Any EU trade deal with US would be limited in scope initially to avoid July 9th tariffs, von der Leyen says
trade tariffs
would be limited to an 'agreement in principle', with further details to be worked out later, the European Commission president
Ursula von der Leye
n has said.
US president
Donald Trump
has threatened to put tariffs of 50 per cent on imports sold into the US from the EU, if the two sides have not agreed a trade deal by July 9th. Near-blanket tariffs on 10 per cent have been charged on EU goods since early April, with cars and steel subject to higher duties.
Speaking in Aarhus, Denmark, Ms von der Leyen said EU negotiators were 'ready for a deal' and wanted a negotiated solution to the transatlantic trade tensions.
'At the same time we are all preparing for the possibility that no satisfactory agreement is reached,' the head of the EU executive said.
READ MORE
'As always in negotiations you never know when they are successfully concluded, we are aiming at the 9th of July,' she said.
[
EU-US trade deal: Cabinet expects 10% baseline tariffs to remain even if agreement is reached
Opens in new window
]
It would be 'impossible' for any agreement next week to have trashed out the 'very complex' detail required for a full trade EU-US deal, given the two sides had only been in talks for three months, the German politician said.
The EU was finalising a 'rebalancing' package of counter tariffs it would hike on a range of US products and industries, in the event Mr Trump's higher import duties on European businesses came into effect, she added.
Earlier today, the Minister for Finance
Paschal Donohoe
said he believes an agreement on tariffs was 'possible, but not certain.'
Speaking to Ivan Yates on Newstalk's Pat Kenny Show, Mr Donohoe said that the EU would be looking for the minimum level of tariff possible
'And then for sectors that are really important to us we will be making the case that they're very important to America for special recognition of them. I think an agreement is possible, but I don't believe it's certain.
'At the moment, an assessment, a report, is being conducted by the United States government into the life science and medicine sector. And basically, the argument that Ireland is making, along with the European Union, is that if you value affordability in medicines that can make an increasingly big difference to your life, that global supply chains have a big role to play in that.
'And if you want to ship those medicines to other parts of the world, having some of your supply chain outside of America is in your long-term interest for doing that. And that briefly is the case that we are making.'
Mr Donohoe said it would be 'very grim for both sides if the situation were to descend to 'tit-for-tat territory'.
Trade between the EU and the US was worth €4 billion every day, if a deal did not happen and there were 'escalatory measures' that would mean the price of goods would go up on both sides of the Atlantic, which would have an impact on inflation.
The second thing that would happen, he said, would be a real risk that this would be damaging for growth and for jobs, he said.
'We published figures a few weeks ago here in Ireland. A forecast of the impact on the GDP? So we did two things. We said if there's no tariffs, what will our economy look like? And if tariffs are applied, and what we modelled it as on, 10 per cent on everything going into the US and 60 per cent between the US and China.
'And what that would mean for the Irish economy very broadly is that we would still grow, but we would grow at a lower pace. We would still have a record number of people at work, but probably up to 75,000 fewer jobs created across the next two to four years and then we would see our public finances still being surplused but a smaller surplus.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Most US firms in Ireland to grow or keep jobs despite global pressure, survey finds
The overwhelming majority of US businesses in Ireland plan to increase or maintain their employment levels in Ireland despite the global uncertainty, and deliberate efforts by US president Donald Trump to bring more manufacturing back to the States. Marking the July 4 Independence Day celebrations, the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) released the results of a survey conducted of its members, where 92.5% said they planned to increase or maintain their current level of employment in Ireland. Of those, 60% said they planned to increase employee numbers, while a third said they would maintain their current number. Nine in 10 survey respondents also said their corporate headquarters had a positive view of Ireland as an investment location, and 68% said their corporate headquarters already had plans to invest in Ireland over the next five years. US multinationals have formed a key part of the modern Irish economy, employing large numbers of workers in key sectors such as pharmaceuticals and technology. However, the Trump administration is engaged in an ongoing tariff war with much of the world, as he demands US companies operating abroad bring more of their operations back home. American Chamber chief executive Paul Sweetman said: "Almost 7.5% of Ireland's entire population is employed — directly or indirectly — by US multinationals. Ireland is a strategic hub for innovation and global decision-makers in major American corporations. "On the flip side, Ireland is the sixth largest source of FDI into the US, and Irish companies are employing almost as many people in the US as US companies are employing in Ireland. It truly is a genuine two-way economic relationship. "Against the geopolitical backdrop of trade, tariffs and uncertainty — which are unquestionably causing challenges for our members — we see a real and emerging optimism that the business community is ready to get moving through accelerating innovative projects and strategic investments." The survey also found a third of US businesses here said housing was the most important challenge for Ireland to overcome for their company to invest and expand here. Other challenges include cost competitiveness, a skills shortage, the complexity of the planning process, supply chain disruption and the need to enhance R&D tax incentives. When asked about the biggest risk is to continued FDI in Ireland over the next five years, housing was cited as the biggest risk (31%), ahead of public infrastructure, trade tariffs, labour costs and availability of skilled talent. On investment in AI and new technologies, 92.5% of respondents said they had increased or maintained AI investment this year, while 65% said they planned to increase investment in AI, automation or data analytics initiatives. When asked how they expect the AI transformation to affect their organisation over the next five years, 82.5% said they expected it to result in either increased or maintained investment. "In the long term, Ireland has a significant opportunity — built on a pedigree of delivery and a can-do attitude — to win new investments and grow. Read More A strong euro against the dollar is creating a new headache for Irish exporters
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Protest held at US Embassy's July 4 celebrations boycotted by Opposition TDs
The event, which ended with a fireworks display set to the soundtrack of 'YMCA' and other songs favoured by US President Donald Trump, was boycotted by a number of opposition politicians. Around 2,500 guests across the fields of politics, business, culture, sport, and media were invited to the July 4 celebrations, which marked the 249th anniversary of US independence. People Before Profit TD Ruth Coppinger was among those who attended a protest outside the gates of the Phoenix Park residence of the new US ambassador to Ireland, Ed Walsh. She said it was important for Mr Walsh, as a representative of the US government, to see it was 'completely unacceptable' to celebrate July 4 while the US supports Israel's actions in Gaza. 'It is very important that there were visible signs that the vast majority of Irish people are absolutely sickened by what's going on in Gaza and they want it to stop.' Protesters waved Irish and Palestinian flags and called on guests to 'walk away' from the event as they chanted 'shame, shame, shame on you' and 'free Palestine'. 'We call on the diners tonight to turn around. Don't accept the free meal. Make a stand and turn away,' they shouted. Some protesters shouted at guests as they exited cars or entered the grounds, calling on them to 'show some solidarity' and re-consider their invitation. 'We have to be here. All these people are going for dinner, we have to be here to stand against all the wrong that is being done in the world,' said one protestor, Laura. Another, Elise, said pro-Palestinian supporters have tried 'sending emails and letters, but using your voice in public, we might get heard'. 'To make people feel some emotion and hopefully change their mind.' Tánaiste Simon Harris addressed the celebrations at the Deerfield Residence, while Mr Walsh, who presented his credentials to President Michael D Higgins on Tuesday, said he looked forward to 'building lasting relationships' during his term. 'I stand before you as a businessman, a family man, and someone who deeply values the ties that bind communities together, from the boardroom to the golf course,' said Mr Walsh. 'As the new US Ambassador to Ireland, I look forward to building lasting relationships, communicating openly, and embracing all that brings our peoples together.' Attendees are given classic American foods such as hot dogs, hamburgers, bourbon and beer, while the entertainment included performances by Una Healy and and Michael Flatley, who performed a tune on his flute. The evening ended with a fireworks display set to songs favoured by Mr Trump, including 'America the Beautiful' and 'YMCA'.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Republicans muscle Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill through Congress
US president Donald Trump's tax-cut legislation cleared its final hurdle in the US Congress on Thursday, as the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved a massive package that would fund his domestic agenda and push millions of Americans off health insurance. The 218-214 vote amounts to a significant victory for the Republican president that will fund his immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent and deliver new tax breaks that he promised during his 2024 campaign. It also cuts health and food safety net programs and zeroes out dozens of green energy incentives. It would add $3.4tn to the nation's $36.2tn debt, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Despite concerns within Trump's party over the 869-page bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voting against it, following an overnight standoff. The bill has already cleared the Republican-controlled Senate by the narrowest possible margin. The White House said Trump will sign it into law at 5pm ET (2100 GMT) on Friday, the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Republicans said the legislation will lower taxes for Americans across the income spectrum and spur economic growth. "This is jet fuel for the economy, and all boats are going to rise," House Speaker Mike Johnson said. Every Democrat in Congress voted against it, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would leave millions uninsured. "The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans, is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in an eight-hour, 46-minute speech that was the longest in the chamber's history. Trump kept up the pressure throughout, cajoling and threatening lawmakers as he pressed them to finish the job. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" he wrote on social media. Though roughly a dozen House Republicans threatened to vote against the bill, only two ended up doing so: Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, a centrist, and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a conservative who said it did not cut spending enough. Marathon Weekend Republicans raced to meet Trump's July 4 deadline, working through last weekend and holding all-night debates in the House and the Senate. The bill passed the Senate on Tuesday in a 51-50 vote in that saw Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote. According to the CBO, the bill would lower tax revenues by $4.5tn over 10 years and cut spending by $1.1tn. Those spending cuts largely come from Medicaid, the health program that covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would tighten enrollment standards, institute a work requirement and clamp down on a funding mechanism used by states to boost federal payments - changes that would leave nearly 12 million people uninsured, according to the CBO. Republicans added $50bn for rural health providers to address concerns that those cutbacks would force them out of business. Nonpartisan analysts have found that the wealthiest Americans would see the biggest benefits from the bill, while lower-income people would effectively see their incomes drop as the safety-net cuts would outweigh their tax cuts. The increased debt load created by the bill would also effectively transfer money from younger to older generations, analysts say. Ratings firm Moody's downgraded US debt in May, citing the mounting debt, and some foreign investors say the bill is making US Treasury bonds less attractive. The bill raises the US debt ceiling by $5tn, averting the prospect of a default in the short term. But some investors worry the debt overhang could curtail the economic stimulus in the bill and create a long-term risk of higher borrowing costs. On the other side of the ledger, the bill staves off tax increases that were due to hit most Americans at the end of this year, when Trump's 2017 individual and business tax cuts were due to expire. Those cuts are now made permanent, while tax breaks for parents and businesses are expanded. The bill also sets up new tax breaks for tipped income, overtime pay, seniors and auto loans, fulfilling Trump campaign promises. The final version of the bill includes more substantial tax cuts and more aggressive healthcare cuts than an initial version that passed the House in May. During deliberations in the Senate, Republicans also dropped a provision that would have banned state-level regulations on artificial intelligence, and a "retaliatory tax" on foreign investment that had spurred alarm on Wall Street. The bill is likely to feature prominently in the 2026 midterm elections, when Democrats hope to recapture at least one chamber of Congress. Republican leaders contend the bill's tax breaks will goose the economy before then, and many of its benefit cuts are not scheduled to kick in until after that election. Opinion polls show many Americans are concerned about the bill's cost and its effect on lower income people.
