NZ Budget 2025: Science Investment Must Increase As A Proportion Of GDP For NZ To Innovate And Compete
If there is one word that sums up the current state of New Zealand's research sector, it is scarcity. As the report summarises:
We have an underfunded system by any international comparison. This parsimony has led to harmful inter-institutional competition in a manner that is both wastefully expensive in terms of process and scarce researcher time, and is known to inhibit the most intellectually innovative ideas coming forward, and of course it is these that can drive a productive innovation economy.
The government expects research to contribute to economic growth, but policy and action undermine the sector's capacity to do so.
The latest example is last week's cancellation of the 2026 grant application round of the NZ$55 million Endeavour Fund 'as we transition to the science, innovation and technology system of the future'. Interrupting New Zealand's largest contestable source of science funding limits opportunities for researchers looking for support for new and emerging ideas.
Changes to the Marsden Fund, set up 30 years ago to support fundamental research, removed all funding for social science and the humanities and shifted focus to applied research. This is despite fundamental research in all fields underpinning innovation and the international ranking of our universities.
New Zealand has an opportunity to change its economy based on the potential of emerging sectors such as artificial intelligence, cleantech and quantum technologies. Other countries, including Australia and the United Kingdom, already consider quantum technologies a priority and fund them accordingly.
But when it comes to strategy, the composition of the boards of new Public Research Organisations, set up as part of the government's science sector reform, are skewed towards business experience. Where there is scientific expertise, it tends to be in established industries. The governance of the proposed new entity to focus on emerging and advanced technologies is yet to be announced.
Critical mass requires funding and strategy
Scientists have been calling for a science investment target of 2% of GDP for a long time. It was once – roughly a decade ago – the average expenditure within the OECD; this has since increased to 2.7% of GDP, while New Zealand's investment remains at 1.5%.
The SSAG report repeatedly refers to the lack of funding, and it would be the obvious thing to see addressed in this year's budget. But expectations have already been lowered by the government's insistence there will be no new money.
The report's second high-level theme is the engagement of government with scientific strategy. Government announcements to date seem focused on attracting international investment through changes to tax settings and regulation. I would argue this is a matter of focusing on the wrapping rather than the present: the system itself needs to be attractive to investors.
Creating a thriving research sector is also a matter of scale. International cooperation is one way for New Zealand to access efficiencies of scale. And work on building international partnerships is one area of positive intent. But we need to look at our connectivity nationally as well, and use investment to build this further.
Countries with greater GDPs than New Zealand's invest much more in research as a proportion of GDP. It means the size of these other countries' scientific ecosystems – if measured by total expenditure – is three to four times New Zealand's on a per capita basis.
A matter of scale
Per-capita scale matters because it tells us how easy it is for researchers to find someone else with the right skillset or necessary equipment. It tells us how likely it is for a student to find an expert in New Zealand to teach them, rather than needing to go overseas.
And it tells us how quickly start-up companies in emerging technologies will be able to find the skilled employees they need. A thriving university system that attracts young people to develop the research skills needed by advanced technology companies is a key part of this challenge.
The government's science sector reform aims to increase its contribution to economic growth. But research contributes to economic growth when scientists can really 'lean in' with confidence to commercialising and translating their science.
That can't happen if budgets don't fund the critical mass, connectivity and resources to stimulate the transition to a thriving science system.
Disclosure statement
Nicola Gaston receives funding from the Tertiary Education Commission as the Director of the MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology. She also receives funding from the Marsden Fund. All research funding goes to the University of Auckland to pay the costs of the research she is employed to do.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
24-06-2025
- The Spinoff
Fonterra boss nabbed science and tech advisory role after texting PM
A Fonterra manager with no scientific background was announced as a member of the PM's science and technology advisory council in May. Documents released under the Official Information Act show she had sent Christopher Luxon a text message to tell him she was keen for the gig to 'support this national mission'. When the makeup of the prime minister's science, innovation and technology advisory council – designed to advise the government on where to direct scientific funding to ' drive economic growth' – was announced in May, some scientists expressed concern that half of the six members came from agriculture backgrounds and had no academic scientific experience. One of those was Komal Mistry-Mehta, chief innovation and brand officer at Fonterra, who, an Official Information Act request has now revealed, was appointed after she texted the prime minister to say she was keen to support the 'national mission'. The establishment of the science, innovation and technology advisory council was announced in January 2025, alongside some of the 'most significant science reforms in three decades '. Setting up the council was one of many recommendations made by the Science System Advisory Group, which was tasked with reviewing the science sector in May last year. The review recommended the group be made up of 'distinguished New Zealand scientists who are not institutional leaders, and individuals from the innovation sector and business'. In May 2025, the members of the advisory council were unveiled, including Sir Peter Gluckman, who led the science sector review, and John Roche, a dairy industry expert and former chief science adviser for the Ministry of Primary Industries, who was appointed deputy chair. Roche was also named as the prime minister's chief science adviser, ending a 310-day wait for a replacement for Dame Juliet Gerrard, who left the role in June 2024. Science, innovation and technology minister Shane Reti was appointed chair of the council, and $5.8m was set aside in the budget to fund its establishment and operation over the next five years. Half of the group's six members have backgrounds in dairy, though Roche is the only one with both agricultural and scientific expertise. Craig Piggott is the founder and head of Halter, an agri-tech company which develops smart-collars for cow and sheep herding, and before that he was working as a mechanical engineer for Rocket Lab, while Fonterra chief innovation and brand officer Komal Mistry-Mehta has held a number of high-level jobs at Fonterra, including heading the company's corporate venture branch, and has a background in law. Communications released to The Spinoff under the Official Information Act show that after the advisory council's establishment was announced on January 23, Mistry-Mehta texted Luxon on February 4 to let him know she was keen on securing a role within the council. 'I saw the recent Science & Technology changes and I think it's a positive step forward for New Zealand, and I'm a big believer in the laser focus on growth,' she wrote. 'As someone who is sharply focused on the commercialisation of R&D [research and development] globally, I wanted to reach out to let you know I would love to support this national mission on your council, or in whatever capacity that would be valuable.' Luxon replied eight days later, on the morning of February 12. 'That's awesome, Komal, thanks so much for stepping up,' he wrote back. Six minutes later, he forwarded Mistry-Mehta's text message to Reti, with the note: 'Komal leads Fonterra R&D. She won Young Exec of the Year a few years back.' A couple of months later, on May 8, the day after the council appointments were announced, Mistry-Mehta sent Luxon another text, telling him she was 'excited to get stuck into the council'. He replied 14 minutes later: 'You are going to be awesome, and thank you so much for stepping up for New Zealand.' Reuben Davidson, the Labour Party's science, innovation and technology spokesperson, told The Spinoff that there had been criticism from across the scientific community that the government's approach was 'all about the old economy'. 'A Fonterra appointment confirms that, with a healthy dose of cronyism,' he said. 'Is it about finding the best people for our boards, or just handing out roles to those people who can text the PM directly?' Davidson said. 'We shouldn't need to OIA text messages from the PM to find out how critical board appointments are being made.' The New Zealand Association of Scientists co-president Lucy Stewart told The Spinoff that prioritising the commercialisation of research and development (R&D) was like holding a marathon with short-distance runners, and having no one to complete the rest of the race. The association was 'incredibly concerned' that certain areas of science would be defunded because they were not seen as financially viable, she said, as was seen with humanities and social sciences being cut from Marsden Fund grant eligibility in December last year. The review that recommended the establishment of the advisory council emphasised the importance of science, innovation and technology beyond its role in economic growth. 'One of the current government's five key economic strategies is to exploit the research and innovation system,' it said. 'But the system has much broader roles to play in terms of national wellbeing, and in stewardship of the nation's physical, environmental, social and human assets.' New Zealand has historically been 'not very good' at commercialising R&D, Stewart said, but not for lack of care – 'there's lots of variants of science where it's not very straightforward [to make a profit]. If it was easy, everyone would be doing it.' She said her main concern over Mistry-Mehta's appointment was that if Fonterra was interested in working on science research, they should be investing in it themselves. 'The board is clearly weighted and being asked to do work that leans in a particular direction,' Stewart said. 'They're supposed to set the direction, and if they start deprioritising things – even if it gets changed in the next few years – it's going to be really damaging, and the impacts could be long term.'
Otago Daily Times
13-06-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Science fund cuts further blow for uni
The cutting of a wide-ranging government science fund is another blow for the University of Otago, academics say. At this week's university council meeting, Otago University vice-chancellor Grant Robertson mentioned the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE) had cut the Endeavour Fund for at least a year while the government works out the new structure of science funding. "Grants due to expire at the end of October are being given a one-year funded extension instead, but this will also act as an impediment to research productivity, requiring new projects and programmes to wait another full year (or more in some cases) before being able to apply for funding," he said. The Endeavour Fund is an open, contestable process that focuses on research excellence and broad impacts. Otago University Endeavour Fund past projects include "future-proofing software reputation and skills development", "development of a multidimensional, fine-scale mapping toolkit for adaptive fisheries management" and "a rapid, point of need diagnostic test for infectious diseases in livestock" It has two separate strands of funding: "Smart Ideas", which rapidly tests promising, innovative research ideas, and "Research Programmes", which rewards ongoing research which is "ambitious, excellent and well-defined". There was typically about $17 million available a year in Endeavour's Smart Ideas tranche and $38m a year in the Research Programmes. MBIE manager for contestable investments Alan Coulson said this cut was a "one-off" to allow the science system reforms to be implemented. "Endeavour funding will continue to be invested in excellent science with the potential to positively impact New Zealand's economy, environment and society. "We are working with Science New Zealand, Universities New Zealand and the Independent Research Association of New Zealand (IRANZ) to ensure allocation is done in a fair and equitable way." Mr Coulson said the available funding for the 2026 Endeavour round would still be allocated into research, science and technology projects. "It's only the allocation mechanism that is changing for 2026, which is by extending existing Endeavour projects rather than funding new projects. "Holding off applications for the 2026 round provides some certainty of funding for Crown Research Institutes working through the mergers into their new configurations." It comes shortly after the government's decision to cut all humanities and social sciences research funding from the Marsden Fund. Otago University acting deputy vice-chancellor research and enterprise Dr Martin Gagnon said the decision would affect the university's research. "Taken in isolation, the effect is manageable but does represent a lost opportunity for our researchers who were planning to apply to this round and may find themselves short on funding." "On the grander scale, this is yet another knock to the New Zealand research funding ecosystem, following the end of humanities and social sciences funding by the Royal Society Te Apārangi, and the sunset of National Science Challenges." Dr Gagnon said a dollar of research today bought "a lot less than it did 10 years ago". "It's getting harder to do research in New Zealand, and without proper investments we risk losing capacity, talent and impact."
RNZ News
28-05-2025
- RNZ News
Science sector faces biggest overhaul in decades, warns cuts will put new research at risk
[xh ]Science cuts could come at the cost of new and research, sector warns Samples at an Auckland laboratory. Photo: Nick Monro / RNZ The administrators of a leading science fund fear cuts as part of the sector's biggest overhaul in decades could come at the cost of new and innovative research. Budget 2025 allocated just over $813 million for business, science and innovation. Almost three quarters of that, nearly $577m, was dedicated to rebates for international filmmakers, leaving about $236m for science and innovation. The budget funded major science reform through the reallocation of money from funds dedicated to research and innovation, with much of the $212m repurposed for new government initiatives. The Science Minister said the reprioritisation of funds would help unleash the long-term potential of the new science system. However, administrators of the blue-skies research Marsden Fund are worried cuts will curb innovation and evidence-based solutions at a time when they are needed most. Much of the $212m reallocated from research and innovation funds such as the Health Research Council, Marsden Fund and Strategic Science Investment Fund, would help set up an office to oversee changing gene technology rules as well as an agency to attract foreign investors. Eighty-four million dollars of repurposed funds were slated for Invest New Zealand over four years and close to $23m to establish a new Gene Technology Regulator over the same period, while the merging of Crown Research Institutes into three of the four new public research organisations was allocated $20m over two years. Money found in the disestablishment of Callaghan Innovation would contribute to the new science landscape. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King Money found in the disestablishment of Callaghan Innovation would also contribute to the new science landscape, such as the formation of the Science, Innovation, and Technology Advisory Council - nearing $6m over five years. However, $38m of reallocated money was set aside for Callaghan Innovation's shutdown, with another $20m to keep its Gracefield Quarter running for another year, while the government decided its future. The chair of the Marsden Fund Council, Professor Gill Dobbie, said Budget 2025 resulted in a $5m funding cut over three years, and suspected that would come at the cost of new research projects. The 30-year-old fund, established to support excellent fundamental and blue-skies research, was allocated just under $79m in the 2025/2026 financial year. The Science Minister's office confirmed that funding for Marsden would be cut in stages over the next couple of years, with a new baseline funding of $71m from 2028/29. For the 2025 funding round, the Marsden Fund Council anticipated just over 100 projects - from a total of 978 proposals - would receive grants from about $80m in available funding. Science Minister Shane Reti. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Projects typically received funding for three years of research, Dobbie said, therefore already contracted researchers would be prioritised when the cuts came in. "There likely will be a reduction in [the] number of new grants we can award each year from 2026/27," she said. "The Marsden Fund Council will review the amount committed through existing research contracts and then determine the number of new grants that can be awarded." In a post-budget statement, the fund's administer, the Royal Society of New Zealand, said the budget cuts came at a time when New Zealand needed "innovation, critical thinking, and evidence-based solutions more than ever" and followed changes to the Marsden Fund last year, that saw support for social sciences and humanities research dropped, and an increased focus on research with the potential for economic benefit. Royal Society chief executive Paul Atkins expressed concern that funding cuts would "effectively reduce the amount available for active research projects". "The capability of our research sector has taken years to build up, and we risk losing talented, knowledgeable, and highly skilled experts." Meanwhile, the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (MBIE) has cancelled the 2026 funding round for its contestable Endeavour Fund to focus on the merger of Crown Research Institutes into new mega science entities. The $55m Endeavour Fund supported research via Smart Ideas - designed to be fast-fail - and longer-term research programmes of up to five years. MBIE said there was precedent to pause contestable funding rounds during a shake-up to reduce the burden on staff. It said the funding for 2026 would instead be directed to current research projects that would otherwise end. "We expect that a contestable round will be undertaken in 2027 subject to further work as part of the science reforms." Technology used to assess the characteristics of fruit. Photo: Gianina Schwanecke / Country Life Science Minister Shane Reti said the reallocated funding would ultimately benefit the system and create more opportunites for research and innovation. He said funding for science, innovation and technology was in line with Budget 2025's approach to economic and fiscal management. "The government has reprioritised funding for initiatives we need to unleash the potential of our science system in the long term - providing for a modern gene technology regime and fundamental changes to New Zealand's science, technology and innovation system, including new public research organisations and a forward-looking science council." Science, innovation and tech start-ups would also benefit, he said, from the government's $100m budget boost to Elevate NZ Venture Funding and an increase to the R&D tax incentive. "I see these as long-term investments that will over time create even more opportunities for world-leading research and innovation that leads to better outcomes for New Zealanders and our economy." Regarding the Endeavour Fund, he said it had not been suspended. "Any speculation about the future of the Endeavour Fund is just that - speculation. Changes to future funding rounds would likely be subject to Budget decisions." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
