Embattled San Mateo County sheriff rehires former chief of staff, leaked memo reveals
A memo shows Sheriff Christina Corpus has rehired Victor Aenlle, who she is alleged to have had an inappropriate relationship with.
Aenlle is back to help process concealed weapons permits, according to the memo.
Last month, voters gave the San Mateo Co. Board of Supervisors to remove Corpus.
SAN MATEO, Calif. - The embattled San Mateo County sheriff has rehired her alleged paramour, Victor Aenlle, to act as a reserve deputy, KTVU has learned.
What we know
Aenlle, the sheriff's former chief of staff, is back to help process concealed weapons permits, according to a leaked memo, signed by Sheriff Christina Corpus. Aenlle was removed as chief of staff last year.
"Please move [Aenlle] over to the active list and please ensure he is receiving all correspondence related to the reserve unit," Corpus' memo reads. She concludes by telling the department to let Undersheriff Dan Perea know if there are any questions.
Rank-and-file unions maintain that Sheriff Corpus "continues to practice the open corruption and defiant mismanagement" that will lead to her ouster.
The backstory
Last month, voters overwhelmingly approved a ballot measure that would allow San Mateo County's Board of Supervisors to remove Corpus, who has been under fire for months, accused of creating a toxic work environment, using racial and homophobic slurs, and having an inappropriate intimate relationship with Aenlle, who she would later promote to assistant sheriff. The supervisors have until 2028 to act.
In addition, San Mateo executive officer Mike Callagy filed a $10.5 million claim against the county in March, saying that Corpus and Aenlle conspired to make false and defamatory statements against him.
Corpus has denied the allegations against her, saying she's been targeted for being Latina and a woman in power. Last January, Corpus filed a claim of her own against San Mateo County, saying she's been discriminated against, harassed and unfairly treated.
Since the scandal broke, the fact that Aenlle was Corpus' civilian chief of staff, was a point of contention.
A scathing report by a retired judge found that Corpus and Aenlle's personal relationship, beyond friendship, was a conflict of interest. The report claimed that Aenlle has more experience as a Coldwell Banker associate real estate broker than he has in law enforcement. The report claimed Corpus violated policy when she repeatedly recommended Aenlle for pay increases.
Furthermore, the report alleged Aenlle abused authority within the department, creating a separate conflict of interest in negotiating a lease of property for a sheriff's department substation brokered by Coldwell Banker Real Estate – a company Aenlle has worked as an associate broker for. The retired judge also concluded Aenlle, as a civilian employee, was not authorized to wear a badge resembling the gold badges of sworn employees, which is a misdemeanor offense.
Following the release of the report, Corpus further sparked controversy by elevating Aenlle to the position of assistant sheriff.
Since the turmoil began, several have called for the sheriff's resignation. The sheriff has been steadfast in her refusal to do so.
What they're saying
The Deputy Sheriff's Association and the San Mateo County Organization of Sheriff's Seargeants released a statement about the rehiring.
"Rehiring Victor Aenlle, the person who sparked the original complaints of nepotism and harassment, along with the intent to spend taxpayer dollars on massage chairs, once again demonstrates her disrespect for both the community and the office she holds," the statement read in part.
The statement concludes by saying they look forward to new leadership in order to restore trust and transparency.
KTVU has reached out to the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors for comment on this latest development, but we have not heard back. A county spokesperson said they had no comment on this story.
KTVU's Henry Lee contributed to this story
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
6 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Alameda County adopts $1 billion plan to address homelessness after years of delay
More than four years after Alameda County voters narrowly approved a sales tax measure to address the area's growing homelessness crisis, the Board of Supervisors on Wednesday adopted a plan for allocating more than $1 billion over the coming years. The board's unanimous vote comes after a prolonged legal battle that, until recently, had prevented the county from spending any of the new tax revenue to address one of the region's most pressing issues. Alameda County's homeless population grew 18% from 2019 to 2024, when it reached an estimated 9,450 people, according to the latest homelessness census. Over that same five years, the number of people living unsheltered across the county, including in tents, vehicles and other makeshift shelters, nearly doubled from 1,710 to 3,107. Oakland is home to more than half of the county's homeless population. Supervisor Elisa Márquez said Wednesday that she was eager to support the county's spending plan for Measure W, but urged residents to demand more accountability from their local leaders as well. 'I need everyone here who has all that passion about Measure W funding to go back to your cities and ask them what they're doing,' Márquez said. 'Every city has to be part of the solution, and until that happens, we're going to continue to have this conversation.' Voters in November 2020 passed a 10-year, half-cent sales tax, known as Measure W, to fund housing and programs related to homelessness, behavioral health care, job training and other essential county services. Collection of the new tax began in July 2021, but the county was unable to spend any funds for several years due to a lawsuit filed by the Alameda County Taxpayers Association challenging the validity of the measure. In April, a judge sided with the county and finally enabled the county to begin releasing funds. The measure is projected to raise a total of more than $1.8 billion. The county has collected $810 million to date and anticipates an additional $1 billion in revenue through June 2031, when the sales tax expires. Of the funds raised to date, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors previously approved $350 million for capital acquisition, $30 million for 250 new interim housing units, $10 million for housing subsidies, $4.5 million for new staffing and $6.5 million food security and senior services. Under the plan approved Wednesday, they will also set aside $170 million of the existing funds raised for a reserve to protect against economic uncertainty and provide financial stability to any programs that might face federal or state funding cuts. Of the remaining $238.5 million previously accrued and funds raised by the tax moving forward, 80% will go toward the county's 'Home Together Fund.' That fund, which is expected to collect $136 million annually, will focus on preventing homelessness and increasing access to homeless shelters and housing. The new funds will mark a notable increase in the county's ability to address its homeless crisis as it currently spends about $219 million annually on services for its unhoused residents. The rest of the money will go into an 'essential county services fund,' which will help to maintain critical county infrastructure and programs related to food security, senior support and services for immigrants, the LGBTQ+ community and other marginalized groups affected by federal policy changes and funding cuts. The county anticipates that the fund will receive about $34 million annually. For the second time in two weeks, dozens of residents and stakeholders came to a special board meeting to offer their feedback about the county's allocation plan. While many expressed their enthusiasm for the unprecedented influx of new funding, they also voiced concerns about several aspects of the proposal. Several questioned the need for a $170 million reserve while others advocated that 90% or more of the overall funds be dedicated for homeless services. A handful of speakers also opposed a $15 million emergency stabilization fund that officials planned to set up to help nonprofit affordable housing providers that were struggling financially due to eviction moratoriums put in place during the pandemic. 'Measure W should be used for what it was voted for — housing and homelessness services, mental health and support services,' said Carmen Jovel of the East Bay Community Law Center. Jovel added that it was 'alarming' that the county planned to use any funds from the measure to help landlords rather than those suffering from homelessness. Vivian Wan, executive director of the affordable housing nonprofit Abode Services, argued that the stabilization fund would assist the agency to serve more unhoused people. "We want to build more supportive housing. We want to help end the homelessness in this community, and we can't do so if we're not (financially) healthy,' she said. The Board of Supervisors did not make a decision on whether or how to move forward with the proposed $15 million emergency stabilization fund and instead punted it to a future meeting.
New York Post
6 days ago
- New York Post
Ex-girlfriend of Delta pilot arrested on plane also charged, accused of joining in abuse of her daughter
The ex-girlfriend of a Delta Airlines pilot hauled off a plane to be charged with child sex crimes has also been arrested — accused of joining in on the pilot's alleged abuse of her daughter, starting when the girl was just 6, according to charging documents. Jennifer Powell, 45, was charged Tuesday with allegedly joining his ex, Rustom Bhagawar, in sexually abusing her daughter — who did not live with her– from when she was 6 until she was 11, according to a probable cause statement obtained by KTVU. The mom not only knew her daughter was being abused, she watched — and even participated, according to the documents. Advertisement 3 Rustom Bhagwagar, 34, was cuffed by federal officers Saturday night onboard Delta Flight 2809. Contra Costa Sheriff Bhagawar, 34, was detained in shocking scenes Saturday when federal agents swarmed his plane when it landed in San Francisco, removing him from the cockpit in handcuffs. Officials then revealed that the pilot faces 24 felony counts of engaging in sex acts with a child age 10 or under, as well as oral copulation, lewd acts and aggravated sexual assault, all on a child. Advertisement 3 The flight had just touched down in San Francisco from Minneapolis. X Powell is now also facing a slew of child sexual abuse charges — and both she and her pilot ex face up to 15 years in prison if convicted, the report said. Bhagwagar, of Florida, had been under investigation since April when Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office received a tip about child sex crimes. Delta confirmed that Bhagwagar has been suspended from the airline pending the investigation. Advertisement 'Delta has zero tolerance for unlawful conduct and will fully cooperate with law enforcement,' a spokesperson told KTVU. 'We are appalled by reports of the charges related to the arrest and the individual in question has been suspended pending an investigation.' 3 Federal agents were seen entering the cockpit to make the arrest, shocking crew and passengers. X Bhagwagar and Powell are both being held at the Martinez Detention Center on a $15 million bond. Bhagwagar is scheduled to be arraigned on July 30. 'Our office stands firmly committed to protecting children and holding those who cause harm accountable,' District Attorney Diana Becton said in a statement. 'Every child deserves to feel safe, protected, and heard when an injustice like this occurs.'
7 days ago
Los Angeles County seeks ordinance preventing law enforcement from concealing their identities
LOS ANGELES -- Los Angeles County leaders want to prohibit law enforcement officers from concealing their identities while on duty, a response to recent immigration raids during which some federal agents refused to identify themselves or covered their faces. The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted 4—0, with one abstention, to direct county counsel to draft an ordinance that bars officers, including federal agents, from wearing masks, with limited exceptions such as for medical protection or during undercover operations. Officers would also be required to visibly display identification and agency affiliation while out in public. Since early June, immigration agents have swarmed Southern California, arresting hundreds of people and prompting protests against the federal raids and the subsequent deployment of the National Guard and Marines. About half the Guard troops and all the Marines were pulled out of LA in recent weeks. Supervisor Janice Hahn, who co-authored the motion, said the raids carried out by the Trump administration have sparked fear and residents have a right to know who is stopping, questioning or detaining them. 'Across the county, people are being pulled out of their cars, beaten, and ripped from their families by men in tactical gear with balaclavas, no badges, and no names," Hahn said. 'That's not how law enforcement in a democracy should operate.' Hahn conceded that it is unclear if the county will be able to enforce the law when it comes to actions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies. 'Ultimately, it might have to be decided by a court,' she said. Legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky said Tuesday that a court could have to decide if the ordinance is interfering with the ability of officers to carry out their duties. 'They key is that it has to apply to all law enforcement. It can't just apply to federal law enforcement,' said Chemerinsky, dean of the law school at the University of California, Berkeley. Administration officials have defended the practice of officers wearing masks, saying immigration agents have faced harassment as they have gone about their enforcement. Officials said agents are hiding their identities for their safety to avoid things like death threats and doxing, where someone's personal information is released without their permission on the internet. 'I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is,' ICE acting director Todd Lyons said last month. In the state legislature, a pending measure would ban local, state, and federal police from covering their faces while conducting operations in California. And a similar bill has been introduced into the U.S. Congress by Democratic senators Alex Padilla, of California, and Cory Booker, of New Jersey. Chemerinsky said the advantage of federal legislation is that it would 'clearly be constitutional' because Congress has the power to regulate how federal law enforcement operates. County counsel has 60 days to submit the draft ordinance to the board for approval. Supervisor Hilda Solis, the measure's other co-author, said local officials must set expectations about how law enforcement should conduct themselves while in the county. 'The use of masks, tactical gear, and refusal to show identification is not only alarming and confusing, but erodes public trust and raises serious safety concerns,' Solis said.
