
I am keeping my lips zipped about the bet
'I watched the men's match completely. But when it came to the ladies final, I watched only the first three games before switching off the TV.'
'Only three games? Why is that?'
'It was fairly obvious by then that Swiatek was going to blow away Anisimova.'
'Blow away? What do you mean?'
'The expression 'blow away' has many different meanings. But in the context of sports, it is mostly used to mean to defeat someone comprehensively.'
'In other words, you outperform everyone else. You destroy the competition.'
'I guess you could say that. Here's an example. At this year's Wimbledon, after the second round, Iga Swiatek just blew away her opponents.'
'That's true. After the second round, she didn't lose a set. How about this example? During the first half of the game, the two teams were evenly matched. In the second half, however, our opponent blew us away by scoring seven goals.'
'Ouch! That must have hurt! Anyway, that's a good example. Here's another one. We thought Sindhu would blow away the competition. We were shocked when she lost in the first round.'
'That's what makes every tournament exciting. You know what they say about sports. Expect the unexpected. So, did Sujatha buy you breakfast? After all, you did take a bet with her that Swiatek would win.'
'That's true. But Sujatha is going through a tough time. Lots of problems at the office. So, I'm keeping my lips zipped about the bet.'
'Keeping your lips zipped? Does it mean the same thing as 'keeping your lips buttoned'?'
'Very good. When you keep your lips zipped, what you are doing is keeping quiet. You're not opening your mouth about some matter. The Manager was angry and wasn't willing to listen to reason. So, I decided to keep my lips zipped.'
'Keeping one's lips buttoned is the best thing to do when someone is angry.'
'Exactly! There's so much corruption in this office. I can't keep my lips zipped, I'm afraid. So, how are things at your office? Heard you're getting a new boss.'
'That's true. He'll be joining us in a week or two.'
'A week or two? That's a long time! What are you guys going to be doing in the meanwhile?'
'What we've been doing the past few days, I suppose! Sleepwalk through the workday.'
'Sleepwalk through the day? What are you talking about?'
'Do you know what sleepwalk means?'
'Of course, I do! Doesn't it mean to walk in one's sleep?'
'That's right! I'm told I used to sleepwalk when I was a kid.'
'I believe my uncle sleepwalks even now. He's nearly 70.'
'Sleepwalk has other meanings as well. It's frequently used in informal contexts to mean to say something without really thinking.'
'And you're not thinking because you're asleep! Since your mind is not functioning or has been switched off, you're not really worried about the consequences of what you do or say.'
'Very good! Some of my colleagues are of the opinion that America is sleepwalking itself into a financial crisis.'
'How about this example? Last night, I saw a movie where most of the actors sleepwalked through their roles.'
'So, what you're suggesting is that the actors were wooden. There was little or no life in their acting.'
'Yes.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Cricket diplomacy can serve India in the neighbourhood
Broadly, soft power is utilisation of a country's cultural strengths as opposed to being coercive to influence and prevail over other nations. More commonly, the arts, entertainment, language and institutions have been components of cultural diplomacy. But sports, too, plays a role, from the extravaganza of the Olympic Games and football World Cups to the Wimbledon championships. In the early 1970s, ping-pong diplomacy broke the ice between the US and China. Cricket diplomacy has occasionally been employed by India and Pakistan as confidence-building measures. Today, the game has bestowed India with a valuable soft power ingredient. In 1928, India, despite being under British rule, stunned the world by lifting the gold medal in hockey in the Amsterdam Olympiad. Other than Mahatma Gandhi's non-violent freedom struggle, no facet of India in that period made an impact on the international community as Jaipal Singh's team's triumph did. Thereafter, India completing a hat-trick of golds in the 1936 Berlin Olympics rather jolted the German dictator, Adolf Hitler, whose world view was of white Aryans constituting a superior race. To his dismay, India thrashed Germany 8-1 in the final. In short, independent India inherited hockey as an instrument of soft power. People worldwide would yearn to witness the Indians' dribbling skills. Fast forward to Mexico 1968: India earned neither a gold nor a silver in hockey for the first time in 40 years. In contrast, three years later, India caught the imagination of the cricketing world by notching back-to-back Test series victories in the West Indies and England. Then, India's unexpected triumph in the 1983 World Cup pitchforked cricket as its new soft power implement. The win instigated the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to reach out to the Pakistan Cricket Board to jointly stage the next such event in 1987 — after England had monopolised hosting rights for the first three competitions. The Indo-Pak collaboration conjured a financial package neither England nor Australia could match. India's friendship with other stakeholder countries ensured decisive support for the bid. As cricket burgeoned in popularity in India and the footprint of television simultaneously expanded, Indian corporates started bankrolling broadcasts. This, in turn, created an opening for the BCCI to demand licence fees undreamt of before from broadcasters. Progressively, India became cricket's financial powerhouse. Today, BCCI's monetary stranglehold over cricket is such that not merely other cricket boards, but also the International Cricket Council (ICC), are at its mercy as in no other sporting discipline. India, contrary to Brazil in soccer, have never been undisputed champions of the game, indeed are yet to win the most prestigious World Test Championship; but BCCI unequivocally controls the sport. India as a team are the darling of BCCI's counterparts, because they fill their coffers with bountiful revenue from digital and TV networks, advertisers and sponsors. But they are not always popular with host cricket lovers, as they perceive BCCI to be a bully and as having inequitably captured the ICC. BCCI was party to ICC's decision to award this year's Champions Trophy tournament to Pakistan. Therefore, India's refusal to play in that country was not only a breach of its commitment, but an infringement of the ICC rules applied in the 1996 and 2003 World Cups, namely forfeiture of points for abstentions, which Australia and England suffered. India also derived unfair benefit from playing at a solitary venue and by summoning spinner Varun Chakravarthy as a replacement in their squad to suit the consistent conditions. ICC allowed the special dispensation. A majority of the participating sides permitted this for pecuniary gains; but it did not please the non-Indian public — thereby impairing India's potential goodwill. It is also opportunistic to meet Pakistan in over-limit World Cups, but not in the World Test Championship. The powers-that-be in India are understandably displeased with Pakistan. So, the principled approach would be to have no links with them at all. In 1974, India preferred to default against South Africa instead of playing against them in the Davis Cup final because of its apartheid regime. The BCCI's muscle is best channelled towards magnanimity, consequently in winning hearts and minds; not arm-twisting and seeking undue conveniences in the field. India can capitalise diplomatically on the robust following the Indian Premier League enjoys in England, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, the West Indies and South Asia, many of whose cricketers figure in the tourney. In 1987, with the anti-India General Zia-ul-Haq holding the reins in Pakistan, India's ties with it were unsatisfactory. But BCCI seeking PCB's cooperation helped to temporarily soften Pakistani people's wariness towards India. Therefore, South Block could consider lifting its long-standing ban on Pakistani cricketers partaking in the IPL. This year, Bangladeshi cricketers were also de facto debarred. Lifting the barrier would encourage people-to-people friendliness. The Indian government's anger with its neighbouring counterparts to its west and east and their proxies need not spill over into punishing individual cricketers. Pakistani and Bangladeshi cricketers crossing swords with the world's best in franchise Twenty20 would likely delight and suitably melt cricket fans in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Ashis Ray is a journalist and author of The Trial That Shook Britain. The views expressed are personal.


New Indian Express
11 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Medvedev eyes redemption on hard courts after five Slam final runs, US Open triumph
WASHINGTON: Daniil Medvedev figures this is his time to shine: He loves playing tennis on hard courts like those used at the D.C. Open. And he loves the U.S. Open, which is just a month away, in particular. Doesn't matter what else he's done this season or how things ended for him at the Australian Open, French Open or Wimbledon. He's reached six Grand Slam finals in his career, all on hard courts. 'Usually, this is the most important part of the season for me,' Medvedev said in an interview in Washington, where he was scheduled to play Corentin Moutet in the quarterfinals on Friday. 'And this year, it's really important for me, because I didn't have the best year. I had a lot of time after Wimbledon, so I'm feeling ready and I feel in good shape." After dropping his opening set at the D.C. Open this week against big-serving Reilly Opelka, Medvedev took the next four sets he played at an event where he was the runner-up in 2019. What works so well for the 29-year-old Russian on hard courts? 'A lot of different things. My ball goes through the air the most. My serve goes faster. And this year, the courts seem pretty fast. On the ATP lately, the courts seem to only get slower and slower. But here it's super fast. I like the way it plays,' said Medvedev, who has been ranked No. 1 and is No. 14 this week, his lowest spot in more than six years. 'It's one thing to like the way it plays and it's another thing to win. But I do feel like I can do big things.'


Hindustan Times
11 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Sinner's ex-coach in bits and pieces, refuses to comment on Italian's recent decision: ‘I don't want the nightmare…'
Jannik Sinner was not allowed to participate in professional tennis between the months of February to May due to his three-month doping ban. He returned to action in Rome 1000, and then French Open 2025, where he lost to Carlos Alcaraz in both finals. Meanwhile, he beat the Spaniard in the Wimbledon final. Italy's Jannik Sinner shows his Wimbledon trophy.(AP) Sinner was forced to fire coach and physiotherapist Umberto Ferrara and Giacomo due to their alleged responsibility in the doping case. The likes of Marco Panichi and Ulises Badio had joined Sinner's team immediately after his 2024 US Open victory. Both the physio and coach were fired by Sinner a few days before Wimbledon 2025, without the world No. 1 giving any reasons for his decisions. With the most surprising news being Sinner rehiring Ferrara as fitness coach. Ferrara will return to the Italian's side from Sesto Pusteria, since the Italian has just begun training in Ohio. The world No. 1 will not be available in Canada this month, preferring to rest up and take it easy ahead of the latter half of the season. Sinner's surprise move caused Naldi to make a statement in the famous Italian magazine 'La Repubblica.' Naldi said, "I don't want the nightmare to start again like last summer, which is why I don't want to comment on this news. This story has damaged my image; I prefer to talk about it when I am more serene. I'll tell my side of the story one day, but it's not the right time yet."