These 5 NYC restaurants have the hottest patrons, controversial new AI ranking claims — and some top spots got seriously snubbed
A divisive new dining ranking — more interested in who's sitting at the table than what's on the menu — is raising eyebrows in New York's image-conscious restaurant world.
Created by Gen Z programmer Riley Walz, LooksMapping scores hotspots in the Big Apple — and Los Angeles and San Francisco, too — based on AI-driven evaluations of the profile photos of patrons leaving Google Reviews.
Advertisement
5 Restaurants and bars have always been prime ways for single people to link up — Gen Z's just trying to make it easier.
CandyRetriever – stock.adobe.com
After scraping countless amounts of data, the algorithm spits out an average score that supposedly represents the physical appeal of each eatery's clientele.
And the results are, in some cases, a complete slap in the face.
Advertisement
Take Balthazar, Keith McNally's iconic Soho brasserie, for example, long considered one of the top NYC spots to see and be seen — there, the clientele ranked a somewhat pitiful 5.4 out of 10.
Adding insult to injury in many cases, the site also dishes a detailed explanation of its findings — like which way age, gender and general physical beauty lean.
Further downtown, for example, it's supposedly mostly unattractive, middle-aged men and women dining at The Odeon, a Tribeca spot with a dreadful 3.1 rating that appears to no longer play host to the 'It' crowd of artists and celebrities it once did.
5 'The model is certainly biased. It's certainly flawed. But we judge places by the people who go there,' the website reads. 'This website just puts reductive numbers on the superficial calculations we make every day. A mirror held up to our collective vanity.'
Looks Mapping
Advertisement
And way up town at ultra-exclusive East Harlem Italian restaurant, Rao's, the elite crowd was handed a woeful 3.4 — suggesting, perhaps, that even AI models get jealous over not being able to snag one of the legendary spot's highly-coveted tables.
Of course, it's not all bad news — fine-dining stalwart Jean-Georges is where hot-leaning, middle-aged men and women go, according to the tool, earning the quintessential French spot a 7.1 and a light, rosy-hued marker on the map.
But even that crowd can't beat local institutions like Katz's Delicatessen, which managed to snag an 8.1 rating — suggesting the customers are as beautiful as the city's best pastrami sandwiches.
5 Balthazar is a legendary spot in the NYC food scene, and despite its apparently unattractive reviewers, it still proves tough to snag a reservation.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
Advertisement
The top ratings in town, however, were reserved for a handful of relatively obscure options — from a Midtown sushi spot to a Thai restaurant in the Financial District.
The NYC restaurants with the hottest patrons, according to AI
Ubani Midtown: 10/10 Shinn West: 10/10 KYU NYC: 10/10 Aroy Dee Thai Kitchen: 10/10 Top Thai 55 Carmine: 10/10
Walz first shared news of the site's launch back in March, and a steady wave of AI-haters, driven developers and delighted daters on the prowl quickly flooded the replies.
5 Rao's was among the LooksMapping's lowest-ranked of the iconic NYC restaurants.
Google Maps
Many have pronounced the AI model flawed — even suggesting that it has a racial bias.
On this subject, Walz told the New York Times, '[the project] is making fun of AI,' and admitted that the attractiveness ranking system was 'a bit janky.'
For now, Manhattan and the Bronx are the only boroughs included on LooksMapping, but Walz, a native New Yorker currently based in San Francisco, 'knew people would rightfully give [him] crap' and is planning to add the other three soon, he assured eager diners in a post on X.
The release of the talked-about tool comes as younger diners are increasingly concerned with customer attractiveness.
Advertisement
With limited budgets and time on their hands, young and single New Yorkers want to go where they might score.
5 Admittedly, clientele can be considered a part of a restaurant's atmosphere, which, for many, is a key factor in deciding to make a reservation.
bobex73 – stock.adobe.com
On TikTok, a new trend has taken hold among women in their 20s that clearly demonstrates a demand for sites like LooksMapping.
Advertisement
Ahead of going out for the evening or as a deciding factor, these ladies are calling the restaurants and bars they're interested in going to and asking the staff whether the current crop of patrons is hot.
'As a hostess, I take my job of vibe checking very seriously and am always happy to keep the girls updated #womensupportingwomen,' wrote one understanding commenter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Fliers with a mysterious cartoon are papering S.F. streets. We found out why
Cryptic fliers started appearing on San Francisco telephone poles this week, offering little more than a smiling cartoon figure, a website and a phone number to text. The analog approach to getting the word out marks the return of Pursuit, the city's favorite scavenger hunt. The 15 friends who designed the clues would prefer to remain anonymous, and that every element of the hunt be a surprise. But there is one thing organizers do want you to know: There's absolutely no catch. 'We don't have any ulterior motive here,' said Pursuit co-creator Riley Walz. 'It's family-friendly. It's totally free. We want people to have a good time, meet new friends, explore San Francisco and maybe visit a few (small) businesses along the way.' Walz is known to San Franciscans as the creator of the Bop Spotter, a Shazam-enabled solar-powered phone planted in the Mission District, auto-curating a Spotify playlist of a street corner's music. He was also part of a team of pranksters that created demand for an imaginary New York steak house with a flood of fake reviews, then made it real for a night. Pursuit is arguably the most ambitious project yet. Last year, the month-long game, with a few clues doled out per week, ended with more than 1,000 participants. Three hundred of them gathered to celebrate the scavenger hunt (and San Francisco) at Jerry Garcia Amphitheater in McLaren Park. Since March, the group has been thinking up a dozen or more clues for this year's hunt that require city exploration, a little problem-solving, and a lot of joy. There's no leaderboard, and everyone's a winner. (There's also no cash prize, as there allegedly was in an unrelated Reddit treasure hunt in May.) Organizers declined to disclose what surprises this year's Pursuit holds. Players are instructed to simply text 415-888-9518, and then wait until July 12. But last year was a blast, filled with city discoveries and creative flourishes that reflect the creators, many of whom work in tech. One clue was a simple YouTube livestream looking out of a second-story apartment window; players had to inspect the video to pick up clues — including one barely visible street sign — and find the location. 'It was funny, because as you were watching it, you could see the players ahead of you, looking at the camera, pointing and solving it in real time,' Walz said. 'It was also proof to us that people were actually doing this.' Another clue came from a series of working telephones planted in businesses, including a hamburger-shaped phone in Flippin Burger on Haight Street. And yet another involved a fill-in-the-blanks worksheet on Waverly Place, which led viewers a few blocks away to the Golden Gate Fortune Cookie Factory. At that popular tourist spot, 500 cookies with special scavenger hunt-specific fortunes were waiting for contestants who asked for 'Percy.' (The group's name for the cartoon character in the fliers.) The cynicism-free event, Walz said, offers proof that San Francisco is still a very fun place. Over half of the businesses approached to participate, sometimes with very strange requests, were more than game. Organizers last year witnessed players gathering as the clues were distributed, making new friends, and patronizing nearby businesses. The meet-up in McLaren Park had the vibes of a happy reunion. The group's small budget is covered by anonymous sponsors, including hundreds of dollars to print physical fliers. New clues will drop every week, but they're not sequential, so players can set their own pace. Walz said the group will be excited to see the turnout, hoping to double last year's participation. Strong curiosity on Reddit should help get to 2,000 players or more. But ultimately he said Pursuit is about the journey, not any marketing goals or target numbers. 'I don't think this could really happen in many other places in the world,' Walz said, 'where you just put up fliers and get this whole almost cult-like horde of people that are trying to (complete) your puzzle.'
Time Business News
3 hours ago
- Time Business News
What Does BMF Stand For in Different Contexts?
The acronym 'BMF' has become increasingly visible across pop culture, social media, business, and even television. While some know it from the hit crime series or hip-hop circles, others may encounter it in corporate documents or casual texts. So, what does BMF stand for? The answer varies depending on the context, and understanding those nuances is key. This article breaks down the different interpretations of BMF, explaining how it means one thing on the streets, another in the boardroom, and something completely different on your favorite streaming service. When it comes to acronyms, BMF is one of those chameleon-like terms that shifts meaning depending on where and how it's used. The BMF acronym can mean a bold slang term, the name of a notorious crime family, a casual texting phrase, or even a legitimate business term. Here's a quick preview of what BMF might stand for: 'Bad Mother F***er' in slang and pop culture 'Black Mafia Family,' a real-life criminal organization Casual abbreviations in texting like 'Be My Friend' Business terms such as 'Business Management Framework' As you can see, asking what does BMF stand for is really a question of context. Let's explore each usage in more detail. In urban slang, BMF is an abbreviation for 'Bad Mother F***er.' This version of the term is often used to describe someone who is powerful, fearless, and commands respect. It's not just an insult or compliment—it's a label worn with pride in certain circles. The phrase gained mainstream popularity thanks to Quentin Tarantino's 1994 cult classic Pulp Fiction , in which Samuel L. Jackson's character carries a wallet emblazoned with 'Bad Mother F***er.' Today, you'll see BMF used across rap lyrics, social media, and gaming chats as a badge of honor. It's often used to denote someone who's dominant, skilled, or just plain cool. In Gen Z slang, it sometimes appears playfully among friends, but its tone and impact still carry that original weight. If you've ever seen BMF on TikTok or Twitter, chances are this is the version being used. Perhaps the most widely recognized interpretation of BMF is the Black Mafia Family, a powerful drug trafficking and money laundering organization that operated in the United States during the late 1990s and early 2000s. Founded by brothers Demetrius 'Big Meech' Flenory and Terry 'Southwest T' Flenory, the BMF Black Mafia Family built a drug empire that extended coast to coast. But it wasn't just drugs—they also ran a hip-hop label, BMF Entertainment, which helped blur the lines between crime and celebrity culture. The family's story came crashing down in the mid-2000s when the DEA dismantled their network, leading to major prison sentences for the founders. However, their legacy lived on in music, urban folklore, and later, television. Understanding what BMF stands for in this context reveals the deep cultural impact this group had—not just on crime history but on modern entertainment. If you've received a message or seen a post with 'BMF' and it's not about crime or slang, you might be wondering: what does BMF mean in text messages? In casual texting or chat, BMF can mean several different things depending on the conversation. The most common texting interpretations include: 'Bad Mother F *er'** – still widely used, though less formal *er'** – still widely used, though less formal 'Be My Friend' – often used jokingly or sincerely, especially by teens – often used jokingly or sincerely, especially by teens 'Big Money Flex' – slang for showing off wealth or success Text abbreviations often lack context, so if you're unsure, just ask the sender. The tone, emojis, and situation usually provide clues. This interpretation of BMF continues to evolve with internet culture, meme language, and regional dialects, especially among younger audiences. Also Read About What does BMF mean in TikTok In a more professional or technical context, BMF can take on a completely different identity. While it's rare, some industries use BMF as shorthand for legitimate business or financial terms. Here are a few business-specific meanings: Business Management Framework – used in corporate planning and strategy – used in corporate planning and strategy Banking and Financial Management – particularly in academia or training materials – particularly in academia or training materials Big Market Fund – a hypothetical or marketing term in investment circles These uses of BMF are usually confined to industry-specific documents, meetings, or educational materials. So if you encounter BMF in an office setting or professional email, it's safe to assume it's far removed from the slang or criminal meaning. In recent years, the acronym BMF reached a whole new audience thanks to the hit STARZ series produced by rapper 50 Cent. The show, simply titled BMF , is based on the rise and fall of the Black Mafia Family, dramatizing their criminal empire and family dynamics. So what's the difference between the BMF TV show vs real life? The show is inspired by real events but dramatized for entertainment. It offers a character-driven perspective that blends fact with fiction. While Big Meech and his crew are portrayed with depth, critics have noted that certain events are exaggerated or compressed. Nevertheless, the series has reignited interest in the acronym and introduced a new generation to the BMF legacy. If someone mentions BMF in pop culture today, they may be talking more about the show than the original crime syndicate. The acronym BMF is a fascinating example of how language and culture intersect. Depending on the context, it can mean a lot of different things: a bold slang term, a historic criminal organization, a phrase in a text message, a structured business term, or a hit TV series. Understanding what BMF stands for requires knowing the environment in which it's used. One version may come across as empowering or humorous, while another carries a legacy of crime and power. As acronyms continue to evolve in our digital and media-driven world, it's more important than ever to ask not just what something means, but where and why it's being used. For more smart short-word guides like this, be sure to check out other tips on TIME BUSINESS NEWS TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Tom's Guide
4 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
This budget-friendly soundbar with Dolby Atmos blew me away — I felt like I was at the movies
If one of your primary concerns is cost, then the Sharp 3.1.2 HT-SBW53121 soundbar could be one of the best soundbars for you. At just £329, the soundbar and subwoofer combo provides an immersive Dolby Atmos (and DTS Virtual:X) experience. I could feel the famous James Bond Italian car chase scene in my soul, and physically flinched every time a gun was fired. With a 3.1.2 setup and compatibility with 2.0.2 rear speakers, this soundbar is one of the most affordable ways to elevate any home theatre experience. Sharp also makes a £449 5.1.2 soundbar, which is just as impressive. If you want to upgrade your home setup for the least amount of money possible (who doesn't?) then I can't recommend the Sharp 3.1.2 setup enough. Find out the full story, including its flaws, in this Sharp 3.1.2 HT-SBW53121 review. If you're in the U.S. and want a similar performance, I'd check out the Polk Signa S4 soundbar, which is a 3.1.2 channel setup for $399. Price £329 (+ optional £179 rear surround speakers) Connectivity HDMI (with 4K pass-through), eARC, Optical, Bluetooth 5.3, 3.5mm aux Weight 4.5kg Dimensions 100 x 7.6 x 12.5 cm Colors Black, white Subwoofer Yes Dolby Atmos Yes Channel 3.1.2 The Sharp 3.1.2 HT-SBW53121 soundbar is pretty affordable, all things considered: it's £329 from Amazon U.K. Yep — it's only available in the U.K., so if you're a U.S. reader, I'd recommend the Polk Signa S4 ($399) instead. It has a 3.1.2 setup too, and it's a genuinely fantastic soundbar. As I said, £329 for a soundbar + subwoofer combo is a great deal. Usually, soundbars of this channel setup start from around £400. Heck, the Samsung Ultra Slim soundbar is £549 for a 3.1.2 setup. The Sharp price/performance sacrifice is almost certainly in the subwoofer: I do wish it was more powerful. However, it could be a worthy tradeoff. Sharp also makes a 5.1.2 channel soundbar and subwoofer for £449, which is also an incredibly reasonable price for a soundbar of this quality. If you want a more immersive experience, I'd recommend that model. Just like its older sibling, the Sharp 5.1.2 soundbar, the Sharp 3.1.2 Soundbar looks like just about every other soundbar. It's quite long, at 40 inches, but relatively low-profile. I was able to fit it on my testing TV's stand easily. Instead of having a plastic or metallic mesh covering, the Sharp 3.1.2 Soundbar is lined with fabric, which gives it a more premium appearance. It's definitely worth taking ease of cleaning into consideration, though: dust could look more prevalent on a fabric soundbar. The top of the mesh houses six buttons that control volume, Bluetooth, and power. I found myself solely using the remote, though. It's quite weighty and well-made when compared to rivals like Bose and Majority's flimsy feeling remotes. At the back of the soundbar, you'll find the ports: there's one eARC HDMI, 2 x HDMI, an Optical, USB, 3.5mm aux, and power input. I tested via eARC, as this provides the best quality. The subwoofer is wirelessly connected, so it only has a power input at its rear. Controlling the subwoofer is easy via the remote, which has subwoofer controls and a bass volume increase. If you want to spend another £179, the 3.1.2 Soundbar is also compatible with Sharp's 2.0.2 rear speakers. I don't think these speakers are essential, but they are nice to have. I found it very easy to connect via the 'Pair' button on the reverse of each speaker. You can also independently increase the volume via the remote control. Considering the £329 price, it's not surprising that the 3.1.2 Soundbar doesn't have a huge range of features. It does, however, have a range of listening EQs. These are: Movie, music, game, night, voice, sport, and independent treble and bass controls. I found myself using 'Movie', which increased the bass. I'd recommend cycling through these features and figuring out which one sounds the best, as there's no one-size-fits-all approach here. The Sharp 3.1.2 soundbar also has Bluetooth connectivity for instant music playback. Accessing the connection is super easy: just press Bluetooth on the soundbar (or change the source input on the remote) and the soundbar will pop up instantly in your phone settings. Again, if you're after a huge range of smart home or AI features, it's worth checking out a pricier soundbar like the Bose Smart Soundbar ($499) or the Samsung Ultra Slim soundbar I mentioned earlier. I don't mind having a simple soundbar, though. If you just want a soundbar that'll make movies sound even more epic, and don't necessarily care about being able to link it to your smart home, then the Sharp 3.1.2 is more than enough. I test every soundbar with 'Top Gun: Maverick' on 4K UHD Blu-Ray, TV shows on Netflix, and music on Spotify and Qobuz. To test the Sharp 3.1.2 Soundbar, I watched 'Top Gun: Maverick', as always. The opening scene has the perfect amount of bass, high-frequency sound effects, and challenging treble, which makes it perfect for testing soundbars. I'm looking for intense bass in the jet engines, clear treble in the 'Danger Zone' track, and clear high-frequency diegetic sounds like ropes whooshing, metal clinking, and radio dialogue. I upped the bass to the max, but I was still a little disappointed by the subwoofer's performance, just as I was with the Sharp 5.1.2 Soundbar. It's to be expected, as the 3.1.2 uses the same physical subwoofer as the 5.1.2. Despite this semi-disappointing subwoofer performance, I was still impressed by the dialogue clarity. The soundbar itself definitely excels with treble; percussion in the soundtrack was rich and piercing without being pinching or tinny. On top of the soundtrack excellence, I never struggled to hear anyone, even over radioed dialogue. I switched it up for the next movie and watched 'Wicked'. I wanted to evaluate the musical performance and figure out if 'Movie' or 'Music' EQ would suit. In both EQ modes, I found the dialogue crystal-clear. The dialogue performance equals that of the Sharp 5.1.2 Soundbar, but, again, the bass was a little disappointing. However, I was still able to enjoy the movie. I wasn't blown away by the Dolby Atmos performance, but 'Wicked' isn't as well-known for Dolby Atmos as, say, 'No Time To Die', which I watched next to test the Sharp 3.1.2 Soundbar's 360° audio performance. In the iconic Matera chase scene, not only was the dialogue clear and audible, but the mixture of the engines, soundtrack, and environmental sounds made for an incredibly immersive listen. I could feel Bond shouting and the squeal of the tyres on the road in my soul. When Bond and Madeline are being shot at, the bullets seem to ricochet off the inside of my brain. I was much more impressed with the Dolby Atmos performance in 'No Time To Die' than 'Wicked'. Actually, 'No Time To Die' was probably the most impressive movie I watched with this soundbar. I would recommend getting this movie just to be amazed by the soundbar's performance. On the whole, I was impressed by the movie performance. I felt immersed in the scenes and I honestly could've been at the movie theatre. I just wish the bass had a touch more power. To replicate real-world usage, I watched TV on the basic tier of Netflix. Not everyone has premium streaming services or UHD 4K Blu-rays, so it's only fair to test with standard resolution audio as well as the premium options. I watched 'Stranger Things' on Netflix, which has a great combination of a synthy, bassy soundtrack, dialogue, and action scenes. Overall, I was really impressed with the performance. Obviously, the lack of bass oomph meant that some action scenes weren't as overpowering as I'd want them to be. Even so, the high-frequency sound effects were clear, which added to the atmosphere. The underground scenes were particularly great: I could really feel the characters' stress due to the immersive soundscape and the buzzing of the fluorescent lights in the scene. This is 100% a worthy upgrade for TV. To test music performance, I listened to a variety of genres using Qobuz, our best music streaming service for audiophiles. 'Money' by Pink Floyd was a little tinny at the top of the percussion section. The bass was a little quiet too, but soundbars are never excellent at music performance. 'Money for Nothing' by Dire Straits was atmospheric at the start and affecting throughout, but, again, disappointing bass. I still had a great time listening to these tracks, but it wouldn't be my first choice of home speaker. 'Bad guy' by Billie Eilish is a very bassy song, so I wanted to see how the Sharp 3.1.2 would deal with its sonic makeup. Surprisingly, it was the best sounding song I listened to on the soundbar. This is likely because there wasn't much sonic differentiation: as the song is almost entirely bass, the subwoofer had to put in extra hours and couldn't sneak away without clocking out. In general, the music performance was a little lacklustre, but soundbars are never amazing in this regard. If you want a home sound system setup, I'd definitely recommend getting some dedicated speakers for music like the Fluance Ri71. For the low, low price of £329, the Sharp 3.1.2 Soundbar is really competitive. The sound excels with dialogue and high-frequency sound effects. With the optional 2.0.2 rear speaker upgrade, the Dolby Atmos performance is truly excellent. However, if you haven't got Premium Netflix or the like, then this 360° audio will be lost. Even so, when I was watching basic tier Netflix, I was still really impressed by the Sharp HT-SBW53121's performance. This is a very versatile setup. It's much better value than the competition, including Bose, Sonos (the $449 Beam 2 is 5.0, so no sub), and Samsung. As a result, I'd recommend the Sharp 3.1.2 Soundbar wholeheartedly for those trying to upgrade their home cinema setup on a budget. As I said earlier, if you're in the U.S. and want a similar performance, I'd check out the Polk Signa S4 soundbar, which is a 3.1.2 channel setup for $399.
