National security risk: Canada bans security cameras in government agencies from this Chinese company; ceases local operations
Hikvision
in
government agencies
. The country has also ordered Hikvision's Canada unit to cease all local operations, citing
national security risks
. Canada's Industry Minister
Melanie Joly
took to the social media platform X (earlier Twitter) to announce this decision. The Canadian government noted that Hikvision Canada's continued operations would be "injurious to Canada's national security" following a review under the
Investment Canada Act
. The ban includes prohibiting the purchase or use of Hikvision products within government departments, agencies, and crown corporations. The minister clarified that the review's scope does not extend to Hikvision's affiliate operations outside of Canada.
What Canada's Industry Minister Melanie Joly said about 'banning' Hikivision
Sharing the X post, Minister Joly wrote: 'My statement on Hikvision Canada Inc. following a national security review under the Investment Canada Act.'
The statement read: 'Following a National Security Review under the Investment Canada Act, the Government of Canada has ordered Hikvision Canada Inc. to cease all operations in Canada and close its Canadian business. The government has determined that Hikvision Canada Inc.'s continued operations in Canada would be injurious to Canada's national security. This determination is the result of a multi-step review that assessed information and evidence provided by Canada's security and intelligence community.
The scope of this National Security Review under the Investment Canada Act does not extend to Hikvision's affiliate operations outside of Canada. However, I strongly encourage all Canadians to take note of this decision and make their own decisions accordingly.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
In addition to this action, the Government of Canada is prohibiting the purchase or use of Hikvision products in government departments, agencies, and crown corporations. The Government of Canada is further conducting a review of existing properties to ensure that legacy Hikvision products are not used going forward.
The Government of Canada welcomes foreign investment - but will never compromise on Canada's national security.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
41 minutes ago
- First Post
Will Dalai Lama name his successor today? Senior Indian ministers attend his birthday celebrations
Ahead of the Dalai Lama's birthday, there are expectations that he could provide clarity on the question of succession. Senior Indian politicians, such as Union minister Kiren Rijiju and Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu, have attended weeklong birthday celebrations. read more Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama greets devotees as he arrives at the Tsuglakhang temple in Dharmsala, India, Tuesday, Aug. 29, 2017. (Photo: AP) Ahead of his birthday later this week, the Dalai Lama is expected to provide clarity on the question of his succession. The Dalai Lama will turn 90 on Sunday. The Tibetan community is currently holding multi-day celebrations in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, where he has stayed for decades. The Tibetan movement runs a government-in-exile in Dharamshala. The Dalai Lama will deliver a speech at around 9:30 am and a press statement is expected at around 11 am. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The question of the Dalai Lama's succession is politically sensitive as China has labelled him as a separatist. China has maintained for years that any successor anointed in exile would not be recognised. In recent years, and particularly in recent months, the Dalai Lama has suggested that his successor would not be from Tibet from the exiled Tibetan community — likely in India. In recent years, as India-China relationship hit a new low following Chinese aggression in 2020, the Narendra Modi government has renewed engagement with the Tibetan movement. During ongoing birthday celebrations, senior Indian politicians, such as Union minister Kiren Rijiju and Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu, have been present. China invaded and occupied Tibet in 1949-50. The Dalai Lama has been living in India in exile since 1959 when he arrived in the country after an uprising against Chinese occupation failed. In a book published this year, the Dalai Lama said that his successor would be born in the 'free world'. This meant that the successor would be from outside of China-occupied Tibet. 'Since the purpose of a reincarnation is to carry on the work of the predecessor, the new Dalai Lama will be born in the free world so that the traditional mission of the Dalai Lama —that is, to be the voice for universal compassion, the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, and the symbol of Tibet embodying the aspirations of the Tibetan people— will continue,' writes the Dalai Lama in the book. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Earlier this week, the Dalai Lama said that there will be some kind of a framework for the continuation of the institution after his death. 'The rest of my life I will dedicate for the benefit of others, as much as possible, as extensive as possible. There will be some kind of a framework within which we can talk about the continuation of the institution of the Dalai Lamas,' the Dalai Lama said. The Dalai Lama is the spiritual head of Tibetan Buddhists. Every Dalai Lama is considered to be the reincarnation of the previous one. The current Dalai Lama is the 14th in line.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Chinese J-20 isn't just a fighter jet—it's a signal to US, Japan and India
State media framed the alleged incident as a textbook display of the J-20's stealth advantage, combat readiness, and pilot skill. One pilot's phrase, ' fighting with bayonets in the air ,' was highlighted as a metaphor for China's fusion of traditional fighting spirit with high-tech modernity. It also underscored a broader theme that China acts decisively to defend its airspace and maritime claims. Reports tied the interception to new Chinese infrastructure projects in the East China Sea, suggesting these developments have unsettled Japan , but that China has the upper hand. While the J-20 East China Sea encounter went largely unreported in English-language Chinese media and may have gone entirely unnoticed by Western outlets, it became a major topic on Chinese platforms like Baidu and Weibo. Hashtags such as '# J-20 pilot says we cannot back down ' and '# J-20 scrambles urgently to repel foreign military aircraft' garnered over 10 million and 47 million views, respectively. The Chinese phrase, 'He who controls the heights, wins,' captures the strategic logic increasingly evident in Chinese discourse—airpower is seen as central to modern warfare. A recent China Central Television (CCTV) broadcast showed a close-range encounter over the East China Sea, where J-20 stealth fighters, codenamed 'Mighty Dragon', claimed to have intercepted foreign aircraft, likely F-35s, approaching China's established Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ). 'The J-20 is mighty—the pride of China's aviation industry and a shining star on the international stage,' read one comment. A Weibo post added: 'The J-20 has been fully upgraded—new domestic engines, enhanced avionics, improved tactics, and better training. We are confident and capable of facing future wars.' Another comment noted that the J-20's recent public appearance marked the maturation of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force's stealth fighter programme. These sentiments reflect a recurring narrative in Chinese state and online media: military strength is both proof and driver of national resurgence. Following China's strong support for Pakistan post-Operation Sindoor, this narrative gained further momentum. In Chinese discourse, the focus is less on tactical details and more on asserting regional air superiority and signalling strategic confidence. The message is clear, at least for the domestic audience: China is no longer playing catch-up; it is leading in its own theatre. J-20: A game changer In China's military narratives, the J-20 is not just an aircraft; it is a symbol of technological independence and strategic reach. It represents China's leap into fifth-generation fighter capabilities, combining stealth, speed, and long-range strike potential. Media coverage often features the J-20 conducting beyond-visual-range engagements under heavy electronic interference, showcasing agility and combat realism. The replacement of Russian engines in Chinese aircraft with fully domestic ones is portrayed as a milestone in defence self-reliance. Reports indicate that China now produces J-20s at a rate that could surpass the regional presence of the US F-35. Testing of a two-seat variant, believed to support manned-unmanned teaming, signals ambitions aligned with sixth-generation airpower. Chinese commentary highlights the J-20's ability to avoid radar detection until it is within 80 kilometres of enemy aircraft, creating what is described as a 'one-sided battlefield'. Its rapid combat readiness, airborne within eight minutes, is regularly cited, as are tactics like 'snake manoeuvres' and visible bomb bay deployments, which are said to deliver both tactical and psychological advantage. Support from electronic warfare aircraft like the J-16D adds to the portrayal of integrated, high-tech combat capability. The pilot corps itself is central to the narrative. With an average age of just 28, J-20 pilots are depicted as the face of a new generation, technically skilled, highly trained, and ideologically committed. A user on Baidu described the J-20 as 'the pinnacle of China's aviation ambitions,' combining sleek design, advanced sensors, and networked combat systems. Yet perhaps more than the jet's features, Chinese discourse highlights production scale as a core metric of power. It's proof of China's growing industrial and military strength. Wang Xiangsui, a professor at the Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, describes this as a doctrine of 'asymmetric air supremacy', not matching adversaries aircraft-for-aircraft, but offsetting their advantages through stealth, electronic warfare, and strategic agility. The J-20 is crucial to that doctrine. Also read: Japan is stepping back from NATO, not Indo-Pacific ties—China is watching the cracks closely China's sky surveillance edge The J-20 is part of a broader ecosystem of aerial dominance. Increasingly, Chinese narratives emphasise high-altitude drones, especially the Wuzhen-7 and Wuzhen-8, as critical for surveillance and deterrence. These unmanned systems are described as flying between 20,000 and 50,000 metres at speeds above Mach 7, far beyond the tracking range of Japanese F-15Js. The Wuzhen-8, in particular, is praised for its stealth and AI-driven systems, with some Chinese analysts calling it a 'quasi-sixth-generation' platform. These drones are cast as vital ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) assets, capable of sustained operations across contested airspace. Their high speed and long endurance are seen as major advantages over regional rivals, reinforcing China's claims to both technological and strategic superiority. What's the message? The messaging in Chinese discourse is deliberate: Beijing is preparing for a confrontation and intends to do so from a position of strength. Fifth-generation fighters, AI-driven drones, and rapid mobilisation are not just military assets. They are woven into a larger story of national revival, technological ascendancy, and strategic inevitability. The J-20 is not just a fighter jet—-it is a signal, aimed squarely at the US, Japan, India, and Taiwan. China aims to command the skies, and it is building both the arsenal and the narrative to make that clear. But first, it starts at home. Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. She tweets @sanahashmi1. Views are personal. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
US, Indo-Pacific partners agree to strengthen maritime cooperation
The United States, Australia, India and Japan have agreed to expand their cooperation on maritime security in the Indo-Pacific and further collaborate on supplies of critical minerals and rare earths that are key components of high-tech production. The foreign ministers of the four countries, known as the "QUAD", met in Washington on Tuesday as the Trump administration seeks to expand US influence in the Indo-Pacific to compete with a rising China amid tensions with partners over trade and defense issues. In a joint meeting with his three colleagues, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the QUAD must be a vehicle for action that goes beyond statements of intent and stressed that commerce and trade will be critical to ensuring the group's relevance in the future. To that end, the four announced in a statement the creation of a QUAD Critical Minerals Initiative that aims to strengthen economic security and collective resilience by collaborating on securing and diversifying critical mineral supply chains". The statement did not provide details of the initiative. We are deeply concerned about the abrupt constriction and future reliability of key supply chains, specifically for critical minerals, they said. This includes the use of non-market policies and practices for critical minerals, certain derivative products, and mineral processing technology. The statement did not mention China by name, but Chinese domination of the critical minerals supply chain has long been a concern of the US and others. The ministers expressed specific concern about rising tensions in the East and South China Seas, where Beijing has become increasingly assertive of maritime and territorial claims that are rejected by its smaller neighbours. We reiterate our strong opposition to any unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion, they said. We express our serious concerns regarding dangerous and provocative actions, including interference with offshore resource development, the repeated obstruction of the freedoms of navigation and overflight, and the dangerous maneuvers by military aircraft and coast guard and maritime militia vessels, especially the unsafe use of water cannons and ramming or blocking actions in the South China Sea. The ministers also condemned North Korea for continuing to launch ballistic missiles, expand its nuclear weapons program and engage in malicious cyberactivity. In a veiled reference to North Korean support for Russia in its war against Ukraine, they expressed deep concern about countries that are deepening military cooperation with North Korea, which directly undermines the global nonproliferation regime". (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
