June 30, 1985, Forty Years Ago: Army deployed after violence in Baroda
Army in Baroda
Three persons were killed and 55 injured, seven of them seriously, as violence erupted suddenly in Baroda. The Army has been deployed to assist the police in patrolling trouble-torn areas under the city. They have intensified their vigil. No arrests have been made so far. It started when youths throwing water-filled balloons in the course of Devshayani Ekadashi festivities turned violent, according to reports.
Naga Rebel Attack
Two road bridges were blown up by suspected Naga hostiles, cutting off Ukhrul from the rest of Manipur. Police said the explosions were suspected to have been engineered by the underground Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland and took place simultaneously. The hostiles used locally made explosives. Serakhong lital steel bridge (200 feet) and Thong Analbi Bridge (100 feet), damaged in the explosions, are situated within 5 km of each other.
Akalis' Release
With the Akalis reacting cautiously to Punjab Governor Arjun Singh's announcement that those not accused of serious crimes would be set free, the state government made another significant gesture clarifying that 'sedition' would be no bar against the release of persons arrested on this charge. Raj Bhavan sources said the governor's speech at Amritsar was apparently misunderstood. What he said was that all except those charged with 'waging of war against the state', murder, arson and dacoity would be released.
Air India Crash
Some indications that there may have been an explosion on board the Air India Jumbo before it crashed into the Atlantic have emerged during the investigation but it is yet to be determined if it could have been caused by a bomb, informed sources said. Senior officials from India who are investigating the crash are yet to reach a definite conclusion about the cause, although they said they have had 'useful' clues so far.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
12 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Relationships will never be free of issues': Jaishankar on India-US ties
Washington: India and America will have to keep growing their relationship despite disagreements and frictions, said external affairs minister S Jaishankar on Monday, during his ongoing visit to America. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar,(Dr. S. Jaishankar-X) 'Relationships will never be free of issues and even differences. What matters is the ability to deal with it and keep trends moving in a positive direction,' said Jaishankar in New York at an event hosted by Newsweek, an American news magazine. 'I remember when I was Ambassador, I literally came in a few days after we had a problem related to one of our diplomats in New York City. And then, I had to deal with (Section) 301 issues, compulsory licensing controversies and with plans to sell F-16 aircraft to Pakistan. We dealt with it,' said India's top diplomat while pointing out that India had seen tensions with US administrations in the past as well. Despite this, Jaishankar argued, India and the United States are brought together by fundamental convergences on economic and strategic issues. India and the United States have disagreed publicly on the exact role played by Washington in mediating a ceasefire between New Delhi and Islamabad after military clashes in early May. US President Donald Trump - who announced the ceasefire before the Indian and Pakistani governments - claimed credit for brokering an end to hostilities. The Trump administration has also attempted to mediate between India and Pakistan on the Kashmir issue and claimed that trade-related inducements were offered to help ease tensions. India has publicly contested these claims by Washington. According to foreign secretary Vikram Misri, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made India's position clear during a phone conversation with President Trump after the G7 summit earlier in June. "Prime Minister Modi stated that the ceasefire was agreed to only at the request of Pakistan and that India does not want mediation. He made it clear that at no point during this episode were India-US trade talks or third-party mediation discussed," Misri said in a statement. "The halt to military action was discussed directly between the two countries through existing military channels," he added. A scheduled meeting between Trump and Modi on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada was reportedly cancelled after the former left the summit early. The Indian PM subsequently declined Trump's invitation to stop over in America on the way back from Canada. The Trump administration's overtures to Pakistan have also been in focus after Trump hosted Pakistan's Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir for a lunch at the White House. Top US military and diplomatic officials have outlined plans for a closer economic and defence relationship with Pakistan, including cooperation on security, counter-terrorism, investment and critical minerals. New Delhi has refrained from commenting publicly on these overtures to Pakistan but has noted these developments with some concern, according to persons aware of the matter. Despite these concerns, Jaishankar outlined plans for a closer partnership with America, including through a trade deal with Washington. The two countries are engaged in active negotiations with the deal expected to be finalised soon, according to White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt. 'Obviously, my hope would be that we can get to a successful conclusion to the trade deal,' said Jaishankar while stating that there would have to be 'give and take' on both sides to secure the agreement. Jaishankar will also meet with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday. The latter is hosting the Quad Foreign Minister's Meeting, which will also feature Japan's Takeshi Iwaya and Australia's Penny Wong. 'There are a lot of issues we need to discuss in the Indo-Pacific. These are issues of maritime safety and security, connectivity, technology, pandemic preparedness and even of education,' said Jaishankar about the Quad's agenda.
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
Gen on 4-day visit to Bhutan to boost def ties
New Delhi: General Upendra Dwivedi is now on a four-day trip to Bhutan to further enhance already close bilateral military ties - which comes at a time that China continues to strengthen its military infrastructure in the Doklam plateau that saw a 73-day face-off between the Indian and Chinese armies in 2017. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The Army chief will call on Bhutanese King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck and hold wide-ranging talks with Lt General Batoo Tshering, the chief operations officer of the Royal Bhutan Army. "The visit reflects the deep-rooted and time-tested ties between India and Bhutan and reaffirms India's commitment to a close and trusted partner," Army spokesperson Colonel Nishant Arvind said. India has been keeping a close watch on the series of border talks between Bhutan and an expansionist China in a bid to resolve their territorial disputes, which include Doklam plateau in the west and Jakarlung and Pasamlung valleys in the north.
India Today
14 hours ago
- India Today
The New Great Game: Sino-American strategic competition in Pakistan
The intensification of great power competition in the 21st century has transformed Pakistan from a peripheral actor into a central prize in the strategic rivalry between the United States and China. This "New Great Game" represents a contemporary iteration of classical geopolitical competition, wherein major powers vie for influence over strategically located middle powers. Pakistan's unique position—as the sole Muslim nuclear power, a gateway to Central Asia, and a critical node in China's Belt and Road Initiative—has made it an indispensable asset for both Beijing and Washington in their broader competition for global Pakistan's strategic value derives not merely from its geographical location, but from its ability to serve multiple functions simultaneously: as China's corridor to the Arabian Sea, America's security lever in South Asia, and a potential source of critical minerals essential to modern warfare and technology. The recent Chinese loan rollover of $3.4 billion and President Trump's hosting of Pakistan's Army Chief at the White House exemplify the heightened attention both superpowers are directing towards strategic approach: The CPEC paradigm China's engagement with Pakistan represents a long-term strategic investment designed to address fundamental vulnerabilities in Beijing's global position. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), launched in 2013 with over $62 billion in committed investments, serves as the flagship project of China's Belt and Road Initiative in South Asia. However, CPEC's significance extends far beyond infrastructure development of Gwadar Port, situated at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, constitutes China's most significant strategic asset in the region. This deep-water port provides Beijing with direct access to energy-rich West Asia whilst circumventing the vulnerable Malacca Strait, through which approximately 80% of China's oil imports currently transit. The recent $3.4 billion loan rollover—comprising $2.1 billion in reserve deposits and $1.3 billion in refinancing—demonstrates China's commitment to maintaining this strategic relationship regardless of Pakistan's economic approach to Pakistan can be characterised as "strategic patience"—providing unconditional financial support whilst gradually building institutional dependencies. Unlike Western donors, Chinese assistance comes without governance conditionalities or human rights requirements, making it particularly attractive to Pakistan's military establishment. This approach has enabled China to secure not only commercial advantages but also potential military positioning in the Indian Ocean recalibration: The Trump doctrineThe Trump administration's approach to Pakistan marked a significant departure from previous American policies, which had oscillated between engagement and estrangement based on Pakistan's cooperation in counterterrorism operations. The June 2025 White House lunch hosted by President Trump for Pakistan's Army Chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, symbolised a new American strategy focused on direct engagement with Pakistan's military leadership rather than its civilian approach reflects a pragmatic acknowledgement of Pakistan's power structures and an attempt to counterbalance Chinese influence through military-to-military cooperation. The approval of a $397 million upgrade package for Pakistan's F-16 fighter aircraft, concurrent with discussions of F-35 sales to India, demonstrates America's willingness to compartmentalise its South Asian relationships rather than viewing them through a zero-sum American strategy appears designed to prevent Pakistan's complete drift into China's sphere of influence whilst maintaining flexibility in broader South Asian policy. By engaging directly with Pakistan's military leadership, Washington seeks to preserve intelligence cooperation, maintain access to Central Asian operations, and ensure continued Pakistani cooperation in regional security resource dimension: Rare earth elements and strategic competitionAn often-overlooked aspect of the Sino-American competition in Pakistan concerns control over critical mineral resources, particularly rare earth elements. Pakistan's geological surveys indicate substantial reserves of rare earth-bearing minerals, including fluorite, barite, bastnaesite, and monazite, primarily located in Balochistan and Gilgit-Baltistan dominance in rare earth processing—controlling over 60% of global refining capacity—has prompted American concerns about supply chain vulnerabilities, particularly given the essential role these minerals play in advanced military systems. The Trump administration's authorisation of geological mapping assistance through the U.S. Geological Survey represents a quiet but significant strategic initiative to diversify rare earth supply chains away from Chinese concentration of Pakistan's rare earth reserves in conflict-affected regions adds complexity to extraction efforts. Both superpowers must navigate not only commercial and technical challenges but also security concerns related to Baloch insurgency and territorial disputes. This dimension of competition may prove increasingly significant as global demand for critical minerals intensifies with the transition to renewable energy and advanced military implications and Indian concernsIndia's position in this triangular competition adds another layer of complexity to the New Great Game. New Delhi views CPEC as a direct challenge to its territorial integrity, given the corridor's passage through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The prospect of Chinese military infrastructure in disputed territory represents a fundamental security concern for India, potentially creating a two-front challenge combining traditional Pakistani hostility with Chinese strategic American decision to engage Pakistan militarily whilst simultaneously deepening partnerships with India through initiatives such as the Quad alliance creates diplomatic tensions. India's concerns about "re-hyphenation"—the return to viewing India and Pakistan as equivalent strategic partners—reflect fears about American commitment to the Indo-Pacific strategy centred on containing Chinese response has involved diversifying its own strategic partnerships, strengthening alternative infrastructure projects such as the Chabahar Port in Iran, and reminding international partners of its significance as a democratic counterweight to authoritarian China. This triangular dynamic ensures that the competition for Pakistan cannot be separated from broader regional power strategic balancing actPakistan's approach to managing superpower competition demonstrates sophisticated strategic thinking despite economic constraints. Islamabad has successfully extracted benefits from both China and the United States whilst avoiding complete alignment with either power. This hedging strategy reflects Pakistan's historical experience of superpower relationships and its understanding of the risks associated with exclusive Pakistani military establishment's ability to maintain productive relationships with both Chinese and American counterparts whilst pursuing independent nuclear and conventional military development illustrates the country's strategic autonomy. Pakistan's nomination of President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, whilst simultaneously deepening CPEC cooperation with China, exemplifies this balanced this balancing act requires careful management of competing pressures. Pakistan must satisfy Chinese expectations regarding CPEC implementation whilst addressing American concerns about terrorism and nuclear proliferation. The country's economic fragility provides both superpowers with leverage, but also ensures continued competition for Pakistani New Great Game in Pakistan represents a microcosm of broader Sino-American strategic competition, wherein middle powers can leverage superpower rivalry to extract maximum benefits whilst maintaining strategic autonomy. Pakistan's success in this endeavour reflects both its intrinsic strategic value and its sophisticated approach to managing great power outcome of this competition will significantly influence broader regional dynamics, particularly concerning Indian Ocean security, Central Asian connectivity, and the global balance of power. As both superpowers continue to invest in Pakistani partnerships, the country's ability to maintain its balancing act whilst avoiding the pitfalls of excessive dependence will determine not only its own strategic trajectory but also the broader evolution of 21st-century great power New Great Game is indeed just beginning, and Pakistan's role as both prize and player ensures its continued centrality in global strategic calculations.- EndsTune InMust Watch
