CO2 levels just broke another record. Here's what that means
When man first walked on the moon, the carbon dioxide concentration in Earth's atmosphere was 325 parts per million (ppm).
By 9/11, it was 369 ppm, and when COVID-19 shut down normal life in 2020, it had shot up to 414 parts ppm.
This week, our planet hit the highest levels ever directly recorded: 430 parts per million.
For 67 years, the observatory on Hawaii's Mauna Loa volcano has been taking these measurements daily — tracking the invisible gas that is building up in our atmosphere and changing life on Earth.
The record is known as the Keeling Curve. Charles David Keeling began those recordings, some of the first in the world to measure CO2 concentration over time.
His son, Ralph Keeling, born one year before the observatory opened, has witnessed the rapid increase firsthand over his lifetime.
"I was a teenager when I first started to appreciate what my father was doing and how it might be significant," Keeling told CBC News. Back then it was around 330 ppm.
Keeling, a geochemistry professor at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego, took over the research once his father passed away in 2005.
"This problem is not going away, and we're moving further and further into uncharted territory, and almost certainly, very dangerous territory."
The build up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere isn't visible to the naked eye, but its concentration matters because of the greenhouse effect.
Like the glass walls that trap heat from the sun in an actual greenhouse, gases in our atmosphere such as CO2 and methane also trap heat from the sun.
At the start of the Industrial Revolution, ice core samples show CO2 levels were around 280 parts per million but as they rose, warming has increased by about 1.3 C over the pre-industrial average.
That's led to rising temperatures and leading to more frequent and extreme weather, like heat waves, floods, wildfires and droughts.
While many have heard about the goals of limiting warming to 1.5 C or 2 C above pre-industrial levels, there have also been efforts to return CO2 levels to below 350 parts per million, as a key part of limiting the damage from climate change.
The record highs have continued though. Just in the last year, CO2 readings from May have increased more than three parts per million — that many more molecules of CO2 trapping heat and contributing to warming.
"We know why it's rising faster than ever, it's because we're burning more fossil fuels each year," said Keeling.
Damon Matthews, a climate scientist and professor at Concordia University in Quebec, also says he's concerned and isn't surprised that there are new records every year.
"If we want to actually stabilize CO2 levels in the atmosphere, we would need to cut global emissions by more than 50 per cent, and we're nowhere near doing that," he said, adding that there are other gases at play but CO2 is the dominant influence.
"Every May, we're going to see a new record of atmospheric CO2, until we actually make a lot more progress on climate mitigation than we have today."
The annual cycle, peaking in late spring in the northern hemisphere, is tied to plant photosynthesis — CO2 concentrations drop in the summer as plants absorb the gas and release oxygen.
In 2021, the International Energy Agency said that if the world wants to limit global warming and reach net-zero by 2050, there could be no new coal, oil or gas projects.
Matthews is part of Canada's net-zero advisory body and says he's seen some progress in decreasing CO2 emissions the last few years, but not enough.
He says Europe's emissions have been going down for decades, and that last year CO2 emissions in China didn't increase. However, he says Canada still lags behind other countries, and the U.S. is trending the other way.
"There's lots of policy options, certainly focusing on expanding the oil and gas industry in Canada right now is not going to get us where we need to go in terms of climate," he said.
"We just need to stop arguing about whether it's a priority and start doing the things that we know will help to solve the problem."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
There's been a stunning drop in heart attack deaths — but these other risks are rising
Deaths from heart attacks have fallen dramatically over the past 50 years, even taking into account a short but sharp increase in mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, in a testament to the remarkable medical investment made by the U.S. to counteract a deadly public health threat, say teams of scientists from UCSF and Stanford who released parallel reports this week. Heart attack deaths dropped by nearly 90% from 1970 to 2022, the time period that the Stanford team studied for their report published in the Journal of the American Heart Association. That's a direct result of immense investment in tools to prevent, test for and treat cardiovascular conditions, in particular heart attacks, said Dr. Latha Palaniappan, senior author of the Stanford paper. 'A 90% reduction in heart attack deaths over the last 50 years is nothing short of a medical miracle,' Palaniappan said. In the paper, Palaniappan and her peers noted that nearly half of global funding for heart disease research comes from the U.S., which 'has had an incredible return on investment.' 'This investment has driven global breakthroughs and continues to shape how we prevent and treat heart disease worldwide,' Palaniappan said. 'These breakthroughs have helped increase life expectancy in the U.S. by a full decade since the 1970s.' On the other hand, progress has flagged in fighting deaths from other types of cardiovascular issues, including high blood pressure, heart failure and arrhythmia, according to both studies. Overall cardiovascular mortality from non-heart attacks increased by about 80% over the past 50 years. Both the Stanford and UCSF studies analyzed heart disease deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The studies noted sharp increases in heart attack deaths during the pandemic — peaking at about 93 of every 100,000 deaths in 2021 — that have since fallen to pre-pandemic levels. Heart disease has been the leading cause of death among Americans for more than a century. The term describes a wide range of conditions, including coronary artery disease, the main contributor to heart attacks, along with heart failure, heart rhythm disorders and hypertension. The drop in heart attacks comes from a multi-pronged effort, including public health campaigns such as smoking cessation efforts, and medical advances in prevention and treatment. According to the Stanford study, someone over age 65 who was hospitalized for a heart attack in 1970 had a 60% chance of leaving the hospital alive; today, they have a greater than 90% chance. But the drop in heart attacks has coincided with an increase in deaths caused by all other heart conditions. The UCSF study found that deaths from high blood pressure doubled from 1999 to 2023, the time period the scientists analyzed. Deaths from heart failure also climbed, hitting a record high in 2023. Part of the reason deaths from other types of heart disease are climbing is because people are generally living longer — the age expectancy increased by about a decade over the past 50 years. They're surviving heart attacks and then succumbing later to other, sometimes related conditions. Dr. Sanket Dhruva, senior author of the UCSF paper, said these conditions are all treatable and preventable. He said the data should compel the medical community to redouble efforts to battle all types of heart conditions — the immense progress made against heart attacks demonstrates what can be done with money and focus, Dhruva said. 'Really one of the key findings of our paper is where have the patterns been worsening,' Dhruva said. 'Death from cardiovascular disease is getting better over time, but it's not that simple. It's very nuanced. Death from hypertension diseases, and related to heart failure — those deaths are reaching record highs.' Dhruva said that for many of these conditions, tools already exist to improve outcomes for most patients — the work needs to focus on making sure those tools are accessible, and that the people who need them are being diagnosed and connected to treatment. For example, the U.S. needs to do a better job of screening for high blood pressure, then making sure people with high blood pressure have access to health care providers, medication and testing equipment. The UCSF paper found a precipitous increase in heart disease deaths during the pandemic, in large part because people's access to care was interrupted — folks stopped visiting their doctors, checking their blood pressure or even taking their medications. Some people stopped exercising, further increasing their risk. Though that care is getting back on track for most people, its absence should demonstrate how critical it is to maintain access. 'The pandemic halted decades of progress,' the UCSF paper noted. 'We know that people were not coming for care, we know that risk factors got worse,' Dhruva said. 'People gained weight, medication adherence slipped, people stopped seeing their care providers as often. Cardiovascular care got worse during the pandemic.' Still, he said, 'We learned a lot from the pandemic. We learned that it's absolutely necessary to ensure that patients are getting care.'


Hamilton Spectator
2 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
WHO expert group fails to find a definitive answer for how COVID-19 began
LONDON (AP) — An expert group charged by the World Health Organization to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic started released its final report Friday, reaching an unsatisfying conclusion: Scientists still aren't sure how the worst health emergency in a century began. At a press briefing on Friday, Marietjie Venter, the group's chair, said that most scientific data supports the hypothesis that the new coronavirus jumped to humans from animals. That was also the conclusion drawn by the first WHO expert group that investigated the pandemic's origins in 2021, when scientists concluded the virus likely spread from bats to humans, via another intermediary animal. At the time, WHO said a lab leak was 'extremely unlikely.' Venter said that after more than three years of work, WHO's expert group was unable to get the necessary data to evaluate whether or not COVID-19 was the result of a lab accident , despite repeated requests for hundreds of genetic sequences and more detailed biosecurity information that were made to the Chinese government. 'Therefore, this hypothesis could not be investigated or excluded,' she said. 'It was deemed to be very speculative, based on political opinions and not backed up by science.' She said that the 27-member group did not reach a consensus; one member resigned earlier this week and three others asked for their names to be removed from the report. Venter said there was no evidence to prove that COVID-19 had been manipulated in a lab, nor was there any indication that the virus had been spreading before December 2019 anywhere outside of China. 'Until more scientific data becomes available, the origins of how SARS-CoV-2 entered human populations will remain inconclusive,' Venter said, referring to the scientific name for the COVID-19 virus. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said it was a 'moral imperative' to determine how COVID began, noting that the virus killed at least 20 million people , wiped at least $10 trillion from the global economy and upended the lives of billions. Last year, the AP found that the Chinese government froze meaningful domestic and international efforts to trace the virus' origins in the first weeks of the outbreak in 2020 and that WHO itself may have missed early opportunities to investigate how COVID-19 began. U.S. President Donald Trump has long blamed the emergence of the coronavirus on a laboratory accident in China, while a U.S. intelligence analysis found there was insufficient evidence to prove the theory. Chinese officials have repeatedly dismissed the idea that the pandemic could have started in a lab, saying that the search for its origins should be conducted in other countries. Last September, researchers zeroed in on a short list of animals they think might have spread COVID-19 to humans, including racoon dogs, civet cats and bamboo rats. __ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
WHO expert group fails to find a definitive answer for how COVID-19 began
Venter said that after more than three years of work, WHO's expert group was unable to get the necessary data to evaluate whether or not COVID-19 was the result of a lab accident, despite repeated requests for hundreds of genetic sequences and more detailed biosecurity information that were made to the Chinese government. 'Therefore, this hypothesis could not be investigated or excluded,' she said. 'It was deemed to be very speculative, based on political opinions and not backed up by science.' She said that the 27-member group did not reach a consensus; one member resigned earlier this week and three others asked for their names to be removed from the report. Advertisement Venter said there was no evidence to prove that COVID-19 had been manipulated in a lab, nor was there any indication that the virus had been spreading before December 2019 anywhere outside of China. 'Until more scientific data becomes available, the origins of how SARS-CoV-2 entered human populations will remain inconclusive,' Venter said, referring to the scientific name for the COVID-19 virus. Advertisement WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said it was a 'moral imperative' to determine how COVID began, noting that the virus killed at least 20 million people, wiped at least $10 trillion from the global economy and upended the lives of billions. Last year, the AP found that the Chinese government froze meaningful domestic and international efforts to trace the virus' origins in the first weeks of the outbreak in 2020 and that WHO itself may have missed early opportunities to investigate how COVID-19 began. U.S. President Donald Trump has long blamed the emergence of the coronavirus on a laboratory accident in China, while a U.S. intelligence analysis found there was insufficient evidence to prove the theory. Chinese officials have repeatedly dismissed the idea that the pandemic could have started in a lab, saying that the search for its origins should be conducted in other countries. Last September, researchers zeroed in on a short list of animals they think might have spread COVID-19 to humans,