logo
Divisive, inflammatory and harmful rhetoric by Rep. Derrick Van Orden must end

Divisive, inflammatory and harmful rhetoric by Rep. Derrick Van Orden must end

Yahoo06-07-2025
As a constituent and member of the La Crosse community, I am writing to express my deep concern and disappointment regarding U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden's repeated use of divisive, inflammatory and harmful rhetoric, as well as his troubling history of behavior that reflects intolerance and bigotry.
Words spoken by a public official carry immense weight. His past actions — including reports of hostile outbursts, use of crude language in public forums, and antagonism toward marginalized groups — do not reflect the dignity, inclusiveness or leadership that his office demands.
Communities across Wisconsin's 3rd District, including mine, deserve representation that uplifts all residents — not one that stokes fear, fuels division or perpetuates hate. Public service is a responsibility that requires humility, accountability and a commitment to all constituents, regardless of their background, beliefs or identity.
Letters: House budget provision exempts executive branch from following court orders
Instead of sowing discord and engaging in performative outrage, I ask that he lead with compassion, civility and a genuine desire to serve. I am tired of politics that use people's identities as punching bags for applause lines. I am ready for leadership that listens, unites and heals.
The people of Wisconsin deserve better. I urge Van Orden to reflect on the tone and substance of his conduct and to remember that his role is to represent all of us — not just the loudest or most like-minded voices. There is still time to choose a better path forward, one rooted in respect, decency and truth.
Tasha Lewis, La Crosse
Letters: Rep. Derrick Van Orden and Green Bay Packers can't just change rules to win
Opinion: Derrick Van Orden should be held accountable for crying wolf about assault claim
Have you no shame sir? A lawmaker and her husband and dog were murdered "Slain Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman, husband and dog to lie in state," June 25. Two more are recovering. Yet you take this time to taunt the Minnesota Governor.
For what purpose? Some clicks on social media? A smile from your president who will throw you under the bus in a heartbeat? How can you look in the mirror?
Cliff Hale, West Allis
Letters: Term limits for Congress needed to ensure continuity and fresh perspectives
Here are some tips to get your views shared with your friends, family, neighbors and across our state:
Please include your name, street address and daytime phone.
Generally, we limit letters to 200 words.
Cite sources of where you found information or the article that prompted your letter.
Be civil and constructive, especially when criticizing.
Avoid ad hominem attacks, take issue with a position, not a person.
We cannot acknowledge receipt of submissions.
We don't publish poetry, anonymous or open letters.
Each writer is limited to one published letter every two months.
All letters are subject to editing.
Write: Letters to the editor, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 330 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI, 53202. Fax: (414)-223-5444. E-mail: jsedit@jrn.com or submit using the form that can be found on the on the bottom of this page.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Van Orden taken to task for harmful rhetoric after killings | Letters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's big bill offers $6K tax break for seniors — but not everyone gets a cut. Here's how much you may save
Trump's big bill offers $6K tax break for seniors — but not everyone gets a cut. Here's how much you may save

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's big bill offers $6K tax break for seniors — but not everyone gets a cut. Here's how much you may save

Donald Trump's big sweeping spending bill included a sweetener for many seniors across America. Starting this year, individuals over the age of 65 can claim $6,000 as a tax deduction in their next filing, according to the Internal Revenue Service. Those who file joint returns can claim this amount individually, which means a married couple could get deductions up to $12,000. Although this isn't the elimination of all income taxes on Social Security that he promised while campaigning, this new subsidy could still be a helpful financial boost for those who qualify. However, the real impact of this new deduction depends on your income bracket. Here's a closer look at how much you could save at different levels of income. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Low income Low-income seniors might not notice this new deduction because they already benefit from a standard deduction that reduces or eliminates the income taxes they owe. As of 2025, the standard deduction for someone over the age of 65 is up to $18,500 individually and up to $32,300 for joint filers. This category includes a significant number of American seniors. According to the KFF, one in three adults over the age of 65 had an income below $28,080 in 2022. Middle income Households with relatively modest incomes could see the most benefit from this new deduction. Because the deduction starts to phase out for single filers earning over $75,000 and married couples making over $150,000 — with full disqualification at incomes above $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples — the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center projects that middle- and upper-middle-income households stand to gain the most. Read more: Americans are 'revenge saving' to survive — but millions only get a measly 1% on their savings. Seniors with incomes between approximately $80,000 and $130,000 are expected to benefit the most from this provision, which would cut their taxes by an average of $1,100, or around 1% of their after-tax income, according to their calculations. High income With a full phase out of the deduction at individual incomes above $175,000 and joint incomes above $250,000, high income tax payers won't benefit from this new incentive at all. Caveats Given all the rules and limitations, this new tax rule could best be described as helpful but limited. Based on the income limits, the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center estimates that less than half of all seniors could see a tax reduction because of this new deduction. The rule is also time-limited and applies only to federal income taxes between 2025 and 2028. Altogether, the new deduction offers a modest cut to a highly specific group of seniors for a relatively short period of time. However, it does have a long-term impact on other government programs that many seniors rely on: Social Security and Medicare. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) projects that the new set of tax policies implemented by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) will hasten the insolvency of both the Social Security and Medicare trust funds, moving their depletion date up from 2033 to 2032 — a full year sooner than earlier forecasts. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of 'massive unemployment' in the US due to the 'biggest change' in history — and says this 1 group of 'smart' Americans will get hit extra hard. Are you one of them? How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

US automakers exempted from fines for fuel efficiency non-compliance
US automakers exempted from fines for fuel efficiency non-compliance

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US automakers exempted from fines for fuel efficiency non-compliance

US regulators have waived fines for automakers failing to meet fuel efficiency standards dating back to the 2022 model year, following a new law signed by President Donald Trump. This move, part of a tax and budget bill, puts an end to fines under the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) rules established by a 1975 energy law. In a letter obtained by Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has informed automakers that it is re-evaluating its fuel economy regulations. The move aligns with other measures from Washington aimed at easing the production of gasoline vehicles and increasing the cost of electric vehicle (EV) sales. In the past, non-compliance with US fuel economy requirements has led to significant penalties for automakers. Stellantis, the parent company of Chrysler, incurred a $190.7m civil penalty for the 2019 and 2020 model years, adding to around $400m in fines from 2016 to 2019. Previously, General Motors (GM) paid $128.2m for 2016 and 2017. President Trump's recent actions also include nullifying California's goal to phase out gasoline-only vehicle sales by 2035. Meanwhile, Tesla has benefited from the situation, earning $2.8bn globally from regulatory credits through the sale of zero-emission EVs. The legislation signed this month by Trump states that vehicle fines will be eliminated for any year where NHTSA has not completed its rulemaking process. Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign director Dan Becker expressed disapproval of the decision, stating: "The Trump administration is reaching back in time to give an obscene gift to pollution law violators GM and Stellantis at the expense of the American taxpayer. 'The automakers lobbied hard for this 'get out of jail free' card. They get hundreds of millions in fines cancelled." GM and Stellantis have yet to respond to the development. Senate Republicans estimates that the law could 'save automakers' around $200m. The NHTSA under President Joe Biden proposed in 2023 to increase fuel economy standards through 2032, which would have cost the industry an estimated $14bn in fines, including $6.5bn, $3bn, and $1bn for GM, Stellantis, and Ford Motor, respectively. However, the final rule adopted last year significantly reduced these requirements, capping potential industry fines at $1.83bn from 2027 through 2031. "US automakers exempted from fines for fuel efficiency non-compliance" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Wall Street Is Hunting for the Perfect Powell Hedge
Wall Street Is Hunting for the Perfect Powell Hedge

Bloomberg

time29 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Wall Street Is Hunting for the Perfect Powell Hedge

Good morning. Wall Street is working out how to play Trump vs Powell. Harvard faculty face a dilemma. And we have the latest on the president's feud with the Washington Commanders. Listen to the day's top stories. Wall Street buzz: Investors are working out how to position themselves just in case Donald Trump does fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. The idea is that a new chair could support Trump's push to cut interest rates —lowering short-term yields while raising long-term ones which are more sensitive to inflation. And while the president's allies attack Powell over the hefty price of renovating the central bank's HQ, we look at why it's costing $2.5 billion (building in a former swamp doesn't help).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store