Tom Mulcair: The stakes are high in the upcoming NDP leadership race
Tom Mulcair is a former leader of the federal New Democratic Party of Canada between 2012 and 2017, and a columnist for CTVNews.ca.
The NDP suffered the worst defeat in its history in last April's election, gaining the support of just six per cent of Canadian voters.
The seven remaining NDP MPs will have their work cut out for them as they try to repair the damage done by their decision to hop in the sack with Trudeau's Liberals.
That so-called supply and confidence agreement saw several NDP priorities like dental care and pharmacare become new strands of Canada's social safety net; a worthwhile initiative that came at a huge political price.
That deal deprived the NDP of any credible business case when knocking on doors during the last election. What possible argument was left to convince NDPers not to vote Liberal, when the NDP's MPs themselves had been voting Liberal for three years?
Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh, Pierre Poilievre
File photo of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shaking hands with New Democratic Party Leader Jagmeet Singh as Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre looks on at a Tamil heritage month reception on Jan. 30, 2023 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld
The decision to back Trudeau may be the most obvious reason for the NDP's electoral disaster, but it's not the only one.
Canada's recent decision to join with 24 other countries in demanding the immediate cessation of the war in Gaza underscores the need for all political parties to have a consistent, long-term approach to this most complex, and existential, foreign relations issue. It's precisely because Canada has been such a historically strong ally of Israel that this signature carries so much weight.
Singh's NDP put itself at odds with the party's usually balanced approach to the complex issues of the Middle East, when some caucus members began to express strident anti-Israel positions.
This wasn't new. Jack Layton had to work hard to maintain that equilibrium, pushing back when a key caucus member had expressed support for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel.
Jack made it clear that while all MPs can bring their own opinions to the caucus table, they don't get to make up their own party policy. The NDP still has a fairly nuanced public position on these issues, at least in its official policies as voted on by the membership. But the leadership and the caucus apparently felt that they were no longer bound by those.
Issue of Israeli-Palestinian conflict isn't going away
The ensuing flurry of increasingly harsh anti-Israel rhetoric made it difficult for the voting public to know whether those pronouncements represented the NDP position. When policy is being made up on the fly in reaction to changing events, no matter how compelling or tragic, a political party's credibility with voters is directly affected. How can they know what they're voting for?
That issue isn't about to go away. Several potential leadership candidates, including Singh's foreign affairs spokesperson, Edmonton Strathcona MP Heather McPherson, have been among the most one-sided in their criticism of Israel. Her statements have been increasing in intensity since the election and may signal that staking out a more extreme position on this issue is seen as politically advantageous to her leadership aspirations.
While that type of hardline attitude might get support from some elements within the party, the ability to talk evenhandedly and consistently about longstanding conflicts on the world stage is seen as a litmus test by a much wider group of Canadian voters.
The NDP has been a party of power in six provinces and now has strong capable governments in British Columbia and Manitoba. If the federal NDP is left talking to itself, the dream of one day also having an NDP government in Ottawa could be pushed to the backburner for decades.
Leadership race
The party has now set a timeline for its leadership race to replace Jagmeet Singh. It may be revealing about the state of the party that it wasn't able to actually announce a date. They only said that the vote would be held at the latest on March 29, in Winnipeg. That will give the NDP apparatchiks the summer to come up with rules for the race that they will be able to announce ahead of the official launch of the campaign in September.
The timing of the vote was being actively discussed by potential candidates, and it's understandable. This fairly long campaign will favour someone who is already ensconced in a good paying position; a sitting MP, for example.
Rules for the leadership campaign are not the only issue that has been affecting the party. When you only have seven MPs and three of them sign a letter decrying a lack of proper consultation on the choice of interim leader, you've got a problem. When those three MPs also happen to be the only racialized women in the caucus, you're setting yourself up for a fall.
Jack Layton
File photo of the late NDP Leader Jack Layton singing with NDP MP Pierre Dionne Labelle, left, and NDP MP Paulina Ayala as they took part in national holiday festivities in Gatineau, Quebec on June 24, 2011. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
The NDP's diversity and inclusiveness have been among its strengths. They won't be for long, if they begin to be seen as a façade. One of the keys to Jack Layton's success was his ability to reach across the linguistic divide.
Jack and I were both English-speaking Quebecers. That gave us an understanding of the linguistic minority experience and reinforced our abiding support for the French fact in Canada.
Reaching out to Quebecers
Of the higher profile NDPers having expressed an interest in running for the leadership, only former MP and outgoing B.C. NDP cabinet minister Nathan Cullen is bilingual. Cullen would have no trouble taking part in a leaders' debate during an election campaign or participating in a fast-paced interview on a talk show like Tout le Monde en parle.
Nathan Cullen
File photo of Bulkley Valley-Stikine NDP candidate Nathan Cullen, left, and Nechako Lakes NDP candidate Murphy Abraham, during a campaign stop in Terrace, B.C., on Sept. 24, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck
That's what the eight million francophone Canadians would expect, and indeed require, from an aspiring prime minister. If, during the NDP's own French leadership debates, certain candidates cannot really participate, they're toast. Or, to put it another way, if one of the unilingual Anglos were to win, the party would be condemning itself to the sidelines, no longer able to be real players in Canadian political life.
An ability to reach out to French voters isn't just seen as essential to francophones themselves. The vast majority of Canadians want a leader who can speak and understand both official languages. It is seen as being an essential skill for building, and keeping together, this great nation.
The stakes are high in this impending race. If it plays its cards right, the NDP could be in a much more favourable position come the next election. Prime Minister Mark Carney has been bequeathed a shivering economic dungpile by the outgoing Trudeau regime. Cleaning up that mess will require more than a broom; he'll need a Kärcher pressure washer.
Some of those tough management choices may prove as unpopular as they are necessary. That may provide the beginning of an opportunity for the NDP. But which NDP will run in the next election? A professionalized, credible NDP that can talk to all Canadians or a rump NDP that's trying to please the fringes?
Serious economic, environmental, social and foreign policy issues require thoughtful policies and the perceived ability to do more than just talk about them and emote. The impending leadership race will provide a window onto the future of a party with a proud, remarkable past.
It could be a new beginning, or it could be curtains.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
25 minutes ago
- CTV News
Canada still working toward Aug. 1 trade deal deadline, LeBlanc says, as U.S. senator casts doubt
President of the King's Privy Council for Canada Dominic LeBlanc speaks at a press conference while Prime Minister Mark Carney listens, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Thursday, June 19, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Patrick Doyle WASHINGTON — Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc said Thursday he's feeling "encouraged" after meeting with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and American lawmakers in Washington, D.C., ahead of next week's tariff deadline. LeBlanc, however, indicated a new economic and security arrangement may not materialize by U.S. President Donald Trump's latest deadline. "Canadians expect us to take the time necessary to get the best deal we can in the interest of Canadian workers," LeBlanc said outside the Dirksen Senate Office Building. "So we are only going to be in a position to accept a deal when the prime minister decides that it is the best deal we can get in the interest of Canadian workers and the Canadian economy." U.S. President Donald Trump has sent letters to multiple nations, including Canada, saying that if no deal is made by Aug. 1, he will impose high tariffs on imports to the United States. Trump's letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatened Canada with 35 per cent tariffs but the White House has said the levies will not be applied to imports compliant with the Canada-U.S-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canada is also being hit with Trump's tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles, and will be impacted by copper duties that are also expected to kick in on Aug. 1. Only a handful of frameworks of trade deals have been announced since Trump first threatened his so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs in April. The president this week said his administration made deals with Japan and the Philippines, adding to previous agreements with Indonesia, Vietnam and the United Kingdom. Many details within the agreements remain vague but all include some level of a tariff, and it's unclear whether the deals would shield countries from Trump's plan to implement further sectoral duties on things like semiconductors and lumber. LeBlanc said "complex negotiations" are continuing between Canada and the United States and he will be returning to Washington next week. LeBlanc described his meeting with Lutnick as productive and cordial. The minister, who was joined by Canadian Ambassador to the U.S. Kirsten Hillman, also had meetings with Republican senators Kevin Cramer, Roger Marshall, Shelley Moore Capito, Todd Young and Tim Scott. LeBlanc said they discussed border security and defence issues and the American lawmakers shared a "desire to see more stability and predictability in the relationship with the United States." "My conversations have focused on how we share so many priorities of President Trump's administration that we should be able to figure out together a deal that's in the best interest of Canadian workers, and obviously they are going to do their side of the table in terms of the American economy and American workers," LeBlanc said. Federal officials have remained tightlipped about what Trump's team has said it wants from Canada. After this week's trade deals were announced, Trump boasted on social media, saying he will only consider lowering tariff rates if countries open their markets to the United States. The president also said Japan would invest $550 billion in the U.S. 'at my direction." When Trump first browbeat Canada over tariffs, saying it was linked to the flow of deadly fentanyl, Ottawa responded with a boosted border plan and named a "Fentanyl Czar." Last month, Ottawa walked back its digital services tax after Trump threatened to halt all trade talks. Carney last week announced measures to stop Chinese steel dumping in Canada. Hillman said those efforts help Canada in its ongoing negotiations. "In our discussion with the American senators this week, the American administration, the measures that Canada has taken on steel in particular... are some of the strongest in the world," she said. "And that has been recognized and very much appreciated. So we are making some positive progress." Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski joined a bipartisan group of American lawmakers in Ottawa last week. The Republican said on Thursday that "we would all like to get to a better place with our trade relationship with Canada" but remained skeptical it would happen ahead of Aug. 1. Canada cannot be treated "as yet one more country that we need to reconcile tariffs on" because of shared economic and national security issues, she said. "I wish that I could say, 'It feels good,' that this is all going to be taken care of before the first of August, but I'm not sensing that," she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press
an hour ago
Canada's trade team downplays chances of deal with Trump by Aug. 1
With the clock ticking on U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to boost tariffs on some Canadian exports to 35 per cent starting Aug. 1, Canada's top trade negotiators are downplaying the likelihood of reaching a deal by that deadline. Dominic LeBlanc, minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, and Canada's ambassador to the U.S., Kirsten Hillman, wrapped up two days of meetings with Republican senators. These included a brief sit-down between LeBlanc and Howard Lutnick, the U.S. secretary of commerce and Trump's point man on tariffs. We've made progress, but we have a lot of work in front of us, LeBlanc told reporters outside a Senate office building on Thursday. LeBlanc said he had a productive, cordial discussion with Lutnick and plans to return to Washington next week. He also added some caveats about the path to reaching a deal. We're going to continue to work toward the Aug. 1 deadline,' he said. But all of these deadlines are with the understanding that we'll take the time necessary to get the best deal that we think is in the interest of the Canadian economy and Canadian workers." Hillman, who was appointed Canada's chief negotiator with the U.S., also suggested an agreement with the Trump administration is not imminent. WATCH | Dominic LeBlanc speaks after meeting Trump's point man on tariffs: It's important for us to recognize that there is a time when the deal is the right deal, and it's important for us to be in a position to continue negotiating until we get to that point, she said. Their comments are the latest evidence that Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is not in a rush to sign a deal with the U.S. Carney said Tuesday that his objective is "not to reach a deal whatever it costs (new window) ." Following Carney's meeting with Canada's premiers earlier this week, Nova Scotia's Tim Houston said the prime minister isn't dead set on signing a deal by the deadline. Other countries reach tariff deals with Trump This comes amid Trump's announcements this week of framework agreements on tariffs struck with Japan (new window) and Indonesia, and reports the U.S. is closing in on a deal with the European Union. Canada may be less panicked than other trading partners about the Aug. 1 deadline because only a small portion of Canada's exports to the U.S. would be affected by Trump's threat of 35 per cent tariffs. That's because most goods enter the U.S. tariff-free (new window) under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, or CUSMA. Officials say LeBlanc and Hillman met with five Republican senators in Washington: Kevin Cramer (North Dakota), Roger Marshall (Kansas), Shelley Moore Capito (West Virginia), Tim Scott (South Carolina) and Todd Young (Indiana). Another Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, told reporters in Washington on Thursday that the U.S. shares a lot of security and economic interests with Canada and shouldn't treat it as just another country when it comes to tariffs. "I wish that I could say it feels good, that this is all going to be taken care of before the first of August, but I'm not sensing that," said Murkowski, who visited Ottawa on Monday (new window) to meet Carney and some of his cabinet ministers. Mike Crawley (new window) · CBC News · Senior reporter Mike Crawley has covered Ontario politics for CBC News since 2009. He began his career as a newspaper reporter in B.C., spent six years as a freelance journalist in various parts of Africa, then joined the CBC in 2005. Mike was born and raised in Saint John, N.B. Follow Mike Crawley on Twitter (new window)
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Braid: After big national meeting, not much hope for Premier Smith's pipeline dreams
Article content They're called Manitoba and British Columbia. Article content Article content The hard reality was obvious during the national premiers' meetings this week with Prime Minister Mark Carney. Article content Both provinces are run by NDP premiers who find themselves surrounded by conservative premiers. Article content We like to imagine, or hope, that partisanship is being set aside in the drive to get projects done. Its a wonderful dream. Article content Article content But after all the meetings and declarations, the omens are not positive for pipelines. Article content Article content On Monday, a memorandum of understanding on pipelines and energy development was signed by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, Ontario's Doug Ford and Scott Moe of Saskatchewan. Article content The three conservative premiers enthusiastically support pipelines to B.C.'s north coast and James Bay in Northern Ontario. Article content Asked if he'd been invited to sign on with the conservative premiers, B.C. Premier David Eby said brusquely: 'No.' Article content Further questioned on whether he would have signed if asked, he said 'I haven't read it.' Article content Eby did say, reluctantly, that he'll consider such a pipeline if a private proponent comes on the scene. Article content Smith didn't challenge Eby. Rather, she emphasized her support for LNG exports and various joint economic projects now being discussed with B.C. Article content Article content She seemed to agree that talks won't happen until a private pipeline proponent comes forward. Article content Both premiers know that no backer is likely to emerge until Ottawa lifts the north coast tanker ban implemented by ex-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2019. Article content Otherwise, how do you ship bitumen – by fishing boat? Article content Premier Smith keeps asking Prime Minister Carney to rescind the ban. He becomes very vague. Article content Even if the ban were to end, the B.C. NDP is likely to be as obstructive as they were when the late Premier John Horgan used 'every tool in the toolbox' – his words – to block the Trans Mountain expansion. Article content Eby now talks about how wickedly expensive the Trans Mountain line was ($34 billion) and how Ottawas was forced to buy it. Article content Article content But a huge part of that cost was directly caused by B.C. obstruction at every step of the way. Article content The province, various municipalities and activists dusted off every possible regulation, legal challenge and blockade to slow or halt progress.
