logo
Why and where are weekly working hours dropping in Europe?

Why and where are weekly working hours dropping in Europe?

Yahoo4 hours ago

Workers in Europe have been gradually putting in fewer hours. Over the past 10 years, the average time spent working per week has declined by one hour in the EU. In nearly half of 34 European countries, the drop was even greater — more than one hour between 2014 and 2024. Weekly working hours also vary significantly across the continent.
So, in which European countries do people spend the most time at the grindstone? How has actual working time changed across the region? And what could be the possible reasons behind this decline?
According to Eurostat, in 2024, the actual weekly working hours for both full-time and part-time workers aged 20 to 64 in their main job ranged from 32.1 hours in the Netherlands to 39.8 hours in Greece. When including EU candidate countries, EFTA members, and the UK, the highest figure was recorded in Turkey (43.1), where average weekly working time exceeded 43 hours.
People in Southern and Eastern European countries tend to work longer hours, with particularly high figures in EU candidate countries. Following Turkey, which tops the list at 43.1 hours, are Serbia (41.3) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (41.1). Montenegro hasn't reported data for 2024, although its working hours came to 42.8 in 2020.
The next countries in the ranking also belong to the same region: Greece (39.8) and Bulgaria (39). North Macedonia, which only has data spanning up to 2020, also recorded a weekly working total of 39 hours.
These countries generally have lower wages, higher informal employment, and less part-time work.
Western and Northern European countries generally have shorter work weeks. Countries like the Netherlands (32.1), Norway (33.7), and Austria and Denmark (33.9) all report significantly fewer weekly working hours. These regions are characterized by strong labour protections, higher productivity, and widespread use of part-time and flexible work arrangements.
Among Europe's largest economies, the UK and Spain (both at 36.4 hours) and Italy (36.1) report the highest average working times, all above the EU average. However, the UK data dates back to 2019, so the actual figure may be lower today, given the overall downward trend in working hours.
When comparing weekly working hours in 2014 and 2024, only four out of 34 countries saw an increase. In three of these countries, the rise was minimal: Lithuania and Cyprus (both by 12 minutes), and Malta (6 minutes). Serbia was the exception, with a significant increase of 1.7 hours — 1 hour 42 minutes.
Related
How to boost productivity and slash turnover: Tips from three 'chief happiness officers'
Four-day week: Which countries are embracing it and how is it going so far?
Weekly working time remained unchanged in France, while the decrease was less than half an hour in Italy, Sweden, and Latvia.
In 16 out of 34 countries, weekly working time fell by more than one hour — exceeding two hours in some cases.
Iceland (3.5 hours) closely followed Turkey (3.8 hours) at the top. Belgium and Luxembourg also recorded significant declines, with a reduction of 2.5 hours each in weekly working time.
In a further seven countries, weekly working hours declined by 1.5 hours or more. These include Denmark and Austria (both 1.9), Germany (1.8), Estonia (1.7), Czechia (1.6), and Portugal and Croatia (1.5).
Scholars and experts have been examining the reasons behind the decline in weekly working hours, offering various explanations. A recent working paper published by the European Commission analysed work time trends in six EU countries between 1992 and 2022. Sergio Torrejón Pérez and his colleagues found that:
Decline in working time is primarily linked to the growing prevalence of non-standard forms of work, mainly part-time work.
Part-time jobs have grown mostly because more women are working and because more jobs are in service industries.
Full-time workers are working more or less the same amount of hours as in the 1980s.
Self-employed people are working fewer hours over time because more of them are working part-time. Even so, they are still working the longest hours on average.
A paper published by the European Central Bank analysed working time in the euro area from 1995 to 2020. Vasco Botelho and his colleagues emphasised that the decline in hours contributed per worker is a long-term trend.
One reason is that technological progress over the past 150 years has transformed the nature of work.
They found that other key factors include the rising share of part-time employment, and the increase in female labour force participation, which is also closely linked to the growth of part-time work.
The decline in working time is driven by both demand and supply-side factors, according to the ECB report. Most part-time workers choose this arrangement voluntarily, opting to work fewer hours than full-time employees. In the overall sample, about 10% of workers reported that they would prefer to work more hours than they currently do.
Another working paper from the IMF by Diva Astinova and her colleagues also found that declines in actual working hours match declines in desired working hours in Europe.
'Increased income and wealth is likely to be the main force behind the decline in desired and actual hours worked,' they suggested.
In other words, researchers proposed that people feel less of a financial pull to put in more hours.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is France On The Cusp Of Another Political Crisis?
Is France On The Cusp Of Another Political Crisis?

Forbes

time18 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Is France On The Cusp Of Another Political Crisis?

France's Prime Minister Francois Bayrou gestures during the political TV show "L'Evenement" (The ... More Event) broadcast on French TV channel France 2, in Paris, on December 19, 2024. Francois Bayrou said he hoped to name a government "over the weekend", "in any case before Christmas" and that a budget would be adopted "in mid-February", although work on this was interrupted by the motion of censure that toppled the previous government. (Photo by Valentine CHAPUIS / AFP) (Photo by VALENTINE CHAPUIS/AFP via Getty Images) France has now gone through three governments in the past year, each one effectively failing to clear the hurdle of passing a fiscally responsible budget. Major stumbling block here is pension reform – two years ago a proposal to raise the headline pension age met with widespread protest. Since then various governments have tried to find ways to offset the pension burden – one notable strategy is to drop the inflation indexation of pensions (a key pillar of the forthcoming budget process is likely to centre on not indexing government disbursements for a year). Prime minister Francois Bayrou has tried to find ways of building a consensus on pension reform – including a broad conclave on pensions, the idea being to raise the formal pension age to 64. This has now run aground, with the Socialists opposing it (their electorate is very sensitive to the topic) and they have threatened to vote against the government in a potential left-wing inspired vote of confidence. The far-right Rassemblement had declared that it would not support such a vote and the manner in which the Socialists had approached the process was slip-shod. Recall that the government has so far staying in power through a 'no-dissolution' pact with the Socialists, so any parliamentary vote where the Socialists vote against the government could result in the collapse of the government (with the collaboration of the Rassemblement and the far-left), and this could be close to fatal for President Macron. Bayrou has not been a convincing performer in his six months in the job, and one option for the President is to replace him, with say the minister for finance Eric Lombard, or to simply swerve the issue of pension reform altogether – which itself would be a defeat of sorts. Other more ambitious longer term pension reforms are now off the table for the time being. As result the budget process now becomes even more complicated beacuse Bayrou's actions have cut off one of the obvious avenues for the government to cut back spending. International events have given Emmanuel Macron a new platform away from domestic troubles, but Francois Bayrou has in effect imperiled his government on pension reform and the government is again on shaky foundations. The stark reality is that with a first outline of the 2026 budget due in a few weeks, France is limping towards a fiscal crisis. At a time when bond yields across the euro-zone have converged and when the imperative to boost defence spending and embark on the investment and savings union (capital markets union) is rising, Europe needs a strong France and the involvement of Emmanuel Macron. Instead, his tenure is now marked by fiscal failure that will shape the future of the French economy and society for the decade to come. Only higher taxes or dramatically lower government spending can stop the financial demise of France. Macron and none of the opposition parties will countenance this and whomever becomes the next president of France will take up a poisoned chalice.

Provexis (LON:PXS) Is In A Strong Position To Grow Its Business
Provexis (LON:PXS) Is In A Strong Position To Grow Its Business

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Provexis (LON:PXS) Is In A Strong Position To Grow Its Business

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, biotech and mining exploration companies often lose money for years before finding success with a new treatment or mineral discovery. Having said that, unprofitable companies are risky because they could potentially burn through all their cash and become distressed. Given this risk, we thought we'd take a look at whether Provexis (LON:PXS) shareholders should be worried about its cash burn. For the purpose of this article, we'll define cash burn as the amount of cash the company is spending each year to fund its growth (also called its negative free cash flow). We'll start by comparing its cash burn with its cash reserves in order to calculate its cash runway. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. You can calculate a company's cash runway by dividing the amount of cash it has by the rate at which it is spending that cash. In September 2024, Provexis had UK£478k in cash, and was debt-free. Looking at the last year, the company burnt through UK£113k. So it had a cash runway of about 4.2 years from September 2024. A runway of this length affords the company the time and space it needs to develop the business. The image below shows how its cash balance has been changing over the last few years. See our latest analysis for Provexis Although Provexis had revenue of UK£1.2m in the last twelve months, its operating revenue was only UK£1.2m in that time period. We don't think that's enough operating revenue for us to understand too much from revenue growth rates, since the company is growing off a low base. So we'll focus on the cash burn, today. Notably, its cash burn was actually down by 74% in the last year, which is a real positive in terms of resilience, but uninspiring when it comes to investment for growth. Of course, we've only taken a quick look at the stock's growth metrics, here. This graph of historic revenue growth shows how Provexis is building its business over time. There's no doubt Provexis' rapidly reducing cash burn brings comfort, but even if it's only hypothetical, it's always worth asking how easily it could raise more money to fund further growth. Companies can raise capital through either debt or equity. Commonly, a business will sell new shares in itself to raise cash and drive growth. By comparing a company's annual cash burn to its total market capitalisation, we can estimate roughly how many shares it would have to issue in order to run the company for another year (at the same burn rate). Since it has a market capitalisation of UK£16m, Provexis' UK£113k in cash burn equates to about 0.7% of its market value. So it could almost certainly just borrow a little to fund another year's growth, or else easily raise the cash by issuing a few shares. As you can probably tell by now, we're not too worried about Provexis' cash burn. For example, we think its cash runway suggests that the company is on a good path. But it's fair to say that its cash burn reduction was also very reassuring. Looking at all the measures in this article, together, we're not worried about its rate of cash burn, which seems to be under control. Taking a deeper dive, we've spotted 4 warning signs for Provexis you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning. If you would prefer to check out another company with better fundamentals, then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt or this list of stocks which are all forecast to grow. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

D-Wave's Advantage2 Gains Traction: More Upside Ahead for QBTS Stock?
D-Wave's Advantage2 Gains Traction: More Upside Ahead for QBTS Stock?

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

D-Wave's Advantage2 Gains Traction: More Upside Ahead for QBTS Stock?

D-Wave Quantum's QBTS standout growth catalyst this quarter is the successful launch and commercial deployment of its next-generation Advantage2 quantum annealer. In the last-reported quarter, the company posted 509% year-over-year growth in revenues, driven mainly by the first Advantage2 sale to the Julich Supercomputing Center. Now generally available via D-Wave Quantum's Leap cloud, it's gaining traction in real-world applications, from U.S. defense to AI-driven drug discovery. Shares of D-Wave Quantum have soared 67.4% over the past three months, largely outperforming the broader industry, sector and the benchmark. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Commercialization of the Advantage2 Quantum System A major driver of D-Wave Quantum's record first-quarter 2025 performance is the rapid commercialization of its next-gen Advantage2 quantum system. Featuring over 4,400 qubits, the platform delivers significant performance gains, 2x coherence time, 40% higher energy scale, and enhanced qubit connectivity, enabling more complex real-world optimization in AI, logistics, finance and materials science. The system's first commercial sale to Julich Supercomputing Center contributed heavily to the first quarter in revenues. A second deployment is underway at Davidson Technologies for U.S. defense applications, highlighting Advantage2's expanding relevance in government sectors. Following its general availability in May 2025 via the Leap cloud, D-Wave introduced new hybrid solvers for both continuous and integer variables, broadening the scope of use cases to include budgeting, scheduling and resource optimization. Beyond hardware, D-Wave also launched a quantum AI toolkit integrated with PyTorch, positioning Advantage2 as a platform for innovation in machine learning. IonQ IONQ: It is rapidly scaling up through major moves, including its $1.075 billion acquisition of Oxford Ionics to accelerate fault-tolerant quantum development. It also launched a quantum networking hub via a $22 million Forte Enterprise deal with EPB and acquired Lightsynq and Capella Space to support its quantum internet vision. On the application side, IonQ partnered with AstraZeneca, AWS and NVIDIA NVDA to achieve a 20× speedup in simulating a pharmaceutical reaction, showcasing growing real-world impact. Rigetti Computing RGTI: It has emphasized improvements in qubit fidelity and error mitigation, partnered with government entities for testing and calibration of its superconducting processors, and is reportedly advancing its roadmap toward hybrid quantum-classical cloud services. Although not yet celebrated through headline-making releases, Rigetti is positioning itself as a 'complete-stack' provider, integrating software infrastructure like its Quil programming framework and Forest SDK to support developer adoption alongside its next-gen hardware. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for QBTS' 2025 earnings implies a 72% improvement over 2024. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research D-Wave Quantum currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) : Free Stock Analysis Report Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI) : Free Stock Analysis Report D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store