Security officers block Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan from entering di National Assembly
Di senate bin suspend Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for six months for March dis year afta dem find her guilty of flouting dia standing rules, but on 5 July, 2025, di federal high court for Abuja rule say di senate "can and should recall her".
Di senate spokesperson, Yemi Adaramodu, bin don tok say di ruling no be binding order but na mere advisory to di senate leadership wey dem fit obey or not.
But Akpoti-Uduaghan bin tell her supporters say she go resume for di senate chambers on Tuesday in accordance wit di court ruling.
Security presence for di entrance of di National Assembly complex bin dey tighter on Tuesday in anticipation say di senator fit show up, and she true-true try to gain access into di complex but dem deny her entry.
Dem first stop her vehicle for di outermost gate, but di senator come down and waka pass di first barricade wia another batch of security personnel stop her again.
We dey update dis tori.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rat in the ranks! The Welcome to Country problem that just won't go away
Michaelia Cash doesn't do subtle. By backing a push to scrap Welcome to Country ceremonies and Aboriginal flags from official events, she's reignited a culture war that puts her squarely at odds with her party leader, making life much harder for Sussan Ley. There's no denying Cash is tapping into a sentiment that exists in the Australian community. Welcome to Country acknowledgements have become so routine they often feel more ridiculous than respectful these days. For many, they've gone from meaningful to mechanical virtue signalling. That doesn't mean most people oppose reconciliation. It means some of us have grown tired of too many empty gestures, particularly when they appear disconnected from real outcomes for Indigenous Australians. So while Labor has been quick to paint Cash's position as out of step with mainstream values, they'd be wise not to overplay that hand. If the Voice referendum taught us anything, it's that public opinion on Indigenous recognition is more complex than elite consensus suggests. In fact, it's entirely plausible that more voters agree with Cash than with Labor (and Ley) on this one, especially if the issue is framed around overuse. But politics is about timing and discipline, and that's where this spat becomes a problem for the Coalition. Ley has been trying to present a more moderate image in the post- Peter Dutton era: supporting acknowledgements and engaging respectfully with Indigenous voices. Now her own Senate leader, no less, has taken a sledgehammer to that, backing a WA Liberal Party motion to strip Welcome to Country of its official status and fly only state and national flags. It's a contradiction that will be hard for Ley to smooth over. She congratulated Indigenous participants during the opening of parliament this week. Cash now seemingly wants the whole thing rolled back. That kind of disunity reinforces Labor's preferred narrative that the Coalition is riven by factional divisions and dominated by culture warriors. Ley looks like a leader being undercut by her own Senate leader, right at a time when two former Nationals leaders still in parliament (Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack) are doing the same on the net zero emissions target. At least they aren't in shadow cabinet or part of the Opposition's leadership team. These sorts of fights quite obviously threaten unity, even if having them immediately after a big election defeat is the right timing. However, that doesn't make life any easier for Ley, and Cash must know that but not care. To be sure, I suspect most Australians want practical progress on Indigenous disadvantage, not more ceremony. When every school assembly, conference and council meeting begins with the same words, fatigue can set in. Especially when multiple speakers all do the same, which isn't how the acknowledgment is supposed to work. The irony of that ignorance is never lost on me when I have to sit through it. So yes, Cash has made Ley's job harder: A Senate leader contradicting their opposition leader is always a bad look, reinforcing the impression of a party divided on both message and tone. But Labor would be foolish to assume this is a free kick. Cash's position, while politically provocative and destabilising, is not fringe, which is what makes her dissent so much harder for Ley to navigate. Labor shouldn't dismiss Cash outright either, which is exactly what they have done. That's just hubris.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Glass Lewis sues Texas over law limiting DEI, ESG proxy advice
July 24 (Reuters) - Glass Lewis, one of the best known proxy advisers, sued Texas on Thursday to block a first-of-its-kind state law limiting its ability to advise shareholders on diversity, environmental and governance practices. In a complaint filed in Austin, Texas federal court, Glass Lewis said Texas' law was unconstitutional, violating its First Amendment right to freedom of association and protection against viewpoint discrimination. Signed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott in June, the law targets "non-financial" advice on environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, or diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) matters, including for votes at shareholder meetings. It requires proxy advisers to conspicuously tell clients that the advice is "not being provided solely in the financial interest of the company's shareholders," and to provide financial analyses supporting the advice. The law takes effect on September 1. Glass Lewis said the law unlawfully forces proxy advisers to broadcast Texas' preferred viewpoints when their own differ, including on hot-button issues that Republican state legislators viewed as "increasingly political." It also said it will likely lose clients and suffer reputational harm if forced to tell clients its advice is bad for them and not in shareholders' financial interests. Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, who enforces the state's laws and is running for U.S. Senate in 2026, is the only defendant. His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Glass Lewis said it has more than 1,300 institutional investor clients, including more than one dozen in Texas. Many companies have this year scaled back or ended their support for DEI programs after Republican U.S. President Donald Trump campaigned against them. The case is Glass Lewis & Co v Paxton, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 25-01153.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Outcry as US agriculture department to cut salaries and relocate staff
Thousands of employees at the US department of agriculture will be forced to take salary cuts and relocate out of the Washington DC area, as part of a major restructuring that experts warn will further weaken support for American farmers and complicate wildfire response. In a memorandum issued on Thursday, agriculture secretary Brooke Rollins outlined the 'key pillars' behind the department's reorganization, focused on reducing its financial footprint, removing resources from the capital, eliminating management, and consolidating workforces responsible for a range of functions, including freedom of information requests, tribal relations, grants, and human resources. More than half of employees working in the Washington DC area will be relocated to five locations – Raleigh, North Carolina; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis, Indiana; Fort Collins, Colorado; and Salt Lake City, Utah. Several key USDA offices will be shuttered in the capital region. The move follows wide-ranging and often chaotic cuts to staff and services being implemented under Trump 2.0, as the administration seeks to dismantle the federal government and fund tax cuts for the wealthy including the president's billionaire donors. 'President Trump was elected to make real change in Washington, and we are doing just that by moving our key services outside the Beltway and into great American cities across the country,' Rollins said in the statement. 'We will do so through a transparent and common-sense process that preserves USDA's critical health and public safety services the American public relies on.' In a video call, Rollins informed USDA staff that they would be advised about new assignments – and homes – over the next few months. More than 90% of the department's almost 100,000 employees are already based in county and regional offices, including at regional research institutions, farm loan offices and conservation facilities. The reorganization will leave only 2,000 of the current 4,600 USDA staff in the Beltway. The department will also eliminate or scale down regional offices, combining them into 'hub locations to the greatest extent possible', according to the memo. Rollins said that the changes would help the USDA better serve its 'core constituents' of farmers, ranchers and US producers, focus on the administration's priorities and eliminate management layers and bureaucracy. But experts warned that the latest cuts and consolidation of key departments focused on civil rights and small and disadvantaged businesses will further hamstring the agency, which is already reeling The latest upheaval follows widespread cuts to Biden era agricultural programs, research grants and staff across the country, which along with Trump's tariff chaos and deepening climate chaos has caused panic among many farmers. In a written statement, Amy Klobuchar, the Democratic ranking member of the Senate agriculture, nutrition, and forestry committee, condemned the plan as a 'half-baked proposal' and called for USDA officials to appear before Congress. 'A reorganization of this scale will impact USDA's ability to provide critical services to Americans and undermine the agency's trusted expertise that farmers and families count on … we must have an immediate hearing before more damage is done.' 'Today's move further guts the government's ability to protect public health, the environment and food safety. The real-world consequences will be severe, directly affecting people's lives,' said Rebecca Wolf, senior policy analyst at Food & Water Watch Senior Food, a nonprofit research and advocacy group. The re-organization is at least partly a cost-cutting measure, according to Rollins, and the relocated staff could see significant salary reductions due to lower rates paid outside the capital due to difference in the cost of living. But details were scant on how the plan will unfold, especially when it comes to management and administration of firefighters at the US Forest Service, an agency housed within the USDA. The USFS, which employs the bulk of the nation's largest firefighting force, is facing severe staffing shortages, a Guardian investigation found this week, as wildfires rage across the country. Rollins emphasized that the plan will ensure continued support for fire operations and other activities critical to the department's mission, but there are concerns that further workforce cuts and administrative focus lost to the reorganization during the peak of fire season could have disastrous effects. As fire risks sharply rise, crews have already begun to feel the impacts from previous cuts to budgets and workers at the agency that support wildfire mitigation and response. The programs incentivized by the Trump administration to sharply shrink the federal government rely on voluntary resignations and early retirements, which undercut the agency's potential to make strategic decisions about its workforce. Roughly 1,400 workers with fire qualifications signed on for the programs, leaving holes on teams that play crucial roles in emergency response, especially during the busiest times of the season. Acknowledging the need to backfill these positions, Rollins called for some to return to active duty through the end of the season – only 65 have been reinstated, according to a department spokesperson. The Forest Service will also see its nine regional offices phased out over the next year and all research stations will be consolidated into one, housed in Fort Collins, Colorado. Experts were struggling to make sense of the announcement, and shared concerns about how another layer of change could cause more chaos and disorganization as fire risks continue to surge. 'Until we know more specifically about the fire program it's hard to determine what some of the outcomes of this could be,' said Riva Duncan, a retired USFS fire officer and vice-president of the Grassroots Wildland Firefighters advocacy group. Duncan added that the consolidation of USFS research stations could be problematic because each does fire research and has a focus specific to the landscapes where the station is housed. 'This is another example of decisions being made by people who haven't bothered to learn or understand the work,' she said. It's also unclear if the reorganization is designed to align with plans from the Trump administration to combine federal firefighters into a single agency, under the department of interior. Those plans were left in limbo Tuesday, after the House appropriations committee determined 'changes in budgetary and management structure spark concerns about impacted agencies' abilities to consistently meet critical performance benchmarks'. A Government Accountability Office (GAO) study was ordered to evaluate the feasibility of the plan, and the House of Representatives adjourned for its August recess on Wednesday, tabling any budget votes until at least September. More than 15,300 employees have already left the USDA since Trump took office, opting for buyouts and early retirement through the administration's deferred resignation plan. Similar staff-cutting measures have been implemented across the federal government, overseen by the so-called department of government efficiency, the quasi government agency created by the billionaire Trump donor Elon Musk. 'This is less a re-organization and more a dismantling. This mass relocation will be costly. It will also result in the mass resignation of staff, which means a major loss of capacity at USDA,' said Ben Lilliston, director of rural strategies and climate change at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP). 'Contrary to the secretary's statement, the USDA is already under-staffed. There was no effort to get input from Congress, the public, or farmers about this reorganization.' A similar USDA relocation program during the first Trump term led to a smaller, less efficient, less experienced and less diverse workforce, according to the GAO, the bipartisan federal government watchdog. The USDA workforce grew 8% during the Biden administration, while salaries rose 15%, largely on temporary funding, the department said on Thursday, as Rollins confirmed that the cuts would continue. 'This reorganization is another step of the department's process of reducing its workforce,' Rollins wrote in the memo, noting that programs to incentivize early retirements and voluntary resignations will continue to reduce the staff numbers further.
