Trump's DOJ urges Supreme Court to reject appeal from Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell
More than two years after Epstein died by suicide in a New York City jail, Maxwell was found guilty in December 2021 of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, among other charges, related to her role in a scheme to abuse minor girls with the wealthy financier for a decade.
Maxwell, now 63, was subsequently sentenced to 20 years in prison. Still, her lawyers have been trying to get her out of prison by appealing her case, arguing she was exempt from prosecution under a clause in Epstein's 2008 non-prosecution agreement.
Years before Epstein died in jail while on federal charges related to the sexual abuse of dozens of minor girls, he was accused of almost identical allegations in a Florida case.
He was able to cut a deal in June 2008, where he pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. This deal allowed him to avoid a possible life sentence and he instead served 13 months in a work-release program.
There was a co-conspirator clause in the deal that stated if 'Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to" four of the financier's assistants, ABC News reported.
Maxwell was not included on the list of assistants, but her lawyers are now arguing the 'plain language' of the deal shows she should not have been prosecuted in Manhattan.
"Despite the existence of a non-prosecution agreement promising in plain language that the United States would not prosecute any co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein, the United States in fact prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein,' her lawyers wrote the Supreme Court in April.
Maxwell's lawyers had already tried and failed to get lower courts to side with them.
The Justice Department argued in a new filing to the Supreme Court on Monday that Maxwell 'was not a party to the relevant agreement,' and there is 'no evidence that the parties to the NPA intended for the coconspirators clause to benefit' her.
'The government was not even aware of [Maxwell's] role in Epstein's scheme at that time,' the filing read.
The Justice Department also contended, citing its policy at the time the deal was made, a U.S. Attorney's Office could only bind other districts in an NPA if it obtained approval of the districts or the department's Criminal Division.
Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, said in a statement circulated by multiple outlets Monday, "I'd be surprised if President Trump knew his lawyers were asking the Supreme Court to let the government break a deal,' adding, 'He's the ultimate dealmaker.'
'I'm sure he'd agree that when the United States gives its word, it should keep it. With all the talk about who's being prosecuted and who isn't, it's especially unfair that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in prison based on a promise the government made and broke,' Markus added.
Trump has been accused of being on Epstein's client list by tech billionaire Elon Musk, whose relationship with the president turned sour after his short stint at the White House leading the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk did not provide any evidence to prove Trump was on any suspected list.
The president's Justice Department and FBI made waves among his Make America Great Again base when they said earlier this month there was never any client list of high-profile names associated with Epstein. The feds also confirmed he died by suicide following years of conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein's death.
Sigrid McCawley, a lawyer who has represented hundreds of clients who have claimed to be Epstein's victims, told ABC News, "After two-plus decades of recruiting and abusing young girls trapped in Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking enterprise, Ghislaine Maxwell has again attempted to escape accountability by trying to hide behind the non-prosecution agreement.
'Maxwell does not deserve any protection, and she should remain in prison for the horrific crimes she committed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
US inflation accelerated last month to highest level since February
Inflation rose last month to its highest level in four months as the cost of gas, food, and groceries rose, reversing several months of cooling price pressures. Consumer prices rose 2.7% in June from a year earlier, the Labor Department said Tuesday, up from an annual increase of 2.4% in May. On a monthly basis, prices climbed 0.3% from May to June, after rising just 0.1% the previous month. Worsening inflation poses a political challenge for President Donald Trump, who promised during last year's presidential campaign to immediately lower costs. The sharp inflation spike of 2022-2023 was the worst in four decades and soured most Americans on former president Joe Biden's handling of the economy. Higher inflation will also likely heighten the Federal Reserve's reluctance to cut its short-term interest rate, as Trump is loudly demanding. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core inflation increased 2.9% in June from a year earlier, up from 2.8% in May. On a monthly basis, it picked up 0.2% from May to June. Economists closely watch core prices because they typically provide a better sense of where inflation is headed. THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. AP's earlier story follows below. WASHINGTON (AP) — Inflation likely accelerated in June as sweeping tariffs on nearly all imports may have pushed up prices for electronics, appliances, and other goods, economists forecast. Consumer prices probably rose 2.6% last month from a year ago, up from an annual increase of 2.4% in May, according to data provider FactSet. The Labor Department will issue its inflation report at 8:30 a.m. eastern. On a monthly basis, prices likely rose 0.3% from May to June, the largest increase since January, economists project. Worsening inflation could pose a political challenge for President Donald Trump, who promised during last year's presidential campaign to immediately lower costs. The sharp inflation spike of 2022-2023 was the worst in four decades and soured most Americans on former president Joe Biden 's handling of the economy. Faster price increases would also likely underscore the Federal Reserve 's reluctance to cut its short-term interest rate, as Trump is loudly demanding. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, inflation is forecast to have risen 3% in June from a year earlier, up from a 2.8% rise in May. On a monthly basis, it is also expected to have picked up 0.3% from May to June, according to FactSet. Economists closely watch core prices because they typically provide a better sense of where inflation is headed. Trump has imposed sweeping duties of 10% on all imports, plus 50% levies on steel and aluminum, 30% on goods from China, and 25% on imported cars. Just last week the president threatened to hit the European Union with a new 30% tariff starting Aug. 1. So far, the tariffs haven't noticeably pushed up inflation, which has been mild for the past four months. Core inflation has fallen from 3.3% in January to 2.8% in May, though that is still above the Fed's 2% target. If inflation in June is much weaker than economists forecast, Trump will likely renew his demands that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell immediately reduce borrowing costs. Powell and other Fed officials have emphasized that they want to see how the economy evolves as the tariffs take effect before cutting their key short-term rate. The Fed chair has said that the duties could both push up prices and slow the economy, a tricky combination for the central bank since higher costs would typically lead the Fed to hike rates while a weaker economy often spurs it to reduce them. Trump on Monday said that Powell has been 'terrible' and 'doesn't know what the hell he's doing.' The president added that the economy was doing well despite Powell's refusal to reduce rates, but it would be 'nice' if there were rate cuts 'because people would be able to buy housing a lot easier.' Last week, White House officials also attacked Powell for cost overruns on the years-long renovation of two Fed buildings, which are now slated to cost $2.5 billion, roughly one-third more than originally budgeted. While Trump legally can't fire Powell just because he disagrees with his interest rate decisions, the Supreme Court has signaled, he may be able to do so 'for cause,' such as misconduct or mismanagement. While inflation was mild in May, there were already signs in last month's report that tariffs were starting to have some impact. The cost of furniture, appliances, toys, and tools rose, though those increases were offset by falling prices for airfares, hotels, and muted rises in rental costs. Some companies have said they have or plan to raise prices as a result of the tariffs, including Walmart, the world's largest retailer. Automaker Mitsubishi said last month that it was lifting prices by an average of 2.1% in response to the duties, and Nike has said it would implement 'surgical' price hikes to offset tariff costs. But many companies have been able to postpone or avoid price increases, after building up their stockpiles of goods this spring to get ahead of the duties. Other companies may have refrained from lifting prices while they wait to see whether the U.S. is able to reach trade deals with other countries that lower the duties.
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ghislaine Maxwell begs Trump for help after having Epstein appeal denied: Live updates
Ghislaine Maxwell is begging President Donald Trump for help after his Department of Justice urged the Supreme Court to reject her appeal of her sex-trafficking conviction. Maxwell's attorney David Oscar Markus told '[Trump is the ultimate dealmaker - and I'm sure he'd agree that when the United States gives its word, it should keep it. 'With all the talk about who's being prosecuted and who isn't, it's especially unfair that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in prison based on a promise the government made and broke.' Epstein's 'Madame' has also said she is willing to speak to Congress about the disgraced financier's files. Her plea comes as Trump supporters continue publicly sparring after the DOJ said there was no client list in the Jeffrey Epstein files. It was a huge retreat from what Attorney General Pam Bondi and other Trump allies had previously claimed. The MAGA civil war reached a boiling point last week when Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino did not show up to work on Friday after it was reported that he had threatened to resign over the botched handling of the Epstein investigation. 12:25 Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders Maxwell, 63, is the only person behind bars - serving 20 years on child sex trafficking charges - despite the fact that pedophile Jeffrey Epstein allegedly controlled a web of underage girls. Now a source said: 'Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal. She would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story. 'No-one from the government has ever asked her to share what she knows. She remains the only person to be jailed in connection to Epstein and she would welcome the chance to tell the American public the truth.' What that 'truth' is remains to be seen. Maxwell was convicted in 2022 over her role in a scheme to sexual exploit and abuse multiple minor girls with Epstein over the course of a decade. Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal client list 'Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal. She would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story,' sources tell the Daily Mail. 12:23 Pam Bondi's DOJ says SCOTUS should not take up Ghislaine Maxwell's case The Justice Department will not be letting British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell off the hook for her role in Jeffrey Epstein 's child sex trafficking ring. Currently serving a 20-year prison sentence, Maxwell's lawyers argued she shouldn't have been put on trial in the first place because of the plea deal Epstein reached with Florida prosecutors in 2008. But Donald Trump 's Attorney General Pam Bondi's DOJ responded in a filing on Monday saying that the Supreme Court should not take up her case. Trump's DOJ makes bombshell decision on Ghislaine Maxwell case Maxwell's lawyers argued she shouldn't have been put on trial in the first place because of the plea deal Epstein reached with Florida prosecutors in 2008. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino threatened to quit over Epstein files Dan Bongino, a longtime leading proponent of theories about Jeffrey Epstein 's client list, failed to show up to work on Friday after Attorney General Pam Bondi and President Donald Trump assured the public no such list exists. At the time it was reported he had threatened to resign over the botched handling of the investigation, which has sparked mutiny within the MAGA ranks and turned some of Trump's most loyal soldiers against him. But Bongino, a podcaster who was picked out of political obscurity to help lead the new-and-improved FBI, reportedly returned to work this week under a cloud of uncertainty about his future at the agency. By Monday morning, officials were starting to squirm and feared that Bongino would be a no-show yet again, but he arrived in the office a few hours later than expected. 11:59 MAGA world in civil war over Epstein files A broken to release more information about the Jeffrey Epstein case has sparked outrage among some of President Donald Trump's loyal supporters. The Justice Department last week said Epstein, who was facing charges of sex trafficking, did not leave behind a 'client list.' Attorney General Pam Bondi suggested in February it was on her desk, though she later said she was referring to the overall case file. Bondi also said officials were poring over a 'truckload' of previously withheld evidence. The Justice Department concluded, however, that public disclosure would not be appropriate and that much of the material was placed under seal by a judge. That has angered right-wing influencers who were once bolstered by Trump's own claims on this case, but are now feeling their demands are being squelched by his administration. Figures like commentator Tucker Carlson, right-wing activist Laura Loomer, and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon claim the government's handling of the case shows a lack of transparency. Anger over the case threatens to divide the MAGA faithful. Epstein 'cover-up' civil war exposes deep fractures and dirty secrets When a group of MAGA 'influencers' marched out of the Oval Office holding up white binders filled with the 'Epstein files', Donald Trump 's base immediately sensed something was off.
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Does Kash Patel deserve to run the FBI? Of course he does – and I'll take a lie detector test to prove it
'Once upon a time, in the land of the free, there lived a wizard called Kash the Distinguished Discoverer.' That piece of verbal wizardry is the opening line of a children's book trilogy called The Plot Against the King (aimed at children aged three and above) by a Mr Kash Patel. The first book, published in 2022, is like Harry Potter for conspiracy theorists. Kash helps King Donald battle Hillary Queenton and a 'shifty knight', who have been spreading lies about the king working with the Russionians. In the final book in the trilogy (The Plot Against the King 3: The Return of the King) a couple of villains called Comma‑la‑la‑la and Baron Von Biden make an appearance. Not so long ago, publishing deeply weird books about the president while also promoting wild QAnon conspiracy theories would get you put on some kind of watchlist. Now it gets you a top job as the guy in charge of watchlists. Patel is not just a children's book author; he is also the director of the FBI. His chief qualification for the role appears to be his extreme devotion to President Donald Trump. He certainly didn't have any FBI experience before getting the job as head of the agency. I don't know if Patel suffers from impostor syndrome – a condition that normally afflicts overqualified women – but he does seem a tad insecure. Last week the New York Times reported that Patel's FBI has 'significantly' increased its use of lie detector tests to screen employees for loyalty. According to the Times, some people have specifically been asked if they've ever been rude about their boss; 'disparaging Mr Patel or his deputy, Dan Bongino … could cost people their job'. Woe betide the FBI underling who admits that they think Patel's official photo on the US Department of Defense website (which has been much-memed online) looks as if he's just been caught smoking joints behind the bike shed and is trying his very best to act sober. Polygraph tests, which track physiological reactions (eg did your heart rate spike?) while you answer questions, are notoriously unreliable. They can be successfully gamed by people who know how they work and are adept at controlling their bodily responses in high-pressure situations. You know, people like FBI employees. That said, it's certainly possible that the FBI is secretly in possession of infallible lie-detecting technology (called something like WaterboardingAI™?). While Patel may come across as insecure, paranoid and generally doolally, he is not always wrong. In his 2023 opus Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy, which is written for 'grownups', he writes about how power works in Washington. 'I regularly used to tell people that the fastest way to move up in the government is to just screw up, and the bigger the screw-up, the bigger the promotion,' he writes. 'Every person implicated in your mistakes has an interest in covering up what they did, so they will promote you. That means the people at the very top are usually the most immoral, unethical people in the entire agency.' No comment there. Anyway, I think I've screwed up myself. Like a dimwit, I've just realised that all of the above might sound a tad disparaging towards Patel. Which, as a British-Palestinian on a green card that's up for renewal, was certainly not my intention. So, just to clarify, Kash, I've been writing in English-English. While American English tends to be blunt, the king's English is a whole different kettle of fish. When we say, 'That's very interesting,' for example, we often mean it's absolute tripe. When we say 'quite good', it means either that something was indeed quite good or that it was actually quite disappointing – you've got to read the room. Calling something 'not bad', on the other hand, often means it's very good. And, of course, the British are also very fond of sarcasm, which Americans can sometimes miss. So, with the greatest respect, Mr Patel, I do not think you are an idiot. I think you are a 'distinguished discoverer' and the greatest FBI director to ever walk God's green Earth. And I'll even take a lie detector test to prove it. Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist
