logo
Southport stabbing murders came after 'wholesale and general failure' to stop Axel Rudakubana in lead-up to attack, inquiry hears

Southport stabbing murders came after 'wholesale and general failure' to stop Axel Rudakubana in lead-up to attack, inquiry hears

Daily Mail​5 hours ago
The Southport murders were the result of a 'wholesale and general failure' to stop Axel Rudakubana in the lead-up to the attack, the chairman of the inquiry into the attacks has said.
The brutal stabbings last July at a Taylor Swift-themed dance club led to the deaths of Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven.
Sir Adrian Fulford cited factors including Axel Rudakubana 's ability to access violent material and buy knives online at a young age, as well as his capacity to leave home unsupervised to commit the masscre.
In his opening remarks, Sir Adrian said that far from being 'an unforeseeable catastrophic event, Rudakubana had a 'known predilection for knife crime ' and posed a 'very serious and significant risk of violent harm.'
Over a period of more than two years, between January 2022 and July last year, he also managed to obtain an arsenal of weapons, including a bow and arrow, two types of machete, two large knives, a sledgehammer, materials to make Molotov cocktail explosives and other ingredients to make the deadly toxin ricin.
The 18-year-old managed to order and buy a 20cm chef's knife using a private VPN online, but his fascination with knives was long held and had been flagged on multiple occasions.
Sir Adrian cited the fact that Rudakubana had been expelled from Range High School in Formby but managed to return and attack another pupil with a hockey stick on December 11, 2019.
Rudakubana was found with a knife and overheard saying he intended to kill another student during the same incident.
He was referred to Prevent on three occasions, on December 5, 2019, February 1, 2021 and April 26, 2021 after being spotted researching school shootings, the Libyan military dictator Colonel Gaddafi and the London Bridge terror attack online.
He was reported missing on March 17, 2022 and later stopped on a bus by police armed with a knife. Sir Adrian said it was 'of potential critical importance' that again Rudakubana said during this incident that he wanted to stab someone.
The teenager killer also had a passion for violent online content, as well as an ever-growing archive of gruesome articles and books, including works on the Rwandan genocide and Nazi Germany.
Additional texts included tomes on urban warfare tactics and others containing gory details about torture and cannibalism.
Sir Adrian cited the fact that Rudakubana had accessed online books, research papers, information leaflets and instruction manuals, which included material about explosives, warfare and knives, including one called 'Assassination Using Poisons and Cold Steel,' and another named 'Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants: The Al-Qaeda Training Manual' on his tablets and devices.
That manual had been downloaded twice, once on August 30, 2021 and then again on September 4, 2021.
A week before the attack, he armed himself with a knife and tried to return to Range High School again, on the day the school broke up for the summer holidays.
Immediately before the attack, he watched a video of the violent stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in Australia and five other individuals.
The award-winning The Trial podcast series on the Southport murders is available now
'Furthermore, his ability, unhindered, to access gravely violent material on the internet, to order knives online at a young age, and then to leave home unsupervised to commit the present attack, speaks to a wholesale and general failure to intervene effectively, or indeed at all, to address the risks that he posed,' Sir Adrian said.
Opening the hearings into last July's attacks, Sir Adrian Fulford said Axel Rudakubana perpetrated 'an almost unimaginable but nonetheless mercilessly calculated' killing spree when he went on the rampage at a Taylor Swift-themed dance club.
Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, died in the attack, which also left eight other children, who cannot be named for legal reasons, and class instructor Leanne Lucas and businessman John Hayes seriously injured.
They, and another 16 children who were at the club, also suffered significant psychological trauma, Sir Adrian said.
Rudakubana, who was 17 at the time, was given a life sentence, with a minimum term of 52 years - one of the highest minimum terms on record - after pleading guilty to the murders and attempted murders, plus other offences, in January.
Soon afterwards, Sir Adrian, a former vice-president of the Court of Appeal, was appointed by the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to carry out a 'forensic investigation' into the events on July 29.
He said it was 'truly critical' that the inquiry gets answers for the families of Rudakubana's victims and makes recommendations to prevent anything similar happening in the future.
The hearings will examine why several agencies, including the police, the courts, the NHS and social services, who all had contact with Rudakubana, failed to identify the risk he posed. It will also investigate whether the attack could or should have been prevented.
Three separate referrals were made to Prevent, the Government's counter-terror programme, about Rudakubana's behaviour, between December 2019 and April 2021, as well as six separate calls to police.
A review into the Prevent referrals, published in February, found he posed sufficient risk to keep his cases active but too much focus was placed on a lack of distinct ideology and they were closed prematurely.
The inquiry will draw on evidence from interviews with witnesses and disclosure from 15 organisations, including MI5, Counter-Terrorism Policing, NHS England and Merseyside Police.
Sir Adrian said 'for the benefit of the victims and their families' Rudakubana would not be named during the hearings, but instead be referred to as 'the perpetrator' or by his initials, AR.
He also read out the names of the three girls who died and the 23 ciphers - the letters or numbers - that the inquiry is using for the ones who survived, but whose anonymity is protected.
He has also urged the media not to use the mugshot of Rudakubana, issued by Merseyside police, in their reporting of the inquiry because of the 'distress' it caused to the young survivors.
He said he had spoken to relatives of the girls present at the dance class, who had told him they found repeated use of it to be 'terrifying.'
'Seeing the face of the perpetrator, often without any warning, has the potential to be significantly retraumatising,' Sir Adrian said.
He added that the continued use of the mugshot also risked 'disrupting the process of rebuilding broken lives.'
As part of a moving tribute, those seated in the inquiry chamber, at Liverpool Town Hall, where the hearings are being held, were also asked to stand for a minute's silence to remember Alice, Elsie and Bebe.
'The perpetrator is responsible for one of the most egregious crimes in our country's history,' Sir Adrian said.
'However hard we try, ordinary language simply fails to reflect the enormity of what he did on 29 July last year.
'None of the most powerful adjectives even begin to suffice. There are no words adequately to describe what occurred and I'm not going to try and then fail to find them.
'Instead, I simply observe that his crimes impose the heaviest of burdens on our society to investigate speedily but comprehensively how it was possible for AR to have caused such devastation; to analyse the decisions that were or were not taken by multiple individuals and organisations given his deteriorating and deeply troubling behaviour; to identify without fear or favour all of the relevant failings; and to make comprehensive, sensible and achievable recommendations to ensure we have the best chance of intervening with and preventing others who may be drawn to treating their fellow human beings in such a cruel and inhuman way.'
Sir Adrian said the first phase of the inquiry, which is expected to last until the end of the year, will focus on Rudakubana, his dealings with the relevant agencies and the sharing of information between them.
It will also look into how well the risk he posed was addressed, decisions which were made or not made 'along with any missed opportunities' to stop him.
Sir Adrian said that such factors, when taken together, suggested that the attack was far from being 'an unforeseeable catastrophic event,' and instead, by July last year, Rudakubana had a 'known predilection for knife crime' and posed a 'very serious and significant risk of violent harm.'
He said the inquiry would need to reflect on whether 'the multi-agency handling' of risk, including the operation of the Prevent programme, was sufficient and determine whether there should be better, more effective systems in place to identify, monitor and control those contemplating such serious crimes.
Sir Adrian added: 'We need to understand what went wrong and thereafter identify and implement the most effective measures to ensure, to the extent that we are able, that there is no repetition.
'As a society we are not helpless when confronted with individuals who are known to be contemplating acts of such depravity and although no solution will be foolproof, we can identify all of the robust steps which should be taken to protect ourselves, and particularly the most vulnerable, from horrors of this kind.
'This must be undertaken at speed, to provide answers for the victims and their families and to identify all of the changes that urgently need to be made.'
Sir Adrian pointed out that the Prime Minister Keir Starmer previously said that Southport 'must be a line in the sand' and that 'nothing would be off the table' for the inquiry to investigate.
The chairman said he was determined that the hearings would 'not turn into an exercise of papering over the cracks' but would act as a 'real engine for change.'
He also said that the present Crime and Policing Bill, which has passed its second reading in the House of Commons, includes the provision of Youth Diversion Orders, which are aimed at anyone aged under 22 that is involved in terrorist offending, in order to 'divert them from the wider criminal justice system', including prosecution.
But he pointed out that Rudakubana's crimes were not terror-related and the inquiry will, therefore, look closely at whether the State should be able to impose restrictions on individuals if there is strong evidence that they intend to commit serious violent crimes per se.
Measures such as imposing curfews, tags, or placing restrictions on their movement or ability to use the internet and social media, or to require psychological intervention until the risk is deemed to have been reduced.
Sir Adrian said he expected all organisations and witnesses taking part in the hearings to be candid and 'frank' and to 'volunteer information about errors' and things which went wrong.
He said he expected his first report on the first phase of the inquiry to be completed by early next year at the latest.
Rachael Wong, director at law firm Bond Turner, representing the three bereaved families, said they would be doing all they could to help Sir Adrian get to the 'truth.'
'We know that nothing the inquiry reveals or subsequently recommends will change the unimaginable loss felt by the families of Elsie, Alice and Bebe, but we all now have a responsibility to ensure that something like this never happens again,' she said.
'We will be doing all we can to assist the chair through the inquiry and uncover the truth.
'It is only through intense public scrutiny that real change can be effected.'
Impact statements from parents of four child survivors will be read to the inquiry tomorrow.
The hearings will then be adjourned until September, when more statements from the remaining relatives of victims and survivors will continue.
The second phase will look at the more wider 'troubling trend' of children being drawn into extreme violence and what can be done to reverse this, the chairman added.
The widespread rioting and civil unrest following the murders is not being examined by the inquiry.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wannabe fraudster, 33, who tried to claim £74,000 after lorry smashed into his Porsche is caught out... because dashcam snapped him 'hiding in bushes'
Wannabe fraudster, 33, who tried to claim £74,000 after lorry smashed into his Porsche is caught out... because dashcam snapped him 'hiding in bushes'

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Wannabe fraudster, 33, who tried to claim £74,000 after lorry smashed into his Porsche is caught out... because dashcam snapped him 'hiding in bushes'

A wannabe fraudster's £74,000 claim has been foiled after footage shows he was not inside his luxury Porsche when it was hit by a lorry - but instead seemingly hiding in the bushes. Terell Brooks, a 33-year-old account manager from Romford, claimed he was sat in the £81,000 car at the time of impact and suffered injuries as a result. However, dashcam footage shows Mr Brooks had parked his Porsche 911 Carrera GTS on the edge of the road on the A13 in Essex on August 19, 2022, when a lorry collided with the vehicle. His claim included £63,435 for alleged damage to the Porsche, £5,000 for personal injury, £2,400 for medical treatment, and a further £3,374 for loss of earnings. But the dashcam footage from the lorry revealed a different story. The video clearly shows the Porsche parked and unoccupied, with Mr Brooks visible several metres away in bushes behind a roadside barrier. It is unclear why he had exited the vehicle, but the footage confirmed he was not inside at the time of the incident. After the footage was put to Mr Brooks' solicitors, they withdrew from the case. Clyde & Co, representing AXA UK who insured the lorry, filed an Amended Defence stating the claim was 'founded on a false premise'. They asserted that both Mr Brooks and an alleged passenger knowingly gave false accounts to insurers, legal representatives, and medical professionals. Mr Brooks subsequently discontinued his claim and agreed to pay AXA's legal costs of £4,000. He signed a Tomlin Order formally admitting his claim was dishonest, confirming he was not in the vehicle at the time of the collision. Deborah Talbot, AXA claims operations manager, said: 'This case highlights how technology is helping us to fight claims fraud. 'The dashcam footage provided clear evidence that Mr Brooks wasn't in the car at the time of the collision, avoiding a potentially costly and lengthy court hearing.' Damian Rourke, partner at Clyde & Co, added: 'Mr Brooks claimed he was sitting in his Porsche, belted up and injured. 'The dashcam showed him in the bushes. 'We still don't know what he was doing there – but we do know he wasn't in the car. His story fell apart the moment the truth came to light. 'In every sense, the claim was caught short.'

Fraudster mum, 28, who faked pregnancy and stole £100,000 from her employers and boyfriend walks free from court
Fraudster mum, 28, who faked pregnancy and stole £100,000 from her employers and boyfriend walks free from court

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Fraudster mum, 28, who faked pregnancy and stole £100,000 from her employers and boyfriend walks free from court

A mother-of-two who faked having cancer, being pregnant and stole nearly £100,000 from her employers has avoided jail. 'Selfish' Megan Reynolds, 28, racked up thousands on lavish gifts - including hotel stays, a five course dinner and clubbing in Amsterdam - using company cards before attempting to conceal them through fake invoices. She defrauded electrical machinery firm CSL Power Systems out of £78,000, who described her as a 'compulsive liar', between 2019 and 2021 before she was caught and dismissed by bosses, Maidstone Crown Court heard. But, just a month later she joined another firm, ATL Retail Limited, where she continued her behaviour - again fraudulently spending £18,500 of the company's cash on her own amenities. Her dishonest habits didn't stop there however, as the court also heard that Reynolds took out a finance agreement for over £1,000 using her boyfriend Callum Bishop's name and details without his consent. She also lied to Mr Bishop by telling him she was pregnant with a fake scan and faked having cancer to a family member to get time off work. Reynolds had initially denied the offences and a trial date was set for February this year but then, less than two weeks before she was due to take the stand, she changed her pleas to guilty. But she avoided prison after a judge decided that given her role as a mother to two small children and having not committed any further offences since being charged, it would be too harsh to put her behind bars. At her sentencing at Maidstone Crown Court on Friday, July 4, the court heard how Reynolds, of Fruit Fields Drive in Rainham, had pleaded guilty to three counts of fraud and a further three counts were ordered to lie on file. During her role at CSL Power Systems in Farningham, near Dartford, between November 6, 2019 and March 26, 2021, Reynolds undertook the book keeping and had access to the company credit cards and would assist colleges by making online purchases on their behalf. But instead, the court heard she was using the 11 company cards to make fraudulent transactions, and tried to conceal them using fake invoices. When an employee noticed a purchase did not have a matching receipt, she tasked Reynolds with reporting it to Barclaycard Bank - an action she did not take, instead providing 'fictional' updates to the company. But by February, 2021, when an employee found a bank statement for an EasyJet flight in her name, the police were called and discovered no fraud had been reported to the bank. That evening, while employees investigated, they found emails were being remotely deleted by Reynolds and she was told to stop. The prosecutor, Nick Sanders, explained how fraudulent payments included car insurance for her vehicle, bookings on and a five-course dinner, along with spending at a nightclub in Amsterdam. To cover her tracks, the court heard how an invoice for a spill kit, valued at £75.96 was used to cover-up a purchase of dog chews Reynolds had made. Meanwhile, an invoice for black frames actually matched the purchase of a 5-piece set of Tefal pans. The total amount of fraud at the company was £78,000, the court heard. But after being dismissed, within a month she was working at another firm in Sevenoaks, ATL Retail Limited, from April 26, 2021 until January 17, 2022. It was only through a chance meeting with someone from CSL that Reynolds' fraudulent past became knowledge to her new employer. ATL Retail Limited made Reynolds redundant and discovered a number of fraudulent transactions, totalling £18,500. But as well as deceiving the two businesses, the court heard how Reynolds had also been deceiving her former partner Callum Bishop from February 2019 until they split in October 2021. The night before he left he found a letter for a financial agreement from Creation Finance in his name for over £1,000 that he had never taken on. He rang the company and found out Reynolds' mobile number was linked to the loan. The prosecutor said: 'She abused her position of trust and was sophisticated in nature'. But Judge Julian Smith said: 'I do not think it is particularly sophisticated, more wounding and hurtful but not particularly sophisticated.' The court heard how the now 28-year-old, had been charged with six fraud offences, including two counts of fraud by abuse of position and four counts of fraud by false representation in 2023. Only three fraud offences, regarding CSL Power Systems, ATL Retail, and Callum Bishop were pursued by the Crown Prosecution Service and the other three charges were ordered to lie on file. The judge added: 'She had quite the network of dishonesty set up. £78,000 is a lot of money and certainly a lot of money whether it's personal or business. 'It's a very substantial impact and it is exploitative. She saw an opportunity and went after it again and again and again.' He said Reynolds was 'dishonest' and 'deceitful' and sought to enrich herself personally at others expense. 'She was given a fresh start and then did it again - straight away,' the judge added. Her defence solicitor, Lucy Kennedy, explained how the victim impact statements had caused Reynolds 'considerable distress' and that her actions were driven out of 'greed' and she is 'mortified'. Relaying Reynolds statements, the defence solicitor said: 'None of it was worth it. That is not me anymore. 'I am devastated that I have hurt them in such a way that they can't trust others in the way they used to and I am devastated that I have caused so much trauma to them.' The court heard Reynolds was 'petrified' to face her victims in the court room and has acknowledged she could be sent to prison, so had packed a small suitcase which she brought into the courtroom. The court heard how the 28-year-old now has a four-and-a-half month old baby who was born prematurely and is immunosuppressed while also being lactose-intolerant. And while the court heard that both baby's fathers are present in their children's lives, the judge considered the fact Reynolds was the 'principle' caregiver and was still breastfeeding her baby. Meanwhile, Ms Kennedy explained Reynolds' son, aged two, had undergone eye surgery for a squint and is due to have another surgery. While explaining that Reynolds' offence was a 'modern day fingers in the till' she then urged for a suspended sentence, keeping in mind her son, two, and her daughter, four-and-a-half months - adding 'that is not her anymore'. 'Keep the three of them together,' Reynolds solicitor said. In response, the prosecutor explained how Reynolds had often told lies in the past, such as pretending to a family member she had cancer to get time off work, telling Mr Bishop she was pregnant by providing a fake scan, and lying about her dog having cancer. While he said he did not doubt that Reynolds had children, the prosecutor referenced her perpetual lies to urge the judge to question information given by the mother-of-two. In his remarks, the judge said the three offences were examples of 'persistent dishonesty'. He said: 'Having faced the victims now, reflect on what it was about you to put your selfish wishes, superficial desires above everybody else. 'You were a fraudster. You were thieving,' he added. The judge handed the 28-year-old a suspended sentence of 24 months in prison for the first count, 15 months in prison for count two, and six months in prison for count three, all suspended for two years and to be served concurrently. She was given 15 rehabilitation activity requirement days and 200 hours unpaid work. Judge Julian Smith added: 'You are being given a chance today because of your two children. If you breach this order what you are telling the court is that you do not care.' A further hearing is set to organise a timetable of repayment for the money stolen. 'I do not expect to see you again. If I do, I am giving you a warning, do not let your children down,' the judge said. Following the conclusion of Friday's hearing her former employer CSL Power Systems recorded their disappointment at what they believe to be an unduly lenient sentence. 'As a company and on a personal level we are thoroughly disappointed with the sentencing ruling by the judge and feel it has sent out the wrong message in today's society,' a spokesperson for CSL Power Systems. 'Essentially you can steal 100K from honest businesses and walk away without ever seeing the inside of a cell as long as you have a well-timed pregnancy!' The company explained how the length of time between her crimes and sentencing has meant the victims had to wait four years for her to be brought to justice, while Reynolds had carried on with her life, in their view, 'without a care in the world'. The company claim Reynolds has never shown any remorse, or apologised for her actions. They described her as a 'compulsive liar', adding: 'We let Miss Reynolds into our lives, and after COVID she worked from offices in our home and we thought she was also a friend.'

CCTV of three women is released after £10,000 in cash is stolen from train passenger's bag
CCTV of three women is released after £10,000 in cash is stolen from train passenger's bag

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

CCTV of three women is released after £10,000 in cash is stolen from train passenger's bag

Police officers are searching for three women after £10,000 was stolen from a man's bag at a London train station. The 49-year-old victim had been carrying the huge amount of cash in an envelope when he boarded a train at Paddington station on Friday, June 20. He went through a barrier at around 9.30am and walked onto the train, supposedly followed by a group of three women. The man entered a train carriage ahead of the women, who then walked past him and exited from the opposite end. He checked his bag a 'short time later' and realised the envelope was missing from his rucksack. The British Transport Police issued an appeal on Tuesday to help identify three women who may have information which could help their investigation. The force released CCTV images of a brunette woman wearing a white cap and sunglasses, another wearing a stripy cap and white top and a third dressed in all white, with a red and beige cap. BTP has asked for anyone who recognises the group to contact them by texting 61016 or calling 0800 40 50 40, quoting reference 170 of 20 June. Cops are also searching for this woman seen wearing a stripy cap and white top in connection with the incident on Friday, June 20 BTP said in a statement: 'Officers investigating after £10,000 in cash was stolen from a man's bag have released these images in connection. 'At around 9.30am on Friday 20 June a 49-year-old man went through a barrier at Paddington railway station. He was followed on to a train by three women who then walked through the carriage and left at the opposite end. 'The victim sat down and checked his bag a short time later when he realised £10,000 in cash in an envelope was missing from his rucksack. 'Officers believe the women in the images may have information which could help their investigation. 'Anyone who recognises them is asked to contact BTP by texting 61016 or by calling 0800 40 50 40, quoting reference 170 of 20 June.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store