamental question of what it means to be conservative.
New York Times
39 minutes ago
- New York Times
Senate Advances Trump Clawback of Foreign Aid and Public Broadcast Funds
The Senate on Tuesday voted to take up legislation to claw back $9 billion for foreign aid and public broadcasting, signaling that the Republican-led Congress is poised to acquiesce to President Trump in a simmering battle with the White House over spending powers. The 51-to-50 vote came after Republican leaders agreed to a handful of concessions to win the votes of holdouts who were uneasy with the proposed rescissions. G.O.P. leaders said on Tuesday they would strip out a $400 million cut that Mr. Trump requested to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, known as PEPFAR, a move that the White House signaled it would not contest. Even then, some Republican senators refused to support a move that they said would relinquish their constitutional power over federal spending, forcing their leaders to summon Vice President JD Vance to the Capitol to break a tie and ram the legislation through a pair of procedural votes. 'We're lawmakers; we should be legislating,' Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said in a speech on the Senate floor on Tuesday night announcing her opposition to the package. 'What we're getting now is a direction from the White House and being told, 'This is the priority. We want you to execute on it. We'll be back with you with another round.' I don't accept that.' She was joined by two other Republicans in siding with Democrats in opposition to advancing the measure: Senators Susan Collins of Maine, the chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. Senate Republicans are hoping to approve the package as early as Wednesday. That would send it back to the House, which passed the bill last month but would still need to give it final approval by Friday for the cuts to be enacted. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fox News
39 minutes ago
- Fox News
Senate GOP blows through 2nd hurdle of the night, teeing up Trump's clawback bill for hourslong debate
Senate Republicans again coalesced behind President Donald Trump's multibillion-dollar spending clawback package and propelled the legislation through its final procedural hurdle, again with the aid of Vice President JD Vance. Lawmakers will now go back and forth through 10 hours of debate on the bill, where Senate Democrats are expected to bleed time and slam the legislation for its cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding. Trump's smaller, $9 billion package passed with nearly all Senate Republicans, while all Senate Democrats voted against it. Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., were the only Republicans to vote against the bill. Once debate has wrapped up on the bill, lawmakers will go through another vote-a-rama, where an unlimited number of amendments can be offered for the bill by either side of the aisle. Democrats will likely try to sideline or derail the package, while the GOP is expected to offer an amendment that would spare about $400 million in international HIV and AIDS funding from the chopping block. The carveout for the Bush-era President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) was agreed to ahead of the vote and is backed by the White House. Trimming funding from the program rattled some Senate Republicans, who publicly and privately warned they may not support the bill unless a fix was found. However, slashing the funding cut from the package could prove a tricky sell to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has called on Senate Republicans to not change the bill. He's been joined by fiscal hawks in the House Freedom Caucus, too, who have demanded that the Senate GOP stay the course on the rescissions package and warned that they would have serious issues if changes were made, stopping short of declaring a full-on rebellion against the bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., hoped that his colleagues in the lower chamber would play ball and pass the bill ahead of a looming Friday deadline. "There was a lot of interest among our members in doing something on the PEPFAR issue," he said ahead of the vote. "So, that's reflected in the substitute, and we hope that if we can get this across the finish line in the Senate that the House will accept that one small modification."
