
Why RBA put shock hold on rates
The central bank released its meeting minutes on Tuesday, showing the board decided to hold the cash rate despite inflation sitting within its target range.
'Recent monthly CPI indicator data – which can be volatile and do not cover all items in the CPI – were broadly consistent with this expectation,' the RBA board said.
But with more Australians currently in work, the RBA was wary the strong employment figures could lead to an increase in inflation.
'The labour market was assessed to have remained tight, with measures of labour utilisation little changed over the prior year,' it said.
'Growth in private demand had begun to recover, but was still subdued.' The board voted 6-3 in favour of holding the cash rate. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
The RBA had to work with May's unemployment figures, which showed just 4.1 per cent of eligible Australians were out of work.
When the June figures were released after the RBA meeting, it showed unemployment had jumped to 4.3 per cent, with 34,000 Aussies losing their jobs.
But households may not have to wait long for interest rate relief, with the RBA's meeting minutes seemingly clearing the way for further rate cuts.
'All members agreed that, based on the information currently available, the outlook was for underlying inflation to decline further in year-ended terms, warranting some additional reduction in interest rates over time,' the RBA minutes said. RBA governor Michele Bullock fronted a press conference after holding the cash rate at 3.85 per cent. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
A cautious RBA monetary board held the official cash rate at 3.85 per cent following its July meeting, with the shock move defying expert commentators and predictions from the money markets.
The board voted 6-3 in favour of the hold.
'A minority of members judged that there was a case to lower the cash rate target at this meeting,' the board said.
'These members placed more weight on downside risks to the economic outlook – stemming from a likely slowing in growth abroad and from the subdued pace of GDP growth in Australia.'
Australia's Cash Rate 2022 Critics say the board is unlikely to learn anything by holding interest rates for a further five weeks. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
Fronting the media after the decision, Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock said the votes were 'unattributed' and declined repeatedly to reveal her position.
She said the board wanted to wait for the full quarterly data to be released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
'By then we will know what the June quarter CPI is and if it comes in as we think it will – a little bit at the margin, we're a little bit worried about – but if it comes in as we think it will, continue to decline, then that validates our easing path,' she said.
Opinion remains divided as to whether the hold was the right decision.
Westpac chief economist Luci Ellis, who worked for the RBA for 15 years, says the central bank might have chosen to 'assert its independence' by bucking expectations of a rate cut.
'There was no real economic benefit to waiting five more weeks,' Ms Ellis wrote in an economic note released last week.
While the decision may have left homeowners frustrated, Ms Ellis said it was a low-risk decision for the central bank from a broader economic perspective.
'The dirty little secret of monetary policy is that small differences in the level of interest rates or the timing of changes make essentially no difference for inflation outcomes,' Ms Ellis said.
'If holding the cash rate 100 basis points lower for a year only boosts inflation by 0.2 per cent or so – broadly the result from the RBA's main model – then 25bp higher for five weeks is not even a rounding error.'
The RBA will next meet on August 12, with money markets widely forecasting a rate cut.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
37 minutes ago
- West Australian
‘Tyrell-ble': Beloved chip brand Tyrrells pulled from major Australian supermarkets due to low demand
Australians have been caught off guard by the quiet disappearance of a beloved chip brand from supermarket shelves without warning. UK -born snack brand Tyrrells has been pulled from Woolworths , Coles and IGA stores, without an official announcement. The change was spotted by a frustrated Reddit user who posted about it last Thursday. 'Gone from their shelves without warning or even clearance tags. Didn't even get a chance to stock up,' the user wrote. 'These were f****** good, made in Australia with Aussie potatoes, and at $3.80 for 165g. Price does what it says, without stupid price hikes and fake offers.' Other users echoed the disappointment. 'WHAT! OUTRAGE! They were the only chips I bought,' one comment read. 'These are the king of chips and I am heartbroken,' another said. 'Damn, that's really disappointing. They were the best chips on the shelves,' a third added. 'Absolutely unacceptable. These are the only good chips,' someone else chimed in. 'That's tyrell-ble,' another joked. Snackbrands Australia, the maker of Tyrrells, confirmed the brand has been discontinued due to low demand. 'We always aim to bring delicious snacks to our consumers in line with their needs, however we sadly had to retire the Tyrrells brand from market due to insufficient levels of consumer demand,' the company said in a statement. 'We realise that there will always be true lovers of the brand out there however we need to balance the requirements of our consumers as well as our retail partners when making these tough decisions.' Both Coles and Woolworths confirmed to they are no longer stocking Tyrrells chips. has also reached out to IGA for confirmation. Snackbrands said Tyrrells will still be available 'for the foreseeable future' in some Harris Farm stores, and suggested fans try their other products. 'The good news is that we continue to innovate and offer great alternatives under our Kettle and Natural Chip Company brands,' a spokesperson added. Tyrrells chips can still be found on Amazon , with nine 165g bags of the classic Pot Crispy Salted flavour currently available for $15.86. Some Reddit users reported spotting a few bags at 7-Eleven and The Reject Shop. Tyrrells, originally founded on a farm in Herefordshire, England in 2002, is known for its hand-cooked, premium potato chips made from locally grown ingredients. The brand entered the Australian market in 2014, initially importing products from the UK. From 2016, following its acquisition of Yarra Valley Snack Foods, Tyrrells chips were made locally in Victoria using Australian potatoes.


Perth Now
39 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Aussie snack lovers shattered as popular chips disappear from shelves
Australians have been caught off guard by the quiet disappearance of a beloved chip brand from supermarket shelves without warning. UK-born snack brand Tyrrells has been pulled from Woolworths, Coles and IGA stores, without an official announcement. The change was spotted by a frustrated Reddit user who posted about it last Thursday. 'Gone from their shelves without warning or even clearance tags. Didn't even get a chance to stock up,' the user wrote. 'These were f****** good, made in Australia with Aussie potatoes, and at $3.80 for 165g. Price does what it says, without stupid price hikes and fake offers.' Other users echoed the disappointment. 'WHAT! OUTRAGE! They were the only chips I bought,' one comment read. 'These are the king of chips and I am heartbroken,' another said. 'Damn, that's really disappointing. They were the best chips on the shelves,' a third added. 'Absolutely unacceptable. These are the only good chips,' someone else chimed in. 'That's tyrell-ble,' another joked. Coles has confirmed it is no longer stocking Tyrrells chips. Credit: Coles Woolworths has pulled Tyrrells chips from its shelves. Credit: Woolworths Snackbrands Australia, the maker of Tyrrells, confirmed the brand has been discontinued due to low demand. 'We always aim to bring delicious snacks to our consumers in line with their needs, however we sadly had to retire the Tyrrells brand from market due to insufficient levels of consumer demand,' the company said in a statement. 'We realise that there will always be true lovers of the brand out there however we need to balance the requirements of our consumers as well as our retail partners when making these tough decisions.' Both Coles and Woolworths confirmed to they are no longer stocking Tyrrells chips. has also reached out to IGA for confirmation. Snackbrands said Tyrrells will still be available 'for the foreseeable future' in some Harris Farm stores, and suggested fans try their other products. 'The good news is that we continue to innovate and offer great alternatives under our Kettle and Natural Chip Company brands,' a spokesperson added. The British-born Tyrrells chips have quietly disappeared from major supermarket shelves. Credit: Tyrrells / Facebook Tyrrells chips can still be found on Amazon, with nine 165g bags of the classic Pot Crispy Salted flavour currently available for $15.86. Some Reddit users reported spotting a few bags at 7-Eleven and The Reject Shop. Tyrrells, originally founded on a farm in Herefordshire, England in 2002, is known for its hand-cooked, premium potato chips made from locally grown ingredients. The brand entered the Australian market in 2014, initially importing products from the UK. From 2016, following its acquisition of Yarra Valley Snack Foods, Tyrrells chips were made locally in Victoria using Australian potatoes.


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Webjet cops huge fine over ‘cheap' airfares
Aussies drawn in by rock bottom airfare prices only to be hit by additional charges can take some comfort after Webjet ordered to pay a huge penalty for 'misleading' advertising. On Monday, the Federal Court ordered online travel agency Webjet to pay $9m in penalties for making 'false or misleading statements about the price of flights and booking confirmations'. Webjet admitted that between 2018 and 2023 it made false or misleading statements on its website, promotional emails and social media posts when it advertised airfares that excluded compulsory fees. Webjet also admitted that between 2019 and 2024 it provided false or misleading booking confirmations to 118 consumers for flight bookings which had not actually been confirmed. Webjet then asked for additional payments of up to $2120, for these bookings, in order for consumers to be able to complete the booking. Webjet has now refunded these consumers. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission began its investigation after a consumer complained about an airfare advertised as 'from $18', which cost almost three times that price after Webjet added its compulsory fees. An example of the misleading advertising Webjet admitted to. ACCC Credit: Supplied 'We took this case because we considered that Webjet used misleading pricing by excluding or not adequately disclosing compulsory fees in its ads,' ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said. 'Seeking to lure in customers with prices that don't tell the whole story is a serious breach of the Australian Consumer Law.' The Webjet fees comprised the 'Webjet servicing fee' and 'booking price guarantee' fee which ranged from $34.90 to $54.90 per booking, depending on whether the flights were domestic, to New Zealand and the Pacific, or other international destinations. While Webjet's website, app and most emails contained information about the additional fees, some users had to scroll to the fine print near the bottom of the screen to see them. In its social media posts, Webjet didn't disclose the additional fees at all. Example from Webjet website advertising 'from $100' getaways. ACCC Credit: Supplied In a statement from February, when the ACCC agreement was initially approved, Webjet said 'it is important to note that, since being advised of the issues of concern by the ACCC in November 2023, Webjet Marketing has voluntarily and proactively implemented improvements to its fee disclosures'. 'Webjet Group is confident that any customer concern with its offering, disclosure, service or pricing was limited,' the statement said. '[Webjet] has always prided itself on its high levels of trust with all customers and stakeholders and has fully co-operated and positively engaged with the ACCC to resolve this matter.' The ACCC found that in the relevant period of late 2018 to late 2023 the Webjet fees represented 36 per cent of the company's total revenue. The matter was resolved outside of court when Webjet and the ACCC agreed to settle on the conditions that Webjet: 'pay a proposed total penalty of $9m; publish a corrective notice in a form agreed with the ACCC for a period of 60 days; review, maintain and continue to implement an Australian Consumer Law compliance program in an agreed form; and contribute $100,000 to the ACCC's costs'.