AustralianSuper criticised for buying up shares in Whitehaven Coal while claiming to be committed to net zero
A major Australian superannuation fund is under fire for substantially increasing its investment in the coal company Whitehaven, and being on the brink of becoming its biggest backer, while still claiming to be committed to reaching net zero emissions.
Shareholder advocacy groups said AustralianSuper was moving against the trend of its peers with recent share purchases in the company, which they said were 'flying in the face of environmental, social and governance (ESG) commitments'.
Clean energy finance organisation Market Forces said the super fund was 'on the precipice' of becoming Whitehaven Coal's largest investor, with shares worth about $395m.
Recent disclosures by Whitehaven, first reported by the Australian Financial Review, reveal AustralianSuper now owns 70.9m shares in the company, or 8.47% of shares on issue, after the recent purchases.
AustralianSuper is the second-largest shareholder in the coal company and, according to Market Forces, holds nearly triple the combined shares of all of the other top 30 super funds in their default investment options, based on the latest disclosures effective as at December 2024.
Market Forces said 'after fully and publicly divesting from the company in 2020', AustralianSuper now held its biggest interest in Whitehaven in 10 years.
Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter
'How on earth can AustralianSuper call itself a responsible investor after buying millions of shares in Whitehaven Coal?' Market Forces' senior analyst, Brett Morgan, said.
'AustralianSuper is backing Whitehaven's expansion plans, which would result in nearly 5bn tonnes of carbon pollution from burning coal, equivalent to running all of Australia's coal-fired power stations until 2062.'
Morgan said the organisation had been contacted by dozens of AustralianSuper members concerned 'that their fund is greenwashing and endangering a safe future for their retirement'.
An AustralianSuper spokesperson said the fund remained committed to its long-term goal of net zero by 2050.
'Whitehaven's acquisition of BHP's metallurgical coal assets changed the company's revenue profile and made it a more attractive investment given their importance in steel making,' the spokesperson said. Metallurgical coal is used primarily to make steel while thermal coal is primarily used for electricity generation.
Sign up to Clear Air Australia
Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis
after newsletter promotion
'The energy transition is not linear, which means thermal coal will be an important stabilising source of electricity for the grid for some time to come, both domestically and overseas.'
But Naomi Hogan, from the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, said climate-aware investors across the superannuation sector had been making an effort on ESG and emissions reductions and 'this AustralianSuper move is going against the trend of its peers'.
'Metallurgical coal investing cannot be used to shield against scrutiny of coal,' Hogan said.
'Last year ACCR published research based on a global survey of 500 investors in the steel value chain, which found that 80% of investor respondents believe metallurgical coal's risk profile will increase in the next decade.'
Hogan said AustralianSuper, having previously 'talked up' the importance of its companies aligning with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, now has a 'huge amount of work ahead to bring [Whitehaven's] emissions into line'.
'ACCR will be looking closely at AustralianSuper's disclosures outlining its ESG risk assessment of this investment,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour considers copying Macron's net zero housing laws
Ed Miliband and Angela Rayner are considering copying French laws that impose strict net zero limits on housebuilders. The Cabinet duo are exploring whether to adopt Emmanuel Macron's green approach, which has driven up construction costs by around a fifth. In 2022, France introduced a law setting limits for how much carbon buildings should produce over their lifetime, including their construction. It comes as Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, faces an uphill battle to fulfil Labour's manifesto promise to build 1.5 million new homes by 2030. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, said: 'Adopting French-style regulations would seriously undermine house-building efforts in the UK. 'Already, Labour's tax policies, reduction in housing starts and failure to control our borders are pricing British families out of the market. This latest proposal would only make things worse, leaving hard-working people with less chance of owning a home. 'Above all, it highlights once again the recklessness of Labour's unrealistic net zero targets. This must not go ahead.' Mr Macron's reforms have proven controversial, being blamed for driving up construction costs, thwarting development and causing house prices to stagnate. Under the scheme, the limits are gradually ratcheted down. They were toughened at the start of this year, with the next change scheduled for 2028. But amid mounting criticism, ministers in Paris are attempting to backtrack and have ordered a review of the planned level for three years time. Valérie Létard, the French housing minister, said there was a need to find a better 'balance of standards' that 'allow for faster projects', adding: 'Urban planning and housing must serve our citizens and not be a source of administrative bottlenecks or a drop in purchasing power.' In a note issued last year, BCG, a leading consulting firm, said the regulations had sparked 'a dramatic effect on construction costs and property values'. 'In new build, the rules require companies to use more energy-efficient materials and equipment,' experts from the company wrote. 'As a result, the cost of constructing a new building has risen by an estimated 10-20 per cent, significantly slowing demand.' The firm said the new regulations had also exacerbated concerns about a value gap opening up between new homes and older, less energy-efficient ones. Despite the criticisms, officials at both Mr Miliband's and Ms Rayner's departments confirmed they were looking at introducing similar rules in the UK. The net zero department, run by Mr Miliband, quietly revealed that it was looking at the French-style reforms in a paper published last week. A Government spokesman insisted no decision has been taken on whether to go ahead. Any changes would come on top of other controversial net zero reforms that have been driven through by Labour ministers. They include the planned introduction of a 'glass tax' that is set to push up the cost of a bottle of wine by 9p and beer by 4p. Mr Miliband is also considering proposals to shift green levies from electricity bills to gas ones, pushing up the cost of central heating. The Home Builders Federation, the trade association for housebuilders, said the UK industry was already building more energy-efficient homes and cautioned against extra regulation. Rhodri Williams, its technical director, said: 'As we look to increase housebuilding to address our chronic housing shortage, and address the failings in the planning system that have for too long resulted in endless delays and additional costs for construction projects generally, any moves to add further potentially significant restrictions on construction need to be carefully considered. 'Adding yet more costs into housebuilding, on top of the other recent major increases for, amongst other things, solar panels, biodiversity net gain, the building safety levy, and employee costs would make even more sites unviable to develop and potentially slash housebuilding across the country.' Ms Rayner, who has fronted the pledge, is under growing pressure amid a widespread expectation that she will not be able to deliver the target of 1.5 million new homes across the course of this Parliament. Despite sweeping changes to planning rules, housebuilding slowed down by 14 per cent last year, according to the British Property Federation. Asked about the prospect of the new net zero limits, a spokesman for the Ministry of Housing said: 'No decisions have been made on this. We are currently considering the right approach to embodied carbon in new buildings, and will ensure that our plans do not block development. 'We are taking decisive action to speed up the planning process and deliver our stretching target of 1.5 million homes through our Plan for Change, with work already being driven through our seismic planning reforms and landmark Planning and Infrastructure Bill.'
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Lamborghini Just Joined These Top Automakers to Save the Gas Engine
Keeping combustion alive is in the best interest of brands that favor V12 and V8 engines Electrification isn't the only way forward for vehicles. One of the most popular alternatives, particularly among enthusiasts, is synthetic fuels. Synthetic fuels blend the charm and familiarity of internal combustion with, ideally, the environmental benefits of curbing gasoline use. While objectively not as clean running as a battery-powered vehicle, synthetic fuels have distinct practical advantages. Performance brands, particularly, are leading the charge, and Lamborghini is the latest automaker to show support. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:10 Full screen 2025 Audi S3 VS 2025 Mercedes-AMG CLA 35: Which one comes out on top? Watch More Lamborghini Temerario Lamborghini Temerario Lamborghini Temerario For performance brands with lots of heritage attached to their combustion motors, synthetic fuels are one way to retain what makes their cars special. Rouven Mohr, Chief Technical Officer at Lamborghini, seems to recognize that. In an interview with Australian outlet CarExpert, Mohr is more than optimistic. 'I'm not saying that synthetic fuel is better than fossil fuel,' he starts. 'But it could be the savior of the combustion engine.' Speaking specifically of the V8 powering the newest hybrid Lamborghini, the Temerario, Mohr explains what makes the combustion engine nigh irreplaceable. 'It starts with the sound, but it's not only about that – it's also about the vibration that we feel, the shifting perception, how the car is rotating in the corner.' Lamborghini is far from the first brand to endorse synthetic fuels, and with good reason Mohr waxed poetic about the V8 powering the Lamborghini Temerario. 'If you ask me the emotion side at the moment, like I said before, I don't see the [electric] solution that is convincing now,' he said to CarExpert. It's hard to disagree; the soundtrack and response of a combustion engine is still something EVs can't replicate. Of course, there are more practical benefits, too. For one, it gives a road forward for the literally billions of gas-powered vehicles already on the planet's roads. Carbon-neutral synthetic fuels, sometimes referred to as biofuels or e-fuels, also provide a way for automakers to sell combustion-powered models in the EU past 2035, the current goalpost banning emission-producing vehicles. 2025 Porsche Macan Electric Turbo — Source: Porsche There's extra oomph behind the CTO's words when you consider other brands under the VW Group's ownership, like Porsche, have already been hard at work developing synthetic fuel options. Synthetic fuel is also being handled as a serious option outside the immediate VW family. Toyota, Mazda, and Subaru have all invested in the synthetic fuel game, most recently when they committed to working with synthetic fuel developer ENEOS to showcase synthetic-friendly engines at Expo 2025 Osaka. Another proponent is Formula 1, for fairly obvious reasons. Arguably, the largest impact synthetic fuel might have is in shipping and aviation applications, which, despite being the largest sources of emissions, won't be going electric anytime in the near (or even distant) future. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 2025 Porsche 911 GTS T-Hybrid — Source: Porsche Final thoughts Despite automakers predominantly focusing on electrification, synthetic fuel has enjoyed a steady burn in the background. Expect more and more automakers to start looking to cleaner-burning fuel in the second half of the decade. While battery power is objectively more efficient from a cost and energy perspective, it won't solve everything. Synthetic fuel is almost the only answer to the looming question of what to do with all of the gas cars we already have, but we're hopeful for a future of combustion-powered V8s and V12s, too. About the Author Steven Paul View Profile
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Could the M6 be Sydney's unbuildable motorway due to sinkholes and a reverse fault?
A 245-metre section of a new Sydney motorway tunnel plagued by sinkholes and a 'challenging' geological feature will bring a $3.1bn transport project to a grinding halt unless an eleventh-hour deal is reached. The M6's new twin 4km tunnels, connecting Sydney's south to the wider motorway network, were approved in 2019 and scheduled to open in 2025. That date was pushed back to 2028 after two large sinkholes opened above the tunnel and below an industrial estate in Rockdale in March 2024. But even that extended timeline is now in doubt after the consortium charged with the tunnels' construction between Kogarah and Arncliffe has said it will down tools from 30 June after the discovery of a 'high-angle reverse fault' in the bedrock close to the sinkholes. In an email to staff published by the Sydney Morning Herald in May, David Jackson, the director of the first stage of the M6 project – a joint venture of CPB, Ghella and UGL, known collectively as CGU – said CGU was pulling out. Jackson stated the design and construct contract had become 'frustrated' and was 'terminated by operation of the law'. He wrote that the tunnel 'excavation … has been on hold for almost a year now due to the impact of unique adverse ground conditions caused by a complex faulting zone, including a high-angle reverse fault (never seen before in the Sydney basin)'. 'The presence of such ground conditions could not have been anticipated by anyone,' he said, adding that they were only discovered once tunnel excavation was carried out. 'It is now apparent that a compliant design solution cannot be achieved to overcome these challenging ground conditions.' The government was made aware of CGU's intention to walk away before the email was sent to staff, a Transport for NSW (TfNSW) spokesperson told Guardian Australia. The project is otherwise 90% completed. Above-ground work by CGU in Kogarah may continue and could be completed by the end of the year. The New South Wales premier, Chris Minns, has criticised the unilateral move, claiming that the contractor remains responsible for designing and building the tunnels. 'My best advice to the contractor today is to send the lawyers home and bring back the engineers,' he told reporters in May. 'I'm not going to allow NSW taxpayers to be put over a barrel for these big projects.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email A TfNSW spokesperson says the department remains 'optimistic' about reaching an agreement with CGU. They previously said the government was working with the contractor 'to identify a technical solution to the issues encountered' on the project and claimed the consortium had not demonstrated it had exhausted all technical options to move forward with the works. 'It is unfortunate CGU now appears to have determined it is in their commercial interest to down tools instead. We're considering Transport's position in relation to the contract given the unilateral steps taken by CGU,' TfNSW said. As part of the tender process for the major project, potential contractors were given geotechnical reports of the ground where the works would be carried out, TfNSW says. It was unable to provide geotechnical reports from any stage of the project to Guardian Australia. CPB, as lead contractor for CGU, says it cannot comment further. Grahame Campbell, an engineer who project managed the M4 – which was finished in half the forecast time and budget – has written a paper for the Centre for Independent Studies about 'bungles' that lead to cost and time blowouts on major infrastructure projects in Australia. He is confident the M6 will be completed eventually, but believes it will be over budget – like other major projects including Sydney's metro and light rail builds and Melbourne's North East Link. 'Of course it can be finished and it's a matter of doing it correctly and doing it with the right team,' he says. Speaking generally, Campbell says blowouts have not always been so common. They can be caused by various factors, including contractors starting construction before finishing designs, changes to designs, governments handing responsibility for risks to contractors, and a lack of expertise within government or at the contractor level. 'A contractor is pretty good at throwing concrete in the ground and putting pitching on the soil,' he says. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'But they're [sometimes] not particularly good at project management. Keep your mind open and understand the broadest issues and deal with them. Unfortunately, those concepts aren't very big in government … at the moment and they get into these messes. 'You would think that having lost billions of dollars over decades, [governments] would have learned by now – but unfortunately it doesn't seem like they have.' Setting up and decommissioning work sites is expensive but it's not unusual for contractors to change midway through builds, Campbell says. Stakeholders should learn from previous large projects, he argues. 'Thousands of projects have been built in the Sydney basin. You know, you could go back and see how they were managed.' Soil or geological abnormalities should ideally be discovered before works begin. Water management – which can lead to sinkholes – is 'always the biggest problem' in major projects, Campbell says. Prof Behzad Fatahi, a professor of civil engineering at the University of Technology Sydney, says the city is home to fault zones, most of which are classified as 'normal'. 'Reverse faults', where a layer of rock is forced upwards and over another layer, are less common and hard to detect because the fault angle is often very steep. Boreholes drilled into the ground five to 10 metres apart may miss a reverse fault, the professor says. Fatahi says survey techniques, including seismic surveys, are not 'bulletproof … There is always a chance of missing things.' The danger of building a tunnel at the site of a rock fault stems from potential movement at the fault zone. While Sydney is not a highly seismic area, even a tiny amount of rock movement could compromise a tunnel, he says. A novel way to protect underground pipelines from land movements involves cushioning pipes with foam, his research has shown. Solutions to prevent sinkholes include grouting, tunnel lining and freezing the ground before excavating. All civil geotech designs come with some unknowns, he says. 'There is no zero-risk … but this doesn't mean that there will be big surprises'. The two sinkholes that opened up above the M6 tunnel were not a normal risk associated with digging, Dr Francois Guillard says. The senior lecturer in the school of civil engineering at the University of Sydney says sinkholes can happen anywhere water penetrates the ground, although karstic regions – often made of soluble limestone – are typically more prone to sinkholes. Sydney is not especially prone to the phenomenon, given its mainly sandstone geology, Guillard says. For a sinkhole to develop, material under the ground's surface needs to be removed, usually by water erosion or chemical decomposition. In urban areas, disturbance of usual water drainage patterns can lead to sinkhole formation under the surface of tarmac. He agrees that investigations of soil and geology from the surface are 'not perfect'. Guillard says human-made sinkholes, triggered by engineering or building works, are 'rare' – as are urban sinkholes generally. 'I would not recommend people be worried, it's low risk,' he says.
