
Poll: 68% back UK oil and gas amid rising NE job losses
Scott Barr, managing director of the Aberdeen-based firm, blamed the cuts on 'the government's ongoing punitive fiscal position and a challenging regulatory environment'.
READ MORE
At an emergency press conference in Aberdeen, Russell Borthwick, chief executive of the Chamber, said nearly 600 jobs had been lost across the region in recent weeks.
He warned these were not isolated incidents but part of a wider trend driven by political and fiscal instability.
Mr Borthwick said: 'We are witnessing the start of deindustrialisation in the UK's energy capital. This is not what the public voted for, and this is reflected in our polling published today.'
The Energy Profits Levy — widely referred to as the windfall tax — was introduced in 2022 by then Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Initially set at 35%, it was raised to 38% in last year's Budget by Chancellor Rachel Reeves. The headline rate of tax on upstream oil and gas activities is now 78% — among the highest in the world.
Mr Borthwick said: 'The Energy Profits Levy is starving the sector of investment and damaging the very supply chain we need to deliver net zero. The country did not vote for lost jobs, rising imports and higher emissions.'
He added: 'Since the windfall tax was first imposed in May 2022, the price of Brent Crude oil has nearly halved. Meanwhile, the levy has been increased by successive governments.
'As the industry faces this punishing tax rate — coupled with uncertainty over environmental assessments and a closed door on exploration — these findings show the UK has become a difficult place to do business.
'It leaves the country reliant on imported oil and gas, and has cost jobs from the energy supply chain which is vital for delivering projects in offshore wind, hydrogen and carbon capture — all essential for net zero.
'The shift to renewables at scale is the goal, particularly offshore wind, but volatile transmission charges and the risk of zonal pricing are undermining investment plans. Policy should instead seek to put the energy transition back on the front foot.'
According to the Chamber's poll, 68% of voters want to meet oil and gas demand from domestic production, rather than relying on imports.
Just 27% believe the windfall tax has had any meaningful impact on reducing household bills, with more than 60% describing it as ineffective.
When informed that companies operating in the North Sea face a 78% tax rate, three times as many voters said they considered the levy unfair as those who said it was fair.
The Chamber has now called for urgent action from both the UK and Scottish governments.
It is seeking an emergency summit involving the Prime Minister and First Minister to prevent further job losses and accelerate green job creation.
It has also called for the Energy Profits Levy to be scrapped before the next financial year, and for clear funding commitments to support the Acorn carbon capture project at St Fergus.
The poll was seized upon by the Scottish Conservatives, who accused both Labour and the SNP of waging an 'ideological war' on the North Sea.
Douglas Lumsden, the party's shadow energy and net zero secretary, said: 'This poll is just the latest to confirm that an overwhelming majority of Scots back producing our own oil and gas while we still depend on it — unlike John Swinney and Keir Starmer, who would rather leave us reliant on imports.'
He added: 'It is crazy that Labour and the SNP continue their ideological war on the North Sea, even as hundreds of workers at Harbour Energy lose their jobs. They are putting our energy security at risk.'
Mr Lumsden said the SNP had 'fought tooth and nail against Jackdaw and Rosebank', and that the First Minister was 'no friend of the industry'.
A UK Government spokesperson said: 'The Government has reformed the Energy Profits Levy to support investment and give industry certainty and stability.
"The Prime Minister has made clear the UK Government's steadfast commitment to the north east of Scotland's energy sector, which plays a vital role in the UK economy and will continue to do so for future generations.
'By making the UK a clean energy superpower, including launching a world-leading carbon capture and storage industry after years of delay, consenting record amounts of clean power, and ending many years of no new nuclear, we will get the UK off dependence on markets controlled by petrostates and dictators, and drive jobs and growth through our Plan for Change.'
The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
21 minutes ago
- Daily Record
SNP Government making 'glacial progress' on removing cladding from homes after Grenfell Tower
Willie Rennie said Nationalist ministers had "no excuse" after works were completed on just 0.2 per cent of potentially affected buildings. The SNP Government has been accused of making "glacial progress" in removing potentially dangerous cladding from residential buildings in the wake of Grenfell Tower fire. Willie Rennie said Nationalist ministers had "no excuse" after official figures showed remediation work had only been completed on just 0.2 per cent of potentially affected buildings. The Lib Dem MSP said the removal of potentially dangerous cladding was an issue "where Scotland simply cannot afford to fall behind". The Scottish Government has estimated up to 1,450 residential buildings may need remediation work - including about 250 high-rises. But full surveys are needed to establish what needs to be done on a case-by-case basis, a process known as Single Building Assessments (SBAs). The Lib Dems today warned that just three SBAs have been completed, while there are only two buildings with active remediation work. A further 12 SBAs are underway. The slow pace is despite Government's Cladding Remediation Programme having received 600 expressions of interest, which allows those responsible for buildings to ask for them to be assessed. The MSP said the lack of progress in Scotland contrasts sharply contrasts sharply with the situation in England where 2,490 buildings identified with unsafe cladding have started or completed remediation works. Rennie said: "In the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower disaster, there can be no excuses for making such glacial progress, but this SNP Government continues to blunder their way through in slow motion. "This is an issue where Scotland simply cannot afford to fall behind; by moving so sluggishly with the necessary building works, the SNP government are only increasing the risks to peoples' lives. "That's why I am imploring ministers to urgently step up the pace in fixing at-risk buildings and keep homeowners, residents and local authorities informed on developments." The Scottish Government has brought forward legislation which could see a tax charged on the construction of certain new residential properties, in line with equivalent legislation in England. The bill seeks to raise about £30m a year to help fund work to fix residential buildings with unsafe cladding which have no linked developer. Ivan McKee, the Public Safety Minister, previously said: "The Scottish government is committed to doing what is right and necessary to address the challenge of fixing buildings affected by unsafe cladding. "That includes putting the appropriate funding arrangements in place to ensure that the associated costs of cladding remediation do not fall directly onto affected homeowners. "I know that developers share our determination to keep people safe and this levy will ensure they make a fair contribution to these costs, just as they will be doing in England." He added: "I also welcome the continued co-operation of developers who have accepted responsibility for the assessments and any required mitigation and remediation of their buildings." The UK Government has already agreed in principle to devolve the powers needed for a Scottish Building Safety Levy. Labour ministers announced their intention to speed up efforts to inspect and repair buildings in response to the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire in London that killed 72 people. The 23-storey tower's cladding is believed to have contributed to the rapid spread of the fire. The Record asked the Scottish Government for comment.


The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Highland Fuels buys Carnegie Fuels in start of 'new chapter'
It said of its acquisition of Brechin-based Carnegie Fuels: 'This carefully considered partnership represents the coming together of two respected, values-led businesses with deep roots in the Scottish energy sector. 'The decision by the Carnegie family to entrust Highland Fuels with the future of the business follows an extensive sale process. Highland Fuels was selected as the preferred partner due to a strong cultural alignment, shared ethos, and a longstanding reputation for service excellence and community focus.' Highland Fuels became employee-owned in August 2023, and this played a key part in the deal, with the Carnegie Fuels leadership highlighting the importance of ensuring the employees of the Brechin-based business were "looked after" by a new owner. Commenting on behalf of Carnegie Fuels, Kevin Carnegie said: 'This [employee ownership] was a key factor in our decision. We wanted to ensure that our team, many of whom have been with us for years, are looked after not just today but into the future. Joining an employee-owned company like Highland Fuels gives them that stability and a real stake in what comes next.' Highland Fuels said: 'Carnegie Fuels has built a legacy of reliability, trust and local service - qualities that strongly reflect Highland Fuels' own values as a customer-centric and employee-focused company.' It added that, as part of the transaction, Carnegie Fuels would 'continue to operate under its established name and management structure', with Ryan Carnegie appointed as director and Kevin and Rosie Carnegie 'supporting a smooth transition'. Read more Highland Fuels describes itself as 'Scotland's leading independent fuel distributor', operating 11 depots, 16 petrol stations and a fleet of 50 road tankers serving the country. It has 260 employees based across operations which stretch from Lerwick in Shetland to Manchester. Stephen Rhodes, managing director of Highland Fuels, said: 'This is a very positive step for both businesses and for the communities we serve. We're honoured to be continuing the Carnegie legacy and welcoming the team into the Highland Fuels family. This partnership is built on shared values and a commitment to long-term success." He added: "This transaction lays a strong foundation for operational continuity and sustainable growth, delivered with a focus on people, communities, and service excellence. Highland Fuels and Carnegie Fuels share a deep-rooted commitment to professionalism, integrity and reliability. By uniting the strengths of the two companies customers can be confident in a trusted energy partner that is well equipped to meet Scotland's evolving energy needs - today and into the future.'


The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Shareholders urged to vote in Scottish battle over trust
It has also recommended that investors should vote for the resolutions to reappoint the existing directors, ahead of crunch meetings which will determine the future path for the fund. Mr Jourdan and other shareholders have requisitioned a general meeting of Maven Renovar VCT, which will be held on August 13. They have put forward resolutions seeking to remove the board of the trust and appoint four replacement directors, including Mr Jourdan, in their place. The management contract for the venture capital trust, formerly known as Amati AIM VCT, was moved by the board from Amati to Glasgow-based private equity house Maven Capital Partners with effect from May. The board then faced shareholder opposition at the trust's annual meeting on June 19. Bill Nixon, managing partner of Maven, declared the private equity house had 'a proven track record to turning round a VCT in a near-identical situation'. He told The Herald: 'It is clear that the last time there was a disproportionately small number of shareholders - about 100 - voted against the board at the AGM which arguably created a distorted outcome relative to the [total] number of shareholders. 'All we would say is whatever way you vote, get out and vote.' Read more Mr Nixon observed that the Bluehone AIM VCT2 fund had delivered an 84% total return and its total net asset value had 'grown 3.6 times' since its management was taken on by Maven in 2011. He said: 'It has got very similar parallels to the Amati fund [now Maven Renovar VCT]. It was an AIM VCT which had lost a lot of value and we materially turned it around.' Mr Nixon added: 'I would like to emphasise we have done this before. We have done this turnaround. We understand that when managers are terminated they don't like it, but I am afraid that is just business. 'We have a much larger resource. We have the capability. We have 11 offices across the UK to execute on this recovery plan.' Mr Jourdan told The Herald: 'There are a significant group of shareholders who were upset at what happened and they want a capital return strategy. 'This is not about me. It is not about trying to get the contract back. It is just about what is the best strategy to pursue from here for the shareholders.' He highlighted his view that the situation 'shouldn't have got as heated as it has'. Flagging the key point of difference from his perspective, he noted the board wanted to let Maven do more unquoted investments for the VCT whereas his group of investors believed shareholders would be better off having capital returned. Mr Nixon said: 'The most important thing is people vote. Shareholder democracy will prevail. Rather than leave the decision to a small group of shareholders, it is important as many shareholders as possible vote. 'We believe that the best approach is to adopt the plan which the experienced board have concluded is best for the company, and where we have a proven track record to turning round a VCT in a near-identical situation.' Read more Claiming the alternative was 'going with a who have a strategy to progressively wind down the company', he declared: 'There is common acceptance in the risk asset space it is better to have large, vibrant portfolios than wind down a VCT which has a significant fixed cost base. 'What this should really be about is performance and capability.' In a response to a circular issued on July 21 by the directors of Maven Renovar VCT, Mr Jourdan, Charles McMicking, Kathleen McLeay and Hector Kilpatrick, the four proposed replacement directors, say: 'At its heart, the question being asked of shareholders is whether they wish the VCT to continue to make new qualifying investments, which involve substantial risks, where these will be mostly in private companies, despite not having any requirement to do this under the VCT legislation; or whether they would prefer to have all surplus capital returned, whilst maximising shareholder value by keeping exposure to the best companies in the existing portfolio, potentially for many years. 'The requisitioning shareholders are proposing the latter and have proposed a new board of directors to implement this strategy. It's that simple.' Mr Nixon said: 'We are encouraging shareholders to vote. Whatever way people vote, the most important thing is they vote and they decide what strategy they want to adopt, and what board they want to run or determine the future strategy for this VCT.' He added: 'To give the company the best prospects of restoration in shareholder value, we think a broader investment policy would be helpful. This is not a policy that is going from AIM to private equity. It is a policy that is going from AIM to AIM and private equity. 'Shareholder democracy will prevail. They will have a choice to appoint the existing experienced board or the choice to appoint a new board including the former investment manager.'