They Reported on Him — Then the Bricks Started Flying: Inside Allegations Against CEO Accused of Targeting Journalists
Prosecutors say Spofford paid a friend $20,000 to lead a coordinated harassment campaign from March to May 2022
Several men carried out acts of vandalism and intimidation, including smashing windows and spray-painting threatsThe former CEO of Granite Recovery Centers was arrested Friday over allegations of stalking and orchestrating attacks on the homes of New Hampshire Public Radio journalists who published claims of sexual misconduct against him.
Eric Spofford, 40, the CEO of the New Hampshire-based network of drug and alcohol treatment centers, was accused of targeting journalists at NHPR in retaliation for an investigation they published where the NPR station allegedly revealed multiple accusations of sexual misconduct during his leadership, according to a statement by the Department of Justice.
The NHPR article, which detailed multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, abusive leadership and retaliation by Spofford during his time as CEO, garnered significant local and national media attention, according to the statement.
Spofford denied the allegations and later sued the media organizations for defamation, but a New Hampshire judge dismissed his lawsuit in 2023.
Prosecutors say that from March to May 2022, Spofford devised a scheme in which he paid his close friend, Eric Labarge, $20,000 to harass and terrorize Lauren Chooljian — the journalist who wrote the article — along with her immediate family and a senior editor at NHPR.
Labarge then allegedly enlisted the help of Tucker Cockerline, Keenan Saniatan and Michael Waselchuck to carry out the stalking campaign, per the statement from the Department of Justice.
The men are accused of having vandalized the homes of Chooljian, her editor, and a house where her parents previously lived, smashing windows with rocks and bricks, The New York Times reported. One of the vandals spray-painted 'Just the beginning!' on an outside wall of her home.All four men were previously charged and have been convicted, per the Department of Justice.
Labarge was sentenced to 46 months in prison in November 2024. Cockerline received 27 months in August 2024. Saniatan was sentenced to 30 months in September 2024 and Waselchuck received 21 months in prison that same month.
Spofford has been indicted on one count of conspiracy to commit stalking through interstate travel, one count of stalking using a facility of interstate commerce and two counts of stalking through interstate travel.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
5 hours ago
- Fox News
Ted Cruz: I didn't speak to Biden once during his presidency
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, answers whether the Department of Justice will be trusted by the American public again on 'My View with Lara Trump.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justice department asked California to give details of non-citizens on voter rolls
The Department of Justice has asked several large California counties to provide detailed personal information of non-citizens who got on to the state voter rolls, an unusual request that comes as the Trump administration has asked about a dozen states to provide wide swaths of information about voters and election practices. The justice department's voting section sent identical letters to local election officials in Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego on 9 July. The request asks the officials to provide the total number of non-citizens who had their voter registrations cancelled since 2020 as well as a copy of their voter registration records, voting history, date of birth, driver's license numbers, and the last four digits of a social security number. The department sent a similar request to Orange county last month and then sued the county after officials redacted some information. 'It's deeply troubling,' said David Becker, the executive director for the Center for Election Innovation & Research. 'It reflects a pretty shocking misunderstanding of federal law regarding list maintenance.' The request for information on non-citizens comes as the Trump administration has arrested and moved to deport thousands of immigrants. Submitting a voter registration form while ineligible to vote is a crime so non-citizens that do so could be prosecuted and potentially deported. This kind of voter fraud, however, is extremely rare. All three counties said they were reviewing the justice department's request. The justice department did not return a request for comment. The justice department's voting section has sent out extensive requests for information to nearly a dozen states recently, many of them focused on how states are removing people from the rolls and suggesting that states are not doing enough to cancel voter registrations of people who are ineligible to cast a ballot. It has also asked many states to turn over all of their voter registration records. At least two states, New Hampshire and Minnesota, have refused so far. 'The Department of Justice did not, however, identify any legal basis in its June 25 letter that would entitle it to Minnesota's voter registration list. Nor did it explain how this information would be used, stored, and secured,' a lawyer for the Minnesota secretary of state's office wrote on 25 July. It is a focus that underscores how the justice department's voting section is shifting away from enforcing anti-discrimination in voting laws and instead hunting for voter fraud. 'For years now, we've seen suits from those conservative groups saying that jurisdictions aren't purging enough folks from their rolls and claiming that they've identified non-citizens on the rolls and that kind of thing. And now we're seeing the Department of Justice do something very similar,' said Sean Morales-Doyle, director of the voting rights and elections program at the Brennan Center for Justice. 'This is a civil rights division and a voting section in particular that are very focused on trying to prove some kind of fraud.' Federal law requires states to regularly check their rolls for people who are ineligible because they have moved or died, with safeguards in place to ensure that eligible voters are not erroneously moved. Republicans have long complained that states are not aggressive enough in removing voters, while Democrats have pointed to errors states have made to justify the continued existence of the safeguards. Trump has often repeated the false claim that non-citizens are voting in significant numbers in US elections, including last month when he said Los Angeles and other Democratic-leaning cities were using 'Illegal Aliens to expand their Voter Base' and 'cheat in elections'. A provision in Trump's March executive order on elections instructs the attorney general to prioritize enforcing laws that prevent non-citizen voting. Numerous studies have shown that non-citizen voting is exceedingly rare. 'This refocus is troubling in part because it means taking away focus from actually enforcing the legal protections for voting rights that the voting rights section has historically been enforcing,' Morales-Doyle said. 'It seems to be investing a bunch of resources in going after a problem that is infinitesimally rare.' There have been isolated instances of non-citizens becoming registered in recent years, but it is often due to confusion about their eligibility. In 2018, for example, a federal prosecutor in North Carolina charged 20 non-citizens with illegally voting and several of them said they had no idea they were ineligible. Last month, election officials in Orange county, California, told the justice department that 17 non-citizens had become registered to vote since 2020. Sixteen of those people self-reported they were non-citizens, according to the Los Angeles Times. The election officials provided the information in June after justice department officials made a similar request to the one submitted to Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego. While election officials turned over the names and dates of birth of those who registered, they redacted their social security and driver's license numbers, citing state privacy laws, the Los Angeles Times reported. When Orange county officials offered to work on a confidentiality agreement under which they could provide the records, justice department responded by suing the county for the records. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each. 'These efforts make it clear President Trump is preparing to use the power of his office to interfere in the 2026 election,' said Samantha Tarazi, CEO and co-founder of Voting Rights Lab, a non-profit that is tracking the justice department's outreach to states. 'What started as an unconstitutional executive order – marching orders for state action regardless of its fate in court – has grown into a full federal mobilization to seize power over our elections. To justify its request for records to the California counties, the justice department pointed to two federal laws, the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and Help America Vote Act (Hava) that set requirements for how states must maintain their voter rolls. Neither statute requires states to continually search for non-citizens on their voter rolls, Becker said. 'There is literally nothing in federal law anywhere that requires states to continually search for non-citizens on their voter lists,' he said. 'States can do this if they choose to. But the federal government plays absolutely no role in that unless a state affirmatively asks them to.' The justice department cited a provision of the NVRA that requires states to come up with a general program for removing voters from the rolls because they have either died or moved. It also cited a provision of Hava that requires states to have a system for removing ineligible voters from the rolls and not to accept a federal voter registration application unless voters provide a driver's license number or the last four digits of their social security number. 'I don't understand how having the name and [personal identifying information] of any voter tells you anything about whether a county is or isn't complying with the NVRA and Hava,' Levitt said. 'The civil rights division hasn't really established a legitimate need for the information they're demanding. Which means they're not really entitled to the information.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
US justice department officials interview Ghislaine Maxwell
The Jeffrey Epstein files scandal swirling around Donald Trump and his administration continued to escalate on Thursday as officials from the Department of Justice met with the late sex offender's longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell, whose lawyer said she 'answered every question … honestly and to the best of her ability'. Todd Blanche, the US deputy attorney general, arrived on Thursday morning at the office of the US attorney in Tallahassee, Florida, ABC News reported. The state prosecutor's office is based in the federal courthouse in the Florida capital and Maxwell's lawyers were also seen entering the building. Related: What are the Jeffrey Epstein files and will they be released? Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking and other crimes at a federal prison in Florida, after being convicted in New York in late 2021. On Thursday afternoon, Maxwell's attorney David Markus said his team had a 'very productive day' with Blanche, who will meet with Maxwell again on Friday, Reuters reported. '[Blanche] took a full day and asked a lot of questions,' Markus said. 'Miss Maxwell answered every single question. She never stopped. She never invoked a privilege. She never declined to answer. She answered all the questions truthfully, honestly and to the best of her ability.' The meeting comes amid growing political and public pressure on the Trump administration to release more details about the Epstein investigation – something that Trump and members of his administration had promised. Mark Epstein, the brother of the disgraced financier, told the Guardian in an interview that if he had the opportunity he would ask Maxwell 'what she and Jeffrey might have known what the dirt was on Donald Trump'. 'Because Jeffrey said, he said he had dirt on Trump,' Mark Epstein said. 'I don't know what it was, but years ago he said he had dirt on Trump.' He added that he wasn't 'particularly worried' for Maxwell, adding: 'There's a lot of people on this planet.' Maxwell's brother Ian Maxwell, meanwhile, told the New York Post that his sister had been preparing 'new evidence' before her meeting with justice department officials. 'She will be putting before [a] court material new evidence that was not available to the defense at her 2021 trial, which would have had a significant impact on its outcome,' her brother told the outlet in an email. Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his prison cell in New York in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges, which he denied, relating to accusations that he 'sexually exploited and abused dozens of minor girls'. He had previously been officially declared a sex offender in Florida but re-emerged as a significant figure in US business and political circles in the years that followed, having struck a deal over the earlier criminal charges. Related: How the Jeffrey Epstein row plunged Maga world into turmoil – a timeline The renewed focus on Trump's past association with Epstein comes after the justice department announced earlier this month that it would not be releasing any more documents from the most recent Epstein investigation – despite earlier pledges by the US president and the US attorney general, Pam Bondi. The justice department's announcement drew criticism and backlash from both sides of the party political aisle, including from some Trump supporters and conservative commentators, who accused the administration of engaging in a cover-up. For years, the Epstein case has been the subject of countless conspiracy theories, partly due to Epstein's ties to high-profile figures. Epstein's death, which was officially ruled a suicide, has also fueled many conspiracy theories. On Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump was informed by Bondi in May that his name appears multiple times in the justice department files related to Epstein. The report also said that Trump was told that many other high-profile individuals were named in the files, and that the department did not plan to release any additional documents related to the investigation. Trump's spokesperson, Steven Cheung, denied the claims in the Journal report and dismissed the story. In an emailed statement this week, Cheung said that 'the fact is that the President kicked him [Epstein] out of his club for being a creep'. Meanwhile, the House oversight committee voted 8-2 on Wednesday to subpoena the justice department for the Epstein files, with three Republicans joining all Democrats in the vote. The committee also subpoenaed Maxwell to testify before committee officials on 11 August. Mike Johnson, the Republican House speaker, questioned whether Maxwell could be trusted. And Dan Goldman, a Democratic New York representative, said in a post on X on Tuesday: 'Ghislaine is looking for a pardon, and who would be better to give it to her than a co-conspirator now in the Oval Office.' Edward Helmore contributed reporting
