
Enterprise AI Meets RAG: A New Era Of Context-Aware Intelligence
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to evolve at breakneck speed, enterprise leaders face a crucial shift in how they think about AI. The conversation is no longer dominated by which organization has the largest or most sophisticated model. Instead, the focus has turned toward something far more meaningful: which company has a model grounded in operational viability, responsible deployment and real-world impact?
For a growing number of companies, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is representing this fundamental shift in how AI can work within the context of real business environments in a multitude of ways. However, as with any new technology, this approach is not without challenges.
At its core, RAG bridges the gap between powerful large language models (LLMs) and trustworthy, business-specific data by generating natural text based on comprehensive documentation retrieval. While LLMs are excellent at generating human-like responses, they often lack the context required to make those responses useful—or even accurate—in a corporate setting.
RAG helps to overcome this by combining generative AI with real-time retrieval of information from a company's own knowledge base. This fusion ensures the AI can deliver responses that are not just fluent but grounded in truth, relevance and compliance, unlocking benefits for employees across the enterprise.
When used right, RAG helps to make generative AI both useful and safe for business.
Across industries like manufacturing, healthcare, finance and more, organizations are looking for AI solutions that can support decision-making without introducing new risks. Hallucinations, lack of data lineage and general-purpose models that ignore organizational nuance are no longer acceptable. Especially in industries where errors in answers lead to costly mistakes or breaches in legality, these answers must be grounded in truth and can't be left to chance.
Enterprise leaders need to ensure they are enhancing clarity while upholding internal and regulatory standards. They need systems that are auditable, transparent and tailored to their specific domain. As RAG gains traction for this purpose—acting as a control layer that filters and aligns AI output with enterprise context, structured data and up-to-date knowledge—a strategic approach is paramount for success.
While RAG holds enormous promise, implementing it within a complex enterprise environment is rarely straightforward. Without proper planning and oversight, businesses can run into a number of challenges.
One of the most common challenges I've encountered is the disconnect between AI capabilities and business expectations. Leaders often assume RAG will deliver immediate, perfectly contextualized insights. But, without foundational preparation, that's rarely the case. RAG readiness takes time and dedicated effort from the organization as a whole, which is why I emphasize full-company buy in.
Data readiness is another major barrier. Internal knowledge repositories are often fragmented, inconsistently structured or outdated. If the source data lacks integrity, no amount of model sophistication will produce reliable results. Success with RAG starts with understanding which data is trustworthy and ensuring it's accessible in real time.
Another critical factor is explainability. One of RAG's advantages is grounding output in verifiable sources, but surfacing those references in a transparent, user-friendly way can pose a major challenge. Building trust requires showing not just the 'what' but the 'why' behind each AI-generated response. This trust is critical in not only getting implementation off the ground but also in growing its usage over time to make it a core foundation of employee workflows.
As always, security and compliance remain front and center. Especially in regulated industries, enterprises must ensure that sensitive data remains protected and that AI systems align with internal policies. In my experience, offering flexibility in how and where RAG is deployed is often what makes adoption feasible.
Ultimately, RAG is not a plug-and-play solution. It demands technical precision, organizational readiness and cross-functional alignment. The organizations that succeed are the ones that view RAG not as a feature but as a strategic capability—built intentionally, deployed carefully and continuously refined.
For AI to thrive in enterprise environments, it must be trusted, transparent and tailored. While RAG is a major step toward that future, this can't be achieved without a well-planned strategy. In the coming months, we'll see more agentic-RAG use cases clearly focused on critical business processes.
The organizations that recognize this—and prioritize context, compliance and control—will be the ones that I believe will lead the next wave of digital transformation. As your team considers how RAG might play a role in their work, remember to include the key factors detailed above in your conversations.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Advanced Micro Devices' GPU Price Increase Signals Confidence Against Competition, Zacks Says
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) recently raised the price of its MI350 Series AI graphics processing un Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EFRAG feeds back on IASB exposure draft on provisions improvements
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) has released a feedback statement on the International Accounting Standards Board's (IASB) Exposure Draft (ED) Provisions – Targeted Improvements. EFRAG's statement summarises stakeholder feedback and explains how it informed EFRAG's final comment letter (FCL), submitted to the IASB on 1 April 2025, in response to the IASB's ED IASB/ED/2024/8. The ED proposed amendments to three aspects of IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. These include the criteria for recognising a provision, specifically the requirement for a present obligation from a past event, the requirements for measuring a provision related to future expenditure and the discount rate used to bring that expenditure to present value. The FCL assessed that the proposals create less clear guidance for some types of provisions. Additionally, EFRAG found that the proposals increase reliance on judgement, which may not lead to a reduction in compliance costs. A consequence of amending the present obligation recognition criterion is the withdrawal of IFRIC 21 Levies. EFRAG welcomed this but noted that the Exposure Draft did not fully address previously raised concerns regarding IFRIC 21. EFRAG recommended that the IASB refine definitions of legal and constructive obligations, specify criteria for exchange transactions, define qualifying past events, clarify actions taken over time and determine when an entity cannot avoid an action. EFRAG also suggested field-testing the requirements and improving examples in the proposed guidance for IAS 37. In the FCL, EFRAG supported proposed improvements to the measurement of provisions, specifically the clarification of required expenditure and specifying a risk-free discount rate, excluding non-performance risk. However, EFRAG highlighted several areas needing further guidance and clarification. EFRAG suggested that the IASB could finalise the measurement amendments more quickly than those related to the present obligation recognition criterion. "EFRAG feeds back on IASB exposure draft on provisions improvements " was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AMD Aims To Dethrone Nvidia In AI Race—Here's How
Nvidia Corp's (NASDAQ:NVDA) AI chip empire is built on H100s, which cost up to $40,000. It is the go-to for tech titans like Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ:META). But with supply shortages and U.S. export bans choking sales to China, startups and sovereign AI dreamers in India and the UAE are increasingly turning to Advanced Micro Devices Inc (NASDAQ:AMD). AMD's secret sauce lies in its cheaper alternative in the MI300 chips, and its open-source ROCm software. Track AMD's stock trajectory here. Can AMD's open-source ROCm software topple Nvidia's iron grip and spark the next AI revolution? Read Also: AMD's Budget Chips: More Pack For The Punch AMD's MI300X chip packs 192GB of memory—twice Nvidia's H100—perfect for building massive AI models. Priced at about $25,000 for the upcoming MI350X, it's a steal compared to Nvidia's wallet-busting chips. Indian startups coding AI for farmers or doctors, and UAE's bold Falcon AI project, can stretch their cash further. AMD's chips also save power, a win for data centers in steamy Dubai. While Nvidia's tangled in supply and trade-ban chaos, AMD's U.S.-focused hustle keeps it nimble, opening doors for scrappy innovators. AMD's Open-Source ROCm: The Startup Spark AMD's ROCm software is the real magic, letting coders run AI anywhere, unlike Nvidia's clingy CUDA, which locks you in like a bad date. India's open-source coders and UAE's homegrown AI builders love this freedom. Microsoft is using ROCm with MI300X on Azure, raving about its low cost. Hugging Face runs numerous AI models on it as well. Nvidia's CUDA has more fans, and its chips link faster, but ROCm's open vibe is stealing hearts. AMD's affordable MI300X and ROCm's open-source spark could let startups and sovereigns challenge Nvidia's pricey empire. The gap with Nvidia is still massive, of course. But AMD doesn't need to be a clone—it just needs to be the alternative. And with export curbs hitting Nvidia's China business, AMD's more measured exposure could be an accidental advantage. The takeaway? AMD might not wear the AI crown—but it's found the secret sauce to get invited to the royal table. Read Next: Photo: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES (AMD): Free Stock Analysis Report NVIDIA (NVDA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article AMD Aims To Dethrone Nvidia In AI Race—Here's How originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data