
Security operation shifts as Trump arrives in North East Scotland
Both leaders are attending a dinner with Mr Trump at Menie, the president's golf resort just a few miles north of Aberdeen, a city known as the oil capital of Europe.Plenty of supporters of both Sir Keir and Mr Swinney have expressed disgust at their decision to dine with the Republican.Off the coast of the resort several oil-related vessels can be seen, along with 11 wind turbines. The president tried to stop their construction and he is still angry about them.It's not just the view he doesn't like. Mr Trump has been critical of the scale, pace and nature of the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy, which is the subject of intense lobbying here.Speaking alongside the Prime Minister at Turnberry earlier, Trump said: "Wind is a disaster in Scotland and across the UK."When we go to Aberdeen, you'll see some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen."
As for Sir Keir, this is the first visit he has made to the north east since taking office just over a year ago. And he too is under pressure on the topic of energy.Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce argue that 5,000 jobs have "needlessly disappeared" from the UK's oil and gas workforce in recent years as a result of taxation levels under Conservative and Labour governments.The Prime Minister told reporters: "We believe in a mix. And obviously oil and gas is going to be with us for a very long time. "And, that'll be part of the mix, but also wind, solar, increasingly nuclear."Trade body Offshore Energies UK, formerly known as Oil & Gas UK, welcomed his comments. Chief Executive David Whitehouse said: "If we are going to use oil and gas, let's produce it here - responsibly, with lower emissions, and with all the benefits to jobs, taxes and growth that come from homegrown supply."Words matter and today's words from the Prime Minster were very welcome. What matters even more is action."
However, climate campaigners have been highly critical. Environmental pressure group Uplift desrcibed Trump's demand for more drilling as "pure fantasy".Uplift's executive director Tessa Khan, said: "New drilling won't cut bills and, after 50 years of extraction, the basin is fast running out of gas – that's geology not a political choice. "Trump's knowledge of the North Sea is limited to his view from his golf course, so let's not listen to him when it comes to how we power our country."This view was supported by many of the protestors in Aberdeensgire who staged a demonstration outside the extensive police cordon around Mr Trump's Menie estate.They had complaints about the cost of security for the visit. And they criticised US policy on topics ranging from abortion to immigration. Campiagner Esme Houston from Aberdeen said: "We're here to tell Trump to leave, bluntly. We're not very happy with his persence in our city and in our country.Another protester, Hannah, said: "It's important to stand up for what we, as Scotland, believe in. What he's done to this community with his golf course is unacceptable.""There's issues with the environment. The community was promised things that weren't delivered. People were forced from their homes."
Protestors also demanded urgent action on Ukraine and Gaza.Jonathan Russell, chair of CND North East of Scotland, said: "We've become obsessed by war rather than dealing with problems by discussion and neogitation.""Masses of money is being made out of people being killed, whether it's in Ukraine or Gaza."Obviously the situation at present in Gaza is horrific and our government, as Trump, are all complicit with this. And it has to change."One thing remains consistent between the two halves of this trip. Golf. Mr Trump spent part of the weekend playing the game in Ayrshire and on Tuesday he will open a new 18-hole course at his Aberdeenshire resort.But among the pristine greens and carefully sculpted fairways of his luxury resorts there is no escaping those urgent, insistent questions about hunger and suffering among the ruins of war.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
a minute ago
- Scottish Sun
Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved near Russia as he blasts ‘foolish' nuke threat from Putin crony
MOVING IN Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved near Russia as he blasts 'foolish' nuke threat from Putin crony Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PRESIDENT Donald Trump has ordered that two nuclear submarines be positioned near Russia following stern threats from Vladimir Putin's comrade. The move by the commander-in-chief comes after former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned the United States of Moscow's nuclear arsenal. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media on board Air Force One on Tuesday Credit: Reuters More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun


Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump orders nuclear submarines moved near Russia
Aug 1 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in regions near Russia in response to threats from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. "I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.


Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's America First biodiesel policy could cost US companies, consumers, trade groups warn
NEW YORK, Aug 1 (Reuters) - The Trump administration's push to discourage the use of foreign feedstocks in domestic biodiesel could lead to higher energy prices for U.S. consumers and restricted domestic production, according to some refining and biofuel trade groups. The warning reflects ongoing friction between President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency and the administration's traditional allies in the energy and agriculture industries over biofuels policy. Trump has promised to slash consumer energy costs, but is also trying to advance his America First agenda to support domestic production through trade protectionism - which can often make costs go up instead. At issue is a proposal from the EPA in June that would for the first time allocate only half as many tradable renewable fuel credits to biodiesel that is either imported or made with foreign feedstocks. Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, refiners must blend large volumes of biofuels into the U.S. fuel supply or purchase the credits, called RINs, from those that do. While meant to help domestic farmers and producers, the new proposal - set to be finalized this autumn - would place unprecedented demand on domestic raw materials needed to make biodiesel like soybean oil, used cooking oil, and animal fat, in a market that currently must look abroad to meet its needs. Meanwhile, restricting the number of RINs that can be generated through such imports will raise credit prices, with a potential spillover impact on diesel and home heating oil, according to the industry groups. "This credit restriction ... will jeopardize the economic viability of renewable fuel production assets and raise overall compliance costs for all obligated parties, which ultimately harms U.S. consumers," Chet Thompson, head of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers group representing refiners, said in a July 25 letter to top Republican lawmakers. The Advanced Biofuels Association also said the policy could mean ramped up consumer costs, by putting a $250 per metric ton premium on domestic versus imported feedstocks, according to a study it commissioned. "Economic analysis shows this would impose significant costs on U.S. biorefineries, raise fuel prices for millions of Americans, and benefit only a narrow set of stakeholders," ABFA President Michael McAdams said in a statement. The White House and EPA declined to comment directly on the price concerns, saying the administration is still seeking public comment on the proposal until August 8. Others in the biofuel industry backed the proposal. "American farmers need all the demand they can get. We should be developing our capacity here, rather than relying on imported used cooking oil from China, or giving Brazilian feedstocks preferential treatment at the expense of U.S. producers and their farm partners," said Emily Skor, CEO of Growth Energy. However, U.S. companies such as ADM (ADM.N), opens new tab, Bunge (BG.N), opens new tab and Cargill that have global assets and process U.S. soy, as well as foreign companies with significant U.S. operations, will likely see negative effects. That includes Australia's Nufarm ( opens new tab, which contracts with farmers in South America to grow new oilseed crops. The biofuel industry had not been seeking the import shift in EPA's June proposal, according to multiple renewable fuel lobbyists and company officials. The White House has since held several meetings with industry officials to hear about potential unintended consequences of the changes, according to multiple sources. The EPA's proposal in June was meant to set out biofuel blending mandates for the next two years. It included a quota of 7.12 billion biomass-based diesel RINs for 2026 - a measurement of the number of tradable credits generated by blending the fuel - and projected that mandate would lead to the blending of 5.61 billion gallons. The biofuels industry and the American Petroleum Institute, an oil trade group, had banded together to lobby the administration to set biomass-based diesel mandates to at least 5.25 billion gallons. The mandate was just 3.35 billion gallons in 2025. Still, there are scenarios in the EPA's accounting that could lead to a lower volume outcome. If all the biodiesel and renewable diesel used in the U.S. next year came from domestic feedstocks, for example, the RIN mandate would yield just 4.45 billion gallons, according to several industry analyses reviewed by Reuters. Ditching the penalty on imported feedstocks could help raise that number, according to the analyses. "That probably aligns with what the administration was trying to do in terms of supporting the agricultural side and farmers," said one industry analyst, who asked to remain anonymous to speak candidly.