Public ownership of water in England and Wales is best way to improve industry, people's commission finds
Set up by four academics with expertise in economics, water governance and the law to 'fill the gaps' of the government-appointed Cunliffe commission, the inquiry will on Monday present its findings to MPs.
Ewen McGaughey, a professor of law at King's College London who is one of the academics involved, said: 'We all want clean water, and in the latest YouGov poll 82% of the British public said that we should bring our water into public ownership.
'Our recommendations are that the British public is right, the evidence supports them, and we should move to a new modern, public water system because this is the best way to cut bills, stop pollution, invest in repairs and give everyone a voice. We can have clean water, or privatised water, but we can't have both.'
The Cunliffe inquiry into the water sector is due to report this month, but it was prevented from considering public ownership by the remit imposed by ministers. Its interim report was criticised last month for failing to recommend clear actions to end the crisis in the water industry.
McGaughey believes ministers could bring water companies into public ownership for minimal cost through the special administration process, which is built into the 1991 Water Industry Act. It can be triggered if a company cannot pay its debts or is not performing its statutory requirements, which include treating wastewater rather than dumping it into the environment.
Shareholders and creditors such as bondholders would be given 'appropriate value' for their stakes, which McGaughey argues would, in effect, be nothing.
In its findings, the people's commission report said a shift to public ownership would provide transparency, reduce costs, improve democratic participation, remove the focus on shareholder profit to wholly focus on the public interest and improve cooperation and collaboration between water companies.
Evidence suggests that the top performing utilities internationally – in Sweden, Denmark and Japan – are in public ownership, the report said. It provides evidence that the costs of water company plans for the next five years have been inflated by the privatised companies and that the privatisation model makes capital investment hugely expensive.
McGaughey criticises the figure of £99bn commonly cited as the cost of taking over the industry in England, because it is based on an estimate from a thinktank that was funded by water companies.
When debt levels of water companies are taken into account, the appropriate value of a water company in law can be close to zero. ; Thames Water, for example, is about £20bn in debt.
Once a water is under special administration, rather than transfer it to another private company it could be kept under public ownership.
The commission said public ownership was not the same as nationalisation. Public ownership meant a company that was run to service the public and the environment and had public ownership of water infrastructure but could include some private sector involvement via not-for-profit companies.
The reports authors – McGaughey, Dr Kate Bayliss, an academic who has investigated the opaque structure of the privatised water industry, Prof Becky Malby of Ilkley Clean River Group and Frances Cleaver, a professor of political ecology at Lancaster University, said there was a once in a lifetime chance for major reform of the water industry which must not be missed.
'There is a better future for the water sector in England and Wales, and it is vital that we have the ambition and the courage to reach for it,' the report said.
'Getting there requires political will to unravel the complicated web of interests. Drawing on the evidence we present here and the UK's vast experience in reforming vital services, we show that it is possible to conserve and protect water now and for the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Reform UK poses 'very serious threat' to Labour, Welsh first minister warns
The threat from Reform in Wales is "very serious", the country's Labour leader said as exclusive polling revealed Nigel Farage's party is the first choice for Welsh voters. Speaking to Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan said: "We think the threat from Reform is a very serious threat. "I think it is important people recognise that things that we see every day in our lives in Wales may be snatched away from us, and the kind of stability that we've had for a long time." Ms Morgan admitted "we've got a lot of work to do to get voters back" ahead of the May 2026 Senedd (Welsh parliament) elections - something backed up by exclusive polling that reveals Reform is beating Welsh Labour, who have been in power in the Senedd since 1999. A More in Common poll for Sky News found 28% of people in Wales would vote for Reform if an election for the Senedd was called tomorrow. That was followed closely by nationalist party Plaid Cymru on 26%, Labour with 23%, the Conservatives on 10%, Lib Dems with 7%, the Green Party with 4% and 2% for other parties or independent candidates. Of those who voted for Labour at last year's general election, less than half (48%) would vote for them again, while 15% would go to Plaid Cymru and 11% to Reform - although 13% were undecided. A total of 883 people representative of the Welsh population were asked from 18 June to 3 July. Last month, Mr Farage told an event in the steel town of Port Talbot, he would reopen Welsh coal mines to provide fuel for blast furnaces. Ms Morgan said she will not be "chasing Reform down a path... because those aren't my values". "What we'll be doing is offering a very clear alternative, which is about bringing communities together," she said. "I think it's really important that we're authentic and we're clear with people about what we stand for. "I think we've got to lead with our values so we're about bringing communities together not dividing them and I do think that's what reform is interested in is dividing people and people do need to make choices on things like that." She admitted "there is a possibility" Reform could be the largest party in the Senedd "and that is really concerning". However, she said the way voting in Wales works means it would be "difficult for them to rule by themselves". Would she go into coalition with Reform?
Times
an hour ago
- Times
‘Kick Zionism to death,' says UK lawyer representing Hamas
One of the British lawyers representing Hamas has told supporters that 'Zionism' is in a 'serious crisis' and encouraged supporters to 'kick it to death'. Franck Magennis, one of three lawyers working on an application to remove the group from the Home Office's list of banned terrorist organisations, told the Socialist Workers' Party's Marxist Festival last week that 'Zionism is dying'. 'It [Zionism] is in a serious crisis; it looks like it is not long for the world, but that doesn't mean that we can be complacent. We must assure that we kick it to death. It must not be allowed to survive this crisis,' Magennis, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers, said in footage seen by this newspaper. • Gary Lineker 'not welcome' to speak at Jewish football writer's memorial His comments came after Riverway Law, the law firm that filed the application, announced that it had relaunched as Riverway to the Sea, a law centre 'dedicated to understanding and confronting the racist ideology of Zionism' through 'strategic litigation'. The name of the new organisation, which is being led by Magennis, and Fahad Ansari, a solicitor who is also representing Hamas, is a reference to the pro-Palestinian slogan 'from the River to the Sea, Palestine shall be free', which has been interpreted by some Jewish groups as a call for the elimination of Israel. • Who are the Israeli ministers sanctioned over Gaza comments? Riverway Law ceased trading in June and no longer function as a solicitor's practice regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, which had opened an investigation into the firm in April after being alerted to social media posts by Ansari. On Monday, a spokesperson for the SRA said that the investigation is ongoing. Both Magennis and Ansari, who are working pro bono as it is an offence to accept money from a proscribed terrorist organisation, have previously made controversial comments on the conflict. In a speech outside Westminster magistrates court in support of Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, a member of the rap trio Kneecap, who had been charged with a terrorism offence, Magennis said, 'It is over for Zionism.' • Hadley Freeman: A conversation every Jew I know is having He added that 'we must make sure that Zionism is not allowed to survive this crisis; we must contribute to the abolition of the state of Israel and its replacement with a single democratic state of Palestine'. In a separate interview earlier this year, Magennis said that the aim of the application was to 'end Israel'. He said: 'I will find a way to empathise with them and hopefully expand the consensus by a bit, so hopefully we can think about what it will mean to end this genocide, to end Israel, which I think is what my client wants'. 'I know a lot of Jews will hear that and think that's a call for some repetition of the Holocaust; it's not, it's a call for peace, it's a call for a democratic state,' he added. • BBC boss left Bob Vylan's Glastonbury death chants on live stream Last year, Ansari tweeted: 'The heroic Palestinian resistance — may every one of their bullets hit their targets … it is imperative that we all support them'. He also paid tribute to Ismail Haniyeh, the leader of Hamas, following his death in Tehran last July. Both lawyers expressed support for Palestine Action prior to the group being proscribed, with Ansari describing them as 'the heroes of the moment'. In their 106-page legal application, Hamas claimed that proscription was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights because it unlawfully restricts freedom of speech and that it was disproportionate as Hamas 'does not pose any threat to Britain or British citizens'. The Home Office is expected to announce its ruling on Hamas's application on July 9. De-proscription is very rare, with only four groups having been taken off the list of banned terror groups since the system was introduced under the Terrorism Act 2000. The Campaign Against Antisemitism warned that a successful application would 'open the way for funding to be channelled through the UK to Hamas' and said that 'it is particularly perverse and revolting that they are invoking human rights in order to do so'. Riverway to the Sea, the Socialist Workers' Party and Garden Court Chambers were contacted for comment.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
King to warn of 'complex threats' facing UK and France - as Macron begins his first state visit
The King will refer to the "complex threats" facing the UK and France - stressing "these challenges know no borders" - as he delivers a speech to welcome President Emmanuel Macron to his first state visit. It's understood that the monarch will be referring to issues around defence, artificial intelligence and the climate crisis when he speaks during tonight's glittering state banquet in Windsor. But with political discussions in the run up to this dominated by the issue of immigration and small boats crossing from France, the King's use of the word "borders" will be seen by some as particularly interesting. King Charles will say: "Our two countries face a multitude of complex threats, emanating from multiple directions. As friends and as allies, we face them together. "These challenges know no borders: no fortress can protect us against them this time." Emphasising how the UK and France can lead the way in confronting them, he will add: "Our two nations share not only values, but also the tireless determination to act on them in the world." King Charles and the Queen are set to welcome the French leader and his wife Brigitte to Windsor Castle. It is the first state visit to take place in Windsor in more than 10 years, and marks the first state visit to the UK by an EU leader since Brexit. Today, Mr Macron will address parliamentarians in the Palace of Westminster's Royal Gallery - and on Thursday, join a UK-France summit with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Defence, growth, security, migration and French tactics on tackling small boats will be discussed, with the two leaders expected to dial in to speak to other allied looking to support any future peace deal in Ukraine. Yesterday, Downing Street said that the UK's relationship with France was "key" to dealing with boat crossings, following reports French police officers had used knives to puncture a boat off the coast. Lord Ricketts, who was the Uk's ambassador to France until 2016, told Sky News that it is not the King's role to get bogged down in issues like the migration crisis. "The King won't get involved in the controversial political discussions, no, I think he's been brought up from birth to avoid that," he said. "I'm sure he has personal views and he will talk about the broader relationship but I think his job is to set the scene, to remind everyone that Britain and France are old nations, they have an enormous amount to share, the history is there and depth of personal relationships and that is the backdrop for Keir Starmer to get into the questions where maybe there are still differences." With the closeness between the two men, and the huge interest in the royals generally in France, journalist Maud Garmy from Pont de Vue magazine told us this trip will certainly attract more attention than your average political visit. "I have to admit, for French media, one of the main things about this visit is going to be the images from Windsor - because of the glamour, because of the pomp, because of the pageantry," she said. "There will be more images on French television about President Macron meeting the King in Windsor rather than him being in London for speeches with the prime minister because those images are much more glamorous, there will be a strong friendship shown, and for the media that's just pure gold." It will be the welcome from their royal hosts that will make the visit particularly special for the president and his wife Brigitte. The Prince and Princess of Wales will travel to RAF Northolt to meet the Macrons before travelling with them to Windsor, where the King and Queen will be waiting to accompany them on a carriage procession to Windsor Castle. The King and Queen paid a state visit to France in September 2023 and enjoy a warm rapport with the Macrons, who will stay in the castle during their trip.
