Energy apartheid: Mining companies transition without justice
The
Delving deeper, the study found that the explosion of household solar energy was only benefiting a white minority: the solar panel area per household was a staggering 73 times higher in white rather than in black areas.
Despite the central role played by the mining sector in the dispossession, exploitation and discrimination of communities under colonialism and apartheid, mining houses such as
As has been documented
According to its Integrated Development Plan, the local Fetakgomo Tubatse municipality hosts an estimated 41 mining operations. Yet, the
Recently Anglo American Platinum joined the increasing numbers of
It does not have to be this way. Anglo American Platinum's successor, like all mining companies, is legally required to invest in the development of host communities under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act through social and labour plan (SLP) projects. An ever-growing pile of reports by the
Valterra and other mining houses have an opportunity to develop SLP infrastructure and income generating projects of a suitable scale, ambition and rigour to rectify this. In this effort to reimagine the SLP, they could draw upon the ideas of local community organisations such as Sekhukhune Combined Mining Affected Communities (SCMAC). The SCMAC has, for several years, called on Anglo Platinum to equip communities to be able to generate electricity to sell to Twickenham and other mines.
The SCMAC has been proactive to the extent of enlisting partners such as 350 Africa, CALS and Ahinasa to research the needs of villages and produce a
Anglo American Platinum has, however, repeatedly failed to offer any concrete support even in the form of pilot projects and feasibility studies. Both company representatives and mine management were conspicuously absent at two events connected to a newly published research report making the case for Anglo's support notwithstanding invitations and prior engagements by the SCMAC.
Valtera might respond that there is limited funding available because Twickenham generates no revenue being in care and maintenance. This does not hold water as Valterra is a vast revenue-generating group of companies and its decision to keep Twickenham non-operational for more than 10 years necessitates more social expenditure to be making a meaningful contribution to economic development of the area.
They might also argue that as just one company they cannot solely be responsible for addressing systemic problems and can only play a supplementary role to the government. But this assumes that they have done everything they can possibly do.
Have they?
In 2024, Anglo American Platinum generated nearly
Anglo American Platinum (in its new guise as Valterra Platinum) and other mining companies therefore have a choice: perpetuate energy apartheid or make good on their commitment to contribute towards a just transition worthy of its name.
Robert Krause is the acting head of Environmental Justice at the Centre for Applied Legal Studies, Wits University
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born — now is the time of monsters
On Sunday, 13 July 2025, siblings Karam and Lulu al-Ghussain, aged nine and 10 respectively, went to fetch water for their family from a water distribution site in Gaza. Given the Israeli Defense Force's (IDF) much-vaunted proclamations of precision bombing, and that there is no indiscriminate bombing, we can assume that they identified when there were enough people and children in line, before proceeding with the bombing of the site, and dismembering Karam and Lulu. I began writing this piece on Saturday, 19 July, and during the course of Saturday 32 Palestinians were killed while seeking food and water. On Sunday, 20 July, another 73 Palestinians who had been queueing were killed. By Monday morning that figure had been adjusted upwards to 93 confirmed dead. The pope went so far as to describe the bombing as barbaric. Much of the aid now being 'allowed' into Gaza is being distributed by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American organisation launched in February 2025 with the aim of supplying aid to Gaza. It operates in a small part of Gaza, has no website and has the full support of the Israeli government. The foundation has been accused of making starvation a bargaining chip and of being a direct accomplice in Israel's killing and starvation machine. The United Nations has estimated that since the end of May the IDF has killed more than 800 people who were trying to secure food at distribution hubs operated by the foundation. That figure is now well above 1,000. I would perhaps be somewhat cynical to suggest that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation exists simply to draw children to distribution sites to create an easy target for the IDF bombs. But am I? The population of Gaza is being systematically starved. And when, in a state of utter desperation, they seek aid, at the only site the IDF has approved, the IDF is then in a position to simply wait for enough people to arrive and to drop a bomb. Every day. Drop a bomb on children every day. Why? Because they can? This is slaughter for sport. And our response? Mostly silence, save for a few news outlets and intrepid reporters and commentators. How did we get here? How is it that the outrage is not so loud as to drown out everything else? In attempting an answer, I am going to draw on two books. The first, the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, and the second the truly remarkable Ignorance and Bliss: On Wanting Not to Know by Mark Lilla. Gramsci was an Italian Marxist philosopher and journalist in the early part of the 20th century. He is most famous for his Prison Notebooks which he wrote during his imprisonment by Mussolini from 1926 until his death in 1937. Perhaps his most well-known quote is 'the old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters'. This idea of a 'time of monsters' refers to what he saw (the period following World War 1) as a time when the old order and old understandings were in a state of collapse. He called this the interregnum (from the Latin, meaning 'between reigns'). In the space created, in the vacuum of social upheaval, is when the monsters emerge to take advantage of the chaos. Hitler in 1930s Germany is, of course, the prototypical example. It seems incontrovertible that we are living in a time of monsters. Viktor Orbán in Hungary, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil and Narendra Modi in India are all prime examples. And, of course, hovering creepily above all of this is the sociopathic felon and friend of Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump. But the prize for the monster of monsters must surely be Benjamin Netanyahu. A man willing to slaughter tens of thousands of children to stay out of court, and to fulfil his messianic delusion of Israel controlling all the territory from ' the river to the sea '. How did we get to the point where these are the monsters filling the void of power and taking millions along with their brutal lies? We now live in a world where millions of people believe that vaccines cause autism; where the habitual liar Trump is seen as a visionary leader; where climate breakdown is for many people a hoax; where the head of health in the US, Robert F Kennedy Jnr, does not believe that HIV causes Aids and believes that the Covid vaccines were developed to control people via microchips; and where Edgar Maddison Welch was so convinced that Hillary Clinton was running a child sex ring in the basement of a Washington DC pizza restaurant that he fired shots at the pizzeria using an assault-like AR-15 rifle in an attempt to 'save' the children, eventually serving four years in jail. Lilla, in Ignorance and Bliss: On Wanting Not to Know, offers a potential answer as to why so many people stubbornly refuse to see the world as it is, rather holding tightly onto some kind of self-delusion. He writes: 'We willingly give up a shot to acquire true beliefs about the world out of fear that truths about ourselves will be exposed in the process, especially our insufficient courage for self-examination. We prefer the illusion of self-reliance and embrace our ignorance for no other reason than that it is ours. It doesn't matter that reliance on false opinion is the worst sort of dependence. It doesn't matter that through stubbornness we might pass up a chance at happiness. We prefer to go down with the ship rather than have our names scraped off its hull.' Lilla argues that the more difficult the truth we have to face, the more we are likely to lie to ourselves. Imagine having to face the truth that we watched as one of the most powerful armies in the world (with the open support of the most powerful one) bombed and slaughtered a classroom full of children (27 of them) every day for 653 days. Every day for 653 days. We saw it happening and we denied, rationalised, pontificated, lied, fudged, and ultimately did nothing. No wonder there is so much solace and bliss to be found in ignorance. DM
Mail & Guardian
10 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Young people don't relate to traditional news sources
There is nothing inherently magical about a newspaper. Socially, sure, the beautiful thing about a physical copy is that it can be shared, passed around and collectively leafed through. But that's not what makes it great. South Africa's youngest news consumers are disengaging from traditional journalism. South Africa's youngest news consumers are disengaging from traditional journalism. Instead, they rely on digital platforms that prioritise speed, user choice and algorithmic influence, often at the expense of credibility and sustained attention. According to the The result is a growing disconnect between young audiences and traditional media outlets. Many young people favour content that feels personal and direct, fuelling a global move toward personality-driven journalism. Influencers and independent creators often receive greater engagement than established news outlets. 'The myth is that young people don't consume media [and] news or read a lot. The reality is that they do, but have a different view of what, how and where they should find and consume it,' said Anton Harber, author and former professor at the University of the Witwatersrand and of the Mail & Guardian. Young people consume considerable amounts of media, but their consumption patterns differ from older generations, Harber explained. Journalists are struggling to connect with them on the platforms and through the formats they prefer. 'There is a disconnect between journalists and young audiences, largely being filled by influencers and chancers who often pretend to be doing journalism but have none of the verification processes, rules and ethics of journalism.' Digital platforms have introduced speed and reach, breaking down the traditional gatekeepers of information. This has expanded access to news, but it has also blurred the lines between credible reporting and unverified content. 'We are flooded by a rich mix of information and disinformation. We have less quality, in-depth, probing journalism and less capacity to know what is true or fake,' Harber said. South Africa reflects the global anxiety over misinformation. In its 2025 report, the Reuters Institute notes that 73% of South Africans are concerned about their ability to discern real from fake information online. This is on par with the United States and Nigeria, but well above the global average of 58%. In addition, the report shows that 55% of South Africans trust the news most of the time, placing the country fifth out of the 48 surveyed. This indicates that trust in news remains relatively strong, but it is steadily declining from the 61% recorded in 2022. 'There has been a deliberate campaign to undermine trust in traditional media for malicious and disruptive purposes, often by governments and organisations attempting to undermine democracy by flooding the zone with disinformation,' Harber said. Mistrust has been amplified by social media algorithms that prioritise aggravating content. Rather than offering clarity, these platforms contribute to information fatigue and deepen public scepticism. 'Social media has facilitated this by using algorithms that favour information that is disruptive, conflictual and anxiety-inducing.' Despite Harber's concerns about the structural risks of algorithmic media, the fast-paced and personalised nature of social media platforms continues to appeal to many young South Africans. Farhana Essop, a law and politics student, said she receives most of her news on Instagram. She explained that she is interested in current affairs but finds traditional forms of news outdated and 'unengaging'. Essop also believes that some newsrooms contain biases, which become embedded into the news published for public consumption. For her, social media is a reliable alternative because it can provide diverse perspectives and first-hand accounts of situations. 'There's a lot of people who are dedicated to giving you both sides and showing you what's actually happening,' she said. Despite the risk of misinformation online, Essop believes the interactive nature of social media provides more context and clarity than traditional media. For Sydney, a psychology student, the constant stream of information — however accessible — can be overwhelming. She believes that staying informed is important, but not at the expense of mental wellbeing. 'You need to be knowledgeable to some extent about what's going on. There are real problems. We need to be aware of that. But when it gets to a point where it affects your mental health and it affects how you perceive certain things — or it clashes with your views — you can distance yourself from it,' she said. Sydney believes that reporting on sensitive topics objectively can underplay the experiences of those affected. This can unintentionally distance readers from the story. 'A lot of [journalists] target very personal and intimate topics from an objective point of view, and some things can't be looked at objectively. When you don't regard the human aspect of [news], it becomes very impersonal.' Shiloh Marsh, a third-year media student, believes the way news is delivered plays a crucial role in how young people engage with it. Marsh receives news from multiple sources, including Eyewitness New s, public broadcaster SABC as well as The Sun and The Citizen . To reconnect with young people, Marsh thinks media houses should employ young reporters and news anchors. 'It's very much the same people that you saw from 20 years ago. We need new faces to interest us.' Marsh says news should be kept easy to understand, and argues that some journalists ask interviewees over-complicated questions and write in jargon that makes news inaccessible for young people. 'I think there's a huge gap between how the news is told versus how young people interpret it,' she said. The challenge lies in the media's resistance to change, Harber contends. Newsrooms must move beyond rigid, formulaic practices and adopt storytelling formats that reflect how young audiences connect with information today. To rebuild trust and remain relevant, journalism must embrace approaches that prioritise transparency and conversation. 'The research shows that young people want to see the faces of those bringing them information [to] identify with them and — most of all — they must be authentic. [Young people] want conversations, not lectures,' he added.
TimesLIVE
10 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Brics would end quickly if they 'ever form in meaningful way': Trump
US President Donald Trump on Friday repeated his threat to slap a 10% tariff on imports from members of the Brics group of developing nations and said the group would end very quickly if they ever formed in a meaningful way. 'When I heard about this group from Brics — six countries, basically — I hit them very, very hard. And if they ever really form in a meaningful way, it will end very quickly,' Trump said without naming the countries. 'We can never let anyone play games with us.' Trump also said he was committed to preserving the dollar's global status as a reserve currency and pledged to never allow the creation of a central bank digital currency in America. Trump announced the new tariff on July 6, saying it would apply to any countries aligning themselves with what he called the 'Anti-American policies' of the Brics group. With forums such as the G7 and G20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive 'America First' approach of the US president, the Brics group is presenting itself as a haven for multilateral diplomacy.
