A City Split in Two: How Cape Town's 2024/5 Budget Betrays Its Poor
Image: Tracey Adams / IOL
This article draws directly from the official City of Cape Town budget document: Annexure 21 – Projects Over R50 Million: 2024/25. A full sector-by-sector analysis covering Housing, Water and Sanitation, Energy, Transport, and Digital Infrastructure including all Top 20 projects in each category.
Cape Town's 2024/25 budget is being marketed as a record investment in infrastructure, growth, and future-readiness. Glossy graphics showcase R36.8 billion in capital projects from smart city operations and solar grids to road upgrades and wastewater treatment plants. The DA-led City Council proclaims progress. But beneath this polished façade lies a deeper, more uncomfortable truth: this budget reinforces the city's spatial and economic apartheid, entrenching exclusion while branding it as modernisation. The Myth of Equal Development
Across five sectors Housing, Water and Sanitation, Energy, Transport, and Digital Infrastructure a clear pattern emerges. While poor and working-class communities receive rhetorical inclusion and a few tactical investments, the lion's share of funding is absorbed by already well-serviced, wealthier areas. We are not witnessing pro-poor development. We are watching the deepening of a Tale of Two Cities.
1. Human Settlements: Perpetuating Spatial Apartheid
Of the Top 20 Housing Projects, valued at R2.55 billion, the city directs funding mostly toward peripheral townships: Blue Downs, Gugulethu, Mfuleni, and Atlantis. On the surface, this seems just. But scratch deeper and a disturbing omission appears: there is no major inner-city social housing project funded over R50 million. Not in Salt River. Not in Woodstock. Not in the Foreshore.
This is despite: Court orders compelling the city to act, available well-located public land and a backlog of over 400,000 families on the waiting list.
Projects like the Airport Industria housing development remain in limbo, delayed by bureaucratic inertia and political resistance. In contrast, R247 million is earmarked to build mixed-use housing further away from the CBD entrenching commuting costs, congestion, and carbon footprints. Apartheid's logic lives on, not by law, but by land use and budget choices.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
2. Water and Sanitation: Cape Flats Neglected While Camps Bay Thrives
Cape Town faces a sanitation crisis. Raw sewage runs through informal settlements. Toilets overflow in Gugulethu. Khayelitsha's ageing pipelines collapse under strain. Yet the city's R9.25 billion water and sanitation budget prioritises mega-projects that bypass the poorest.
Yes, the Cape Flats Wastewater Works upgrade (R1.35 billion) is commendable. So is the Zandvliet expansion. But consider this: the Camps Bay Pump Station serving one of the wealthiest suburbs receives R427 million, nearly three times more than the entire sanitation budget for Masiphumelele.
No funding is allocated for dry sanitation pilots, community-managed ablution blocks, or decentralised waste treatment in informal settlements. No urgency exists to address Philippi's groundwater contamination or the sanitation gap in "Covid" informal settlements.
The rhetoric says 'inclusive growth.' The numbers say 'privilege protection.'
3. Energy Transition: A Future for the Few
The DA administration is proud of its green energy agenda. In this budget, it allocates R8.27 billion to energy and electricity, with projects like: Atlantis Solar PV + Battery Plant (R621 million), Smart Grid Automation (R964 million), Steenbras Hydroelectric Station Rehab (R1.27 billion).
Yet township residents, who experience the worst of load-shedding, are left in the dark literally and figuratively. The Informal Settlement Electrification Program, targeting Crossroads and Nyanga, receives just R254 million a meagre 3% of the energy budget.
Why no investment in: Microgrids for backyarders? Rooftop PV pilots in Khayelitsha? Solar training for youth in Mitchells Plain?
This is not an energy transition. It is a green gentrification strategy dressed in climate language, engineered to benefit commercial zones, CBD towers, and smart offices while the Cape Flats remain energy-insecure.
4. Transport: Roads to Nowhere for the Poor
Transport receives the largest capital allocation R11.5 billion. The DA calls it a 'mobility revolution.' Yet 67% of this goes to: Foreshore Freeway redevelopment (R940 million), N1/N7 and N2 Interchanges (R1.96 billion), CBD nodal upgrades (R663 million) and Airport Link reconfiguration (R463 million).
Meanwhile, Khayelitsha, Gugulethu, Bonteheuwel, and Nyanga remain traffic-choked, underserved, and dangerous for pedestrians.
Yes, there is R588 million for Spine Road and R501 million for Nyanga road rehab but these are a fraction of what is needed. The Bonteheuwel Active Mobility Project, a rare pro-poor investment in walking and cycling, is only R275 million less than a third of the Foreshore flyover upgrade.
Where is the funding for: Safe school zones in Bishop Lavis? Accessible taxis for the elderly in Manenberg? Flood-proof roads in Philippi?
Public transport reform is sorely needed. Yet the MyCiTi expansion continues to exclude most black working-class commuters, while taxis used by 70% of residents are still criminalised, not subsidised.
5. Digital Infrastructure: WiFi in Theory, Disconnection in Reality
The DA touts its 'Smart City vision', with R7.8 billion in ICT and data infrastructure. Projects like the: Smart City Ops Platform (R712 million), ERP Cloud Upgrade (R648 million) and IoT Sensor Network (R314 million), ...are futuristic and seductive. But for whom?
Yes, R184 million goes to Cape Flats Smart Poles and R288 million to school WiFi but many township youth still lack devices. Fibre to Langa and Manenberg libraries means little without laptops, stable power, and tech support. An AI chatbot to help pay rates does not help a backyarder whose shack has no electricity.
Open Data and Digital Inclusion mean nothing without co-design, digital literacy, and community ownership.
The DA's Double Game: Performative Efficiency, Structural Exclusion
The DA often says: 'we get the basics right.' But budgeting is not neutral. Every project chose nor not chosen reveals values. Why do Camps Bay's sewers get R427 million, but Gugulethu's sewer backlog R154 million?
Why is Foreshore's freeway prioritised over Masiphumelele's flood-proof roads?
Why is there no social housing in Sea Point, but R247 million for a distant project in Airport Industria?
These are not accidents. They are ideological expressions of a vision: one where the city is clean, digital, solar-powered, and efficient for those who already have.
A Progressive Vision Reimagined
We are not calling for no development. We are calling for just development. A budget that: Prioritises sanitation where dignity is denied, not where beaches must be clean.
Electrifies informal homes before expanding CBD offices.
Delivers social housing where jobs are, not where land is cheap.
Funds youth tech skills before smart surveillance.
Cape Town can be both world-class and inclusive. But it must break with its colonial urban design, apartheid-era zoning, and neoliberal budget logic. It must place the poor and working majority at the centre of capital planning not on the outskirts, or at the bottom of funding tables.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
BEE left out of US trade talks
Lamola distances political issues from trade talks, saying empowerment policies are not being discussed with US officials. Ongoing negotiations on a trade deal with the US have not included any discussion about political issues, including broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) or affirmative action, says International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola. At a media briefing yesterday, Lamola emphasised on a number of occasions that those issues had 'not been brought to the negotiating table'. He said despite some 'speculations' by those who had visited Washington, that these matters were critical, 'those issues were not in the feedback' the US negotiators had given their South African counterparts. Nor were they in the framework being discussed. B-BBEE not brought to trade talks table He added: 'We prefer to deal with what is in front of us… 'So, we separate facts and other things that we hear.' Lamola appeared to criticise some groups within South Africa that may have hurt the country's relationship with the US. ALSO READ: US tariffs: Here's why talks over trade deal have been 'complex' 'It is unfortunate that this government's efforts in resetting the relationship with the US have been undermined by some actors within South African society.' Representatives from the DA, AfriForum, the Solidarity Movement and Freedom Front Plus travelled to the US this year to voice concerns over South African policies such as B-BBEE and the Expropriation Act. This coincided with Trump's executive order granting refugee status to Afrikaners, citing claims of persecution, while also cutting US financial aid to South Africa in response to the International Court of Justice case brought by President Cyril Ramaphosa's administration against Israel. Govt accused groups of sowing division As a result, the SA government has repeatedly accused the groups of sowing division in the country. Lamola has assured the public that support programmes will help offset the US 30% tariff on SA exports. He highlighted that the US is South Africa's third-largest trading partner, accounting for 7.5% of total exports. ALSO READ: Government must actively manage fallout from US tariffs with trade crisis committee – BLSA 'South African exports do not compete with US producers and do not pose a threat to US industry. 'On the contrary, our exports are crucial inputs that support America's own industrial base. 'Our agriculture exports are even counter-seasonal, meaning that they fill gaps in the US market, not replace domestic products.' Tariffs could reduce economic growth by 0.2% Economists estimate that the new tariffs could reduce South Africa's economic growth by 0.2%. However, Lamola pointed out that 35% of South African exports will remain exempt. These include products like copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energyrelated products. ALSO READ: SA's efforts to repair US ties undermined internally, says Lamola amid tariff fallout He also said South African companies had already adapted to steel and aluminium tariffs that were introduced under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act back in 2018. Government will roll out several key support measures. These include an export support desk that will act as a single point of contact for companies affected by the US tariff hike. Support desk The desk will provide ongoing updates, assist with exploring new international markets and connect exporters with South African embassies and high commissions abroad. An economic relief package is also being prepared to help companies cope with short-term financial pressures and develop longer-term plans to protect jobs and production.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Tshwane and Joburg squeeze residents for cash
Joburg and Tshwane are resorting to desperate revenue tactics that punish residents instead of fixing mismanagement. Nothing our dysfunctional metros do surprises us. But the latest moves by the City of Tshwane and the City of Joburg smack of a desperation which bodes ill, not only for the metros, but for their residents too. As Tshwane vows to appeal against a court decision that its proposed 'cleaning levy' is unconstitutional, the DA in Joburg claims that the city is in such a financial mess – and desperate for income – that it has instructed its traffic cops that they must collect at least R7 000 each per day in fines. Not only that, but officers have allegedly also been told that they can claim overtime if they need to meet their target. DA MPL Michael Sun said the municipality is pushing its rate collection responsibilities to the JMPD. 'This effectively turns law enforcement into a revenue-generating system rather than a public safety service,' he said. ALSO READ: Motorists could become targets of aggressive revenue collection operations by JMPD, says DA Both the Tshwane and Joburg actions show absolute contempt for their residents and ratepayers – but, at the same time, remind us that two of the biggest cities in the country have been mismanaged into the garbage dump. Desperate revenue raising devices are in operation everywhere you look –increases in rates and utility bills – but, clearly, there is still room for more milking. In much the same way as e-tolls tried to force motorists to pay for a service – highways – already paid for through our taxes, Tshwane's unconstitutional levy is another double tax. The reason the metros are short of cash is, as we have said repeatedly, that they have been mismanaged and looted, mainly by the ANC's deployed cadres… and that hundreds of thousands of freeloaders are allowed to get power and water without paying for it. Again we say: put these cities under administration because those running them are clearly unfit for the job. NOW READ: Court rules against City of Tshwane's cleaning levy
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Targeting Lesetja Kganyago — our incoming national sport
SA Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago is doing what a few other people in charge of important institutions are doing. He is daring the politicians to stop him. And he knows with utter certainty that what he is doing is right. But there is a problem. A huge problem. I couldn't quite believe my eyes and my ears while I was watching SA Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago last Thursday. I actually had to check with a colleague, who is much more knowledgeable than myself, because I almost thought the universe had caught up with me and I didn't really understand what had just happened. But live, on TV, Kganyago had just announced that the Monetary Policy Committee would target the 'lower end of the inflation target'. In other words, Kganyago has decided that we will have a 3% inflation target. And just as we heard so much of the phrase 'uncharted territory' in the days after the DA's rejection of the Budget, so we heard rather a lot of the word 'unilaterally' after Kganyago's announcement. I have a huge amount of sympathy for the governor. I mean, can you imagine being in his position, watching all of the numbers lining up for a historic opportunity, to lock in lower inflation for generations to come. Knowing that the stars have aligned celestially to make a long-held dream come true. Only to know, with that horrible feeling you get in your stomach as your child points their handlebars at the rugby post, that here on Earth our politics is so broken it just cannot happen. In a better universe, perhaps in a better time, there would have been a fairly simple argument. Some in the ANC, including I'm sure Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, would have been able to manage this process, caress it along, speak to this person and that person, make sure that person is out of the room (and preferably out of the country) for this meeting… Distracted And in the end, so long as some in the ANC were kept quiet, or distracted by the vital national debate between Coca-Cola and Kingsley Cola, it would have gone through. No longer. Instead, one can imagine Julius Malema arguing nonsensically that the SA Reserve Bank must be 'nationalised'. The ANC is hopelessly divided, while the DA will probably run a mile from the argument at this point. God knows what the MK party would do, but I'm fairly certain that Colleen Makhubele would be on hand in Parliament to stuff it up. So, this means that Kganyago is doing what I think a few other people in charge of important institutions are doing. When the politicians have lost all legitimacy and authority, some people in those positions have a lot more freedom. In some cases (think Edward Kieswetter at the SA Revenue Service), they do the right thing. In others, (think Collins Letsoalo at the Road Accident Fund), they do whatever they want. I think Kganyago is in effect daring the politicians to stop him. And he knows with utter certainty that what he is doing is right. But even with that certainty, I'm sure there's plenty to keep him up at night. There is a problem. A huge problem. The people who have to live under this, you and me, have not been properly consulted. Normally, people who represent us, someone who is elected, would make the decision. Godongwana has not made the decision; Kganyago has. Now, for the moment, it may not matter. Inflation is low, the decisions of the Monetary Policy Committee will be broadly in line with what it would have done anyway. But that won't last. You and I both know that Eskom is not done with price increases. Just as we all know that Joburg is so broken that it is going to try to gouge as much out of us as it can, while Cape Town seems intent on doing something similar. In other words, basically everything you pay the government for is going to go up by more than inflation. And this is where the pain is going to come from. To hit 3%, the Monetary Policy Committee will have to keep rates tighter for a long time. Just as the full consequences of US President Donald Trump's tariffs are being unleashed on the world. I wonder if Kganyago has factored in all of that. In the firing line None of the politicians is going to go out to bat for higher interest rates right now. Instead, the SA Reserve Bank will be the institution in the firing line. As the governor, he will be the symbol. Former Reserve Bank governor Tito Mboweni, who left us decades too soon, once told a gathering that he was amazed to find there was a helipad on top of the SA Reserve Bank building in Pretoria. It was put there by the previous regime in case a governor ever had to be taken out in a hurry. Presumably, there was a military base in De Aar or something that they would be taken to, should Pretoria ever fall to the communists. Kganyago might find that unexpectedly comforting. Unfortunately, the image of the SA Reserve Bank could not be restored from De Aar. And neither could the whole idea of inflation targeting. And this is surely the huge risk — that by going this route, the political backlash becomes so big it doesn't just claim Kganyago, but the entire idea of using interest rates to lower inflation.
