Could Investing in Bitcoin Help You Buy Your Next House?
The move is significant, because the price of homeownership is falling in Bitcoin but rising in dollars.
In 2012, Bitcoin traded for less than $100; today, it trades for over $100,000.
10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin ›
Due to the rising cost of housing in America, many young people now think they might not ever be able to afford a new house. But don't worry, Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) could change all that and make home ownership a reality.
At the end of June, the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency issued a new directive, instructing both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to count Bitcoin as an asset on single-family home mortgage applications. Previously, mortgage applicants had to convert any Bitcoin holdings into U.S. dollars if they wanted their crypto to count.
Given Bitcoin's rapid price appreciation over the past decade, this move could end up being a real game-changer. Here's why.
Most people agree that the American dream of buying a new home is currently out of reach. Prices for homes have been soaring, and higher interest rates have put mortgage payments out of reach for many would-be home buyers.
There's plenty of evidence to support this. In July 2024, a CNN survey reported that 86% of all renters said they would like to buy a home but can't afford one. And 54% of those said that it was "unlikely" that they would ever be able to.
The problem is even more profound for young would-be homeowners, who now face a slowing economy and nagging thoughts that AI could be coming for their jobs. How are they ever possibly going to be able to afford a new house?
And that's where Bitcoin comes into the picture. If you think the prices of new homes are soaring, then what about the price of Bitcoin? In 2022, the price of Bitcoin was $17,000. Today, the price of Bitcoin is $107,000. If you had purchased Bitcoin in 2012, when it was trading for less than $100, you'd be able to afford just about any type of home you could imagine today.
A new 30-second ad from Coinbase Global makes this point perfectly. The Coinbase ad shows a beautiful, two-story, pastel blue suburban home with a manicured lawn -- the stuff that homeowner dreams are made of. A voice intones: "In 2012, you'd need 30,000 Bitcoin to buy this house... A decade later, it would only take you 20 Bitcoin... And, today, it could be yours for 5." But the real kicker comes at the end of the ad: "If home prices keep falling in Bitcoin, why do they keep rising in dollars?"
That, in a nutshell, is why investing in Bitcoin could help you afford your next house. Bitcoin is a disinflationary asset and a potential hedge against inflation. Best of all, Bitcoin is widely available to everyone. You don't need to be an accredited investor and you don't need millions of dollars. In fact, most cryptocurrency exchanges will let you start buying Bitcoin with just a few bucks.
The U.S. government is thinking out of the box on this one. According to William J. Pulte, Director of the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency, this new thinking about Bitcoin is part of a bigger vision by the Trump administration to make America the "crypto capital of the world." And what better way to do that than by making the American dream of home ownership a reality again?
Right now, it's just a directive, instructing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to get busy on this. According to the text of this directive, it will apply to all crypto "evidenced and stored on a U.S.-regulated centralized exchange." And it will give Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac a bit of wiggle room when it comes to adjusting for risk, volatility, and overall market conditions.
One big winner in all of this could be centralized cryptocurrency exchanges such as Coinbase. It's still early, but it looks like you won't be able to list Bitcoin as an asset on a mortgage application if you have it stored anywhere else. So, for example, you won't be able to count your Bitcoin if you have it in cold storage on a hardware device hidden under your bed.
Also, the directive doesn't mention spot Bitcoin ETFs, so it will be interesting to see what develops here. With these ETFs, Bitcoin is held only "indirectly," not "directly." So will this Bitcoin count also? If it doesn't, it's easy to envision a scenario in which people stop buying the spot Bitcoin ETFs and shift to buying Bitcoin on Coinbase.
The really exciting part about all this is that many top investors now expect Bitcoin to hit $1 million within the next five years. For example, Cathie Wood of Ark Invest thinks Bitcoin will hit $1.48 million by the year 2030.
Given Bitcoin's current price of $107,000, that's a more than 10x increase within a very short period of time. With those types of gains, you could be well on your way to home ownership in just a few years.
Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025
Dominic Basulto has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool recommends Coinbase Global. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Could Investing in Bitcoin Help You Buy Your Next House? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
What if killing Canada's digital services tax is just the beginning for Donald Trump?
OTTAWA—Call it a prudent climbdown, a show of weakness, or an unavoidable concession. There are several ways to look at Prime Minister Mark Carney's 11th-hour decision to cancel the federal government's Digital Services Tax last weekend. But what if it's also a tangible example of exactly what Carney warned would happen? The Liberal leader won a minority government on April 28 with a pitch that no one was better placed than himself to protect Canada from Donald Trump. The U.S. president has mused about using 'economic force' to annex Canada. As if taunting or teasing this country, he questions why it exists, and keeps floating the prospect of it becoming the '51st state' of the U.S. Two days before the election, Carney spelled out how he understood all of this. 'The U.S. is trying to put economic pressure on us to gain major concessions, to the extreme of a level of integration of our countries that would impinge our sovereignty,' Carney said that day in King City, north of Toronto. Carney, in his final campaign conference, ruled out any prospect the U.S. would use military Flash forward to last week. There was Trump, posting on social media that Canada's incoming Digital Services Tax — a policy that would force American tech giants and other firms, including Canadian ones, to pay up — was nothing short of a 'blatant attack' on the United States. Trump declared he had cut off all negotiations to resolve the trade war that started earlier this year with his wave of tariffs on Canadian goods. In other words, Canada's most important commercial and military partner, the destination for 76 per cent of all exports last year , was willing to ditch talks and dictate terms that could jeopardize thousands of jobs and hundreds of billions of dollars in economic activity. All over a domestic policy the Americans didn't like. Barely 48 hours later, shortly before midnight on a Sunday, the government announced the tax was dead. Not only would Canada not implement the policy as planned, it would repeal the 2024 law that created it. Is this Trump using economic pressure to force Canada's hand? 'It is exactly that,' said Lawrence Herman, a veteran trade lawyer and special counsel with the firm, Cassidy Levy Kent. 'It's an example of, on a particular issue, how much pressure can be brought to bear to force Canada to abandon not only a policy, but a law that has been in force for 18 months.' In Herman's view, the decision looks like a 'significant retreat' by the government, which shows 'how dependent we are on a reasonable relationship' with Canada's largest trading partner. Other policies that Trump has complained about, such as the supply management system for dairy and poultry, could be next, he said. Pete Hoekstra, the U.S. ambassador to Canada, told the CBC this week that he has a 'strong belief' Canada could water down that system by changing a law designed to protect it if that becomes part of a new trade deal. 'It's not a particularly good start to this so-called new economic and security relationship,' Herman said. He was referring to Carney's stated goal of talks that are now continuing under an agreement struck at the Group of 7 summit in the Alberta Rockies last month to strive for a deal to redefine the relationship by July 21. Others have been harsher in their judgment. Lloyd Axworthy, a former Liberal foreign affairs minister, posted online that Carney was acquiescing to Trump in a way that contradicts his 'elbows up' mantra on the campaign trail. 'Forget any dreams of a more sovereign, self-directed Canada. We're doubling down on the corporate cosiness and U.S. dependency that's defined our last half-century,' he wrote on Substack. Axworthy did not respond to an interview request Thursday. For Jean Charest, a former Quebec premier who sits on the government's Canada-U.S. advisory council, the situation illustrates the 'chaos' of dealing with Trump, whose administration is grappling with trade talks and tariffs threats against most countries on the planet. This meant that Carney's government was operating 'in a world of very bad choices,' Charest said. Deciding to scrap the Digital Services Tax, in that context, was 'certainly a legitimate choice,' he said. 'We are not in an ordinary world of negotiations,' Charest added. 'It would be nice to think, 'You give, I give ... we compromise.' It doesn't work that way with Donald Trump, and we're making our way through this by trying to protect essentially what's the most important for us in the short term, and that's a negotiation that has some legs.' Charest noted that there was opposition inside Canada to the Digital Services Tax, which would have applied back to 2022 with a three per cent tax on Canadian revenues from digital services companies with more than $1.1 billion in global earnings and $20 million inside Canada. The U.S. also pushed back against the policy when Joe Biden was in power. David Pierce, vice-president of government relations with the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said his business lobby group felt the Digital Services Tax should be paused. He also said it would have been wrong to proceed with it after the U.S. dropped a controversial provision from Trump's major budget bill last week: the so-called 'revenge tax' that would have hit the U.S. assets of foreign businesses and individuals. That decision came as the G7 agreed to exempt American firms from a co-ordinated effort to ensure corporations pay a minimum tax, which was 'absolutely a win' for the U.S. Even so, Pierce said Canada likely had no choice but to drop the policy, given Trump's exploitation of Canada's 'weakness' — its major economic reliance on trade with the U.S. 'We just hope that this now paves the way for a good renewed deal,' said Pierce. The ultimate goal of the federal government in that deal, at least publicly, has been to return to the terms of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), which Trump signed in 2018 during his first term, after disparaging North American free trade as unfair to his country. That would mean lifting the rounds of tariffs Trump has imposed since the winter, with import duties tied to concerns about drugs and migration over the border, and others that Trump slapped on Canadian autos, steel and aluminum in a bid to promote those sectors in the U.S. Canada has responded with countertariffs on its own that the government says hit more than $80 billion worth of American imports to Canada. Canada's lead trade negotiator with the Trump administration, Ambassador Kirsten Hillman, was not available for an interview this week, the embassy in Washington told the Star. Charest, however, said he believes it is possible that Canada could accept some level of tariffs in a July 21 deal, so long as they have no material effect. Such 'zero-effect' tariffs could only kick in at levels of trade that Canada doesn't or likely won't achieve, for example. Yet there's a question of how much any deal can be relied upon, so long as Trump is in the White House, unilaterally imposing tariffs that Canada views as 'illegal' violations of the 2018 trade deal. 'Trump is arguing about supply management and the (Digital Services Tax), but it's the U.S. that is in flagrant breach of its trade obligations. It's abandoned the CUSMA, virtually behaving as if it did not exist and the U.S. signature has no meaning,' Herman said. 'So we are in a world where rules and the rules-based system, and the stability that that treaty was supposed to provide, have gone by the board.' That means, at least for now, the Carney government is operating in a world where Canada's foremost ally, the colossus to the south, will use economic force to get what it wants.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Anthony Scaramucci Predicts Bitcoin Treasury Frenzy 'Will Fade'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Anthony Scaramucci, founder and managing partner of SkyBridge Capital, believes the recent surge in public companies adopting crypto treasury strategies is unlikely to last. What Happened: In an interview with Blooomberg, Scaramucci said the current wave of firms mimicking Michael Saylor's Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) treasury model is likely to fade over time. "We're seeing this replication of the crypto treasury company idea right now," Scaramucci said. "But eventually, that will fade." According to Scaramucci, investors may soon realize it makes little sense to pay a premium for shares in companies that primarily hold Bitcoin or other crypto assets, assets that investors could purchase directly themselves. "Why pay the middleman?" he asked. Trending: Tired of Grid Failures and Charging Deserts? This Startup Has a Solar Fix and $25M+ in Sales — Over the past year, several public companies have aggressively pursued crypto treasury strategies, inspired by Saylor's playbook at Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) (formerly MicroStrategy). The latest is BitMine Immersion Technologies (AMEX:BMNR), a Bitcoin mining firm that announced a $250 million private raise this week to build an Ethereum treasury. BitMine also appointed Thomas Lee, founder of Fundstrat and a frequent CNBC contributor, as its board chairman. Many of these companies have sought to differentiate themselves by enlisting high-profile advisors. Examples include Eric Trump, who serves on the board of Metaplanet (OTC:MTPLF), often referred to as Japan's answer to Strategy and Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) co-founder Joe Lubin, who is chairman at Sharplink Gaming (NASDAQ:SBET), a former betting company now focused on Ethereum treasury management. "Saylor's position is unique because Strategy is now offering multiple products," Scaramucci said. "I'm not criticizing the others—I'm bullish on Bitcoin—but investors need to carefully examine the hidden costs within each of these crypto treasury firms." SkyBridge's crypto-focused ETF, the First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry and Digital Economy ETF, lists Strategy as its largest holding. Saylor also wrote the foreword to Scaramucci's recently published Bitcoin It Matters: While Wall Street has launched an increasing number of crypto ETFs and diversified investment products, some of which compete with crypto treasury firms like Strategy, Strategy remains one of the year's top-performing crypto-related stocks. Strategy has funded its extensive Bitcoin purchases through a complex mix of stock and debt offerings, including convertible notes and, most recently, preferred shares. The crypto treasury model has also faced criticism. Short-seller Jim Chanos recently labeled Saylor's approach as 'financial gibberish,' arguing that investors would be better off buying Bitcoin directly rather than paying premiums for shares in companies like Strategy. Saylor dismissed Chanos's concerns, defending the premium that Strategy's shares command over its Bitcoin holdings. Scaramucci raised a similar question. "If you give a company $10 and they put $8 into Bitcoin, will they make money? Probably. But you might have done better just buying $10 worth of Bitcoin yourself. That's the real issue," he said. Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Image: Shutterstock This article Anthony Scaramucci Predicts Bitcoin Treasury Frenzy 'Will Fade' originally appeared on
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin Long-Term Holders Signal Patience in Market
According to Glassnode, long-term holders (LTHs) are defined as investors who have held bitcoin (BTC) for at least 155 days. CoinDesk Research indicates that one reason bitcoin has ye to reach new all-time highs has been selling pressure from these long-term holders. However, zooming out, Glassnode data shows that the percentage of bitcoin's circulating supply that has not moved in at least three years currently stands at 45%, which is the same level observed in February 2024, one month after the launch of the US exchange-traded fund. Three years ago, in July 2022, the market was in the midst of the leverage crisis triggered by the collapse of 3AC and Celsius during the last bear market, when bitcoin was priced at $20,000, which shows the conviction of LTHs. Meanwhile, the share of circulating supply that has not moved in at least five years is at 30% and has remained flat since May 2024. So, even though long-term holders are selling, as they typically do when prices climb higher, these data points suggest that the broader cohort has not significantly changed its aggregate behavior for over a year now, implying that many are waiting for higher prices before making further in to access your portfolio
