Dalton Tagelagi: Niue on course to achieve its renewable energy goals
'Alakihihifo Vailala
, PMN
Niue's Prime Minister Dalton Tagelagi
Photo:
RNZ Pacific / Lydia Lewis
Niue's Prime Minister Dalton Tagelagi says the island nation will achieve its "ambitious target" of 80 percent renewable energy goal by the end of 2025, reducing its reliance on fossil fuels and contributing to its
Paris Agreement
commitments.
Speaking on
PMN Niue
, Tagelagi says reaching the target will reap many benefits for the nation, which sits 68 metres above sea level at its highest point.
"We will be reaching that target with 80 percent renewable energy, and that means it will save us a lot in fossil fuel," Tagelagi says.
"Fossil fuel is one of the main contributors to climate change, and that means that will factor in as part of our national determined contribution towards the Paris Agreement."
Niue is currently hosting the Niue National Energy Summit 2025 in partnership with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
The Summit brings together government leaders, MPs, village councils, private sector players, development partners and community stakeholders to co-develop a shared vision for Niue's energy future and set priorities for the next Energy Roadmap through to 2035.
This is the second Energy Summit, following the 2015 summit, which set the target of achieving 80 per cent renewable energy by 2025.
Last year, during a visit to Niue, Aotearoa, New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced an investment of $20.5 million in a new, large-scale project aimed at helping the island nation achieve its renewable energy target.
New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Niue Prime Minister Tagelagi in Niue last year.
Photo:
RNZ/Giles Dexter
The project also ensures better energy security during destructive weather events.
Tagelagi says that greater funding commitments for Small Island Developing States are needed, a sentiment echoed by many leaders during last year's Conference of the Parties in Azerbaijan.
"Everyone was calling for at least US$39 billion (NZ$65b) annually to support adaptation across all small island development states," Tagelagi says.
Reflecting on last month's United Nations Ocean Conference, Tagelagi says Niue is gaining international traction due to homegrown initiatives, such as when the nation declared its entire Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) a Multiple-Use Marine Park under the Nukutulea Framework in 2022.
Niue is one of the few countries worldwide with 100 percent of its ocean space legally managed and marks the second largest no-take Marine Protected Area by EEZ percentage globally.
"The world's keeping an eye on it because of how it was structured or how the initiative and thing is," Tagelagi says.
"It does come with higher responsibilities with people outside wanting to know more about what we're doing.
"It is one thing to put ourselves out there. The other challenge would
-
PMN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
ACT sets out plan to party faithful: "Keep the government and make it better"
ACT is holding their annual rally in Auckland on Sunday. Shown: ACT leader David Seymour at the 2023 party rally. Photo: RNZ / Mohammad Alafeshat ACT has unveiled its pitch to lure a new supermarket player into New Zealand through a new fast-track approval process. It's part of the party's bid to focus on "problem solving" rather than "finger-pointing" as it looks toward the next election, to "keep the government" and make it "better". Leader David Seymour made the announcement at the party's annual rally on Sunday, in Auckland, where it considered its half-time "report card" of its performance in government . Seymour outlined the party's wins through the past year and a half - including in efforts on law and order and reducing co-governance - while signalling to the campaign ahead and the voters he wanted to claim. A key focus of Seymour's speech were the voters who he said had been treated as a "scapegoat" by the previous government. He suggested Labour chose landlords as a scapegoat for the issue of high rents. He said Labour did this because of "politics." "There are three million voters and only 120,000 are landlords so there's 23 other voters per landlord. They say the most important skill in politics is the ability to count." Along with landlords, Seymour said firearm owners, farmers and employers were affected by policies Labour put in place, as well as groups of people he said Labour had left out in the cold. "Blaming someone might feel good. We think that building something feels better," he said. "Whether you rent or own, farm or teach, build or tend, your future depends on solving the same problems, not blaming different people." His coalition partners weren't left unscathed tough, as he pointed to efforts to target big corporations as a way of making things easier for New Zealand, and targeting the cost of living. "You can understand people wanting to go after the banks or the supermarkets or the power companies. "It would be the easiest thing in the world for me to give a speech saying they're crooked and need to be punished somehow. "They should be taxed somehow, have their businesses broken up, or be watched over by even toothier watchdogs. It's the curse of zero sum thinking." His solution to the "biggest challenge we face" - the cost of living - was to loosen up what Seymour called "outdated planning and consenting rules", which were the biggest barriers to international supermarket players setting up shop in the country. "With the cost of living, the solution is not regulation but competition. Business should fear competition, not their own government." A new ACT party proposal - rather than government policy - would introduce a fast-track approval process that would streamline rezoning, consenting and investment approvals to build new supermarkets at scale. Seymour said this would allow new entrants or smaller grocers to get approval within months, not years. There was no mention in the speech of a specific player who had shown interest in setting up in New Zealand, but Seymour said he hoped it would bring a "serious extra chain to retail in New Zealand.' "Even if it doesn't, just the possibility of a new competitor can help keep competitive pressure on the incumbents," he said. "If it doesn't work, we'll know that either our market is more competitive than we thought, or we have some other problem." Ultimately, he told the audience, "if you're looking for finger pointing, don't look here. We are interested in problem solving." "If you want to find a scapegoat, you can, but it still won't work. We tried it with landlords, we tried it with oil and gas, we tried it with farmers, employers, and licensed firearm owners. "Every time government goes after a group in society, the problem gets worse." As part of his speech he also acknowledged the failure of the Treaty Principles Bill to pass into law. "Our partners abandoned us defining the Treaty Principles, so we lost the vote. "That's a shame, but there's something more important than winning the vote. We won the argument." It's a key policy that differentiates ACT from its coalition partners, and the party has indicated it will continue to try and pass it in some form. "It is now a matter of time before the Treaty Principles Bill or something like it passes," Seymour told the gathering. At the half-way mark of this term in government, Seymour said the party's focus from here would be "campaigning to keep the government and keep making it better." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
NZ's new AI strategy is long on 'economic opportunity' but short on managing ethical and social risk
By By Andrew Lensen* of Photo: Supplied/Callaghan Innovation The government's newly unveiled National AI Strategy is all about what its title said: "Investing with Confidence". It tells businesses that Aotearoa New Zealand is open for AI use, and that our "light touch" approach won't get in their way. The question now is whether the claims made for AI by Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology Shane Reti - that it will help boost productivity and enable the economy to grow by billions of dollars - can be justified. Generative AI - the kind powering ChatGPT, CoPilot, and Google's video generator Veo 3 - is certainly earning money. In its latest funding round in April, OpenAI was valued at US$300 billion . Nvidia, which makes the hardware that powers AI technology, just became the first publicly traded company to surpass a $4 trillion market valuation . It'd be great if New Zealand could get a slice of that pie. New Zealand doesn't have the capacity to build new generative AI systems, however. That takes tens of thousands of NVIDIA's chips, costing many millions of dollars that only big tech companies or large nation states can afford. What New Zealand can do is build new systems and services around these models, either by fine-tuning them or using them as part of a bigger software system or service. The government isn't offering any new money to help companies do this. Its AI strategy is about reducing barriers, providing regulatory guidance, building capacity, and ensuring adaptation happens responsibly. But there aren't many barriers to begin with. The regulatory guidance contained in the strategy essentially said "we won't regulate". Existing laws are said to be "technology-neutral" and therefore sufficient. As for building capacity, the country's tertiary sector is more under-funded than ever, with universities cutting courses and staff. Humanities research into AI ethics is also ineligible for government funding as it doesn't contribute to economic growth. The issue of responsible adoption is perhaps of most concern. The 42-page " Responsible AI Guidance for Businesses " document, released alongside the strategy, contains useful material on issues such as detecting bias, measuring model accuracy, and human oversight. But it is just that - guidance - and entirely voluntary. This puts New Zealand among the most relaxed nations when it comes to AI regulation, along with Japan and Singapore . At the other end is the European Union, which enacted its comprehensive AI Act in 2024, and has stood fast against lobbying to delay legislative rollout. The relaxed approach is interesting in light of New Zealand being ranked third-to-last out of 47 countries in a recent survey of trust in AI . In another survey from last year, 66 percent of New Zealanders reported being nervous about the impacts of AI . Some of the nervousness can be explained by AI being a new technology with well documented examples of inappropriate use, intentional or not. Deepfakes as a form of cyberbullying have become a major concern. Even the ACT Party, not generally in favour of more regulation, wants to criminalise the creation and sharing of non-consensual, sexually explicit deepfakes. Generative image, video, and music creation is reducing the demand for creative workers, even though it is their very work that was used to train the AI models. But there are other, more subtle issues, too. AI systems learn from data. If that data is biased, then those systems will learn to be biased, too. New Zealanders are right to be anxious about the prospect of private sector companies denying them jobs, entry to supermarkets , or a bank loan because of something in their pasts. Because modern deep learning models are so complex and impenetrable, it can be impossible to determine how an AI system made a decision. And what of the potential for AI to be used online to mislead voters and discredit the democratic process, as the New York Times has reported, may have occurred already in at least 50 cases. The strategy is essentially silent on all of these issues. It also doesn't mention Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi. Even Google's AI summary tells me this is the nation's founding document, laying the groundwork for Māori and the Crown to coexist. AI, like any data-driven system, has the potential to disproportionately disadvantage Māori if it involves systems from overseas designed (and trained) for other populations. Allowing these systems to be imported and deployed in Aotearoa New Zealand in sensitive applications - healthcare or justice, for example - without any regulation or oversight risks worsening inequalities even further. What's the alternative? The EU offers some useful answers. It has taken the approach of categorising AI uses based on risk : This feels like a mature approach New Zealand might emulate. It wouldn't stymie productivity much - unless companies were doing something risky. In which case, the 66 percent of New Zealanders who are nervous about AI might well agree it's worth slowing down and getting it right. Andrew Lensen is a Senior Lecturer in Artificial Intelligence at Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington -This story was originally published on The Conversation.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Commercial fishing school refunds $1m for subsidy errors over four years
Westport Deep Sea Fishing Ltd blamed an IT change for contributing to its miscalculation. Photo: 123RF A commercial fishing school has repaid more than $1 million to the government, after errors that included claiming funding for students who never attended. Westport Deep Sea Fishing Ltd said an IT change and a decision to waive fees for flood-affected students contributed to the problems. A Tertiary Education Commission report said the private tertiary institution received funding for 523 full-time equivalent students in the four years from 2020 to the end of 2023. An audit last year "revealed significant issues with how student data was reported" and a subsequent investigation found it should have received funding for only 413 FTE students, a difference of almost 110 FTE. The report said, before the audit, the commission had already recovered $264,079 in fees-free funding, due to breaches of the scheme's funding agreement between 2020-23. It said the audit also found a course that made up 0.0333 of a course of study was incorrectly entered as 0.333, meaning the school received $3000 more per student enrolment than it should have. "This resulted in an indicative funding recovery of $354,081 for 116 students," the report said. The investigation found 122 students (109 FTE) were invalid enrolments. The report said the school confirmed it "preloaded" a lot of students into its 2023 student data return, "but had failed to remove any enrolments which did not eventuate or where the learner did not meet the requirements for a confirmed learner enrolment". It said the school also claimed funding for nine students who had been granted recognition of prior learning, meaning the school awarded them credit for existing knowledge, without actually providing any tuition. The report said the investigation found the school needed to repay a further $633,550. "WDSF has acknowledged the invalid enrolments that were identified during this work, attributing the errors to administrative oversights," the report said. "As indicated above, the preloading of enrolments in the 2023 SDR, without sufficient removal of any learners who did not progress to a full enrolment, has created significant overfunding." It said the school entered a repayment plan and the money would be repaid by June 2025. "The TEC notes that, while a number of issues were identified, WDSF management and staff have engaged openly and co-operatively throughout the audit and investigation process," the report said. School owner Peter Maich told RNZ the fees-free repayment followed a decision to waive fees for students who were not able to attend courses, due to flooding in Bay of Plenty. He said the school was told that, because it was not charging a fee, it should not have claimed fees-free funding, which at the time covered the first year of fees for first-time tertiary students. Maich said a change in IT provider for data returns to the Tertiary Education Commission resulted in duplicate enrolments. He said the failure to remove students from its 2023 data return was due to the school being audited during the period it would normally remove non-attenders from its system. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
