logo
Trump's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' includes some that support his immigration policies

Trump's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' includes some that support his immigration policies

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Officials in communities from rural to urban and red to blue blasted the Trump administration's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' with many saying they've been outspoken supporters of the president and his stringent immigration policies.
Officials who back President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown questioned how their jurisdictions wound up on a list of more than 500 that the Department of Homeland Security says are obstructing enforcement. Several communities were misspelled, including Cincinnati, which was spelled Cincinnatti.
Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, Wisconsin, said the inclusion of his heavily Republican community must be a clerical error.
'We have no idea how we got on this list whatsoever right at this point,' Davel said. 'I think it was just a big mix up, probably some paperwork or something.'
Meanwhile, those with policies protecting immigrants also pushed back, saying they are doing right by their communities.
'This is simply the latest attempt by the Trump administration to strong-arm cities like Seattle into changing our local policies through bluster and threats to critical federal funding for public safety and homelessness,' Bruce Harrell, the city's mayor, told The Associated Press in an email. 'It's not going to work — the law is on our side — and we will not hesitate to protect our people and stand up for our values.'
The list was published as the Trump administration ramps up efforts to follow through on the president's campaign promises to remove millions of people who are in the country illegally. It came out as Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced major leadership changes, and after a White House official said the administration wanted to drive daily immigration arrests significantly higher.
The administration says each jurisdiction on the list will receive formal notification that the government has deemed them noncompliant and if they're believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes.
Some communities don't know why they were included
The list was compiled using a number of factors, including whether the localities identified themselves as sanctuary jurisdictions, how much they complied with federal officials enforcing immigration laws, if they had restrictions on sharing information with immigration enforcement or had any legal protections for people in the country illegally, according to Homeland Security.
But communities said the list doesn't appear to make sense. In California's Orange County, the city of Huntington Beach is on the list even though it has sued the state over its policies that protect immigrants and its City Council supports Trump. But the nearby city of Santa Ana, which has policies to protect members of its sizable immigrant community, is not.
In North Dakota, seven mostly small, rural counties wound up on the list, including Slope County, which has about 700 people and overwhelmingly voted for Trump in 2024. County officials reached out to Republican Gov. Kelly Armstrong's office to see what steps to take next, and plan to discuss the matter next week with the county state's attorney, County Commission Chairman Scott Ouradnik said.
Other communities defend their policies that protect immigrants
Communities supportive of immigrants said their policies aren't just about immigrants but all residents by ensuring anyone who is a victim or witness feels they can come forward and report crime. States including California, Illinois and Washington, which have such policies, are on the list.
In Hartford, Connecticut, Mayor Arunan Arulampalam said the capital city's laws and policies have enhanced the vibrancy and safety of the community. The city bars people's immigration status from being used to deny city services and police can't arrest people solely because of immigration status.
'While my administration remains laser-focused on real solutions that protect our community, it is clear that current federal policies do not share this commitment to safety and threaten to undermine the gains we have made,' Arulampalam said in a statement.
Nithya Nathan-Pineau, an attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, said it's unclear what criteria were used to formulate the list or define the concept of sanctuary nor what legal action the government plans to take against the jurisdictions.
'It seems quite arbitrary because not all of these states or specific jurisdictions have a policy that limits cooperation with ICE,' Nathan-Pineau said. 'It's pretty clear that this is another attempt to intimidate and bully.'
What is a sanctuary jurisdiction?
There's no clear definition of what a sanctuary jurisdiction is, but the term generally applies to state and local governments that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. It originated in the 1980s with U.S. churches that housed Central Americans who fled civil wars.
Last month, Trump signed an executive order requiring the secretary of Homeland Security and the attorney general to publish a list of states and local jurisdictions that they considered to be obstructing federal immigration laws. The list is to be regularly updated.
Federal departments and agencies, working with the Office of Management and Budget, would then be tasked with identifying federal grants or contracts with those states or local jurisdictions that the federal government identified as 'sanctuary jurisdictions' and suspending or terminating the money, according to the executive order.
ICE, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security, enforces immigration laws nationwide. The agency often seeks state and local help in alerting federal authorities of immigrants wanted for deportation and holding them until those authorities are able to take custody.
___
Taxin reported from Santa Ana, California, and Bellisle from Seattle. Associated Press writers Jack Dura in Bismarck, North Dakota, David Collins in Hartford, Connecticut, Gisela Salomon in Miami and John O'Connor in Springfield, Illinois, contributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here is the new evidence we learned about during Bryan Kohberger's court hearing
Here is the new evidence we learned about during Bryan Kohberger's court hearing

CNN

time34 minutes ago

  • CNN

Here is the new evidence we learned about during Bryan Kohberger's court hearing

After two and a half years of desperately searching for answers in the deaths of four Idaho college students, the case reached a bitter resolution as Bryan Kohberger admitted guilt for the first time. Kohberger, seated behind a table in an off-white button-up shirt and patterned tie, responded to questions from Judge Steven Hippler with a series of simple yeses and a neutral gaze, admitting in one-word answers Wednesday that he planned and carried out the brutal stabbings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin at their off-campus Moscow, Idaho, home in November 2022. While Kohberger himself didn't give a direct account of what happened, Wednesday marked a pivotal moment as a case shrouded in secrecy from gag orders and sealed filings momentarily shared a wider picture with the victims' families and the public who have been begging for answers. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson, who has led the case since the early winter days of Kohberger being charged, gave a play-by-play of the evidence prosecutors intended to present at trial, painting the most detailed look at a case that has only been revealed through broad strokes pieced together from court documents. The new evidence shared during Wednesday's hearing included a car rushing away from the scene, new insight into how Kohberger encountered a roommate, and a used Q-Tip abandoned in the trash linking Kohberger to the crime. While the image of what happened in the early morning hours of November 13, 2022, is now sharper, many details are still left out of focus, and it's unclear whether we will ever have full clarity of why those horrific acts occurred. Here is what Thompson shared during his office's account of events. In July 2022, four months before the murders, Kohberger's cell phone began pinging a cell tower near 1122 King Road, the victims' home, Thompson said. From July 9 to the time of the murders, Kohberger's phone connected to the area approximately 23 times between 10:00 p.m. and 4:00 a.m., he said. While Kohberger was in the area, prosecutors have no evidence that shows he had direct contact with the King Road home or its occupants, Thompson said. Prosecutors didn't share insight into why he was in the area or how he ended up coming upon the residence. He also noted that while his phone connected to a nearby cell tower, the area is densely populated and includes a lot of homes. In the early morning hours of November 13, 2022, Thompson said, Kohberger left his home in Pullman, Washington, to drive the 10 miles to Moscow and turned off his cell phone from 2:54 a.m. to 4:48 a.m. While there were no cell phone tower pings during at this time because his phone was off, compiled video surveillance showed Kohberger's car entering Moscow, driving around the neighborhood, including to the end of the dead-end road where the roommates' house was located, Thompson said. Kohberger ultimately parked his car behind the residence, he said. Previously released court documents said Kohberger entered the home through a sliding glass door and made his way to the third floor, where he fatally stabbed Mogen and Goncalves, but new details were shared Wednesday about his exit from the house. The evidence shows Kohberger 'encountered' Kernodle in the hallway and 'ended up killing her,' Thompson said, implying that he may not have originally intended to do so. Chapin, who was asleep in Kernodle's bedroom, was also fatally stabbed by Kohberger, the prosecutor said, without sharing details on how or why Chapin was targeted. This realization is especially haunting given that Dylan Mortensen, one of the surviving roommates who was awake at the time of the murders, saw someone in a black mask walk through the house. No explanation was given by prosecutors on why she was not targeted. While prosecutors believe Kohberger went to the home with the intent to kill, 'We will not represent that he intended to commit all the murders, but that is what happened,' Thompson said. At 4:20 a.m. that morning, a car identified as Kohberger's was seen leaving the area 'at a high rate of speed' on nearby cameras, and 'almost loses control' around a corner, Thompson said. Prosecutors believe Kohberger then took a series of back roads to return to Pullman, as no video of his car was seen from nearby highway cameras that morning. Cameras show him enter Pullman from the south around 5:26 a.m. and arriving at his apartment several minutes later, Thompson said. Prosecutors previously said in court filings and during hearings that a single source of male DNA was discovered on the sheath of a Ka-bar knife, the weapon believed to have been used in the stabbings, found near two of the victims. The murder weapon hasn't been found, Thompson said Wednesday. Investigators ultimately narrowed in on Kohberger and tested trash at his parents' Pennsylvania home, where a Q-Tip was found containing DNA matching his father, Thompson said. Investigators later tested Kohberger's DNA and found it to be a match to the DNA on the sheath, he added. A search of Kohberger's Pullman residence six to eight weeks after the murders found it to be nearly empty, with Thompson saying there was 'virtually nothing there.' His car, which was seized, had also 'been meticulously cleaned inside,' he said. Even parts of the car that are often dirty from use, like side door compartments, were spotless, Thompson added, calling the intensive cleaning part of Kohberger's plan. Wednesday's hearing left one giant hole in the story: why Kohberger targeted the residents of the King Road house. And it's unclear if the public will ever get an answer, as it's not required by the plea deal. The plea agreement and the written factual basis, filed Wednesday following the hearing, offer little insight into why Kohberger committed the appalling crimes he admitted to. The victims' families, in particular, are left without answers, leaving them to wonder why this happened to their loved ones as they began their adult lives. There is also no stipulation in Kohberger's plea agreement to prevent him from doing interviews with media or writing a book. A trove of documents and discovery that could shine more light on the case remain sealed by the court and is expected to stay that way until after the sentencing on July 23. But it's unclear how the court will handle the large volume of material. Steve Goncalves, Kaylee's father, spoke after the hearing about his disappointment, saying 'It was terrible. We let her down, they let my daughter down.'

Seven missing after massive explosion at California fireworks warehouse
Seven missing after massive explosion at California fireworks warehouse

Washington Post

time39 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Seven missing after massive explosion at California fireworks warehouse

A warehouse storing fireworks in Northern California exploded on Tuesday, leaving seven people missing as of Wednesday evening, officials said. Dramatic video footage captured by KCRA 3 News, a Sacramento broadcaster, showed smoke pouring from the building's roof before a massive explosion created a fireball that seemed to engulf much of the warehouse, accompanied by an echoing boom. Hundreds of fireworks appeared to be going off and were sparkling within the smoke. Photos of the aftermath showed multiple destroyed buildings and a large area covered in gray ash.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store