
Role of GLP-1 Drugs in Psoriasis and PsA Is Debated
Besides mitigating obesity, an established risk factor for psoriasis and PsA, GLP-1 drugs have shown promise in improving psoriasis symptoms and are associated with a lower risk for cardiovascular events, for which people with psoriasis and PsA are at increased risk. Some researchers predict that the drugs will prove to have immunomodulatory effects and become an important addition to current treatments for psoriasis and PsA, even in patients without obesity or diabetes.
At the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2025 Annual Meeting and Trainee Symposium, investigators with the GRAPPA dove into hours' worth of discussions and debates about a class of drugs whose emergence Artie Kavanaugh, MD, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, described as a possible 'watershed moment' for the field, akin to the advent of biologic therapies in the 1990s.
But with evidence still sparse in patients with psoriatic disease and ancillary concerns about access, cost, patient selection, and physician confidence in prescribing, there was little agreement as to how, whether, or when these drugs should be integrated into clinical practice.
A GLP-1 Pioneer
Endocrinologist Daniel J. Drucker, MD, professor in the Department of Medicine's Division of Endocrinology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, who discovered some key biological actions of the hormone GLP-1 in the 1980s and '90s, kicked off the conference with a video presentation affirming GLP-1 RAs potential as immunoregulatory agents with anti-inflammatory activity beyond their well-documented effects on body weight.
In a 2023 trial of semaglutide in patients with obesity who did not have diabetes, Drucker noted prevention of cardiovascular events and death was seen as independent of weight loss. Similarly, Drucker said, a recent trial in people with metabolic liver disease saw improvements associated with semaglutide that were independent of weight loss.
With psoriasis and PsA, randomized controlled trial evidence has yet to support weight-loss independent improvements in symptoms. However, this may soon change: In two separate trials, Eli Lilly is studying a combination of tirzepatide and the interleukin-17A antagonist ixekizumab in patients with overweight or obesity and psoriasis or PsA. The trials will wrap up next summer.
Results from trials of GLP-1 inhibitors in nonobese populations, including cohorts of people with Alzheimer's disease, stand to shed further light on their anti-inflammatory effects outside the context of weight loss, Drucker said.
'These medicines are diversifying. We're going to see a wave of new molecules and new indications to treat inflammation,' he predicted, including that of skin, joints, and bone. Still, Drucker cautioned, the drugs 'are not magic bullets, and each condition will need to be assessed on its own.'
Real-World Experience From Latin America
In a subsequent talk, Enrique Soriano, MD, head of rheumatology at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, presented a real-world perspective from Latin America, where GLP-1 drugs are approved in most countries for diabetes or obesity — but still not easy to access and far from becoming a routine part of any rheumatologist's or dermatologist's daily practice.
'We all know that obesity increases the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis in psoriasis patients,' Soriano said — and that weight loss can decrease that risk. 'We also know that treatment response is lower in PsA patients with obesity,' he said. 'But the question for us is whether this drug [class] can improve symptoms and inflammation in our patients and whether this improvement, if it happens, is related to the weight loss or is an independent effect.'
Soriano presented a retrospective review from his institution's service of 6800 patients with psoriasis (mostly mild) and 488 with PsA. In each group, just over 1% of patients were taking a GLP-1 RA for obesity, diabetes, or both. While acknowledging the limitations of his study's retrospective design, Soriano noted that 'there was no report of any improvement or change in the skin involvement, and there was also no record of any change in their joint symptoms after starting these drugs.'
Soriano also conducted a survey of rheumatologists across several countries in Latin America and found that under a third said that they had encountered a patient whom they thought could benefit from the addition of a GLP-1 drug, while fewer than 10% said that they would feel confident prescribing one. More than half said that if they did think a patient could benefit, they would refer that person to a specialist, such as an endocrinologist.
Dermatologist Describes Current Data as 'Weak'
Anthony Fernandez, MD, PhD, director of medical and inpatient dermatology at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, praised GLP-1 RAs as 'fascinating medications' with 'a very attractive adverse event profile.'
Fernandez cited studies dating back over a decade in which use of these medications has been shown to improve psoriasis. 'And we have some data to suggest that the mechanism…is not entirely related to weight loss. In fact, there's data to support that these medications affect psoriasis-relevant immune pathways. So, in that way, they share similarities with many of the systemic medicines that we already prescribe to treat psoriasis.'
Still, Fernandez cautioned, 'The data right now is really weak,' limited to small studies and randomized trials enrolling mostly men. While a few patients in these studies saw dramatic improvements in psoriasis after starting these drugs, 'the reality is that most have, at best, a modest improvement,' he said, 'certainly nowhere near the improvement we are used to seeing' from targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs).
Moreover, he said, some patients enrolled in the studies were effectively treatment naive. 'That raises a critical question about whether or not a patient [on ts- or bDMARDs] would actually see any further improvement adding GLP-1 RAs,' he said.
Fernandez said he thought that dermatologists can safely prescribe and manage GLP-1 therapies. The bigger question is whether they should.
'My opinion is no,' he concluded. 'There will be rare patients who are obese and or have type 2 diabetes and either fail or have a contraindication to all the great systemic medicines we already have available to us. And in those patients, a trial of a GLP-1 RA would seem to be reasonable. But personally, I think we need much, much better data for recommendations concerning general use by dermatologists.'
During a question-and-answer period after Soriano's and Fernandez's presentations, other physicians shared their experiences and practical concerns about insurance approvals, referrals, and whether most dermatologists and rheumatologists were simply too busy to manage all the comorbidities of chronic immune-mediated disease for their patients. Some shared anecdotes about patients whose disease had improved after treatment with GLP-1 RAs, including in the absence of other systemic therapies.
Patients Intrigued — but Share Clinician's Caution
At the same session, Suzanne Grieb, PhD, a patient research participant (PRP) with GRAPPA and assistant professor at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore , presented results from a survey of her fellow GRAPPA PRPs about their experiences and interests regarding GLP-1 drugs.
None of the 11 respondents reported having been prescribed the medications.
'The majority of us described our psoriatic disease as mostly manageable with our current treatment,' Grieb, who has PsA, told the conference.
However, that did not mean they weren't curious about GLP-1s. Grieb's survey revealed that while all participants were aware of the importance of exercise and healthy weight in disease management, many continued to struggle with both. Few reported having spoken with their providers about specific interventions. While three respondents expressed interest in taking GLP-1s, they were uncertain whether they would be able to access them.
Patients 'are interested in GLP-1s' impact on our psoriatic disease, but also on other elements of our health, thinking more holistically [about] the benefits that could be achieved through these medications,' Grieb said. But the respondents in her survey also reported concerns about adding medications and 'the potential for having to take this medication for the rest of our lives.'
In an interview after her presentation, Grieb elaborated on her personal perspective. 'I don't meet the requirement for obesity,' she said. 'But I'm overweight, and I could probably benefit from a GLP-1. Without clear weight-related indications, it's hard, perhaps to be able to justify prescribing it if it's not going to be available. So it's a hard conversation [for clinicians] to bring up with their patients.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer on Eli Lilly: 'It Needs Breakthroughs in New Areas'
Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) is one of the stocks that Jim Cramer shed light on. While Cramer still backed the company, he did express uncertainty about its future as he stated: 'What I'm thinking, as someone who owns Eli Lilly for the Charitable Trust and who wishes I owned PepsiCo, is that there might be a short-term peak in the use of these drugs (GLP-1s). The Achilles heel of these drugs is that they're too effective. At some point, you lose enough weight, and you might think you can stop taking them… Whatever the case, if Eli Lilly is going to break out from this level, it needs breakthroughs in new areas, heart, brain, that it just doesn't have right now, or there has to be some new data that shows something else positive that the GLP-1 drugs can do. Photo by Myriam Zilles on Unsplash Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) is engaged in the research, development, and sale of pharmaceutical products, including therapies for diabetes, cancer, autoimmune disorders, pain, and migraines. While we acknowledge the potential of LLY as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Americans Are Turning To DIY Weight Loss Injections to Dodge $1,000+ Monthly Drug Costs
Demand for glucagon-like peptide-1 weight-loss drugs — such as Ozempic, Zepbound and Wegovy — coupled with limited insurance coverage has fueled a risky but growing 'gray' market for purchasing active ingredients from China, Reuters reported recently. Reuters cited a 44% monthly increase in January in shipments of tirzepatide and semaglutide from Chinese suppliers not registered with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, according to data from the Partnership for Safe Medicines. The gray market — named because the drugs are technically legal to buy for 'research purposes' — provides users with GLP-1 compounds, including semaglutide, tirzepatide and even retatrutide, which is still in clinical trials, in powder form for as little as $50 a vial. Buyers then mix the powder with bacteriostatic water at home to create an injectable solution. Don't Miss: Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to grab $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Without insurance, the monthly cost of these drugs starts at around $500 and can exceed $1,000. A survey by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans found that 36% of employer health plans will cover GLP-1 drugs for obesity in 2025. In April, the Trump administration also announced that Medicare and Medicaid would not cover anti-obesity medications, which includes the GLP-1 class. Buyer Communities Try to Mitigrate Gray Market Risks However, the DIY gray market carries significant risks. Some buyers attempt to reduce these risks by sending powders to labs for purity testing before use. Janoshik Analytical CEO Peter Magic told Reuters that the Czech Republic-based lab tested 3,050 samples of obesity drugs in 2024, up from just over 650 the previous year. Yet the at-home mixing process still introduces human error. Amy Spencer, a Missouri woman interviewed by Reuters, said she reduced her monthly cost from more than $500 for brand-name GLP-1s to $50 on the gray market. But she accidentally overdosed after a reconstitution miscalculation, suffering severe flu-like symptoms for four days. Trending: This AI-Powered Trading Platform Has 5,000+ Users, 27 Pending Patents, and a $43.97M Valuation — FDA Ruling a Driving Factor to Going Gray If that level of risk sounds overwhelming to navigate, rest assured, passengers navigating the world of gray market peptides are hardly alone. Subreddits like "SemaglutideFreeSpeech" can provide some hand-holding, and also direct users to outside resources on more secretive channels, like Telegram. Many users on the subreddit are being directed to "go gray" after FDA rulings essentially halted the ability of compounding pharmacies to sell cheaper versions of the medicines. The FDA had temporarily allowed compounding of the GLP-1 drugs semaglutide and tirzepatide during shortages because federal law permits copycat versions when FDA-approved drugs are listed as scarce. When the shortages were resolved, however, the exemption ended — as did a cheaper alternative to brand-name GLP-1 drugs. Some compounders are trying to continue business as usual with workarounds like adding vitamin b12, to differentiate the medications from the FDA-approved Companies, State Attorneys Respond The gray market hasn't gone unnoticed by regulators and drug companies alike. Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY), maker of GLP-1s Monjouro and Zepbound, and Novo Nordisk (NYSE:NVO) said they're combating unsafe products through lawsuits and consumer education, Reuters reports. Meanwhile on the customs front, the FDA does intercept some illegal imports, although personal-use buyers are rarely prosecuted. Attorneys general from 38 U.S. states and territories also warned the FDA in February about illegally sold weight-loss drugs, including unregulated ingredients from China, Reuters reports. 'It can be very dangerous. You're playing the role of your own doctor, pharmacist, and FDA inspector,' Shabbir Safdar, executive director of the Partnership for Safe Medicines, said in a statement to Reuters. Read Next: Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they're on pace — Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? NOVO NORDISK (NVO): Free Stock Analysis Report ELI LILLY (LLY): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Americans Are Turning To DIY Weight Loss Injections to Dodge $1,000+ Monthly Drug Costs originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Friederike Ernst: Using The Internet To Empower People And Communities
Friederike Ernst is an Ivy League physicist, co-founder of Web3 company Gnosis, and a mother of four ... More children under 10. At the age of 12, Friederike Ernst's father handed her a copy of theoretical physicist Simon Singh's The Code Book, sparking a lifelong interest in cryptography. The gift was prescient; Friederike went on to study physics to post-doctoral level at Stanford and Colombia, before transitioning to the world of tech. 'I have always loved building things. I could have been a very happy carpenter,' says Friederike. 'I enjoy being in a place where I can shape things, and the next iteration of the internet, known as 'Web3' or the decentralised web, is one of the areas where we can create a better society for all.' Through our conversation, one theme came through consistently - an engrained distrust of authority and the idea of empowering people with agency. That is the fundamental value that underscores her mission-driven work in the tech space - creating the infrastructure that gives power and autonomy back to people, rather than to huge corporations. 'Labels really don't matter' - the changing face of tech for women The businesswoman in glasses standing near the display At 22, she was the only woman in her class, but she says it's rare to be the sole woman these days: 'We've made tremendous progress. We don't need to get to 50:50 representation in every field - it's true that generally speaking men and women have different interests - but a certain level of diversity is important'. She adds that as the only woman, there is a burden to prove yourself not just on your own behalf, but as a representative of women everywhere. Today, Friederike is a mother of four children aged between one and nine years old, and she challenges the idea that tech is a hostile space for women. 'In the beginning, they can underestimate you, but I feel really appreciated for my contributions. Some say it's not a good place for mothers but I haven't found that to be the case. If you're smart, driven, and making a contribution, labels really don't matter.' Power (and profit) to the people Growing up in Germany, Friederike's values are shaped by counter-cultural cypherpunk ideologies grounded in resisting authority and unchecked capitalism: 'I'm a firm believer in agency, just give people the right tools and they can achieve what they want to.' That's what appeals to her about working in Web3, where decentralisation, privacy, and user ownership are prioritised. At Gnosis, she works on developing the infrastructure needed to make that happen across a diverse range of applications and sectors. She describes Web3 as a do-over of the early internet that allows for shared agency. 'The internet was initially used for a lot of peer-to-peer interactions. Over the last 30 years, a lot of that power has been centralised to accrue value and power to the same 10 companies. Google probably has access to your search history, correspondence, and location - that's an incredible amount of information - and then they target you with related ads.' What if we could have similar services without compromising on privacy? Why should we accept that this is the quid pro quo for access to online tools and services? Reimagining finance for everyone Concept of decentralized internet. Wide banner. WEB 3 technology concept. WEB 3.0 3d rendering.. Friederike explains that the principle of shared ownership, where communities, not corporations, hold the value they help create, can be applied to money and finance. At its foundation, Web3 is a neutral technology that could be steered in vastly different directions. 'Web3 is a base technology; an infrastructure. It can be used to create a utopia, but it can also be used to build an extremely effective surveillance state,' one advocate said. 'We need to ensure that doesn't happen, and that privacy is normalised again.' This is where Gnosis, the company she co-founded, comes in. Gnosis is building the digital tools and systems needed to make financial services more accessible, fair, and decentralised. The idea is simple: instead of profits going to a handful of big banks, tech companies, and intermediaries, the benefits should flow back to the users who actually create the value. 'We're building the foundations for a more open, equitable internet — but there's still a long way to go,' she says. 'In an open financial system, everyone should have equal access to opportunities, no matter where they live. Right now, it's incredibly difficult for people in some countries to hold foreign currencies or invest in global markets. But that kind of access is essential if we want a fairer world.' Traditionally, banks have held a lot of power. But today, new technologies make it possible to replace that middleman. Thanks to blockchain, a secure, shared digital ledger, money can now move directly between people without needing a central authority to oversee it. Friederike said: 'Bitcoin was the first example of this. It started as a form of digital cash that people could send to each other without going through a bank. Over time, it evolved into what many now consider 'digital gold' because there's a limited supply — which helps protect its value over time.' The bigger shift, she believes, will come from creating new money that is no longer dependent on central banks. At Gnosis, she helped to create and launch a trust-based cryptocurrency called Circles, where users create and issue their own coins so that they can use them to barter with other trusted people in their community. As the community using Circles grows, so too does its power as a currency. Agency and autonomy are the values that drive Web3 Asked who she looks up to in terms of values, Friederike is reluctant to name specific role models, but said: 'I look up to people who can withstand the pressure or temptation to make money quickly.' In a space dominated by tech giants constantly looking for new ways to monetise and digital currencies creating hype without benefits, the focus on value creation rather than value extraction is certainly refreshing.