Meta shareholders sue Zuckerberg, Thiel and Sandberg for $8bn over FTC fines
The trial started with a privacy expert for the plaintiffs, Neil Richards of Washington University School of Law, who testified about Facebook's data policies.
'Facebook's privacy disclosures were misleading,' he told the court. Jeffrey Zients, White House chief of staff under Joe Biden and a Meta director for two years starting in May 2018, is expected to take the stand later on Wednesday in the non-jury trial before Kathaleen McCormick, chief judge of the Delaware chancery court.
The case will feature testimony from Zuckerberg and other billionaire defendants including the former chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, venture capitalist and board member Marc Andreessen, and former board members Peter Thiel, Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, co-founder of Netflix. A lawyer for the defendants, who have denied the allegations, declined to comment.
McCormick, the judge who rescinded Elon Musk's $56bn Tesla pay package last year, is expected to rule on liability and damages months after the trial concludes. The case began in 2018, following revelations that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a now defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful US presidential campaign in 2016.
The FTC fined Facebook $5bn in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, saying the company had violated a 2012 agreement to protect user data.
Shareholders want the defendants to reimburse Meta for the FTC fine and other legal costs, which the plaintiffs estimate total more than $8bn.
In court filings, the defendants described the allegations as 'extreme' and said the evidence at trial will show Facebook hired an outside consulting firm to ensure compliance with the FTC agreement and that Facebook was a victim of Cambridge Analytica's deceit.
Meta, which is not a defendant, declined to comment. On its website, the company has said it has invested billions of dollars into protecting user privacy since 2019. The lawsuit is considered the first of its kind to go to trial that alleges that board members consciously failed to oversee their company.
Known as a Caremark claim, such lawsuits are often described as the hardest to prove in Delaware corporate law. However, in recent years, Delaware courts have allowed a growing number of these claims to proceed. Boeing's current and former board members settled a case with similar claims in 2021 for $237.5m, the largest ever in an alleged breach of oversight lawsuit.
The Boeing directors did not admit to wrongdoing.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
The Meta trial comes four months after Delaware lawmakers overhauled the state's corporate law to make it harder for shareholders to challenge deals struck with controlling shareholders such as Zuckerberg. The bill, which did not address Caremark claims, was drafted after the state's governor met with representatives of Meta.
Most publicly traded companies are incorporated in the state, generating more than a quarter of the state's budget revenue. Meta, which was reportedly considering leaving Delaware earlier this year, is still incorporated in the state.
Andreessen Horowitz, the venture capital fund co-founded by Andreessen, said earlier this month that it was reincorporating in Nevada from Delaware and encouraged other companies to do the same. The company cited the uncertainty of the state's courts and referenced the Musk pay ruling. Andreessen is expected to testify on Thursday.
In addition to privacy claims at the heart of the Meta case, plaintiffs allege that Zuckerberg anticipated that the Cambridge Analytica scandal would send the company's stock lower and sold his Facebook shares as a result, pocketing at least $1bn.
Defendants said evidence will show that Zuckerberg did not trade on inside information and that he used a stock-trading plan that removes his control over sales and is designed to guard against insider trading.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Railway mega-deal would require heavy engineering
NEW YORK, July 18 (Reuters Breakingviews) - It's somehow fitting that in a country where coal, polio and shipbuilding are making a comeback, there's also an 1860s-style transcontinental railway under consideration. Union Pacific is in talks to buy smaller rival Norfolk Southern, in a deal that would create a $240 billion coast-to-coast U.S. operator by value of combined stock and debt. The idea holds greater appeal than stoking fossil fuel consumption or reviving eradicated diseases, but it also risks having financially harmful effects. Consolidation ground to a halt after a series of mergers in the 1990s shrank dozens of freight carriers into just seven, and was blamed for derailments, disruptions and losses. The government introduced stiffer rules requiring that any large deal enhance competition rather than simply not hurt it. Anticipation of widespread regulatory rollbacks under the Trump administration and sluggish railroad growth prospects have changed the calculus, however, with Union Pacific CEO Jim Vena recently touting the advantages of a cross-country line before the Wall Street Journal reported, opens new tab early deal negotiations on Thursday. Setting aside how pliable Washington's Surface Transportation Board may be, connecting 50,000 track miles into one unified network has some logic. The existing regional system adds costs, including from transferring railcars and complicating service routes. With about 40% of all traffic directly tied, opens new tab to international trade, according to an industry group, higher tariffs also pose a fresh hurdle to increasing revenue at companies which have already firmly squeezed expenses. The harder question relates to value creation. The best, albeit imperfect, comparison is Canadian Pacific's 2023 acquisition of Kansas City Southern, which was grandfathered into the older merger rules, for $31 billion. The buyer promised, opens new tab $1 billion in annual synergies, the bulk coming from growth equal to about 8% of combined revenue and the rest from slashing almost 3% of combined operating expenses. On that basis, Union Pacific would be able to generate about $3.6 billion of synergies, according to Breakingviews estimates. Assuming Union Pacific were to pay the same 23% premium as Canadian Pacific did, valuing the Norfolk Southern enterprise at some $91 billion including net debt, the implied return on invested capital, with the revenue uplift and expense savings factored in, would be about 7%. To just match the target's 7.9% weighted average cost of capital, as estimated by Morningstar analysts, would require some $4.6 billion of synergies. That considerable sum may be within reach, at least according to Bernstein analysts. They see potential benefits of between $4 billion and $5 billion. At more than 12% of the top lines for both companies, or nearly a third of their total operating expenses, it sounds optimistic. Absent some creative engineering, the effort hardly looks worth the long haul. Follow Jeffrey Goldfarb on X, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab.
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Three people are dead in a possible training accident in Los Angeles, official tells the AP
An explosion early Friday killed three people and is being investigated at least preliminarily as a possible training accident, according to a law enforcement official briefed on the matter who was not authorized to discuss the matter by name and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. Los Angeles County Fire Department said it responded to calls about a possible explosion around 7:30 a.m. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department has not confirmed any deaths. Attorney General Pam Bondi said she learned about three deaths from U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli's office. His office didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office said he's been briefed on the matter, which occurred at the LA County Sheriff's Special Operations Bureau in East Los Angeles. Aerial footage from KABC-TV shows the explosion happened in a parking lot filled with sheriff patrol cars and box trucks.
Reuters
10 minutes ago
- Reuters
IMF eyes revised global forecast, but warns trade tensions still cloud outlook
WASHINGTON, July 18 (Reuters) - The International Monetary Fund warned on Friday that risks related to trade tensions continue to cloud the global economic outlook and uncertainty remains high despite some increased trade and improved financial conditions. IMF First Deputy Managing Director Gita Gopinath said the fund would update its global forecast later in July given "front-loading ahead of tariff increases and some trade diversion," along with improved financial conditions and signs of continued declines in inflation. In April the IMF slashed its growth forecasts for the United States, China and most countries, citing the impact of U.S. tariffs on imports now at 100-year highs and warning that rising trade tensions would further slow growth. At the time, it cut its forecast for global growth by 0.5 percentage points to 2.8% for 2025, and by 0.3 percentage points to 3%. Economists expect a slight upward revision when the IMF releases an updated forecast in late July. Gopinath told finance officials from the Group of 20 major economies who met this week in South Africa that trade tensions continued to complicate the economic outlook. "While we will update our global forecast at the end of July, downside risks continue to dominate the outlook and uncertainty remains high," she said, in a text of her remarks. She urged countries to resolve trade tensions and implement policy changes to address underlying domestic imbalances, including scaling back fiscal outlays and putting debt on a sustainable path. Gopinath also underscored the need for monetary policy officials to carefully calibrate their decisions to specific circumstances in their countries, and stressed the need to protect central bank independence. This was a key theme in the G20 communique released by finance officials. Gopinath said capital flows to emerging markets and developing economies remained sluggish, but resilient, in the face of increased policy uncertainty and market volatility. For many borrowers, financing conditions remained tight. For countries with unsustainable debt, proactive moves were essential, Gopinath said, repeating the IMF's call for timely and efficient debt restructuring mechanisms. More work was needed on that issue, including allowing middle-income countries to access the G20's Common Framework for Debt Restructuring, she said.
