logo
Tom Mulcair: The stakes are high in the upcoming NDP leadership race

Tom Mulcair: The stakes are high in the upcoming NDP leadership race

CTV News4 days ago
The NDP suffered the worst defeat in its history in last April's election, gaining the support of just six per cent of Canadian voters. Former NDP leader Tom Mulcair says the impending leadership race will provide a window onto the future of a party with a proud, remarkable past. (CTV News graphics / Jasna Baric)
Tom Mulcair is a former leader of the federal New Democratic Party of Canada between 2012 and 2017, and a columnist for CTVNews.ca.
The NDP suffered the worst defeat in its history in last April's election, gaining the support of just six per cent of Canadian voters.
The seven remaining NDP MPs will have their work cut out for them as they try to repair the damage done by their decision to hop in the sack with Trudeau's Liberals.
That so-called supply and confidence agreement saw several NDP priorities like dental care and pharmacare become new strands of Canada's social safety net; a worthwhile initiative that came at a huge political price.
That deal deprived the NDP of any credible business case when knocking on doors during the last election. What possible argument was left to convince NDPers not to vote Liberal, when the NDP's MPs themselves had been voting Liberal for three years?
Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh, Pierre Poilievre
File photo of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shaking hands with New Democratic Party Leader Jagmeet Singh as Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre looks on at a Tamil heritage month reception on Jan. 30, 2023 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld
The decision to back Trudeau may be the most obvious reason for the NDP's electoral disaster, but it's not the only one.
Canada's recent decision to join with 24 other countries in demanding the immediate cessation of the war in Gaza underscores the need for all political parties to have a consistent, long-term approach to this most complex, and existential, foreign relations issue. It's precisely because Canada has been such a historically strong ally of Israel that this signature carries so much weight.
Singh's NDP put itself at odds with the party's usually balanced approach to the complex issues of the Middle East, when some caucus members began to express strident anti-Israel positions.
This wasn't new. Jack Layton had to work hard to maintain that equilibrium, pushing back when a key caucus member had expressed support for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel.
Jack made it clear that while all MPs can bring their own opinions to the caucus table, they don't get to make up their own party policy. The NDP still has a fairly nuanced public position on these issues, at least in its official policies as voted on by the membership. But the leadership and the caucus apparently felt that they were no longer bound by those.
Issue of Israeli-Palestinian conflict isn't going away
The ensuing flurry of increasingly harsh anti-Israel rhetoric made it difficult for the voting public to know whether those pronouncements represented the NDP position. When policy is being made up on the fly in reaction to changing events, no matter how compelling or tragic, a political party's credibility with voters is directly affected. How can they know what they're voting for?
That issue isn't about to go away. Several potential leadership candidates, including Singh's foreign affairs spokesperson, Edmonton Strathcona MP Heather McPherson, have been among the most one-sided in their criticism of Israel. Her statements have been increasing in intensity since the election and may signal that staking out a more extreme position on this issue is seen as politically advantageous to her leadership aspirations.
While that type of hardline attitude might get support from some elements within the party, the ability to talk evenhandedly and consistently about longstanding conflicts on the world stage is seen as a litmus test by a much wider group of Canadian voters.
The NDP has been a party of power in six provinces and now has strong capable governments in British Columbia and Manitoba. If the federal NDP is left talking to itself, the dream of one day also having an NDP government in Ottawa could be pushed to the backburner for decades.
Leadership race
The party has now set a timeline for its leadership race to replace Jagmeet Singh. It may be revealing about the state of the party that it wasn't able to actually announce a date. They only said that the vote would be held at the latest on March 29, in Winnipeg. That will give the NDP apparatchiks the summer to come up with rules for the race that they will be able to announce ahead of the official launch of the campaign in September.
The timing of the vote was being actively discussed by potential candidates, and it's understandable. This fairly long campaign will favour someone who is already ensconced in a good paying position; a sitting MP, for example.
Rules for the leadership campaign are not the only issue that has been affecting the party. When you only have seven MPs and three of them sign a letter decrying a lack of proper consultation on the choice of interim leader, you've got a problem. When those three MPs also happen to be the only racialized women in the caucus, you're setting yourself up for a fall.
Jack Layton
File photo of the late NDP Leader Jack Layton singing with NDP MP Pierre Dionne Labelle, left, and NDP MP Paulina Ayala as they took part in national holiday festivities in Gatineau, Quebec on June 24, 2011. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
The NDP's diversity and inclusiveness have been among its strengths. They won't be for long, if they begin to be seen as a façade. One of the keys to Jack Layton's success was his ability to reach across the linguistic divide.
Jack and I were both English-speaking Quebecers. That gave us an understanding of the linguistic minority experience and reinforced our abiding support for the French fact in Canada.
Reaching out to Quebecers
Of the higher profile NDPers having expressed an interest in running for the leadership, only former MP and outgoing B.C. NDP cabinet minister Nathan Cullen is bilingual. Cullen would have no trouble taking part in a leaders' debate during an election campaign or participating in a fast-paced interview on a talk show like Tout le Monde en parle.
Nathan Cullen
File photo of Bulkley Valley-Stikine NDP candidate Nathan Cullen, left, and Nechako Lakes NDP candidate Murphy Abraham, during a campaign stop in Terrace, B.C., on Sept. 24, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck
That's what the eight million francophone Canadians would expect, and indeed require, from an aspiring prime minister. If, during the NDP's own French leadership debates, certain candidates cannot really participate, they're toast. Or, to put it another way, if one of the unilingual Anglos were to win, the party would be condemning itself to the sidelines, no longer able to be real players in Canadian political life.
An ability to reach out to French voters isn't just seen as essential to francophones themselves. The vast majority of Canadians want a leader who can speak and understand both official languages. It is seen as being an essential skill for building, and keeping together, this great nation.
The stakes are high in this impending race. If it plays its cards right, the NDP could be in a much more favourable position come the next election. Prime Minister Mark Carney has been bequeathed a shivering economic dungpile by the outgoing Trudeau regime. Cleaning up that mess will require more than a broom; he'll need a Kärcher pressure washer.
Some of those tough management choices may prove as unpopular as they are necessary. That may provide the beginning of an opportunity for the NDP. But which NDP will run in the next election? A professionalized, credible NDP that can talk to all Canadians or a rump NDP that's trying to please the fringes?
Serious economic, environmental, social and foreign policy issues require thoughtful policies and the perceived ability to do more than just talk about them and emote. The impending leadership race will provide a window onto the future of a party with a proud, remarkable past.
It could be a new beginning, or it could be curtains.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Electoral flashback: B.C. MLAs mull proportional representation despite voters saying no three times
Electoral flashback: B.C. MLAs mull proportional representation despite voters saying no three times

Vancouver Sun

time8 minutes ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Electoral flashback: B.C. MLAs mull proportional representation despite voters saying no three times

VICTORIA — A B.C. legislature committee recently spent two weeks on a trip down memory lane, revisiting the debate over proportional representation that dominated three referendums over the past 20 years. The committee on democratic and electoral reform — four New Democrats, two Conservatives and one Green — was appointed to review a range of issues after the last provincial election. But in two weeks of public hearings earlier this month, most of the witnesses focused on the committee's specific mandate to examine 'models for electing members of the legislature, including proportional representation.' A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The switch to a form of proportional representation, or PR, was an option in a referendum during the 2009 provincial election and another in a ballot-by-mail in 2018. Both times voters endorsed the existing first-past-the-post system by a decisive 61 per cent. PR got 58 per cent support in a 2005 referendum but fell short of the 60 per cent threshold set by the then B.C. Liberal government. Yet it is back on the agenda this year at the behest of the Greens. The B.C. party could have won as many as eight seats under PR in the last provincial election as opposed to the two it did win under first-past-the-post. The prospect drew a scornful submission from Bill Tieleman, political consultant, one-time press secretary to NDP Premier Glen Clark, and a leader of the successful fight against PR in the earlier referendums. 'The public has clearly spoken,' said Tieleman. 'Yet here we are again. I regret that the provincial legislature is once more examining an issue that B.C. voters have democratically, decisively, and not once but twice strongly rejected. 'The reason is clear. The B.C. Green party insisted on this committee examining proportional representation as a condition for supporting the B.C. NDP government. I get it. It's political reality. 'But this committee should not be examining electoral systems for the fourth time. It's kind of ridiculous after 20 years, when B.C. voters have heard all the arguments and voted against proportional representation with what should be finality.' Tieleman offered a shorthand take on why voters prefer the status quo to PR. 'The reason why voters strongly supported our current first-past-the-post system is that it is simple, stable and successful,' he argued. 'By comparison, proportional representation is complicated and confusing, and it removes local, accountable elected officials. It is a foreign voting system that has chronic problems where it's used.' Most of those who made submissions — electoral reform advocates, university professors, Green party members and others — disagreed. Many of their arguments for proportional representation were similar to ones mounted in the past two referendums. But I was struck by how some PR advocates have turned against the whole idea of referendums after losing two in a row. Leading the way on that score was the first speaker in the lineup, Adriane Carr, a former Vancouver city councillor and a former leader of the Greens. Referendums are too time consuming, she argued. 'Timeliness is important, so no referendum beforehand,' she argued. Rather, Carr says the government should impose proportional representation by a vote of the legislature before the next election. Then, after a term or two of governments elected under PR, it would submit the system to referendum after the fact. Fair Voting B.C. went further, declaring that 'voting reform is a civil rights issue, and referendums are not an appropriate way to settle such questions.' Rejecting the notion of bypassing referendums was Bob Plecas, a Tieleman ally in the fight against PR and a deputy minister under former Social Credit and NDP governments. 'The legislature should not unilaterally end this relationship with the voters who today directly elect their MLA, especially after 61 per cent of them have just recently rejected the idea of pro rep,' said Plecas. 'If it proceeds, it would be essential to go to a referendum including a supermajority in both vote and constituency.' The committee wrapped up hearings last week and closed the door on written submissions Friday. The members will then get to work crafting recommendations to the legislature. Their final report is due Nov. 26. If the MLAs felt bound by the majority of submissions on electoral reform, they would recommend a shift to proportional representation. But I doubt that will happen. Since dodging the PR bullet in 2018, the B.C. NDP has won back-to-back majorities under first-past-the-post. The party's provincial director, Tania Jarzabek, did propose some electoral reforms in a submission to the committee. Pointedly, she did not take a stand on PR, one way or the other. Nor can I see the Conservatives supporting an electoral system that could empower further splits in their already fractious caucus. Besides, just this past week, Research Co. reported an opinion poll on electoral reform. While respondents showed some interest in other systems for electing governments, 65 per cent said they were satisfied with the existing first-past-the-post system. I expect committee members, apart from the one Green MLA, will reach a similar conclusion in favour of the status quo and avoid a call for proportional representation, with or without a referendum. vpalmer@

Spruce Woods byelection called for August 26
Spruce Woods byelection called for August 26

Winnipeg Free Press

time8 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Spruce Woods byelection called for August 26

The byelection for the provincial constituency of Spruce Woods will be held on Tuesday, Aug. 26, the Manitoba government said late Friday, hours after Premier Wab Kinew held another news conference in Westman. Kinew and two cabinet ministers appeared in Glenboro to promote road and bridge work that is part of the province's long-term infrastructure plan. The town is in the Spruce Woods constituency, where the byelection must be held to fill the seat vacated by Progressive Conservative Grant Jackson in March. Ray Berthelette (Matt Goerzen / The Brandon Sun) Kinew and his NDP cabinet ministers have made a series of announcements in and around the constituency in recent weeks. Political science professor Kelly Saunders at Brandon University says a NDP win in the rural seat would be a huge symbolic win for the party, because rural seats in southwest Manitoba have been Tory strongholds. Kinew said Thursday he is confident the party's candidate, Ray Berthelette, can bring Spruce Woods into the NDP fold, at a news conference to unveil the candidate. Colleen Robbins from Souris is the Tory candidate, while the Liberals have selected Brandon teacher Stephen Reid. The government news release said the chief electoral officer will issue information in the upcoming days that will indicate polling times, locations and the dates, and locations of advance polls. Colleen Robbins (Supplied) Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. There are 57 seats in the legislature; 34 are held by the governing New Democrats; 20 by the Progressive Conservatives; one independent Liberal; one independent member and the vacant Spruce Woods seat. fpcity@ Stephen Reid (Supplied)

Liberal MPs call for Canada to join France in recognizing Palestinian state
Liberal MPs call for Canada to join France in recognizing Palestinian state

CTV News

time8 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Liberal MPs call for Canada to join France in recognizing Palestinian state

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators gather on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, April 12. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Spencer Colby. OTTAWA — Liberal members of Parliament are publicly calling on the Canadian government to follow France's lead in recognizing Palestine as a state. Toronto MP Salma Zahid said in a social media post that Canada must join France in announcing its recognition of a state for the Palestinian people. MP Fares Al Soud, who represents the Toronto-area riding of Mississauga Centre, posted a message on social media saying that justice for the Palestinian people 'demands recognition.' French President Emmanuel Macron has said he intends to formally recognize a Palestinian state in September during the United Nations General Assembly. When asked whether Prime Minister Mark Carney would do the same, his team did not respond to the question. Carney's office instead referred The Canadian Press to a social media post by the prime minister on Thursday in which he said Canada supports a two-state solution that 'guarantees peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 25, 2025 Émilie Bergeron, The Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store