Medical device maker Teleflex to split lower growth units
Shares of the company were down 12% in premarket trade after it also forecast its adjusted profit below Wall Street estimates.
After the split, Teleflex would focus on devices for bloodstream and heart procedures, along with medical imaging, while separating its urology, acute care and OEM units.
The urology unit has been experiencing lower sales from its UroLift device for enlarged prostate treatment, while the OEM or the contract instrument manufacturing division recently lost a customer.
A total of 12 out of 19 manufacturing facilities will be transferred to the new company.
Teleflex also plans to boost the remaining business by buying Germany-based Biotronik's blood vessel device unit for about 760 million euros ($796.3 million) in cash.
It said the separation will allow each company to simplify operations, streamline manufacturing, allocate resources more effectively and increase management focus.
Liam Kelly will stay as Teleflex CEO, and the company intends to initiate an executive search for key management positions at the spun-off business shortly.
Teleflex said it would distribute shares of the spun-off company to shareholders and expects the separation to be completed in mid-2026.
Separately, the Wayne, Pennsylvania-based company expects adjusted per-share profit for 2025 in the range of $13.95 to $14.35, below analysts' average estimate of $15.23 as per data compiled by LSEG.
The company also said its Chief Financial Officer Thomas Powell will retire, and be replaced by accounting chief John Deren.
($1 = 0.9544 euros)
Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs and healthcare trends with the Reuters Health Rounds newsletter. Sign up here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
India, U.S. mini trade deal unlikely before Aug 1, CNBC-TV18 reports
NEW DELHI, July 22 (Reuters) - A mini trade deal between India and the United States is unlikely before the August 1 deadline, news channel CNBC-TV18 reported on Tuesday citing sources.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Date set for showdown in battle for Maven Renovar VCT
Maven Renovar claims that its former asset manager lost almost 10% of the trust's current market capitalisation on three "unquoted/pre-IPO" investments, the latest in a series of allegations against Amati. Read more: Amati maintains that "the real and most important question" is whether shareholders will be allowed to determine the best strategy for the company going forward. A general meeting to vote on the requisitioners' proposals has been set for August 13. The requisitioners are opposing the board's decision earlier this year to remove Amati as the manager of the VCT without a shareholder vote. Directors of investment trusts are not obliged to have a shareholder vote when changing fund management arrangements. The July 1 requisition request from the group led by Mr Jourdan came a week after shareholders of the venture capital trust voted to sack the board of Maven Renovar. They also rejected proposals for a switch to an "AIM Plus" investment strategy under the trust's new fund manager, Glasgow-based Maven Capital Partners. Previously known as the Amati AIM VCT, the fund's mandate is to invest in London's junior Alternative Investment Market (AIM). The new strategy would have seen the introduction of a pipeline of deals in private companies alongside investments in the junior market. Read more: The requisitioners are calling for the existing board of directors led by chair Fiona Wollocombe to be replaced by Mr Jourdan, Charles McMicking, Hector Kilpatrick and Kathleen McLeay. The current directors remain in place on a caretaker basis until new board members are elected. In a statement, Mr Jourdan and Mr McMicking said the events of the past few months have been the result of the board Maven Renovar acting without proper consultation with shareholders. Robert Legget, who was appointed to the board at the June meeting when the existing directors were voted out, said the central matter is the fund's under-performance while under Amati's management. "Shareholders have a very simple choice: to let the former investment manager, whose performance caused significant loss to the company, onto the board and into a conflicted position alongside other proposed directors selected by him/the requisitioners, or to agree with the independent board that a credible plan to halt this decline was in shareholders' best interests," Mr Legget said. "It is a critical function of an independent board that it selects and appoints investment managers in accordance with shareholders' best interests, and I commend the board for taking decisive action to address underperformance prior to my joining."
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Official India jobless data is not accurate, say top independent economists: Reuters poll
BENGALURU, July 22 (Reuters) - The Indian government's unemployment data is inaccurate and masks the severity of joblessness and underemployment, according to a Reuters poll of independent economists, several of whom said the true jobless rate is around twice the official figure. India is the world's fastest-growing major economy at an annual rate of 7.4% in the January-March quarter, but so far growth has failed to create enough well-paying jobs for the millions of young people entering the workforce each year. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government is now more than one year into a third term after losing a commanding majority, partly blamed on discontent among youth over their future prospects. Over 70% of independent economists polled over the last month, 37 of 50, said the official unemployment rate, at 5.6% in June, is inaccurate. In a Reuters survey last year most economists flagged chronic joblessness as the government's biggest challenge. Experts say outdated definitions of what constitutes a job in a country of more than 1.4 billion people are distorting the true scale of unemployment and underemployment. "The whole thing to me is really throwing dust in your eyes. You say this is the unemployment rate, the growth rate — quite often, they don't make much sense. We have a massive employment problem and that is not reflected in the data," said Pranab Bardhan, professor emeritus of economics at the University of California, Berkeley. "Most Indian workers are underemployed. If you are able-bodied and you did not work for any time, not even one hour in the last six months, unless you are rich, how did you feed yourself?... So you scrounge around and do something. And then you are employed. Now what does that employment mean?" asked Bardhan. The Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), opens new tab, which estimates India's official employment and unemployment data, counts anyone working even one hour a week as employed. The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation defended the credibility of its labour force data and its representation of India's labour market dynamics, saying the PLFS uses Computer-Assisted Personal Interviews to improve data quality and reduce errors, and noted international agencies use its data in their reporting. While it is difficult to provide an alternate estimate of the jobless rate, 17 experts surveyed did, giving a median of 10%, ranging from 7% to as high as 35%. For years, India published official unemployment rates of around 4%, partly because statisticians counted unpaid family labour and subsistence work as employment. Experts argue this diverges from international norms and makes the jobless rate incomparable with other countries. And it is not just academics and career labour market experts who are concerned about data accuracy. "Unemployment is one of our big challenges and I don't believe the government data reflects the true ground situation," said Duvvuri Subbarao, Reserve Bank of India Governor from 2008-2013. Subbarao said the kind of jobs being created also matters. As high-growth sectors like finance and IT tend to be less labour-intensive, he called for a sharper policy focus on manufacturing, which holds greater potential for large-scale employment. About a quarter of experts polled had no problem with the accuracy of official jobless data. "No one in the world has perfect employment data. People assume the U.S. labour force survey is perfect. It's not. Our PLFS is very robust now. People just don't want to believe it," said Surjit Bhalla, former executive director for India at the International Monetary Fund. But several experts said even if methodologically sound, official figures fail to capture deeper challenges. On its current path, India will take at least two decades to match the female labour force participation rates of other G20 countries, the survey found. A lack of strong job creation is also showing up in stagnating wages. "We are home to some of the big dollar billionaires… the wealth of some of the elite has been growing dramatically over the past decade. But real wages are not growing. Half of the workers are getting less than they got even 10 years ago. To me, these are not signs of a healthy economy," said Jayati Ghosh, professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. "We should be prioritising good quality employment generation," she said. Asked what the government should prioritise to create more high-quality jobs, several said improving education and skills, promoting private investment and reducing regulatory hurdles. "Stop selling the narrative that farm jobs growth (is) to be read as jobs growth. Adopt an industrial policy, with a manufacturing strategy that is horizontal in nature, not a PLI type picking winners tactic, that is clearly failing," said Santosh Mehrotra, professor at the University of Bath. PLI (Production Linked Incentive) is a subsidy scheme to boost domestic manufacturing. The government scaled back the scheme just four years after its launch.
