Trump vs Musk: Call the breakup poetic justice. Call it karmic crypto-collapse. Just don't call it surprising
When two men believe the world revolves around them, it's only a matter of time before their orbits collide. And when they do, the explosion isn't quiet. Rather, it's a full-blown Twitter meltdown with echoes loud enough to rattle both Wall Street and Mar-a-Lago. And boy, we are watching the best cosmic collision since Pluto got downgraded.
Welcome to the spectacular implosion of the Trump–Musk bromance. What began as a mutual admiration society of billionaire chest-thumping and red-hat flirting has now devolved into the kind of public breakup even the Real Housewives would find a bit too messy.
Let's rewind.
Once upon a time, in the golden age of post-truth politics, Elon Musk, the tech messiah, meme lord, and part-time Mars enthusiast, decided to dip his toes into political kingmaking. A neat little $277 million was funnelled into the Donald Trump campaign machinery. In any other part of the world, this would be called oligarchic meddling. In the United States, it's called 'Super Tuesday'.
Trump, ever the transactional romantic, reciprocated by giving Musk a cosy seat at the regulatory table named DOGE, where he could quietly dismantle watchdogs, neuter climate policies, and make capitalism great again (for Tesla stock). Love was in the air. Or maybe, it was just the fumes from Musk's Boring Company flamethrowers.
But like all ill-fated love stories, this one came with red flags. Musk's reputation, once burnished with visions of space colonies and clean energy, began to crumble under the weight of layoffs, lawsuits, and livestreamed tantrums. Turns out, being the adult in the room is hard when you're too busy rebranding Twitter into an unpronounceable algebra problem.
Enter phase two: Reputation rehab.
Suddenly, Musk was 'distancing' himself from the Trump administration. He quit councils, tweeted vaguely progressive things, and flirted with the idea of centrism, all while pretending he hadn't spent the past four years quietly enjoying deregulation like a raccoon in a trash buffet.
But this Thursday? The façade shattered.
In a tweet that will one day be studied in both communications courses and FBI depositions, Musk posted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files.'
He even had the gall to add: 'Have a nice day, DJT!'
That wasn't a mic drop. That was a nuke in 280 characters.
And let's be honest: If anyone was going to try to cancel someone else using Jeffrey Epstein, it was always likely to be Musk.
Trump, unsurprisingly, didn't take it well. His reply was less subtle than a red tie in a wind tunnel: Musk is 'crazy,' and perhaps more worryingly for SpaceX investors, he threatened to cut off government contracts.
Suddenly, two men who once shared bromantic photo ops and mutual disdain for accountability were hurling legal threats across a billion-dollar battlefield. Kanye West (of course) tried to play counsellor, tweeting something along the lines of 'bros don't fight, we love you both'. Unfortunately, love is dead and so is Kanye's credibility.
And yet… are we really witnessing the final act?
Let's not forget: Trump has made up with worse. Just ask Marco 'sweaty little man' Rubio or Ted 'your wife is ugly' Cruz. With Trump, personal insults are just foreplay. It's politics as WWE: Everyone's bleeding, but it's still part of the script.
Still, there's something deliciously different this time. This feud doesn't feel like kayfabe. It feels real. Real messy. Real vindictive. Real stupid. And that makes it… kind of beautiful?
Because if 2025 is going to be yet another parade of rich men yelling into microphones about how oppressed they are, the least we can ask for is a little entertainment. Preferably the kind that ends in lawsuits and meme wars.
So, grab your popcorn. Watch the world's richest man implode on the platform he owns, while being roasted by the guy he helped elect. Call it poetic justice. Call it karmic crypto-collapse. Call it what you will.
Just don't call it surprising.
After all, in the immortal words of the internet, 'This you?'
sudhanshu.mishra@indianexpress.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple cites Supreme Court's birthright ruling in fight over Epic Games injunction
Apple is hoping a new U.S. Supreme Court ruling curbing the power of federal judges to issue nationwide orders will help the technology giant win an appeal in a lawsuit requiring it to revamp its lucrative App Store. In a court filing on Tuesday, Apple told the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the Supreme Court's June order in a case involving birthright citizenship bolsters the iPhone maker's arguments in a high-stakes standoff with "Fortnite" game developer Epic Games. The Supreme Court limited when judges can issue so-called universal injunctions that apply broadly, and not just to the parties in a lawsuit. The justices did not rule on whether the Trump administration can legally terminate the right to citizenship for people born on U.S. soil, but the decision was a win for the administration, which had complained about individual lower courts blocking its policies nationwide. Even though the case at the high court had nothing to do with Apple, its appeal could test the scope of the justices' ruling. Apple and Epic did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Apple in its appeal is challenging a U.S. district judge's order in April that said the company must open its App Store to more competition, allowing all developers - not just Epic - more freedom to steer consumers to alternative payment options outside of an app. The appeal also challenges the judge's finding that Apple was in contempt for violating a prior injunction in the same case. Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and how apps are distributed to consumers. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple must allow developers to more easily steer consumers to potentially cheaper non-Apple payment options. Apple defied that court order to maintain a revenue stream worth billions of dollars, Gonzalez Rogers ruled in April. Apple has denied any wrongdoing, and defended its compliance with the court's orders. Apple told the 9th Circuit that, after the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship decision, judges no longer have freestanding authority to issue universal injunctions. Apple also noted that Epic pursued its lawsuit on its own, not as a class action on behalf of a larger group. Epic told the appeals court in May that Apple's App Store changes will have wide-reaching benefits for the industry and consumers. "The sky has not fallen. Instead, developers and consumers are finally beginning to see the long-awaited benefits of increased competition," Epic said. The case is Epic Games Inc v. Apple Inc, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 25-2935. For Epic: Gary Bornstein and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore For Apple: Gregory Garre and Roman Martinez of Latham & Watkins Read more: Apple, Visa and Mastercard win dismissal of merchant antitrust lawsuit over payment fees Epic Games settles lawsuit against Samsung over app controls Swiss privacy tech firm Proton sues Apple in US over app store rules Apple must face consumer lawsuit over iCloud storage, US judge rules
Economic Times
42 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Tesla shares plunge over 8% on sharpest quarterly sales decline in 10 years
Shares of US electric vehicle maker Tesla fell over 8% to hit a low of $303 on Nasdaq in early trade on Thursday following the company's lackluster Q2 results. Company's total automotive revenues fell 16% to $16,661 million in the April-June quarter versus $19,878 million reported in the year ago period. ADVERTISEMENT Tesla shares fell amid significant volumes with over 100 million shares (10.8 crore) shares changing hands. Tesla's net income attributable to common stockholders was also down 16% in the quarter to $1,172 million compared to $1,400 crore in the corresponding quarter of the last financial year. The company's total revenues in Q2-2025 were reported at $22,496 million, down by 12% over $25,500 million reported in the year ago company had announced its earnings on operating expenses stood at $2,955 million, down 1% over 2,973 in the year ago period while the operating margin was reported at 4.1%, which was a fall of 219 bps compared to 6.3% in Q2-2024. ADVERTISEMENT Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA) stood at $3,401 million, down by 7% over $3,674 million in the year ago period. Adjusted EBITDA margin stood at 15.1%, up by 71 bps over 14.4% in Q2-2024. ADVERTISEMENT Total revenue decreased 12% YoY to $22.5B and impacted by the decline in vehicle deliveries, lower regulatory credit revenue, reduced vehicle average selling price (ASP) (excl. FX impact1), due to mix and decline in Energy Generation and Storage revenue due to lower ASP, the company filing to the exchange cash, cash equivalents and investments was $36.8B. The sequential decrease of $0.2B was primarily the result of changes in restricted cash and cash used in financing activities partially offset by free cash flow. ADVERTISEMENT It was Elon Musk company's worst quarterly decline in sales in over a decade, a Reuters report said, adding that Tesla's second-quarter profit missed analysts' expectations, yet its profit margin on making cars was not as bad as many had a conference call, chief executive Musk said U.S. government cuts in support for electric vehicle makers could lead to a "few rough quarters" for the company before a wave of revenue from self-driving software and services begins late next year. ADVERTISEMENT "While we continue to execute on innovations to reduce the cost of manufacturing and operations, over time, we expect our hardware related profits to be accompanied by an acceleration of AI, software and fleet-based profits," a company statement product, Tesla said that its focus remains on prudently growing its vehicle volumes in a capex efficient manner by using our existing vehicle production capacity before building new lines. Plans for new vehicles that will launch in 2025 remain on track, including initial production of a more affordable model in 1H25. "Our purpose-built Robotaxi product – Cybercab – will continue to pursue a revolutionary 'unboxed' manufacturing strategy and is scheduled for volume production starting in 2026," the filing said. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Tesla's entry and why manufacturing scene is not quite electric for India
US automaker Tesla's entry into India last week is an unpleasant reminder about how India keeps missing the manufacturing bus, again and again. This time, we've lost the race to produce and consume Electric Vehicles (EV), yet again, to China and the US. What makes the loss even more agonising is that, like China, India too started its EV journey pretty much at the same time around 2015. A decade later, or what now seems like between sundown and sunrise, China emerged as the leading EV market. Its conveyor belts simply seem unstoppable, while India stands still. Consider some more enviable statistics. China's annual EV sales rose from just 2,344 units in 2015 to a staggering 1.7 million in 2024. Over 50% of new cars sold were electric models in 2024 and it currently has over 41.3 million EVs on road. As many as 300 companies are manufacturing EVs there and four of the world's top 10 EVs sold worldwide are from China. In contrast, India has just a handful of producers. Total registered EVs stood at about 2 million as on 2024, accounting for 7.5% of India's total vehicle sales. But electric two-wheelers lead the pack, comprising 60% of total EV sales. The good news is India is expected to have an estimated 50 million EVs on the road by 2030, but then, China would have scaled another unbeatable milestone by then. In short, India is still warming up to the idea of large-scale EV adoption, while China is out to get another bite of meat, this time from global markets as it moves to the next stage of the consumption value chain. One of the reasons for such aggressive adoption of China-made EVs is the significant state-sponsored subsidies for consumers, and the availability of adequate charging infrastructure. India lacks both the charging infrastructure and suitable incentives. What's concerning now is how Beijing is flooding the global markets with its low-priced electric cars. China has subsidised EVs since 2009, but those incentives were phased out officially in 2022. Market watchers, however, believe that Beijing is artificially keeping prices low, as local governments are continuing to offer cash subsidies. Take for instance, the pricing of China's MG Motors and BYD, which are on par with Indian models, notwithstanding the high import tariffs of about 70%-100%. This has been the case with other markets too, which is why, the European Union recently opened an anti-subsidy investigation against China to know if it's gaming the pricing structure with unofficial state-sponsored incentives. Now, in this backdrop, the one thing that's upsetting about Tesla's much-awaited India foray is its seemingly half-hearted interest to tap India, touted to emerge as the world's third largest auto market. Moreover, the US automaker is grappling with excess capacity and declining sales, while China's BYD is at a threatening distance of dethroning Tesla as the world's largest EV maker. Given the circumstances, a large growing market like India offer a promising opportunity, but Tesla isn't as excited. Its India foray was low key and marked by the absence of its celebrated founder Elon Musk. This is quite different from other large MNCs like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Google, which saw the respective billionaire bosses descending down on India to script history. Besides, Tesla's limited number of model launches and their pricing at over Rs 60 lakh each also makes its India journey uninspiring. Currently, Tesla imports fully assembled vehicles into India, which are subject to import duties as high as 70% to 100% if the car's cost, insurance, freight value exceeds $35,000. That said, India does offer attractive tariff rates of just 15% for willing companies under its EV policy launched last year. But to avail these lower tariffs, companies have to invest at least half-a-billion dollars in local production. The policy also sets a three-year timeline to set up manufacturing facilities and starting commercial production, with a goal of achieving 50% domestic value addition within five years. Besides, to ensure the progress of domestic manufacturing ecosystem, the government also opened another lifeline via its Production-Linked Incentive scheme, encouraging foreign auto companies to localise production. Then there's the other flagship scheme Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles (FAME), which too offers the much needed impetus to EV sales with state governments chipping in. It's not that India lacks the scale and strategic depth to emerge as a global leader in the automotive value chain. In 2022, India overtook Germany to emerge as the world's fourth largest automotive market and is set to reach a record 50 lakh units in the next few years. The automobile market contributes nearly 7% to the GDP, and the EV market in India is expected to touch $48.6 billion, creating 50 million direct and indirect jobs. But one reason that's deterring potential buyers and therefore prospective manufacturers is that fast-charging solutions remain scarce. Currently, India has only one public charging station per 135 EVs, significantly lower than the global average of one station for every 6-20 EVs, according to CareEdge research report. As per estimates, India now has over 12,000 public EV-charging stations and needs at least 1.3 million charging stations by 2030. Recognising the need, the government is also prioritising charging infrastructure. Among the notable initiatives are the setting up of 72,000 public charging stations with an investment of Rs 2,000 crore across the country by 2026. Above all, India imports over 90% of the EV batteries, which makes the end product expensive and also remains vulnerable to supply shocks. The question is, if and how the government will overcome these multiple challenges to restart the EV journey.
