Offence by Prajwal Revanna could be construed as offence against society at large: Court
Terming the case, where the victim is a former help at the accused's family farm as a 'David vs Goliath' battle, Mr. Bhat said that 'committing sexual offences against a maid and other women in society by showing disdain towards them due to their economic condition is a grave offence' and that 'the act of committing forcible sexual intercourse on the victim repeatedly would be more than committing of murder'.
Quoting the Sanskrit saying 'Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitaha...', the judge said that 'dharma should not be destroyed so that we may not be destroyed as a consequence thereof' and awarded the maximum punishment under Section 376(2)(n) (repeated rape on the same woman) of Indian Penal Code for Prajwal Revanna. The judgment rejects appeals for leniency by the convict's counsel on the grounds that he has to look after his former Prime Minister grandfather and aging parents and that he had no criminal antecedents, among other grounds.
Victim's statement key to conviction
The 480-page judgment examines the victim's statement at length and considers depositions by multiple witnesses, including her sister who was working with her and other family members, Prajwal's driver Karthik, who allegedly copied the explicit clips from the MP's phone, to corroborate the same and rejected defence's arguments that there were contradictions in the same.
The defence had argued that the victim had never worked at the Gannikada farmhouse and it did not belong to the Revanna family in 2021, when the crime was committed. It further argued that the victim was unable to tell the date of the crimes.
However, the court concludes that the depositions by Karthik, the victim's sister and the victim's son studying at a school in Gannikada for three years, proved that she worked there.
Further, the defence's contradictory stands itself indicated that they accepted that she worked at the farm, the court concludes. Further, the farmhouse belonged to Bhavani Revanna's brother Prakash since 2015 and was bought by Suraj Revanna in October, 2021 and the family, including Prajwal was using the same, the court concludes through multiple witnesses.
Regarding the dates of the two sexual assaults, the court concludes that the victim being a rustic villager, also an illiterate, though may not have told the exact dates, was consistent with the timeline of events, as during COVID-19 lockdown and four years before she lodged the complaint.
The court also quotes the statement of the victim's sister who was with her when she was abused at Basavanagudi, though the victim did not confide in her then.
The sister told the court that on the third day of their visit to Basavanagudi, where the victim was raped, her sister was dull and upon enquiry, she was silently uttering that they cannot do anything. The court said this 'would become relevant because of the fact of the behaviour of the victim immediately after the incident'.
Corroborative evidence
Apart from the victim's statement, the judgment further relies on two scientific evidences.
'The prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt about the commission of the incident by placing corroborative evidence of the scientific experts in the form of DNA Examination Report wherein the stains found on the sari and other clothes of the victim matched with the DNA profiling of accused Prajwal Revanna. The prosecution has also proved the digital records in the form of videos which were circulated were not edited/morphed and also the male and female voice found in the videos matched with the sample voice of accused Prajwal Revanna and the victim,' the judgment said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Elections round the corner, Bihar gets a new Chief Secretary: Who is Pratyaya Amrit?
Bihar Development Commissioner Pratyaya Amrit, credited with improving road condition and power supply in the state, has been appointed as the next chief secretary, an official notification said on Monday. He will succeed Amrit Lal Meena who retires on August 31. The notification issued by Additional Chief Secretary, General Administration Department, B Rajinder states: 'Pratyaya Amrit, development commissioner with additional charge of additional chief secretary, health and disaster management is transferred and appointed chief secretary with effect from 1 September, 2025, in view of retirement of present chief secretary Amrit Lal Meena on 31 August, 2025.' In his career, Pratyaya Amrit has handled many crucial assignments. He has been among the key IAS officers, including R K Singh (former Union minister) and Amir Subhani (former chief secretary), entrusted with boosting governance and overhauling infrastructure. First as secretary of the road construction department and later as energy department secretary, Pratyaya Amrit has been instrumental in constructing major roads in Bihar, including the state government's flagship Ganga Path and AIIMS-Digha flyover. Before the 2015 Assembly polls, the 1991-batch officer played a key role in strengthening power supply till village level in the state. In 2011, Pratyaya Amrit was the only IAS officer picked by the government in the individual category for the Prime Minister's Award for Excellence in Public Administration. During the Covid-19 second wave in 2021, he took over as Principal Secretary, Health Department, and played a key role in curbing the rise of new cases and containing the spread of the virus. Pratyaya Amrit's appointment as Bihar Chief Secretary assumes significance as the state is going to polls this year end.
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
After trial drags on for 49 yrs, 71-year-old confesses to theft
On Saturday, a weary Kanhaiya Lal stood before the chief judicial magistrate, Jhansi, and confessed to theft and embezzlement from a cooperative society. The trial had dragged on for 49 years. The ailing 71-year-old no longer wanted to fight. After trial drags on for 49 yrs, 71-year-old confesses to theft 'I am tired. I am now 71 years old and have grown weary of appearing in court again and again. I no longer have the strength to fight this case. I confess the crime and I want it to end,' Lal told the court. CJM Munnalal found him guilty under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 457 (housebreaking), 380 (theft), 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), and 120B (criminal conspiracy). His punishment: A total fine of ₹2,000. The court imposed ₹300 each under sections 457, 380, 409, 468, and 120B, and ₹500 under section 467. The court took into account his confession, time already spent—nearly a year—in custody, and his health. Upon paying the fine, he was allowed to return home to Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. GS Chauhan, a senior advocate in Lucknow high court, said pendency of cases is common in all courts across the country. 'This issue can only be addressed by constituting more courts at the district level, strengthening lower judiciary and making time bound redressal of cases compulsory,' he said. In 1976, Kanhaiya Lal, then employed as a peon at the LSS cooperative society in Bamanua village, Jhansi district, was one of three employees named in a complaint filed by the then-secretary, Bihari Lal Gautam. The FIR alleged that Lal, along with two colleagues, Lakshmi Prasad and Raghunath, had stolen a receipt book and a wristwatch valued at ₹150. Police found forged receipts with fake signatures had been used to collect ₹14,472 from society members. Lakshmi Prasad alone was alleged to have misappropriated ₹3,887.40. A case of theft and embezzlement was registered, and all three accused were arrested and sent to jail. They were later granted bail. Both Lakshmi Prasad and Raghunath died during the course of the trial. Kanhaiya Lal, however, continued to appear before the court till 2012. Special prosecution officer Akhilesh Maurya said the case remained inactive for nine years before a month-bailable warrant was issued against Lal in 2021. The charges were framed against him on December 23, 2023. It took nearly two more years, for a verdict; that too only after Lal appeared in court and informed the judge he wished to end the matter by pleading guilty.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
36 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump says June jobs data 'rigged', Wall Street and economists disagree
The monthly jobs report is already closely-watched on Wall Street and in Washington but has taken on a new importance after President Donald Trump on Friday fired the official who oversees it. Trump claimed that June's employment figures were "RIGGED" to make him and other Republicans "look bad". Yet he provided no evidence and even the official Trump had appointed in his first term to oversee the report, William Beach, condemned the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labour Statistics appointed by former President Joe Biden. The firing followed Friday's jobs report that showed hiring was weak in July and had come to nearly a standstill in May and June, right after Trump rolled out sweeping tariffs. Economists and Wall Street investors have long considered the job figures reliable, with share prices and bond yields often reacting sharply when they are released. Yet Friday's revisions were unusually large -- the largest, outside of a recession, in five decades. And the surveys used to compile the report are facing challenges from declining response rates, particularly since COVID, as fewer companies complete the surveys. Nonetheless, that has not led most economists to doubt them. "The bottom line for me is, I would not take the low collection rate as any evidence that the numbers are less reliable," Omair Sharif, founder and chief economist at Inflation Insights, a consulting firm, said. Many academics, statisticians and economists have warned for some time that declining budgets were straining the government's ability to gather economic data. There were several government commissions studying ways to improve things like survey response rates, but the Trump administration disbanded them earlier this year. Heather Boushey, a top economic adviser in the Biden White House, noted that without Trump's firing of McEntarfer, there would be more focus on last week's data, which points to a slowing economy. "We are having this conversation about made-up issues to distract us from what the data is showing," Boushey said. "Revisions of this magnitude in a negative direction may indicate bad things to come for the labour market." Here are some things to know about the jobs report: Economists and Wall Street trust the data Most economists say that the Bureau of Labour Statistics is a nonpolitical agency staffed by people obsessed with getting the numbers right. The only political appointee is the commissioner, who does not see the data until it is finalised, two days before it is issued to the public. Erica Groshen, the BLS commissioner from 2013 to 2017, said she suggested different language in the report to "liven it up", but was shot down. She was told that if asked to describe a cup as half-empty or half-full, BLS says "it is an eight ounce cup with four ounces of liquid". The revised jobs data that has attracted Trump's ire is actually more in line with other figures than before the revision. For example, payroll processor ADP uses data from its millions of clients to calculate its own jobs report, and it showed a sharp hiring slowdown in May and June that is closer to the revised BLS data. Trump and his White House have a long track record of celebrating the jobs numbers -- when they are good. These are the figures Trump is attacking Trump has focussed on the revisions to the May and June data, which on Friday were revised lower, with job gains in May reduced to 19,000 from 144,000, and for June to just 14,000 from 147,000. Every month's jobs data is revised in the following two months. Trump also repeated a largely inaccurate attack from the campaign about an annual revision last August, which reduced total employment in the United States by 818,000, or about 0.5 per cent. The government also revises employment figures every year. Trump charged that the annual revision was released before the 2024 presidential election to "boost" Vice President Kamala Harris's "chances of Victory", yet it was two months before the election and widely reported at the time that the revision lowered hiring during the Biden-Harris administration and pointed to a weaker economy. Here's why the government revises the data The monthly revisions occur because many companies that respond to the government's surveys send their data in late, or correct the figures they have already submitted. The proportion of companies sending in their data later has risen in the past decade. Every year, the BLS does an additional revision based on actual job counts that are derived from state unemployment insurance records. Those figures cover 95 per cent of US businesses and are not derived from a survey but are not available in real time. These are the factors that cause revisions Figuring out how many new jobs have been added or lost each month is more complicated than it may sound. For example, if one person takes a second job, should you focus on the number of jobs, which has increased, or the number of employed people, which has not? (The government measures both: The unemployment rate is based on how many people either have or do not have jobs, while the number of jobs added or lost is counted separately). Each month, the government surveys about 121,000 businesses and government agencies at over 630,000 locations -- including multiple locations for the same business -- covering about one-third of all workers. Still, the government also has to make estimates: What if a company goes out of business? It likely will not fill out any forms showing the jobs lost. And what about new businesses? They can take a while to get on the government's radar. The BLS seeks to capture these trends by estimating their impact on employment. Those estimates can be wrong, of course, until they are fixed by the annual revisions. The revisions are often larger around turning points in the economy. For example, when the economy is growing, there may be more startups than the government expects, so revisions will be higher. If the economy is slowing or slipping into a recession, the revisions may be larger on the downside. Here's why the May and June revisions may have been so large Ernie Tedeschi, an economic adviser to the Biden administration, points to the current dynamics of the labour market: Both hiring and firing have sharply declined, and fewer Americans are quitting their jobs to take other work. As a result, most of the job gains or losses each month are probably occurring at new companies, or those going out of business. And those are the ones the government uses models to estimate, which can make them more volatile. Groshen also points out that since the pandemic, there has been a surge of new start-up companies, after many Americans lost their jobs or sought more independence. Yet they may not have created as many jobs as startups did pre-COVID, which throws off the government's models. Revisions seem to be getting bigger The revisions to May and June's job totals, which reduced hiring by a total of 258,000, were the largest -- outside recessions -- since 1967, according to economists at Goldman Sachs. Kevin Hassett, Trump's top economic adviser, went on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday and said, "What we have seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers." Hassett blamed a sharp drop in response rates to the government's surveys during and after the pandemic: "When COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed." Yet calculations by Tedeschi show that while revisions spiked after the pandemic, they have since declined and are much smaller than in the 1960s and 1970s. Other concerns about the government's data Many economists and statisticians have sounded the alarm about things like declining response rates for years. A decade ago, about 60 per cent of companies surveyed by BLS responded. Now, only about 40 per cent do. The decline has been an international phenomenon, particularly since COVID. The United Kingdom has even suspended publication of an official unemployment rate because of falling responses. And earlier this year, the BLS said that it was cutting back on its collection of inflation data because of the Trump administration's hiring freeze, raising concerns about the robustness of price data just as economists are trying to gauge the impact of tariffs on inflation. US government statistical agencies have seen an inflation-adjusted 16-per cent drop in funding since 2009, according to a July report from the American Statistical Association. "We are at an inflection point," the report said. "To meet current and future challenges requires thoughtful, well-planned investment ... In contrast, what we have observed is uncoordinated and unplanned reductions with no visible plan for the future. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
