Kokua Line: Will time-of-use power rates expand after study?
Answer : Yes, Hawaii's Public Utilities Commission issued Order No. 41713 on May 21, entitled 'Closing the Advanced Rate Design Track, ' which says that Time-of-Use rates evaluated in the Advanced Rate Design study 'did not achieve the essential goals of meaningfully shifting electricity use to daytime hours and empowering all customers to save money ' and therefore should not expand as-is to all Hawaiian Electric customers. The order also says that the studied TOU program, marketed as Shift and Save, shall remain open to customers who are currently enrolled, unless they opt out.
Hawaiian Electric closed Shift and Save to new enrollments as of Feb. 1, when the one-year pilot period ended. There were about 20, 000 customers in the pilot program, who 'will be informed about the program's close and that they may choose to opt out. The purpose of the pilot was to test how these rates would work in real life in households and businesses. We now have detailed data on customer behavior related to price signals, which can help inform future decisions about rate design, ' Darren Pai, a spokesperson for Hawaiian Electric, said in an email Tuesday.
Shift and Save encouraged 'customers to shift their energy use from evening peak and overnight hours when rates are higher to the daytime when solar energy is abundant and rates are lower, ' Hawaiian Electric's website says. However, the company's final report on Shift and Save, posted by the PUC on May 1, said its time-of-use rates 'did not achieve a meaningful shift of electricity use to the daytime off-peak period and were not structured and /or implemented to provide all customer categories with an opportunity to reduce their bills, particularly residential customers who work full-time during the day and /or commute in an electric vehicle, ' according to the PUC's order.
Hawaiian Electric and other parties have until June 18 to respond to the PUC's order.
Q : I read articles about the Shinnyo Lantern Floating at Ala Moana Regional Park, and I was just wondering about the details of the ceremony : what are the lanterns made of, what are they floating on, are they cleaned and reused or recycled afterwards, do any blow away into the open ocean, etc ? I realize the importance of the event to the participants in honoring lost loved ones, but am also hoping that the environment is honored and protected from further degradation in this age of diminishing resources and environmental crisis.
A : Each of the 6, 000 individual lanterns are comprised of a foam base, paper lantern, a candle in a foil cup and a plastic rudder, according to the event's website. They're designed to catch on lines strung across the water to ensure they don't float out to sea. Volunteers on canoes retrieve them after the ceremony ends. Some parts, such as the foam bases and plastic rudders, are cleaned and reused year after year, while the paper on which prayers and remembrances are written is removed and disposed of 'in a proper and spiritually respectful way, ' according to the website, The ceremony also includes large guiding lanterns and collective remembrance lanterns, which are made of different materials but which also are retrieved and reused, it says.
Shinnyo-en is a school of esoteric Buddhism founded in Japan in the 1930s ; its first temple outside of Japan was dedicated in Hawaii in 1971, the website says.------------Write to Kokua Line at Honolulu Star-Advertiser, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Suite 2-200, Honolulu, HI 96813 ; call 808-529-4773 ; or email.------------
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17-07-2025
- Yahoo
Stop calling 911 about unhoused people on Public Utility Commission property: CK police
The Chatham-Kent Police Service is asking people to please stop calling 911 about unhoused people camped on the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) property on Grand Avenue. Calling 911 is for emergencies only, the force said in a news release issued Thursday. "The Chatham-Kent Police Service is aware of the presence of unhoused individuals choosing to shelter at the PUC property, which is municipally-owned and is within the guidelines of the municipality's encampment protocol," police said. "Unhoused individuals are permitted to shelter at this property under existing guidelines." Outreach workers from R.O.C.K., Reach Out Chatham-Kent, have been working with the municipality to help relocate residents of an encampment in the downtown park on the edge of the Thames River. City officials say they needed people out of the park by the start of this week because a construction project requires the site for equipment storage into next year. Unhoused can camp if there's no adequate alternative The eviction has led to confusion among unhoused people and their advocates over where they can legally camp. Courts have ruled that Ontario municipalities cannot evict encampment residents without offering adequate, accessible shelter spaces. "This means that the Municipality of Chatham-Kent cannot remove people who are experiencing homelessness unless alternative options are provided or there are compelling safety concerns," the municipality says on its website. "Chatham-Kent's current emergency shelter (Victoria Park Place) operated at 99 per cent capacity on average in 2024, illustrating that there are simply not enough beds for the approximately 200-plus individuals experiencing homelessness in Chatham-Kent." The municipality's encampment policy prohibits encampments in the following areas. On or within 100 metres of municipal playgrounds, water parks, splash pads, beaches or sports fields. On or within 100 metres of any elementary school, childcare facility, assisted living facility or other health or social services facility providing support or care services to youth or vulnerable populations. Within 10 metres of any private property line. On or under bridges. On or within five metres of sidewalks or pedestrian paths. On or within 25 metres of any cemetery. On or within five metres of an off-leash dog area. On or within five metres of any community garden. In any actively used parking lot. In or on any public-use building or structure. In areas that block the free movement of another person on a street, public pathway, sidewalk or other path of public travel. On municipal land where individuals have a private easement or ownership interest or where the municipality owes a duty to maintain the land to the benefit or partial benefit of private individuals (i.e. beach access). On municipal lands in areas obstructing construction or maintenance activities. Structures must be freestanding and able to be moved as necessary, the rules say. The policy also expresses zero tolerance for violence or other criminal acts and demands that sites "maintain a level of reasonable cleanliness." That includes no used, uncapped needles in or around the site and no unreasonable amounts of garbage, clutter, or uncontained debris.
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
NV Energy asking to raise rates by more than twice as much as needed, say experts
(Photo: Ronda Churchill/Nevada Current) The Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer Protection says NV Energy requires less than half of the $224 million rate hike it's asking the Public Utilities Commission to approve for Southern Nevada customers, and criticized the utility for attempting to charge ratepayers for lavish spending on lodging and limos for company gatherings. The 9% proposed rate hike is expected to cost the average customer an additional $15 to $20 a month. An expert witness testifying on behalf of the BCP, Mark Garrett, says NV Energy, based on a formula used to determine its revenue requirement, needs a rate hike of $106 million to provide service to its customers in the south. The utility is asking the PUC to include in the rate hike the cost of constructing Greenlink, a massive transmission line project, while it is still under construction and not benefitting ratepayers. Greenlink's cost has ballooned from just under $2.5 billion to more than $4.2 billion, and could increase even more, depending on the outcome of President Donald Trump's trade wars with Mexico and Canada. The increase related to Greenlink alone would hike rates by $60.6 million, or about $3.60 a month, for a little more than two years. The company argues that including the cost of construction while in progress, which is usually not permitted because it requires customers to pay for a service not yet provided, will generate cash flow, and help maintain credit ratings. In 2021, NV Energy's then-CEO Doug Cannon told state lawmakers that 'Nevadans will not be asked to pay for this investment until at least five to six years down the road.' Cannon left the company last month, following the revelation that the utility overcharged some 80,000 customers, some going back as far as 20 years. 'The company is faced with meeting the demands of growth, addressing system reliability, resource adequacy, legislative goals and mandates, and operational needs as it relates to sufficient levels of staffing, technology, and insurance – all of which necessitates investments above those currently reflected in the existing revenue requirement,' NV Energy vice president and chief financial officer Mike Behrens said in testimony submitted to the PUC, justifying the utility's rate requests. Behrens testified that including the costs of constructing Greenlink, while work is in progress, would help avoid a bond rating downgrade and higher interest rates on future debt. Garrett, on behalf of the BCP, recommended the cost of constructing Greenlink not be included in the upcoming rate case. 'The company has not demonstrated a financial need,' Garrett countered, and said the claim that charging customers now for constructing the project would save money 'is inaccurate.' While including the cost of construction in progress in the base rate would save the company $35 million in interest, it would cost customers $52.7 million in higher rates, and 'makes no economic sense for ratepayers,' Garrett testified. NV Energy is also seeking to recoup $16.4 million in affiliate expenses incurred by the company or its affiliates, such as Berkshire Hathaway Energy, its holding company. Among the expenses is an invoice for just under $1.3 million for Red Rock Resort, including $14,940 for incidentals, $152,156 for 'guest room attrition,' $575,068 for banquet food and beverages, $17,140 for internet, $78,482 for audio/visual services, and $3,248 for luggage porters. Nichole Loar of the BCP recommended the PUC disallow all $16.4 million in affiliate expenses – including: Chauffeured transportation services; Washington, D.C. office building and related labor; 'Excessive lodging charges' at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, D.C. and the J.W. Marriott in Phoenix; Lobbying expenses; Outside counsel; Corporate airfare; Alcoholic beverages; Entertainment; and Charitable donations 'The utility needs to be reminded they operate with a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (given by the PUC), which is a privilege to serve as a monopolistic entity, not a right,' Loar testified. 'The recent proposed increases are placing vulnerable demographics at a heightened risk for heat-related illnesses, such as heatstroke,' Las Vegan Angel DeFazio of the National Toxic Encephalopathy Foundation said in a news release following a consumer input session last week on the proposed increase. She noted that seniors and others on fixed incomes are challenged to cover essential expenses, such as food and medicine, and pay for energy, especially during the summer months when bills skyrocket. The PUC is expected to hold hearings on the proposed rate hike in September. If approved, rates would increase on Oct. 1.
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Hawaiian Electric seeks approval for wildfire safety work
Typical residential customers of the state's largest utility could see their monthly bill rise between $1 and $5.50 to cover costs of an expanded three-year wildfire safety plan. Hawaiian Electric disclosed the cost estimates in a plan update filed with the state Public Utilities Commission on Friday. The safety plan for work through 2027 is subject to PUC approval, and the utility anticipates that bills won't likely increase for plan work until 2026. Ratepayer cost estimates vary by island where the cost and scope of planned improvements are different and add up to $350 million for Maui County, Oahu and Hawaii island. Kauai has an electric utility owned by ratepayers. The biggest Hawaiian Electric investments in wildfire safety are slated for Maui, where a wind-driven inferno determined to have originated from a downed company power line killed 102 people and destroyed most of Lahaina on Aug. 8, 2023. Hawaiian Electric said it plans to spend $181 million on wildfire safety work throughout Maui County, but mainly on Maui where the state's wildfire risk is highest. This work, the company said, should cost a typical residential customer $5.41 more per month. Work on Maui is to initially include putting underground about two miles of overhead power lines in critical safety areas in Lahaina determined with the help of a community working group providing area-specific knowledge and input. Hawaiian Electric said this initial work in Lahaina will be a pilot project that informs planning for future undergrounding of power lines in the West Maui town and other areas. On Oahu, safety plan work is expected to cost $68 million and result in a typical residential customer's monthly bill rising by $1.05. Work on Hawaii island is expected to cost $101 million and have a $2.86 monthly bill impact. A typical residential customer uses 500 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month. Not all of the cost for wildfire safety work under the plan will be borne by ratepayers. Hawaiian Electric said some of the expense is being covered by existing programs, including a $95 million federal grant for grid resilience received in 2024. Hawaiian Electric in a news release noted that bill impacts from the planned work may be reduced if the company can use a financing strategy that the Legislature approved in a bill passed April 30. Senate Bill 897 authorizes the PUC to let the company issue long-term bonds that finance safety infrastructure work and are repaid through customer billing. This form of financing, known as securitization, is less costly for Hawaiian Electric than other forms of available debt. Gov. Josh Green has yet to act on SB 897. His office in written testimony raised some concerns about various drafts of the bill that were different than what lawmakers passed. 'The Companies will take advantage of that option if /when it becomes available, ' Hawaiian Electric said in the filing, referring to its subsidiaries on different islands. Hawaiian Electric said about two-thirds of wildfire safety work will be capital investments in upgraded physical infrastructure, with the other third to be spent on operations and maintenance that includes enhanced equipment inspections and removal or trimming of thousands of hazardous trees. Other specific work to be done under the plan include :—Insulating wire power lines in highest risk areas to prevent sparking if a line touches another line or falls to the ground.—Replacing and strengthening poles.—Installing more weather stations and hazard-detection cameras.—Expanding AI-assisted video camera stations to enable 100 % coverage of all high and medium wildfire risk areas.—Creating a wildfire watch office that includes a meteorologist to monitor media reports, internal and external weather information and field reports to provide more situational awareness for operations.—Using a wildfire risk model to inform real-time decision-making and to refine the company's Public Safety Power Shutoff program so that shutoffs, if necessary, can be more precise and shorter. 'The (plan ) is designed to provide public safety, wildfire risk mitigation, reliability and resilience benefits for the Companies' customers and the State as a whole, ' Hawaiian Electric said in the filing. The plan filed with regulators Friday updates a less-detailed 'blueprint ' filed with the PUC in January that had a $450 million estimated cost and scope of work that Hawaiian Electric then said could change with refinements. Hawaiian Electric created its first wildfire mitigation plan in 2019, which did not include a power safety shutoff program. The plan was updated in the months after the Maui wildfire disaster, and many upgrades and operational changes have been implemented since then, including the shutoff program begun in July. The wildfire that struck Lahaina caused an estimated $5.5 billion in property damage. A $4 billion settlement of fire victim litigation is to be mostly paid for by the utility, the state and landowner Kamehameha Schools. Hawaiian Electric's share of the settlement is $2 billion. It is to be paid over four years and not add to customer bills. The parent of the utility, Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc., raised capital for the first payment by selling new shares of stock. Additional payment funding is expected to be raised through issuing debt and equity in HEI. BY THE NUMBERS Hawaiian Electric 2025-2027 wildfire safety plan estimated costs :—Total : $350 million—Maui County : $181 million—Hawaii island : $101 million—Oahu : $68 million Monthly bill impacts ----Maui County : $5.41—Hawaii island : $2.86—Oahu : $1.05 —Residential customer using 500 kilowatt-hours of electricity
