Nationwide pays out 99% of all £100 Fairer Share payments in one day - have you got yours?
Today marks the first day its Fairer Share offer payouts started, which was announced in May.
And Nationwide says it has 'all but completed' the payments already to eligible customers.
It has processed 99.97 per cent of payments to eligible members, with the remaining 0.03 per cent due to be completed by 4 July at the latest.
It means the mutual has paid out £400million to Nationwide members today making it one of the UK's largest payouts in a single day.
This is the third year running Nationwide has made the Fairer Share payment to members, which it started in 2023.
It came as Nationwide announced profits of £2.3billion before tax in its annual results in May.
As a mutual owned by members not shareholders, Nationwide is able to share some of its profits with its members rather than paying dividends.
To be eligible for the payment this year, Nationwide members needed to have either a current account and savings account, or a current account and a mortgage.
To be a qualifying current account, your account must have been open on 31 March 2025.
Qualifying members must still have a current account open in June.
Your savings will have qualified for the current account if you had at least £100 in total or in one or more savings accounts or cash Isas with Nationwide at the end of any day in March 2025.
To be a qualifying mortgage customer, you must have had at least £100 on your Nationwide residential mortgage on 31 March 2025.
In total, Nationwide has now paid eligible members more than £1billion in cash in 2025.
In addition to the £400million Fairer Share offer, Nationwide paid out £615million to members in its Big Thank You payment, which gave over 12million eligible members £50 to thank customers for enabling the successful purchase of Virgin Money
Stephen Noakes, Nationwide's retail director, said: 'We have already made excellent progress in rolling out this year's Fairer Share payment, having surpassed four million payments in the first day.
'We are delighted to have been able to pay eligible members £100 for the third year running.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ofsted shake-up could lower house prices
Ofsted's inspections shake-up could lower house prices around top-performing schools, the watchdog's chief has hinted. Sir Martyn Oliver said properties come with a premium if they are located near high-achieving schools, especially those rated 'outstanding' under the current Ofsted system. However, he suggested this was likely to change when one-word Ofsted ratings are replaced with more 'nuanced' report cards from November, which will give schools colour-coded rankings across 10 different inspection areas. Sir Martyn said the inspections overhaul would prove a headache for property agencies such as Rightmove, which show house-hunters the Ofsted rankings of nearby schools. 'Here's a burning question: what's Rightmove going to do?', Ofsted's chief inspector told an audience at the Festival of Education at Wellington College on Thursday. 'It's a serious point. Interestingly, Ofsted is probably one of the best known regulators and inspectors in the world, let alone in this country.' The former headteacher, who built a career turning around failing schools, added: 'All those years of living at least 20 minutes away from my school, sometimes 40 minutes – I ended up sponsoring two special measures schools right where I live. 'And the house prices shot up. They were both in special measures, both went to 'outstanding', and the house prices went up £15,000 within a week. It does make a difference.' Value of single-word judgements In an apparent defence of the former Ofsted ranking system, Sir Martyn said it showed that 'parents obviously put a value' on single-word judgements of schools. Research published by Yopa, the estate agency, last year showed properties in England close to 'outstanding' schools were priced around £116,000 higher on average than those near schools rated 'inadequate' – the lowest ranking under the single-word system. Similar research by Knight Frank in 2021 found that properties in catchment areas for 'outstanding' primary schools sold for 10 per cent more on average than those located further away. Schools will still be allowed to promote their one-word ratings until they are reinspected by Ofsted, which usually happens every three to four years. It is unclear whether estate agents will still be allowed to display schools' ratings on their websites beyond that. It comes after the school inspections watchdog a faced a backlash over its plans to replace single-word judgements with new colour-coded report cards. Under the new system, it will give schools ratings for each area of practice, ranging from a red 'causing concern' up to a dark green 'exemplary'. Last year, the Government announced that it was scrapping the one-word system following the death of Ruth Perry, a headteacher who took her own life in 2023 after an Ofsted inspection downgraded her school in Reading from 'outstanding' to 'inadequate'. Prof Julia Waters, Mrs Perry's sister, has been among critics of the proposed changes, saying in February that they read as if Ofsted has 'fed single-word judgements through an online thesaurus'. 'A fine balance' of complexity needed Speaking on Thursday, Sir Martyn said he had been forced to strike 'a fine balance between providing so much complexity and so much nuance that schools find it stressful… or not enough nuance and not enough complexity that it does them [teachers] a disservice for the great job that they do'. But he added that the new system would deprive the best-performing schools of the opportunity to boast about their success. 'We've been doing something for 30-plus years in a single way,' the watchdog chief said. 'If I look at my phone there will be pictures of people standing in front of their schools with balloons with an O, a U, a T – [spelling] 'outstanding' – and local newspapers up and down the country celebrating. 'It happens all of the time, and we're about to take that away and change it to something else that for more than three decades people are used to.'
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
The stumbling block government could face over 1.5 million homes policy
The Labour government 's pledge to build 1.5 million new homes by 2029 is jeopardised by a critical shortage of skilled construction workers. A survey by City & Guilds found that 76 per cent of construction firms are struggling to recruit skilled personnel, with 84 per cent agreeing the industry faces critical skills shortages. The Construction Industry Training Board estimates the sector needs an additional 239,300 workers by 2029 to meet the projected housing demand. More than half of employers, 54 per cent, express significant doubts about the sector's current workforce capacity to achieve both the housing target and net-zero housing goals. Industry leaders are calling for an urgent reset in how talent is attracted, trained, and upskilled across the construction sector, emphasising collaboration between industry, education, and government.
Sky News
29 minutes ago
- Sky News
Fiscal rules are silly but important as Reeves has banged on about them and markets care
You're probably tired by now of hearing all about "black holes". It's one of those phrases trotted out by journalists in an effort to make economic policy sound a little more interesting. And in some senses it's a massively misleading image. After all, when people talk about fiscal holes, what they're really talking about is something rather prosaic: the amount of money it would take for the chancellor not to break her fiscal rules. Those fiscal rules are not god-given, after all. They were confected by the chancellor herself. Missing them will not really result in Britain sliding into infinite nothingness. Even so, whatever you choose to call the dilemma she's faced with right now, it's certainly quite a big deal. And understanding this helps provide a little context for the extraordinary events of the past few days, with markets sliding in the wake of Ms Reeves' teary appearance at Prime Minister's Questions. Following that moment, the yield on UK government debt - the rate of interest we're being charged by international investors - suddenly leapt higher. Granted, the jump was nothing like what we saw in the wake of Liz Truss's mini-budget. And those yields dropped down after the prime minister backed the chancellor. Even so, they underline one very important bit of context. The UK has become something of an outlier in global debt markets. For years, the yield on our benchmark government bonds was more or less middle of the industrialised-world pack. But since 2022's drama, it has hovered unnervingly high, above every other G7 nation. That speaks to a broader issue. Britain might not have the biggest deficit in the G7, or for that matter, the highest national debt. Others (most notably France, and to some extent, too, the US) face even more desperate fiscal dilemmas in the coming years. But markets do still seem nervous about Britain. Perhaps that's because of what they (and we) all endured in 2022 - when British gilt markets stepped briefly over the precipice, causing malfunctions all around the financial system (most notably in obscure parts of the pensions investment sector). But it also owes something to the fact that the chancellor's own fiscal plans are sailing worryingly close to the wind. Reeves made f iscal rules matter The main piece of evidence here is the amount of leeway she has left herself against her fiscal rules. As I said at the start, there's nothing gospel about these rules. But having created them and banged on about them for a long time, even those of us who are a little sceptical about fiscal rules would concede that breaking them is, as they say, not a good look. Back in spring, the Office for Budget Responsibility thought the chancellor had about £9.9bn in leeway against these rules. But since then, she has u-turned on both the cuts in winter fuel payments and on personal independence payments. That reduces the £9.9bn down to barely more than £3bn. But the real issue isn't just these U-turns. It's something else. The stronger the economy is, the more tax revenues come in and the more her potential headroom against the fiscal rules would be. By the same token, if the economy grows less rapidly than the OBR expected, that would mean less tax revenues and an even bigger deficit. And if you compare the OBR's latest forecasts with the current average of forecasts among independent forecasters, or for that matter, the Bank of England, they do look decidedly optimistic. If the OBR is right and everyone else is wrong, then the chancellor "only" has to fill in the hole left by those U-turns. But if the OBR is wrong and everyone else is right, things get considerably more grisly. Even a small downgrade in the OBR's expectations for productivity growth - say a 0.1 percentage point drop - would obliterate the remaining headroom and leave the chancellor with a £6bn shortfall against her rule. Anything more than that (and bear in mind, most economists think the OBR is out by more than that) and she could be £10bn or more underwater. Now, there are plenty of very reasonable points one could make about how silly this all is. It's silly that so many people treat fiscal rules as tablets of stone. It's silly that government tax policy from one year to the next seems to hinge on how right or wrong the OBR's economic forecasts are. Yet all this stuff, silly as it might all seem, is taken quite seriously by markets right now. They look at the UK, see an outlier, and tend to focus more than usual on black holes. So I'm afraid we're going to be talking about "black holes" for quite some time to come.
