
Credibility of judiciary has to be enhanced: SC judge
'The credibility of the judiciary has to be enhanced. Black sheep are everywhere…We have around 900 judges, but yes, there are issues that need to be addressed because the judiciary is the institution that commands the last hope and faith of the people in the country,' he said. On the Justice Varma episode, he was clear: 'The CJI (Justice Sanjiv Khanna) took immediate steps.'
The judiciary has found itself embroiled in a controversy following the recovery of cash from the residence of justice Varma on March 14, while he served as a judge of the Delhi high court. In the wake of the episode, he was moved back to his parent high court in Allahabad. CJI Khanna last week wrote to the President and Prime Minister for initiating removal proceedings against the judge under the Constitution as justice Varma refused to resign, despite a three-member in-house panel confirming allegations of cash at his residence.
Justice Gavai, who will serve as CJI until November 23, 2025, was equally firm in his view on post-retirement positions for CJIs. 'It has been my consistent view that a CJI should not take up any political assignment. I will not take any post-retirement assignment, including the governor's office or any other political assignment. No CJI should take any office which is below the CJI's office under the office of precedence,' he said. In the Order of Precedence maintained by the Government of India, the CJI ranks 6th, placed just after the Prime Minister and just above the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. This high placement reflects the significance and constitutional stature of the office.
'SC can't be aloof when the country is in danger'
In a conversation with HT, justice Gavai emphasised that the Supreme Court cannot remain indifferent in moments of national crisis, as he condemned the Pahalgam attack.
'When the country is in danger, the Supreme Court can't be aloof, we are part of the country,' said justice Gavai, adding that the court was 'stunned' upon hearing of the tragedy.
With CJI Khanna abroad at the time, justice Gavai convened a full court meeting and, with the CJI's permission, the Supreme Court observed two minutes of silence to honour the victims -- a rare gesture. Traditionally, the apex court observes silence only once a year on January 30, to mark Mahatma Gandhi's assassination.
This is the first time in its history that the Supreme Court officially condemned a terrorist attack and held a remembrance ceremony, marking a shift in how the judiciary publicly expresses solidarity in moments of national grief.
Justice Gavai also welcomed the ceasefire declared between India and Pakistan following 'Operation Sindoor', saying war benefits no one. 'Yuddh ke kya disasters hain (wars lead to disasters) we have already seen...it's been three years we have been seeing war in Ukraine... over 50 thousand have died... the other conflict in Gaza has seen many more casualties...' said the CJI, adding: 'As a citizen of the country, everybody is concerned. Whatever happens, happens to everyone... Fortunately, there has been a ceasefire... by 12 tomorrow we will know more.'
Justice Gavai will be India's first CJI from the Buddhist community and only the second Dalit CJI.
'Constitution is supreme'
In recent months, tensions have simmered between the judiciary and other branches of government. Vice-president Jagdeep Dhankar criticised the judiciary for acting as a 'super Parliament,' while BJP MP Nishikant Dubey recently accused CJI Sanjiv Khanna of fomenting civil war -- remarks that the apex court termed 'irresponsible' but did not act upon. Justice Gavai, however, expressed a stronger view.
'May be some other judge would have taken a different view... When dignity of court is concerned, there should be no compromise,' he said. Though the BJP distanced itself from Dubey's comment, the incoming CJI believed notice should have been issued.
Also Read: In big Supreme Court move, judges' asset details, appointment process made public
Reaffirming the judiciary's constitutional place, he said: 'Ultimately, what is supreme has already been answered by the apex court in its 13-judge bench decision in the Kesavananda Bharati judgment – the Constitution is supreme. All three wings must perform their functions and discharge their duties within the space and remits allocated to them by the Constitution.'
He stressed the need for 'mutual respect' among constitutional authorities: 'The supremacy of the Constitution has to be accepted by everyone.'
On judicial appointments and nepotism:
Justice Gavai pushed back against allegations of nepotism in the higher judiciary, after the statistics released by the Supreme Court recently showed that 14 of 221 high cCourt judge appointments cleared since November 2022 are related to sitting or retired judges.
'There is enough transparency in how the collegium functions. We take everyone on board. Merely because some lawyers elevated happen to be kith and kin of judges, you cannot say there is nepotism… If someone is highly meritorious and happens to be related to a judge, should that person be disqualified? I don't think so,' he said.
While 17 recommendations remain pending with the government, justice Gavai advocated for resolving delays through dialogue. 'The views of the executive cannot be totally ignored. The judiciary and the executive have to come together and try to find a solution.'
Tackling pendency and protecting liberties:
Among his top priorities, the CJI-designate lists reducing pendency at all levels of the judiciary and strengthening legal aid. 'Pendency is everyone's botheration, and I would like to work on reduction right from the bottom to the Supreme Court,' he said.
With over 45 million cases pending in district courts, more than 6 million in high courts, and over 80,000 in the apex court (of which more than 35% are over a year old), the task is monumental. Justice Gavai also signalled intent to address judicial appointments pending with the government: 'On appointments also, I would like to try and resolve those which are pending.'
His judicial tenure has seen him take strong positions to protect civil liberties and ensure procedural fairness. From staying Rahul Gandhi's conviction in 2023, to granting bail to activist Teesta Setalvad and NewsClick editor Prabir Purkayastha, his benches have routinely intervened to curb state excess.
Most notably, in the so-called 'bulldozer justice' case, his bench laid down guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions without due process. 'In the Bulldozer judgment, it was necessary to pass such orders. Somebody may think it is overstepping,' he said, citing the Vishaka guidelines as precedent for judicial intervention in legislative vacuum.
Transparency, social media scrutiny and merit:
Justice Gavai supports public disclosure of judges' assets -- a move recently adopted by the Full Court. 'It is the judiciary which directs Parliamentarians to disclose their assets and criminal antecedents. So, we must do the same.'
On the video released by the top court showing cash recovered from Justice Yashwant Varma's residence, Gavai said the release was 'avoidable,' noting that any content released by the apex court is presumed authentic by the public.
Asked about social media campaigns and trolling faced by judges, he remained unfazed. 'The social media campaigns and trolls should not bother judges,' he said, but added that 'a judge should exercise a degree of restraint.'
As the second CJI from the scheduled caste community, justice Gavai acknowledged the importance of representation but cautioned against tokenism. 'They need to be represented, but you cannot compromise on merit,' he asserted.
Looking ahead, he said matters with broad public impact would be prioritised under his leadership. He will begin his term with hearings on petitions challenging the Waqf Amendment Act 2025. 'I would like to take up such matters which benefit large sections of society,' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC rejects plea to call Mathura's Shahi Eidgah disputed structure
The Allahabad high court on Friday dismissed an application by Hindu petitioners asking that the Shahi Eidgah mosque in Mathura be referred to as a 'disputed structure' during the legal proceedings on the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah title dispute. The suits filed by Hindu litigants since 2022 seek the removal of the Shahi Eidgah mosque as well as restoration of the temple. (PTI) The controversy is related to the Mughal-era mosque at Mathura, which Hindu groups say was built by emperor Aurangzeb after demolishing a temple at the mythical birthplace of Lord Krishna. The suits filed by Hindu litigants since 2022 seek the removal of the Shahi Eidgah mosque as well as restoration of the temple. The Muslim side has rejected the petitions and said they are barred under the 1991 Places of Worship Act, which freezes the religious character of shrines as they were at the time of independence, barring the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute in Ayodhya. The Hindu petitioners asked the court to direct the stenographer to use word 'disputed structure' in place of order 'Shahi Idgah Mosque' during further proceedings of the suits and other connected matter. The Muslim side said it was an abuse of the process of the law. 'A bare perusal of the pleading of the parties in the suit reveals that there is dispute between the parties with regard to the site where Shahi Masjid Idgah is existing. Parties have claimed their respective title over suit property. Therefore, it may be termed as property in dispute,' said justice Ram Manohar Narain Mishra. 'In pleadings of the parties also, the structure in question is referred as Shahi Masjid Idgah and at this stage, where hearing of the suits is yet to commence and even issues have not been framed, it is neither desirable nor expedient to issue any direction to stenographer, as prayed by the applicants, to refer Shahi Masjid Idgah in judgments and orders as 'disputed structure',' the judge added. 'There is no dispute with regard to identity of property in suit, therefore, the prayer made in the application A-44 cannot be granted at this stage.' Mahendra Pratap Singh, a lawyer from Mathura who moved this application, said that legal experts will be consulted and the order will be analysed. 'We will challenge the order in the Supreme Court after consultation,' said Singh, adding that the order dismissing the application to term the Shahi Eidgah Masjid as a disputed structure will not harm the original suit. Meanwhile, secretary for Shahi Eidgah Masjid management committee and its counsel Tanveer Ahmed welcomed the order and said, 'Justice has been done.' 'Regular namaz is held at the mosque till date and has a separate access. So, there is no dispute. This cannot be called a disputed site,' said Ahmed, adding that the petitioners are wasting the court's time. The Hindu side had submitted that the Shahi Idgah mosque was constructed on the site historically recognised as the birthplace of Lord Krishna. The site holds immense religious significance for Hindus, they argued. But the Muslim side argued that the mosque was in existence for the last 400 years and its existence was sought to be undermined by the present application, which was not permissible under law. Allowing the present application will amount to pre- determination that the Shahi Masjid Idgah is not a mosque at an early stage, the Muslim side said. The religious dispute simmered in the first half of the 20th century but a 1968 agreement calmed tempers. On October 12, 1968, an agreement was signed between the Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan and the Shahi Masjid Idgah Trust, which divided the land between the two parties and relinquished any claims of the Hindu parties to the land of the mosque. But the Hindu side's petition challenged the settlement and alleged that the pact had no legal validity because the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust, which the petitioners claimed had the ownership and title of the land, was not party to the settlement. The Hindi suit claimed that Shahi Eidgah Masjid was constructed on a part of 13.37-acre land belonging to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust. They demanded the mosque, which abuts the temple, be removed and the land returned to the trust because it is the mythical birthplace of Lord Krishna. The Allahabad high court on December 14, 2023 directed the appointment of a court commissioner to supervise the survey of the mosque premises. However, the Supreme Court on January 16, 2024 stayed implementation of the December 14, 2023 order. The case is part of a decades-old ideological project by Hindu groups that argue that medieval-era Islamic structures were built by demolishing temples and demand rights over those structures. Cases by Hindu groups and individuals in Varanasi and Mathura are currently being adjudicated in courts across Uttar Pradesh, even as a larger issue relating to the Place of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 is being heard by the Supreme Court.


Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC issues notice on plea seeking enforcement of 27% OBC law in MP
The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice on a fresh petition seeking enforcement of a Madhya Pradesh law providing 27% reservation to the other backward classes (OBC) in state employment but refused to pass any interim directions noticing that the matter is already pending in the top court. SC issues notice on plea seeking enforcement of 27% OBC law in MP A bench of justices PS Narasimha and R Mahadevan, sitting during the partial court working days, passed the order seeking response of the Madhya Pradesh government on a petition filed by 18 people belonging to the OBC community, led by petitioner Nishchay Sonbirse. The petition argued by advocate Varun Thakur pointed out that in 2019, the MP government brought amendment to the Madhya Pradesh Lok Seva (Anusuchit Jatiyon, Anusuchit Jan Jatiyon Aur Anya Pichhade Vargon Ke Liye Arakshan) Adhiniyam, 1994, increasing reservation benefits in jobs for OBCs from the existing 14% to 27%. Thakur said that prior to enactment of the Act, the same law was introduced by way of an Ordinance that was challenged before the MP high court by a final-year MBBS student. On her plea, an interim order was passed on March 19, 2019 directing that the counselling for NEET-PG examination of 2019 will be conducted as per the old law providing for 14% OBC reservation. He stated that despite the Ordinance becoming law, the interim order has been continued by the executive arm of the state without there being any stay or interim order passed by either the high court or the top court. The bench said, 'We are not going to grant you any interim order. Very reluctantly we are issuing notice. We will only post the matter along with the batch of matters pending before this court.' In 2022, the state of Madhya Pradesh had filed a transfer petition before the top court. Subsequently by an order of the court, all petitions pending before the high court stood transferred to the top court where the matter is still pending. Solicitor general Tushar Mehta appearing for the state opposed the petition pointing out that already the issue is under consideration in the transfer petition filed by the state. He questioned the need for adding yet another petition to the bunch of cases where the validity of the law has been challenged. Thakur pointed out that the pending batch of cases only challenge the Ordinance. However, the Act has not been challenged so far. However, lawyers appearing in the matter refuted this claim pointing out that even the 2019 Act by the state introducing 27% reservation for OBC in public employment is pending before the top court. Thakur said that the implementation of the 2019 amendment remains uncertain and sought a clarification from the court giving effect to the law. The petition filed by him said, 'The legislation has neither been struck down nor declared unconstitutional by any court of law. In fact, no interim order has been passed by this court or the high court of Madhya Pradesh for restraining enforcement of the law.' He stated that the operation of the statutory provision cannot be stultified by granting an interim order except when the court is fully convinced that the particular enactment is unconstitutional. He questioned the executive for not acting upon the legislation in the absence of any order restraining them from doing so.


Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
No fuel to ELVs in Delhi: Enforcement ends, but CAQM's order awaited
A day after the Delhi government requested the rollback of a controversial directive to deny fuel to end-of-life vehicles (ELVs), the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) was yet to issue a formal statement withdrawing the order till late on Friday. The enforcement of the policy, however, has quietly stopped and fuel is now being sold to all vehicles and impounding drives have ceased. Petrol pump dealers say they have resumed normal operations, giving fuel to all vehicles in the absence of clear instructions. (RAJ K RAJ /HT PHOTO) Senior CAQM officials, who were reportedly occupied with high-level meetings on stubble burning with the Punjab and Haryana governments over the past two days, are expected to take a final call on the matter after the weekend, officials familiar with the matter said. 'We have just received the letter from the Delhi government. Any decision that will be taken will be communicated accordingly,' a CAQM official said on Friday, asking not to be identified. The delay has created a policy vacuum: while there is no active enforcement, the order still technically stands. Petrol pump dealers say they have resumed normal operations, giving fuel to all vehicles in the absence of clear instructions. 'With enforcement teams withdrawn and the government itself opposing the crackdown, there's no point in denying fuel to anyone,' said Nishchal Singhania, president of the Delhi Petrol Dealers Association. The Delhi government has, for the time being, stopped any coercive action like impounding of ELVs from fuel stations, environment minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa said. The government has communicated to CAQM that it is not feasible to implement the denial of fuel to ELVs at petrol pumps due to implementation issues such as the Automated Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras facing technical glitches, system not integrated with the database of neighbouring NCR states, Sirsa said on Friday. 'Currently, the crackdown is on hold because the government has faced implementation issues about which we have already informed the CAQM. We are waiting for its further directions,' Sirsa told HT. The Delhi government had started enforcing CAQM's order on July 1, targeting petrol vehicles older than 15 years and diesel vehicles older than 10 years, in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines. On the first day, 98 such vehicles were identified at fuel stations, of which 80 were impounded. But by the second day, amid public outrage, only seven of the 78 identified ELVs were seized. But faced with implementation challenges and rising criticism, the Delhi government on the third day of the crackdown wrote to CAQM, urging withdrawal of the directive. Despite this pause in enforcement, transport department officials stressed that the legal status of these vehicles remains unchanged under Supreme Court orders. 'Over 6.9 million vehicles have been de-registered, and they continue to be considered ELVs. The current suspension only affects the round-the-clock deployment at petrol stations, not the broader legal position,' a transport official said, adding that enforcement may resume in the future. On Thursday, chief minister Rekha Gupta had acknowledged the hardship caused by the enforcement. 'In view of the difficulties being faced by the citizens of Delhi, our government has written to the CAQM requesting that the decision of not providing fuel to ELVs be reconsidered,' she posted on X, noting that the move was affecting the 'daily lives and livelihoods of millions.' CAQM had earlier cited the VAHAN database to justify the policy, estimating 6.2 million ELVs in Delhi, including 4.1 million two-wheelers and 1.8 million four-wheelers. However, government officials later clarified that this number includes vehicles that are already scrapped, de-registered, or issued no-objection certificates to be sold outside the NCR. A senior official familiar with the data said the actual number of ELVs still operating on Delhi roads is likely closer to 600,000—just 10% of the figure cited by CAQM. Delhi's total vehicle population is around 8.1 million, according to the Delhi Statistical Handbook 2004.