Trump says he will hit copper imports with 50 per cent tariffs
WASHINGTON -- U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday he will impose a 50 per cent tariff on copper imports -- but hasn't said yet when it will take effect.
'Today we are doing copper,' Trump told reporters at a cabinet meeting. 'I believe the tariff on copper, we are going to make it 50 per cent.'
The level of tariff was reiterated in the meeting by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. But the president was not scheduled to sign any executive orders Tuesday to implement the duties.
Data from Natural Resources Canada shows the United States accounted for 52 per cent of Canada's copper export value in 2023. Canada's total exports of copper and copper-based products that year were valued at $9.3 billion.
It's estimated Canada has less than one per cent of global copper reserves and it ranked 12th in the world's 2023 copper production, behind other major producers like Chile, Peru, the Democratic Republic of Congo, China and the United States.
After Trump's remarks, shares in mining company Freeport-McMoRan were up 4.6 per cent and the price of copper was up 8.7 per cent to $5.47 per pound.
Markets have seen large swings for months due to Trump's on-and-off efforts to realign global trade through tariffs. The looming copper tariffs are a sign that Trump plans to go ahead with a list of sectoral levies beyond his current import taxes on steel, aluminum and automobiles.
Citing national security concerns, Trump earlier this year launched investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 into multiple products, including copper and pharmaceuticals.
Trump said he will soon announce duties on pharmaceuticals but suggested he would give manufacturers a year before introducing those tariffs.
'After that they're going to be tariffed if they have to bring the pharmaceuticals into the country, the drugs and other things, into the country,' Trump said. 'They're going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200 per cent.'
The Section 232 tariffs are separate from Trump's massive global tariff regime, which he delayed Monday in order to give his administration more time for trade negotiations.
Devastating U.S. duties against countries around the world were set to come into force Wednesday before Trump pushed back the deadline to Aug. 1.
Canada was not targeted by those global tariffs and has committed to coming up with some sort of bilateral deal with the U.S. by July 21. The Prime Minister's Office said Monday it was still working toward that deadline.
Meanwhile, Canada's Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne sent letters to provinces, territories and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities on Tuesday calling on them to support domestic steel and aluminum industries through 'strategic procurement policies.'
Ottawa last month introduced rules to limit federal procurement to using steel and aluminum from Canada and 'reliable trading partners,' among other measures.
In Champagne's letter, posted on social media, the minister urged his counterparts in other levels of government to 'take meaningful steps to implement similar policies in your jurisdictions.'
'A co-ordinated approach across jurisdictions would send a strong signal of unity and reinforce Canada's resolve to secure fair treatment for our businesses and workers,' the letter said.
-- With files from The Associated Press
U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday he will impose a 50 per cent tariff on copper imports -- but hasn't said yet when it will take effect.
'Today we are doing copper,' Trump told reporters at a cabinet meeting. 'I believe the tariff on copper, we are going to make it 50 per cent.'
The level of tariff was reiterated in the meeting by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. But the president was not scheduled to sign any executive orders Tuesday to implement the duties.
Data from Natural Resources Canada shows the United States accounted for 52 per cent of Canada's copper export value in 2023. Canada's total exports of copper and copper-based products that year were valued at $9.3 billion.
It's estimated Canada has less than one per cent of global copper reserves and it ranked 12th in the world's 2023 copper production, behind other major producers like Chile, Peru, the Democratic Republic of Congo, China and the United States.
After Trump's remarks, shares in mining company Freeport-McMoRan were up 4.6 per cent and the price of copper was up 8.7 per cent to $5.47 per pound.
Markets have seen large swings for months due to Trump's on-and-off efforts to realign global trade through tariffs. The looming copper tariffs are a sign that Trump plans to go ahead with a list of sectoral levies beyond his current import taxes on steel, aluminum and automobiles.
Citing national security concerns, Trump earlier this year launched investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 into multiple products, including copper and pharmaceuticals.
Trump said he will soon announce duties on pharmaceuticals but suggested he would give manufacturers a year before introducing those tariffs.
'After that they're going to be tariffed if they have to bring the pharmaceuticals into the country, the drugs and other things, into the country,' Trump said. 'They're going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200 per cent.'
The Section 232 tariffs are separate from Trump's massive global tariff regime, which he delayed Monday in order to give his administration more time for trade negotiations.
Devastating U.S. duties against countries around the world were set to come into force Wednesday before Trump pushed back the deadline to Aug. 1.
Canada was not targeted by those global tariffs and has committed to coming up with some sort of bilateral deal with the U.S. by July 21. The Prime Minister's Office said Monday it was still working toward that deadline.
Meanwhile, Canada's Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne sent letters to provinces, territories and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities on Tuesday calling on them to support domestic steel and aluminum industries through 'strategic procurement policies.'
Ottawa last month introduced rules to limit federal procurement to using steel and aluminum from Canada and 'reliable trading partners,' among other measures.
In Champagne's letter, posted on social media, the minister urged his counterparts in other levels of government to 'take meaningful steps to implement similar policies in your jurisdictions.'
'A co-ordinated approach across jurisdictions would send a strong signal of unity and reinforce Canada's resolve to secure fair treatment for our businesses and workers,' the letter said.
-- With files from The Associated Press
By Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 8, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Forget About Inflation! This Is a Much Bigger Threat to Wall Street.
Key Points Volatility has been readily apparent for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite since 2025 began. Inflationary fears have been heightened by President Donald Trump's tariff and trade policy, as well as the rapid expansion of M2 money supply. However, there's no bigger threat to the stock market's rally than the earnings quality of Wall Street's most-influential businesses. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Over the last century, the stock market has been a surefire moneymaker for patient, long-term-minded investors. Although other asset classes have increased in value over extended periods, including real estate, Treasury bonds, and commodities like gold, silver, and oil, none have come close to matching the annualized return of stocks. But just because the stock market offers a lengthy track record of making long-term investors richer doesn't mean Wall Street is free of volatility. Since the curtain opened for 2025, the benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) and growth-focused Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) have both hit new highs. Additionally, the iconic Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI) and S&P 500 fell into correction territory, with the Nasdaq Composite enduring a short-lived bear market. Volatility tends to be driven by investor uncertainty and emotions. Though there's clear uncertainty at the moment concerning the prevailing rate of inflation and how rising prices might adversely impact stocks moving forward, a strong argument can be made that there's a much bigger threat to Wall Street than inflation. Inflationary fears are mounting on Wall Street Let me preface this discussion by noting that a modest level of inflation is normal, healthy, and expected. When the U.S. economy is firing on all cylinders and expanding, it's expected that businesses will possess some level of pricing power that allows them to charge more for their goods and services. Historically, the Federal Reserve has targeted a prevailing rate of inflation of 2%. What has professional and everyday investors concerned is the potential for two variables to significantly increase the domestic inflation rate, which can have adverse consequences on corporate America, the U.S. economy, and the stock market. The first of these issues is President Donald Trump's tariff and trade policy. Following the close of trading on April 2, Trump unveiled his grandiose plan, which included a 10% sweeping global tariff, as well as higher " reciprocal tariff rates" on dozens of countries that have historically run unfavorable trade imbalances with America. For what it's worth, Trump has paused reciprocal tariffs on most countries until Aug. 1. The implementation of global tariffs comes with a host of potential problems, ranging from worsening trade relations with our allies to the possibility of foreign countries and/or consumers not buying American-made goods. But arguably the biggest worry of all with tariffs is their inflationary impact. Whereas output tariffs are applied to finished products imported into the country, input tariffs are duties assigned to goods used to complete the manufacture of products in America. Input tariffs run the risk of making U.S. goods costlier, and Trump's tariff and trade policy doesn't do a very good job of differentiating between output and input tariffs. An expected increase in the prevailing rate of inflation from Donald Trump's tariff and trade policy has even resulted in something of a " Trump bump" in Social Security's 2026 cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) forecast. M2 money supply is expanding at its fastest pace in three years. US M2 Money Supply data by YCharts. The second variable that can cause the inflation rate to accelerate and remain well above the Fed's 2% target is the expansion of U.S. money supply. Similar to the prevailing rate of inflation, money supply is something we want to see growing at a modest rate. Expanding economies require added capital to facilitate transactions. Steady growth in money supply is one of the key markers of a healthy economy. What's specifically worth noting about U.S. money supply is the expansion we're witnessing in M2. This measure of money supply includes cash and coins in circulation, demand deposits in a checking account, money market accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit (CDs) under $100,000. It's money that can be spent, but requires a little effort to get to. Over the trailing year, through May 2025, M2 money supply has increased by precisely 4%. It's the fastest year-over-year expansion in M2 since 2022 -- likely a result of the Fed kicking off a rate-easing cycle and making borrowing rates more attractive -- and it suggests a strong possibility of the U.S. inflation rate remaining stubbornly above 2%. But there's a much bigger downside threat to the stock market than inflation. Earnings from Wall Street's most-influential businesses aren't all they're cracked up to be The surface-scratching red flag for Wall Street is its valuation. When 2025 began, the S&P 500's Shiller price-to-earnings (P/E) Ratio, which is also known as the cyclically adjusted P/E Ratio (CAPE Ratio), was at its third-highest multiple when back-tested 154 years. Based on what history tells us, the previous five times when the S&P 500's Shiller P/E Ratio surpassed 30 and held this multiple for at least two months were eventually followed by declines ranging from 20% to 89% in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and/or Nasdaq Composite. In short, the stock market has a track record of struggling when valuation premiums become extended to the upside. When stocks, collectively, trade at aggressive valuation premiums, it's often reflective of investor excitement over a next-big-thing innovation (e.g., artificial intelligence), as well as the result of strong earnings growth. But herein lies the real threat to Wall Street: Earnings growth has been a bit of a smoke-and-mirrors show for some of the stock market's leading businesses. Don't get me wrong -- some of Wall Street's most-influential businesses have blown the doors off of growth expectations with consistency for years. This includes Nvidia and Microsoft. But some of the stock market's top companies aren't nearly as operationally sound as they might appear -- and that's a problem. Electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) serves as a perfect example. On the surface, it's been profitable for five consecutive years and has relied on its first-mover advantages in the EV space, as well as its expansion into energy generation and storage, as a means to grow its sales and profits. But you might be surprised to learn that more than half of Tesla's pre-tax income has consistently derived from unsustainable sources, not from selling EVs or energy generation and storage equipment. In the March-ended quarter, Tesla reported $589 million in pre-tax income, of which $595 million came from selling regulatory automotive credits (which are given to it for free by federal governments) and $309 million in net interest income earned on its cash (less interest expenses). Without regulatory credits and interest earned on its cash, Tesla would have produced a $315 million pre-tax loss for the first quarter. Worse yet, President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, which was signed into law on Independence Day (July 4), is getting rid of automotive regulatory credits for EVs. Tesla is about to lose a 100% gross margin line item, which further exposes how poor its earnings quality truly is. Something similar can be said about Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), but for different reasons. Apple's earnings quality comes under significant scrutiny if you back out the impact of its market-leading share buyback program. Since 2013, Apple has repurchased an almost unfathomable $775 billion worth of its common stock and retired in excess of 43% of its outstanding shares. Dividing net income by a shrinking number of outstanding shares has pushed earnings per share (EPS) higher and made the stock more fundamentally attractive to value seekers. But here's the issue: Apple's growth engine has stalled for years, and it's being completely masked by the company's outsized buyback program. In fiscal 2021 (ended Sept. 25, 2021), Apple delivered $94.7 billion in net income. For fiscal 2024 (ended Sept. 28, 2024), net income tallied $93.7 billion. Despite a $1 billion decline in net income over three years, Apple's EPS rose from $5.67 to $6.11, and its stock has rallied 44% since fiscal 2021 ended. In other words, the business has worsened from an income standpoint, but the company has added close to $750 billion in market value, which makes no sense. Therefore, although inflation is a headline story, it's the earnings quality of Wall Street's most-influential businesses that's the unequivocal threat to the stock market. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $425,583!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $40,324!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $674,432!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Another day, another Trump tariff threat
Opinion We apologize. We apologize deeply for going back to the same ground we worked in our July 11 editorial, when we said, about U.S. President Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariff levy on Brazil, 'It was Canada a couple of weeks ago, when Trump was railing about the unfairness of a Canadian dairy tariff that he actually agreed to in the last Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade pact and that hasn't been levied, and it's Brazil's turn now. And it will be Canada again.' Because it is Canada. Again. Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post U.S. President Donald Trump Thursday night, on his own social media outlet, Trump posted a letter that he was sending to Prime Minister Mark Carney, decrying drugs 'pouring into our Country' from Canada, and complaining about the aforementioned tariff on dairy products. (Which American dairy exporters would face if they reached certain export levels — which they never have reached, and hence, are tariffs they never have paid. But why bother to worry about facts?) The letter starts out 'It is a great honour for me to send you this letter in that it demonstrates the strength and commitment of our trading relationship, and the fact that the United States has agreed to continue working with Canada, despite Canada having financially retaliated against the United States…' Trump then goes on to say that he is ordering a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian products to come into effect on Aug. 1, over and above tariffs already announced on steel, aluminum and auto parts, and threatens to increase that rate if Canada retaliates with tariffs of its own. It doesn't explain whether, like his last threat of 10 per cent or 20 per cent, the tariff only applies to products outside the CUSMA trade agreement. 'If Canada works with me to stop the flow of fentanyl, we will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter. These tariffs may be modified upwards or downwards, depending on our relationship with your country. You will never be disappointed with the United States of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Far from never being disappointed, we are, in fact, deeply disappointed with the United States of America. Or, at least, with its threatener-in-chief. He does not negotiate in good faith, he changes his demands and the reasons for them at the drop of a hat, and seems to think that disrupting global trade, roiling global financial markets and upending relationships with long-standing friendly nations is somehow 'doing business.' It's not. At this point, we should be looking at cutting our losses in the best way we can. It's time to leave Trump behind: we can make nice in trade talks, do our best to mollify a president who can't even be bothered to use facts to bolster his 'national security' tariffs, but in every possible way, we should be moving to separate ourselves from trade with the United States under Trump. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. We should avoid American products, decline to vacation or travel in the United States, and refuse to absorb American tariffs into the prices Canadian sellers charge American customers. Americans should feel the full cost of their president's unilateral 'negotiations.' As well, we should look to enter trade agreements with nations that negotiate honestly and fairly, and that then live up to the terms and spirit of those negotiations. And move every bit of trade we can to those countries. It took just seven hours from when our earlier editorial was written until Trump proved the editorial's central thesis to be correct: 'There is a simple truth President Trump is making more and more clear with each passing day and each passing edict. If you give in to blackmail, the blackmailer will just come back later for more.' He'll be back, demanding even more. Depend on it.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Trump, officials questioned about Texas flood response
As U.S. President Donald Trump toured the devastation from the deadly Texas floods, he and other officials faced questions about the state and federal government's response to the disaster.
